A strong and reversible adhesive fibrillar surface based on an advanced composite with high strength and strong adhesion

References

• Autumn K, Liang YA, Hsieh ST, et al. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature. 2000;405(6787):681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang YA, et al., Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99(19) :12252–12256.
   Google Scholar
• Yao H, Gao H. Mechanics of robust and releasable adhesion in biology: bottom–up designed hierarchical structures of gecko. J Mech Phys Solids. 2006;54(6):1120–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Gao H. Bio-inspired mechanics of reversible adhesion: orientation-dependent adhesion strength for non-slipping adhesive contact with transversely isotropic elastic materials. J Mech Phys Solids. 2007;55(5):1001–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shintake J, Cacucciolo V, Floreano D, et al. Soft robotic grippers. Adv Mater. 2018;e1707035. DOI:10.1002/adma.201707035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Hawkes EW, Fuller C, et al. A robotic device using gecko-inspired adhesives can grasp and manipulate large objects in microgravity. Sci Rob. 2017;2(7):eaan4545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song S, Drotlef D-M, Majidi C, et al., Controllable load sharing for soft adhesive interfaces on three-dimensional surfaces, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114(22):E4344–E4353.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Meng J, Gu Z, et al. Bioinspired multiscale wet adhesive surfaces: structures and controlled adhesion. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;30(5):1905287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiner C. A.n.d. Campo, E. Arzt, adhesion of bioinspired micropatterned surfaces: effects of pillar radius, aspect ratio, and preload, Langmuir: the ACS. J Surfaces & Colloids. 2007;23:3495–3502.
   Google Scholar
• Kasem H, Tsipenyuk A, Varenberg M. Biomimetic wall-shaped hierarchical microstructure for gecko-like attachment. Soft Matter. 2015;11(15):2909–2915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peressadko A, Gorb SN. When less is more: experimental evidence for tenacity enhancement by division of contact area. J Adhes. 2010;80(4):247–261.
   Google Scholar
• Kappl M, Kaveh F, Barnes WJ. Nanoscale friction and adhesion of tree frog toe pads. Bioinspiration & biomimetics. 2016;11(3):035003.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Yao Y, Li X, et al. Fabrication of advanced polydimethylsiloxane-based functional materials: bulk modifications and surface functionalizations. Chem Eng J. 2021;408:127262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paretkar D, Kamperman M, Schneider A, et al. Bioinspired pressure actuated adhesive system. Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials For Biological Applications. 2011;31(6):1152–1159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf MP, Salieb-Beugelaar GB, Hunziker P. PDMS with designer functionalities—Properties, modifications strategies, and applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2018;83:97–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamperman M, Kroner E, Del Campo A, et al. Functional adhesive surfaces with “gecko” effect: the concept of contact splitting. Adv Eng Mater. 2010;12(5):335–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geim AK, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, et al. Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair. Nature Materials. 2003;2(7):461–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesel LF, Greiner C, Arzt E, et al. Gecko-inspired surfaces: a path to strong and reversible dry adhesives. Advanced Materials. 2010;22(19):2125–2137.
   Google Scholar
• Del Campo A, Greiner C, Álvarez I, et al. Patterned Surfaces with Pillars with Controlled 3D Tip Geometry Mimicking Bioattachment Devices. Advanced Materials. 2007;19(15):1973–1977.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Bai P, Li X, et al. Robust scalable reversible strong adhesion by gecko-inspired composite design. Friction. 2021;10(8):1192–1207.
   Google Scholar
• Gorb S, Varenberg M, Peressadko A, et al. Biomimetic mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive microstructure. J R Soc Interface. 2007;4(13):271–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heepe L, Varenberg M, Itovich Y, et al. Suction component in adhesion of mushroom-shaped microstructure. J R Soc Interface. 2011;8(57):585–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy MP, Aksak B, Sitti M. Gecko-inspired directional and controllable adhesion. Small. 2009;5(2):170–175.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Tan D, Meng F, et al. Adhesion Enhancement of Micropillar Array by Combining the Adhesive Design from Gecko and Tree Frog. Small. 2021;17(4):e2005493.
   Google Scholar
• Heepe L, Gorb SN. Biologically Inspired Mushroom-Shaped Adhesive Microstructures. Annual Review of Materials Research. 2014;44(1):173–203.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou T, Ruan B, Che J, et al. Gecko-Inspired Biomimetic Surfaces with Annular Wedge Structures Fabricated by Ultraprecision Machining and Replica Molding. ACS omega. 2021;6(10):6757–6765.
