Unlocking the potential of transdermal drug delivery

References

• Sneader W. Drug discovery: A history. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2005:1–468.
   Google Scholar
• Mitragotri S, Burke PA, Langer R. Overcoming the challenges in administering biopharmaceuticals: formulation and delivery strategies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13(9):655–672. doi: 10.1038/nrd4363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(11):1261–1268. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prausnitz MR, Mitragotri S, Langer R. Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(2):115–124. doi: 10.1038/nrd1304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargason AM, Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S. The evolution of commercial drug delivery technologies. Nat Biomed Eng. 2021;5(9):951–967. doi: 10.1038/s41551-021-00698-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman LS, Gilman A, Hardman JG, et al. Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 9th ed. (NY): McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division; 1996; p. xxi, 1905 p.
   Google Scholar
• Proksch E, Brandner JM, Jensen JM. The skin: an indispensable barrier. Exp Dermatol. 2008;17(12):1063–1072. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00786.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagna L, Greenblatt DJ. More than skin deep: transdermal drug-delivery systems. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(25):1638–1639. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198606193142509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommannan D, Menon GK, Okuyama H, et al. 2. Examination of the mechanism(s) of ultrasound-enhanced transdermal drug delivery. Pharmaceut Res. 1992;9(8):1043–1047. doi: 10.1023/A:1015806528336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommannan D, Okuyama H, Stauffer P, et al. 1. The use of high-frequency ultrasound to enhance transdermal drug delivery. Pharmaceut Res. 1992;9(4):559–564. doi: 10.1023/A:1015808917491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElnay JC, Kennedy TA, Harland R. The influence of ultrasound on the percutaneous absorption of fluocinolone acetonide. Int J Pharm. 1987;40(1–2):105–110. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(87)90054-8
   Google Scholar
• Mitragotri S, Blankschtein D, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery using low-frequency sonophoresis. Pharmaceut Res. 1996;13(3):411–420. doi: 10.1023/A:1016096626810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitragotri S. Sonophoresis: a 50-year journey. Drug Discovery Today. 2004;9(17):735–736. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03209-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalia YN, Naik A, Garrison J, et al. Iontophoretic drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(5):619–658. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby A. The treatment of pelvic inflammation by iontophoresis of acetyl beta methylcholine chloride. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1936;31(1):93–100. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(36)90959-6
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs J. The iontophoresis of acetyl-beta-methylcholine chloride in the treatment of chronic arthritis and peripheral vascular disease. The Am J Med Sci. 1934;188(1):32–36. doi: 10.1097/00000441-193407000-00004
   Google Scholar
• Martin L, Ruland H, Ruland L. Studies on the local and systematic effects of acetyl beta-methylcholine administered by iontophoresis. N Engl J Med. 1937;217(6):202–205. doi: 10.1056/NEJM193708052170602
   Google Scholar
• Murdan S. Electro-responsive drug delivery from hydrogels. J Control Release. 2003;92(1–2):1–17. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00303-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(5):581–587. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry S, McAllister DV, Allen MG, et al. Microfabricated microneedles: A novel approach to transdermal drug delivery. J Pharmaceut sci. 1998;87:922–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Song C, Hong YS, et al. Wearable/disposable sweat-based glucose monitoring device with multistage transdermal drug delivery module. Sci Adv. 2017;3(3):e1601314. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amani H, Shahbazi MA, D’Amico C, et al. Microneedles for painless transdermal immunotherapeutic applications. J Control Release. 2021;330:185–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly RF, Larraneta E. Slowly dissolving intradermal microneedles. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;3(3):169–170. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0369-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He ML, Yang GZ, Zhang SH, et al. Dissolving microneedles loaded with etonogestrel microcrystal particles for intradermal sustained delivery. J Pharmaceut sci. 2018;107(4):1037–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim E, Erdos G, Huang SH, et al. Microneedle array delivered recombinant coronavirus vaccines: immunogenicity and rapid translational development. EBioMedicine. 2020;0:102743. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102743
   Google Scholar
• Larrañeta E, Lutton REM, Woolfson AD, et al. Microneedle arrays as transdermal and intradermal drug delivery systems: Materials science, manufacture and commercial development. Mater Sci Eng R-Rep. 2016;104:1–32. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2016.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Straeten A, Sarmadi M, Daristotle JL, et al. A microneedle vaccine printer for thermostable COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Nat Biotechnol. 2024;42:510–517. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01774-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander A, Dwivedi S, Ajazuddin, et al. Approaches for breaking the barriers of drug permeation through transdermal drug delivery. J Control Release. 2012;164(1):26–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.09.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry BW. Novel mechanisms and devices to enable successful transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;14(2):101–114. doi: 10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00167-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denet AR, Vanbever R, Préat V. Skin electroporation for transdermal and topical delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(5):659–674. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prausnitz MR, Bose VG, Langer R, et al. Electroporation of mammalian skin: a mechanism to enhance transdermal drug delivery. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 1993, 90. p. 10504–10508.
   Google Scholar
• Yarmush ML, Golberg A, Sersa G, et al. Electroporation-based technologies for medicine: principles, applications, and challenges. In: Yarmush ML, editor. Annual review of biomedical engineering, Vol. 16. 2014. p. 295–320. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-104622.
   Google Scholar
• Charoo NA, Rahman Z, Repka MA, et al. Electroporation: an avenue for transdermal drug delivery. Curr Drug Deliv. 2010;7(2):125–136. doi: 10.2174/156720110791011765
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zorec B, Becker S, Rebersek M, et al. Skin electroporation for transdermal drug delivery: the influence of the order of different square wave electric pulses. Int J Pharm. 2013;457(1):214–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.09.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Lee H, Lim GS, et al. Enhanced transdermal drug delivery by Sonophoresis and simultaneous application of Sonophoresis and iontophoresis. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2019;20(3):96. doi: 10.1208/s12249-019-1309-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe S, Takagi S, Ga K, et al. Enhanced transdermal drug penetration by the simultaneous application of iontophoresis and sonophoresis. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 2009;19(3):185–189. doi: 10.1016/S1773-2247(09)50034-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly RF, Singh TRR, Garland MJ, et al. Hydrogel-forming microneedle arrays for enhanced transdermal drug delivery. Adv Funct Mater. 2012;22(23):4879–4890. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201200864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusama S, Sato K, Matsui Y, et al. Transdermal electroosmotic flow generated by a porous microneedle array patch. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):658. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20948-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan XM, She JC, Lin DA, et al. Microneedle-mediated delivery of lipid-coated cisplatin nanoparticles for efficient and safe cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Inter. 2018;10(39):33060–33069. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b12926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XF, Xu Q, Zhang P, et al. Cutaneous microenvironment responsive microneedle patch for rapid gene release to treat subdermal tumor. J Control Release. 2019;314:72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li DD, Hu DD, Xu HX, et al. Progress and perspective of microneedle system for anti-cancer drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2021;264:120410. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye YQ, Wang C, Zhang XD, et al. A melanin-mediated cancer immunotherapy patch. Sci Immunol. 2017;2(17):eaan5692. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aan5692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar HO, Ghorab M, El-Nahhas SA, et al. Design of a transdermal delivery system for aspirin as an antithrombotic drug. Int J Pharm. 2006;327(1–2):81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.07.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanr M, Ita KB, Popova IE, et al. Microneedle-assisted delivery of verapamil hydrochloride and amlodipine besylate. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;86(2):284–291. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahad A, Al-Jenoobi FI, Al-Mohizea AM, et al. Systemic delivery of β-blockers via transdermal route for hypertension. Saudi Pharm J. 2015;23(6):587–602. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2013.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KJ, Hwang MJ, Shim WG, et al. Sustained drug release behavior of captopril-incorporated chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose biomaterials for antihypertensive therapy. Int j biol macromol. 2024;255:128087. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin X, Zhu DD, Chen BZ, et al. Insulin delivery systems combined with microneedle technology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;127:119–137. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo R, Jiang TY, Di J, et al. Emerging micro-and nanotechnology based synthetic approaches for insulin delivery. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43(10):3595–3629. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60436e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachibana K, Tachibana S. Transdermal delivery of insulin by ultrasonic vibration. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1991;43(4):270–271. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1991.tb06681.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu JC, Wang JQ, Zhang YQ, et al. Glucose-responsive insulin patch for the regulation of blood glucose in mice and minipigs. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;4(5):499–506. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0508-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YQ, Yu JC, Kahkoska AR, et al. Advances in transdermal insulin delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;139:51–70. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qindeel M, Ullah MH, Fakhar Ud D, et al. Recent trends, challenges and future outlook of transdermal drug delivery systems for rheumatoid arthritis therapy. J Control Release. 2020;327:595–615. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkilani AZ, McCrudden MTC, Donnelly RF. Transdermal drug delivery: Innovative pharmaceutical developments based on disruption of the barrier properties of the stratum corneum. Pharmaceutics. 2015;7(4):438–470. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics7040438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezel A, Mitragotri S. Interactions of inertial cavitation bubbles with stratum corneum lipid bilayers during low-frequency sonophoresis. Biophys J. 2003;85(6):3502–3512. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74770-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun S-Y, Zhang H, Fang W, et al. Chapter Three – Bio-chemo-mechanical coupling models of soft biological materials: a review. In: Bordas SPA, editor. Advances in Applied Mechanics. Vol. 55. San Diego: Elsevier; 2022. p. 309–392.
   Google Scholar
• Chan WCW. Nanomedicine 2.0. accounts of chemical research. Acc Chem Res. 2017;50(3):627–632. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00629
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim BYS, Rutka JT, Chan WCW. Current concepts: Nanomedicine. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(25):2434–2443. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0912273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner V, Dullaart A, Bock AK, et al. The emerging nanomedicine landscape. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24(10):1211–1217. doi: 10.1038/nbt1006-1211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolarsick PAJ, Kolarsick MA, Goodwin C. Anatomy and physiology of the skin. J Dermatol Nurses’ Assoc. 2011;3:203–213. doi: 10.1097/JDN.0b013e3182274a98
   Google Scholar
• Sandby-Moller J, Poulsen T, Wulf HC. Epidermal thickness at different body sites: Relationship to age, gender, pigmentation, blood content, skin type and smoking habits. Acta Derm-Venereol. 2003;83(6):410–413. doi: 10.1080/00015550310015419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madison KC. Barrier function of the skin: “La raison d’Être” of the epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121(2):231–241. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12359.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhling A, Bielfeldt S, Himmelmann A, et al. Comparison of the stratum corneum thickness measured in vivo with confocal raman spectroscopy and confocal reflectance microscopy. Skin Res Technol. 2014;20(1):50–57. doi: 10.1111/srt.12082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell LM, Wiedersberg S, Delgado-Charro MB. The determination of stratum corneum thickness an alternative approach. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;69(3):861–870. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhart L, Lippens S, Tschachler E, et al. Cell death by cornification. BBA-Mol Cell Res. 2013;1833(12):3471–3480. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein AM, Abramovits W. Ceramides and the stratum corneum: structure, function, and new methods to promote repair. Int J Dermatol. 2003;42(4):256–259. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2003.01507.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamanaka S, Nishio M, Hara H, et al. Human epidermal glucosylceramides are major precursors of stratum corneum ceramides. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;119(2):416–423. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.01836.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer M, Duchnik E, Maleszka R, et al. Structural and biophysical characteristics of human skin in maintaining proper epidermal barrier function. Postep Derm Alergol. 2016;33:1–5. doi: 10.5114/pdia.2015.48037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath JA, Eady RAJ, Pope FM. Anatomy and Organization of Human Skin. In: Burns T, Breathnach S, Cox N, Griffiths C, editors. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology. Oxford; Malden (MA): Blackwell Science; 2004 p. 45–128.
   Google Scholar
• Corcuff P, Bertrand C, Leveque JL. Morphometry of human epidermis in vivo by real-time confocal microscopy. Arch Dermatol Res. 1993;285(8):475–481. doi: 10.1007/BF00376820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limat A, Stockhammer E, Breitkreutz D, et al. Endogeneously regulated site-specific differentiation of human palmar skin keratinocytes in organotypic cocultures and in nude mouse transplants. Eur J Cell Biol. 1996;69(3):245–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merad M, Ginhoux F, Collin M. Origin, homeostasis and function of Langerhans cells and other langerin-expressing dendritic cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(12):935–947. doi: 10.1038/nri2455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton K, Vallejo AF, Davies J, et al. Langerhans cells-programmed by the epidermis. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1676. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsui T, Amagai M. Dissecting the formation, structure and barrier function of the stratum corneum. Int Immunol. 2015;27(6):269–280. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxv013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham J, Mathew S. Merkel cells: A collective review of current concepts. Int J Appl Basic Med. 2019;9(1):9–13. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_34_18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cichorek M, Wachulska M, Stasiewicz A, et al. Skin melanocytes: biology and development. Postep Derm Alergol. 2013;30:30–41. doi: 10.5114/pdia.2013.33376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirshin EA, Gurfinkel YI, Priezzhev AV, et al. Two-photon autofluorescence lifetime imaging of human skin papillary dermis: assessment of blood capillaries and structural proteins localization. Sci Rep-UK. 2017;7(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01238-w
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nguyen AV, Soulika AM. The Dynamics of the skin’s immune system. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(8):20. doi: 10.3390/ijms20081811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovaszi M, Szegedi A, Zouboulis CC, et al. Sebaceous-immunobiology is orchestrated by sebum lipids. Dermatoendocrinol. 2017;9(1):e1375636. doi: 10.1080/19381980.2017.1375636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong R, Geyer S, Weninger W, et al. The dynamic anatomy and patterning of skin. Exp Dermatol. 2016;25(2):92–98. doi: 10.1111/exd.12832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadon D, McCrudden MTC, Courtenay AJ, et al. Enhancement strategies for transdermal drug delivery systems: current trends and applications. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2022;12(4):758–791. doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-00909-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruela ALM, Perissinato AG, Lino MED, et al. Evaluation of skin absorption of drugs from topical and transdermal formulations. Braz J Pharm Sci. 2016;52(3):527–544. doi: 10.1590/s1984-82502016000300018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang A, Jung EC, Zhu HJ, et al. Vehicle effects on human stratum corneum absorption and skin penetration. Toxicol Ind Health. 2017;33(5):416–425. doi: 10.1177/0748233716656119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sznitowska M, Janicki S, Williams AC. Intracellular or intercellular localization of the polar pathway of penetration across stratum corneum. J Pharmaceut sci. 1998;87(9):1109–1114. doi: 10.1021/js980018w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N’Da DD. Prodrug strategies for enhancing the percutaneous absorption of drugs. Molecules. 2014;19(12):20780–20807. doi: 10.3390/molecules191220780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiserovabergerova V, Pierce JT, Droz PO. Dermal absorption potential of industrial-chemicals - criteria for skin notation. Am J Ind Med. 1990;17(5):617–635. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700170507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKone TE, Howd RA. Estimating dermal uptake of nonionic organic chemicals from water and soil: I. Unified fugacity-based models for risk assessments. Risk Anal. 1992;12(4):543–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00711.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts RO, Guy RH. Predicting skin permeability. Pharmaceut Res. 1992;9(5):663–669. doi: 10.1023/A:1015810312465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karande P, Jain A, Ergun K, et al. Design principles of chemical penetration enhancers for transdermal drug delivery. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 2005, 102. p. 4688–4693.
   Google Scholar
• Aqil M, Ahad A, Sultana V, et al. Status of terpenes as skin penetration enhancers. Drug Discovery Today. 2007;12(23–24):1061–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanikkannan N, Kandimalla K, Lamba SS, et al. Structure-activity relationship of chemical penetration enhancers in transdermal drug delivery. Curr Med Chem. 2000;7(6):593–608. doi: 10.2174/0929867003374840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovácik A, Kopecná M, Vávrová K. Permeation enhancers in transdermal drug delivery: benefits and limitations. Expert Opin Drug Delivery. 2020;17(2):145–156. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2020.1713087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser K, Kriwet K, Naik A, et al. Passive skin penetration enhancement and its quantification in vitro. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2001;52(2):103–112. doi: 10.1016/S0939-6411(01)00166-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathan IB, Setty CM. Chemical penetration enhancers for transdermal drug delivery systems. Trop J Pharm Res. 2009;8(2):173–179. doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v8i2.44527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AC, Barry BW. Skin absorption enhancers. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1992;9(3–4):305–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat BE, Hart D, Langer R, et al. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends. J Control Release. 2011;152(3):330–348. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachhav YG, Summer S, Heinrich A, et al. Effect of controlled laser microporation on drug transport kinetics into and across the skin. J Control Release. 2010;146(1):31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou S, Del Río-Sancho S, Laubach HJ, et al. YAG fractional laser ablation improves cutaneous delivery of pentoxifylline from different topical dosage forms. Int J Pharm. 2022;628:122259. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joshi D, Gala RP, Uddin MN, et al. Novel ablative laser mediated transdermal immunization for microparticulate measles vaccine. Int J Pharm. 2021;606:120882. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120882
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee WR, Shen SC, Wang KH, et al. The effect of laser treatment on skin to enhance and control transdermal delivery of 5-fluorouracil. J Pharmaceut Sci. 2002;91(7):1613–1626. doi: 10.1002/jps.10142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CH, Aljuffali IA, Fang JY. Lasers as an approach for promoting drug delivery via skin. Expert Opin Drug Delivery. 2014;11(4):599–614. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2014.885501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklar LR, Burnett CT, Waibel JS, et al. Laser assisted drug delivery: A review of an evolving technology. Lasers Surg Med. 2014;46(4):249–262. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vora D, Kim Y, Banga AK. Development and evaluation of a heparin gel for transdermal delivery via laser-generated micropores. Ther Deliv. 2021;12(2):133–144. doi: 10.4155/tde-2020-0024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YW, Voyer J, Li YB, et al. Laser microporation facilitates topical drug delivery: a comprehensive review about preclinical development and clinical application. Expert Opin Drug Delivery. 2023;20(1):31–54. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2023.2152002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassan DG, Lynch AM, Stiller MJ. Physical enhancement of dermatologic drug delivery: iontophoresis and phonophoresis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34(4):657–666. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(96)80069-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangarosa LP, Hill JM. Modern Iontophoresis for local-drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 1995;123(2):159–171. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(95)00047-M
   Google Scholar
• Vranic E. Iontophoresis: fundamentals, developments and application. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2003;3(3):54–58. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2003.3530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zuo J, Du LN, Li M, et al. Transdermal enhancement effect and mechanism of iontophoresis for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Int J Pharm. 2014;466(1–2):76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.03.013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cázares-Delgadillo J, Ganem-Rondero A, Quintanar-Guerrero D, et al. Using transdermal iontophoresis to increase granisetron delivery across skin in vitro and in vivo: effect of experimental conditions and a comparison with other enhancement strategies. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2010;39(5):387–393. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2010.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calatayud-Pascual MA, Balaguer-Fernández C, Serna-Jiménez CE, et al. Effect of iontophoresis on in vitro transdermal absorption of almotriptan. Int J Pharm. 2011;416(1):189–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.06.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saluja S, Kasha PC, Paturi J, et al. A novel electronic skin patch for delivery and pharmacokinetic evaluation of donepezil following transdermal iontophoresis. Int J Pharm. 2013;453(2):395–399. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.05.029
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fang JY, Huang YB, Wu PC, et al. Transdermal iontophoresis of sodium nonivamide acetate I. consideration of electrical and chemical factors. Int J Pharm. 1996;143(1):47–58. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(96)04681-9
   Google Scholar
• Pillai O, Borkute SD, Sivaprasad N, et al. Transdermal iontophoresis of insulin – II. Physicochemical considerations. Int J Pharm. 2003;254(2):271–280. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00034-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shin MD, Shukla S, Chung YH, et al. COVID-19 vaccine development and a potential nanomaterial path forward. Nat Nanotech. 2020;15(8):646–655. doi: 10.1038/s41565-020-0737-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakhalian D, Shultz RB, Miles CE, et al. Opportunities for biomaterials to address the challenges of COVID-19. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2020;108(10):1974–1990. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Crudden MTC, Larrañeta E, Clark A, et al. Design, formulation and evaluation of novel dissolving microarray patches containing a long-acting rilpivirine nanosuspension. J Control Release. 2018;292:119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Crudden MTC, Larrañeta E, Clark A, et al. Formulation, and evaluation of novel dissolving microarray patches containing rilpivirine for intravaginal delivery. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2019;8(9):1801510. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201801510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz B, Chambre L, Harrington K, et al. Silk fibroin microneedle patches for the sustained release of levonorgestrel. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2020;3(8):5375–5382. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.0c00671
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li W, Tang J, Terry RN, et al. Long-acting reversible contraception by effervescent microneedle patch. Sci Adv. 2019;5(11):eaaw8145. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw8145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Terry RN, Tang J, et al. Rapidly separable microneedle patch for the sustained release of a contraceptive. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;3(3):220–229. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0337-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett SB, Ter Haar GR, Ziskin MC, et al. International recommendations and guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26(3):355–366. doi: 10.1016/S0301-5629(00)00204-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanem MA, Maxwell AD, Wang YN, et al. Noninvasive acoustic manipulation of objects in a living body. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 2020, 117. p. 16848–16855.
   Google Scholar
• Brucks R, Nanavaty M, Jung D, et al. The effect of ultrasound on the in vitro penetration of ibuprofen through human-epidermis. Pharmaceut Res. 1989;6(8):697–701. doi: 10.1023/A:1015938522673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy D, Kost J, Meshulam Y, et al. Effect of ultrasound on transdermal drug delivery to rats and guinea pigs. J Clin Investig. 1989;83(6):2074–2078. doi: 10.1172/JCI114119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machet L, Boucaud A. Phonophoresis: efficiency, mechanisms and skin tolerance. Int J Pharm. 2002;243(1–2):1–15. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00299-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ita K. Recent progress in transdermal sonophoresis. Pharm Dev Technol. 2017;22(4):458–466. doi: 10.3109/10837450.2015.1116566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herwadkar A, Sachdeva V, Taylor LF, et al. Low frequency sonophoresis mediated transdermal and intradermal delivery of ketoprofen. Int J Pharm. 2012;423(2):289–296. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.11.041
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Argenziano M, Banche G, Luganini A, et al. Vancomycin-loaded nanobubbles: a new platform for controlled antibiotic delivery against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections. Int J Pharm. 2017;523(1):176–188. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.03.033
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baji S, Hegde AR, Kulkarni M, et al. Skin permeation of gemcitabine hydrochloride by passive diffusion, iontophoresis and sonophoresis: In vitro and in vivo evaluations. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 2018;47:49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2018.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitragotri S, Blankschtein D, Langer R. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal protein delivery. Science. 1995;269(5225):850–853. doi: 10.1126/science.7638603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji YW, Zheng J, Geng ZL, et al. Controllable formation of bulk perfluorohexane nanodroplets by solvent exchange. Soft Matter. 2022;18(2):425–433. doi: 10.1039/D1SM01457A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin J, Yang L, Chen F, et al. Drug delivery system based on nanobubbles. Interdiscip Mater. 2022;1(4):471–494. doi: 10.1002/idm2.12050
   Google Scholar
• Lea-Banks H, Hynynen K. Sub-millimetre precision of drug delivery in the brain from ultrasound-triggered nanodroplets. J Control Release. 2021;338:731–741. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma XT, Yao MN, Shi JY, et al. High intensity focused ultrasound-responsive and ultrastable cerasomal perfluorocarbon nanodroplets for alleviating tumor multidrug resistance and epithelial–mesenchymal transition. ACS Nano. 2020;14(11):15904–15918. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c07287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spatarelu CP, Jandhyala S, Luke GP. Dual-drug loaded ultrasound-responsive nanodroplets for on-demand combination chemotherapy. Ultrasonics. 2023;133:107056. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2023.107056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlatakis S, Zhang WQ, Thomas S, et al. Effect of phase-change nanodroplets and ultrasound on blood–brain barrier permeability in vitro. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(1):51. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16010051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao H, Li XX, Li B, et al. Sono-promoted drug penetration and extracellular matrix modulation potentiate sonodynamic therapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Acta Biomaterialia. 2023;161:265–274. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.02.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin TH, Wang P, Li JG, et al. Ultrasound-sensitive siRNA-loaded nanobubbles formed by hetero-assembly of polymeric micelles and liposomes and their therapeutic effect in gliomas. Biomaterials. 2013;34(18):4532–4543. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang WQ, Shi YH, Abd Shukor S, et al. Phase-shift nanodroplets as an emerging sonoresponsive nanomaterial for imaging and drug delivery applications. Nanoscale. 2022;14(8):2943–2965. doi: 10.1039/D1NR07882H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YZ, Du LN, Lu CT, et al. Potential and problems in ultrasound-responsive drug delivery systems. Int J Nanomed. 2013;8:1621–1633. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S43589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadoul A, Lecouturier N, Mesens J, et al. Transdermal alniditan delivery by skin electroporation. J Control Release. 1998;54(3):265–272. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(97)00195-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu QH, Liang WQ, Bao JL, et al. Enhanced transdermal delivery of tetracaine by electroporation. Int J Pharm. 2000;202(1–2):121–124. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(00)00432-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanbever R, Langers G, Montmayeur S, et al. Transdermal delivery of fentanyl: rapid onset of analgesia using skin electroporation. J Control Release. 1998;50(1–3):225–235. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(97)00147-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denet AR, Préat V. Transdermal delivery of timolol by electroporation through human skin. J Control Release. 2003;88(2):253–262. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00010-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen A, Daly ME, Hui SW. Transdermal insulin delivery using lipid enhanced electroporation. Biochim Biophys Acta, Biomembr. 2002;1564(1):5–8. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(02)00453-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blagus T, Markelc B, Cemazar M, et al. In vivo real-time monitoring system of electroporation mediated control of transdermal and topical drug delivery. J Control Release. 2013;172(3):862–871. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.09.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar-Chávez JJ, Bonilla-Martínez D, Villegas-González MA, et al. The use of sonophoresis in the administration of drugs throughout the skin. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2009;12(1):88–115. doi: 10.18433/J3C30D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy SN, Sen A, Zhao YL, et al. Temperature influences the postelectroporation permeability state of the skin. J Pharmaceut sci. 2004;93(4):908–915. doi: 10.1002/jps.20016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin SZ, Li B, Lan GH, et al. Activation and synchronization of the oscillatory morphodynamics in multicellular monolayer. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 2017, 114. p. 8157–8162.
   Google Scholar
• Xue SL, Li B, Feng XQ, et al. Biochemomechanical poroelastic theory of avascular tumor growth. J Mech Phys Solids. 2016;94:409–432. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue SL, Li B, Feng XQ, et al. A non-equilibrium thermodynamic model for tumor extracellular matrix with enzymatic degradation. J Mech Phys Solids. 2017;104:32–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue SL, Yin SF, Li B, et al. Biochemomechanical modeling of vascular collapse in growing tumors. J Mech Phys Solids. 2018;121:463–479. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin SF, Xue SL, Li B, et al. Bio-chemo-mechanical modeling of growing biological tissues: finite element method. Int J Non Linear Mech. 2019;108:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2018.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Li Y, Guo M, et al. Polymerization force-regulated actin filament-Arp2/3 complex interaction dominates self-adaptive cell migrations. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 2023, 120. p. e2306512120.
   Google Scholar
• Lin SZ, Ye S, Xu GK, et al. Dynamic migration modes of collective cells. Biophys J. 2018;115(9):1826–1835. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chizmadzhev YA, Zarnitsin VG, Weaver JC, et al. Mechanism of electroinduced ionic species transport through a multilamellar lipid system. Biophys J. 1995;68(3):749–765. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80250-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XL, Huang XS, Mo JS, et al. A fully integrated closed-loop system based on mesoporous microneedles-iontophoresis for diabetes treatment. Adv Sci. 2021;8(16):2100827. doi: 10.1002/advs.202100827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JB, Zheng ST, Ma DY, et al. Masticatory system–inspired microneedle theranostic platform for intelligent and precise diabetic management. Sci Adv. 2022;8(50):eabo6900. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo6900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Jamal WT, Kostarelos K. Liposomes: from a clinically established drug delivery system to a nanoparticle platform for theranostic nanomedicine. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44(10):1094–1104. doi: 10.1021/ar200105p
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozzuto G, Molinari A. Liposomes as nanomedical devices. Int J Nanomed. 2015;10:975–999. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S68861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabane E, Zhang XY, Langowska K, et al. Stimuli-responsive polymers and their applications in nanomedicine. Biointerphases. 2012;7(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s13758-011-0009-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casalini T, Rossi F, Castrovinci A, et al. A perspective on polylactic acid-based polymers use for nanoparticles synthesis and applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:259. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng SS. New-concept chemotherapy by nanoparticles of biodegradable polymers: where are we now? Nanomedicine. 2006;1(3):297–309. doi: 10.2217/17435889.1.3.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jochum FD, Theato P. Temperature- and light-responsive smart polymer materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(17):7468–7483. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35191A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandare J, Calderón M, Dagia NM, et al. Multifunctional dendritic polymers in nanomedicine: opportunities and challenges. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(7):2824–2848. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15242D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian HY, Hu M, Liu CH, et al. Highly biocompatible, hollow coordination polymer nanoparticles as cisplatin carriers for efficient intracellular drug delivery. Chem Comm. 2012;48(42):5151–5153. doi: 10.1039/c2cc31708g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YT, Li K, Pan J, et al. Folic acid conjugated nanoparticles of mixed lipid monolayer shell and biodegradable polymer core for targeted delivery of Docetaxel. Biomaterials. 2010;31(2):330–338. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XD, Dong YC, Zeng XW, et al. The effect of autophagy inhibitors on drug delivery using biodegradable polymer nanoparticles in cancer treatment. Biomaterials. 2014;35(6):1932–1943. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvizo R, Bhattacharya R, Mukherjee P. Gold nanoparticles: opportunities and challenges in nanomedicine. Expert Opin Drug Delivery. 2010;7(6):753–763. doi: 10.1517/17425241003777010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhumkar DR, Joshi HM, Sastry M, et al. Chitosan reduced gold nanoparticles as novel carriers for transmucosal delivery of insulin. Pharm Res. 2007;24(8):1415–1426. doi: 10.1007/s11095-007-9257-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisselier E, Astruc D. Gold nanoparticles in nanomedicine: preparations, imaging, diagnostics, therapies and toxicity. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38(6):1759–1782. doi: 10.1039/b806051g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Zhang X, Liang XJ. Gold nanoparticles: Emerging paradigm for targeted drug delivery system. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31(5):593–606. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni JA, Darjuan MM, Mercer JE, et al. On the formation and morphology of lipid nanoparticles containing ionizable cationic lipids and siRNA. ACS Nano. 2018;12(5):4787–4795. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b01516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenchov R, Bird R, Curtze AE, et al. Lipid nanoparticles─from liposomes to mRNA vaccine delivery, a landscape of research diversity and advancement. ACS Nano. 2021;15(11):16982–17015. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c04996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thi TTH, Suys EJA, Lee JS, et al. Lipid-based nanoparticles in the clinic and clinical trials: from cancer nanomedicine to COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccines. 2021;9(4):359. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9040359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elnaggar YSR, El-Massik MA, Abdallah OY. Fabrication, appraisal, and transdermal permeation of sildenafil citrate-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers versus solid lipid nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed. 2011;6:3195–3205. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S25825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han YQ, Zhang Y, Li DN, et al. Transferrin-modified nanostructured lipid carriers as multifunctional nanomedicine for codelivery of DNA and doxorubicin. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9:4107–4115. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S67770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizwanullah M, Ahmad J, Amin S. Nanostructured lipid carriers: a novel platform for chemotherapeutics. Curr Drug Deliv. 2016;13(1):4–26. doi: 10.2174/1567201812666150817124133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao ZY, Shao JY, Tan BX, et al. Targeted lung cancer therapy: preparation and optimization of transferrin-decorated nanostructured lipid carriers as novel nanomedicine for co-delivery of anticancer drugs and DNA. Int J Nanomed. 2015;10:1223–1233. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S77837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taratula O, Kuzmov A, Shah M, et al. Nanostructured lipid carriers as multifunctional nanomedicine platform for pulmonary co-delivery of anticancer drugs and siRNA. J Control Release. 2013;171(3):349–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.04.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Tang DY, Yang T, et al. Facile preparation of biocompatible nanostructured lipid carrier with ultra-small size as a tumor-penetration delivery system. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018;170:355–363. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.06.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WH, Luo GF, Vázquez-González M, et al. Glucose-responsive metal–organic-framework nanoparticles act as “Smart” Sense-and-Treat Carriers. ACS Nano. 2018;12(8):7538–7545. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b03417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He CB, Liu DM, Lin WB. Nanomedicine applications of hybrid nanomaterials built from metal–ligand coordination bonds: nanoscale metal–organic frameworks and nanoscale coordination polymers. Chem Rev. 2015;115(19):11079–11108. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon-Yarza T, Mielcarek A, Couvreur P, et al. Nanoparticles of metal-organic frameworks: on the road to in vivo efficacy in biomedicine. Adv Mater. 2018;30(37):1707365. doi: 10.1002/adma.201707365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZW, Wang ZJ, Gu ZB, et al. Accounts of chemical research. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52(5):1255–1264. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palivan CG, Goers R, Najer A, et al. Bioinspired polymer vesicles and membranes for biological and medical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45(2):377–411. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00569H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai WY, Mo R, Di J, et al. Bio-inspired synthetic nanovesicles for glucose-responsive release of insulin. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15(10):3495–3502. doi: 10.1021/bm500364a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu JC, Zhang YQ, Ye YQ, et al. Microneedle-array patches loaded with hypoxia-sensitive vesicles provide fast glucose-responsive insulin delivery. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 2015, 112. p. 8260–8265.
   Google Scholar
• Segel M, Lash B, Song JW, et al. Mammalian retrovirus-like protein PEG10 packages its own mRNA and can be pseudotyped for mRNA delivery. Science. 2021;373(6557):882–889. doi: 10.1126/science.abg6155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreitz J, Friedrich MJ, Guru A, et al. Programmable protein delivery with a bacterial contractile injection system. Nature. 2023;616(7956):357–364. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05870-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen C, Li YC, Zeng ZA, et al. Systemic administration with bacteria-inspired nanosystems for targeted oncolytic therapy and antitumor immunomodulation. ACS Nano. 2023;17(24):25638–25655. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c10302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deserno M. Elastic deformation of a fluid membrane upon colloid binding. Phys Rev E. 2004;69(3):031903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.031903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao HJ, Shi WD, Freund LB. Mechanics of receptor-mediated endocytosis. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 2005, 102. p. 9469–9474.
   Google Scholar
• Yi X, Shi XH, Gao HJ. Cellular uptake of elastic nanoparticles. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;107(9):098101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.098101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JL, Yao HM, Shi XH. Cooperative entry of nanoparticles into the cell. J Mech Phys Solids. 2014;73:151–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi X, Gao HJ. Incorporation of soft particles into lipid vesicles: effects of particle size and elasticity. Langmuir. 2016;32(49):13252–13260. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garikipati K, Arruda EM, Grosh K, et al. A continuum treatment of growth in biological tissue: the coupling of mass transport and mechanics. J Mech Phys Solids. 2004;52(7):1595–1625. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2004.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt S, Ganguly P, Salbreux G. Vertex models: from cell mechanics to tissue morphogenesis. Philos Trans R Soc London, Ser B. 2017;372(1720):20150520. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Xue SL, Meng QH, et al. Multiscale fracture mechanics model for the dorsal closure in Drosophila embryogenesis. J Mech Phys Solids. 2019;127:154–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellomo N, Bellouquid A, Nieto J, et al. Multiscale biological tissue models and flux-limited chemotaxis for multicellular growing systems. Math Models & Methods In Appl Sci. 2010;20(7):1179–1207. doi: 10.1142/S0218202510004568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner JG. History of pharmacokinetics. Pharmacol Therapeut. 1981;12(3):537–562. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(81)90097-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teorell T. Kinetics of distribution of substances administered to the body I the extravascular modes of administration. Archives Int De Pharmacodyn Et De Ther. 1937;57:205–225.
   Google Scholar
• Teorell T. Kinetics of distribution of substances administered to the body II the intravascular modes of administration. Archives Int De Pharmacodyn Et De Ther. 1937;57:226–240.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler DJ. Theory of the mean absorption time, an adjunct to conventional bioavailability studies. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1978;30(1):476–478. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1978.tb13296.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perl W, Samuel P. Input-output analysis for total input rate and total traced mass of body cholesterol in man. Circ Res. 1969;25(2):191–199. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.25.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riegelman S, Collier P. The application of statistical moment theory to the evaluation ofin vivo dissolution time and absorption time. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1980;8(5):509–534. doi: 10.1007/BF01059549
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellman R, Jacquez JA, Kalaba R. Some mathematical aspects of chemotherapy: I. One-organ models. Bull Math Biophys. 1960;22(2):181–198. doi: 10.1007/BF02478005
   Google Scholar
• Himmelstein KJ, Lutz RJ. A review of the applications of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1979;7(2):127–145. doi: 10.1007/BF01059734
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Widmark E, Tandberg J. Uber die bedingungen fur die akkumulation indifferenter narkoliken theoretische bereckerunger. Biochem Z. 1924;147:358–369.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelis L, Menten ML. Die kinetik der invertinwirkung. Biochem Z. 1913;49:352.
   Google Scholar
• Hedaya MA. Basic pharmacokinetics. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis/CRC Press; 2012; p xxxiii, 561 p.
   Google Scholar
• Poon W, Kingston BR, Ouyang B, et al. A framework for designing delivery systems. Nat Nanotech. 2020;15(10):819–829. doi: 10.1038/s41565-020-0759-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S. An overview of clinical and commercial impact of drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2014;190:15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye YQ, Yu JC, Wen D, et al. Polymeric microneedles for transdermal protein delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;127:106–118. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Tang J, Terry RN, et al. Long-acting reversible contraception by effervescent microneedle patch. Sci Adv. 2019;5(11):5. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw8145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bali NR, Salve PS. Selegiline nanoparticle embedded transdermal film: an alternative approach for brain targeting in Parkinson’s disease. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 2019;54:101299. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Han MR, Kim YH, et al. Tip-loaded dissolving microneedles for transdermal delivery of donepezil hydrochloride for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016;105:148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao ZQ, Liang L, Hu LF, et al. Subcutaneous implantable microneedle system for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease by delivering donepezil. Biomacromolecules. 2022;23(12):5330–5339. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c01155
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Courtenay AJ, McAlister E, McCrudden MTC, et al. Hydrogel-forming microneedle arrays as a therapeutic option for transdermal esketamine delivery. J Control Release. 2020;322:177–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Sinha VR, Dahiya L, et al. Transdermal delivery of duloxetine-sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin complex for effective management of depression. Int J Pharm. 2021;594:120129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120129
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao PF, Le ZC, Liu LX, et al. Therapeutic delivery to the brain via the lymphatic vasculature. Nano Lett. 2020;20(7):5415–5420. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar S, Bankar NG, Kulkarni MV, et al. Dissolvable microneedle patch containing doxorubicin and docetaxel is effective in 4T1 xenografted breast cancer mouse model. Int J Pharm. 2019;556:263–275. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.12.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Moussaoui S, Fernández-Campos F, Alonso C, et al. Topical mucoadhesive alginate-based hydrogel loading ketorolac for pain management after pharmacotherapy, ablation, or surgical removal in condyloma acuminata. Gels. 2021;7(1):8. doi: 10.3390/gels7010008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu P, Kashaw SK, Sau S, et al. Discovering pH triggered charge rebound surface modulated topical nanotherapy against aggressive skin papilloma. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2020;107:110263. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai WW, Wang CH, Yu CH, et al. Preparation of a mixed-matrix hydrogel of vorinostat for topical administration on the rats as experimental model. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015;78:255–263. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2015.07.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong WJ, Ye J, Wang WJ, et al. Self-assembled lecithin/chitosan nanoparticles based on phospholipid complex: a feasible strategy to improve entrapment efficiency and transdermal delivery of poorly lipophilic drug. Int J Nanomed 2020, 15, 5629–5643. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S261162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitis CD, Ferraro GB, Jain RK. The blood–brain barrier and blood–tumour barrier in brain tumours and metastases. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20(1):26–41. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0205-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed KS, Shan XT, Mao J, et al. Derma roller® microneedles-mediated transdermal delivery of doxorubicin and celecoxib co-loaded liposomes for enhancing the anticancer effect. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2019;99:1448–1458. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.02.095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SH, Liu HL, Huang SS, et al. Dextran methacrylate hydrogel microneedles loaded with doxorubicin and trametinib for continuous transdermal administration of melanoma. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;246:116650. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan WY, Zhai YH, Yu KY, et al. Coated microneedles mediated intradermal delivery of octaarginine/BRAF siRNA nanocomplexes for anti-melanoma treatment. Int J Pharm. 2018;553(1–2):298–309. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.10.043
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pan JT, Ruan WY, Qin MY, et al. Intradermal delivery of STAT3 siRNA to treat melanoma via dissolving microneedles. Sci Rep-UK. 2018;8(1):1117. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19463-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang YJ, Davis DA, AboulFotouh K, et al. Novel formulations and drug delivery systems to administer biological solids. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;172:183–210. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearton M, Saller V, Coulman SA, et al. Microneedle delivery of plasmid DNA to living human skin: formulation coating, skin insertion and gene expression. J Control Release. 2012;160(3):561–569. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma P, Hu-Lieskovan S, Wargo JA, et al. Adaptive, and Acquired Resistance to Cancer Immunotherapy. Cell. 2017;168(4):707–723. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen GJ, Chen ZT, Wen D, et al. Transdermal cold atmospheric plasma-mediated immune checkpoint blockade therapy. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 2020, 117. p. 3687–3692.
   Google Scholar
• Kim NW, Kim SY, Lee JE, et al. Enhanced cancer vaccination by in situ nanomicelle-generating dissolving microneedles. ACS Nano. 2018;12(10):9702–9713. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b04146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MC, Lai KY, Ling MH, et al. Enhancing immunogenicity of antigens through sustained intradermal delivery using chitosan microneedles with a patch-dissolvable design. Acta Biomaterialia. 2018;65:66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu XK, Guo L, Liu H, et al. Stretchable electronic facial masks for skin electroporation. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34:2311144. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202311144
   Google Scholar
• Li S, Xu JW, Li R, et al. Stretchable electronic facial masks for sonophoresis. ACS Nano. 2022;16(4):5961–5974. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c11181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CC, Shah AS, Amiri N, et al. A Conformable ultrasound patch for cavitation-enhanced transdermal cosmeceutical delivery. Adv Mater. 2023;35(23):2300066. doi: 10.1002/adma.202300066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu HJ, Zhu X, Wang CH, et al. Stretchable ultrasonic transducer arrays for three-dimensional imaging on complex surfaces. Sci Adv. 2018;4(3):eaar3979. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aar3979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu HJ, Huang H, Li MH, et al. A wearable cardiac ultrasound imager. Nature. 2023;613(7945):667–675. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05498-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin MY, Zhang ZY, Gao XX, et al. A fully integrated wearable ultrasound system to monitor deep tissues in moving subjects. Nat Biotechnol. 2024;42(3):448–457. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01800-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CH, Chen XY, Wang L, et al. Bioadhesive ultrasound for long-term continuous imaging of diverse organs. Science. 2022;377(6605):517–523. doi: 10.1126/science.abo2542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung HU, Rwei AY, Hourlier-Fargette A, et al. Skin-interfaced biosensors for advanced wireless physiological monitoring in neonatal and pediatric intensive-care units. Nature Med. 2020;26(3):418–429. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0792-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao W, Emaminejad S, Nyein HYY, et al. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature. 2016;529(7587):509–514. doi: 10.1038/nature16521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Liu GD, Li R, et al. Contact-resistance-free stretchable strain sensors with high repeatability and linearity. ACS Nano. 2022;16(1):541–553. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c07645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai HD, Li S, Barreiros J, et al. Stretchable distributed fiber-optic sensors. Science. 2020;370(6518):848–852. doi: 10.1126/