   Google Scholar
• Hu H, Tian H, Shao J, et al. Discretely supported dry adhesive film inspired by biological bending behavior for enhanced performance on a rough surface. ACS App Mat & Interfaces. 2017;9(8):7752–7760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parness A, Soto D, Esparza N, et al. A microfabricated wedge-shaped adhesive array displaying gecko-like dynamic adhesion, directionality and long lifetime. J Royal Soc Interface. 2009;6(41):1223–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao D, Gao X, Lu H, et al. Controllable anisotropic dry adhesion in vacuum: gecko inspired wedged surface fabricated with ultraprecision diamond cutting. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27(22):1606576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day P, Eason EV, Esparza N, et al. Microwedge machining for the manufacture of directional dry adhesives. J Micro Nano-Manuf. 2013;1(1). DOI:10.1115/1.4023161
   Google Scholar
• Simaite A, Temple B, Karimi MA, et al. Understanding the influence of silicone elastomer properties on wedge-shaped microstructured dry adhesives loaded in shear. J Royal Soc Interface. 2018;15(20180551):20180551.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arzt E, Quan H, McMeeking RM, et al. Functional surface microstructures inspired by nature – from adhesion and wetting principles to sustainable new devices. Pro Mater Sci. 2021;100778.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston ID, McCluskey DK, Tan CKL, et al. Mechanical characterization of bulk Sylgard 184 for microfluidics and microengineering. J Micromech Microeng. 2014;24(3):035017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Wang S, Liu M, et al. Directional Transportation on Microplate-Arrayed Surfaces Driven via a Magnetic Field. ACS applied materials & interfaces. 2021;13(31):37655–37664.
   Google Scholar
• Shahsavan H, Zhao B. Bioinspired Functionally Graded Adhesive Materials: Synergetic Interplay of Top Viscous–Elastic Layers with Base Micropillars. Macromolecules. 2013;47(1):353–364.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Yao Y, Chen S, et al. A new nanoparticle-reinforced silicone rubber composite integrating high strength and strong adhesion. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2021;151:106645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan D, Wang X, Liu Q, et al. Switchable Adhesion of Micropillar Adhesive on Rough Surfaces. Small. 2019;15(50):e1904248.
   Google Scholar
• Barreau V, Hensel R, Guimard NK, et al. Fibrillar Elastomeric Micropatterns Create Tunable Adhesion Even to Rough Surfaces. Advanced Functional Materials. 2016;26(26):4687–4694.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Tan D, Hu S, et al. Reversible Adhesion via Light-Regulated Conformations of Rubber Chains. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(49):46337–46343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel R, Moh K, Arzt E. Engineering micropatterned dry adhesives: from contact theory to handling applications. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28(28):1800865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Sitti M. Biologically inspired polymer microfibers with spatulate tips as repeatable fibrillar adhesives. Applied Physics Letters. 2006;89(26):261911.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Hu H, Shao J, et al. Fabrication of well-defined mushroom-shaped structures for biomimetic dry adhesive by conventional photolithography and molding. ACS applied materials & interfaces. 2014;6(4):2213–2218.
   Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Tan D, Wang Z, et al. Switchable Adhesion on Curved Surfaces Mimicking the Coordination of Radial-Oriented Spatular Tips and Motion of Gecko Toes. ACS applied materials & interfaces. 2022;14(27):31448–31454.
   Google Scholar
• Castellanos G, Arzt E, Kamperman M. Effect of viscoelasticity on adhesion of bioinspired micropatterned epoxy surfaces. Langmuir. 2011;27(12):7752–7759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SH, Xu G, Soh AK. Robust Nanoadhesion Under Torque. Tribology Letters. 2008;29(3):235–239.
   Google Scholar
• Jin K, Cremaldi JC, Erickson JS, et al. Biomimetic Bidirectional Switchable Adhesive Inspired by the Gecko. Advanced Functional Materials. 2014;24(5):574–579.
   Google Scholar
• Hao Z, LianWei W, ShiXing J, et al. Fabrication and adhesion of hierarchical micro-seta. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2012;57(11):1343–1349.
   Google Scholar
• Jin K, Tian Y, Erickson JS, et al. Design and fabrication of gecko-inspired adhesives. Langmuir. 2012;28(13):5737–5742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Qi H, Wu H, et al. Friction behavior of gecko-inspired polydimethylsiloxane micropillar array with tailored Young’s modulus by incorporation of ZrO2 particles. Chem Phys Lett. 2021;763:138202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksak B, Murphy MP, Sitti M. Adhesion of biologically inspired vertical and angled polymer microfiber arrays. Langmuir. 2007;23(6):3322–3332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasem H, Varenberg M. Effect of counterface roughness on adhesion of mushroom-shaped microstructure. J R Soc Interface. 2013;10(87):20130620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Shen R-J, He B. Influence of surface roughness on wet adhesion of biomimetic adhesive pads with planar microstructures. Micro & Nano Letters. 2012;7(12):1274–1277.
   Google Scholar
• Shi W, Cheng X, Cheng K. Gecko-inspired adhesives with asymmetrically tilting-oriented micropillars. Langmuir. 2022;38(29):8890–8898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar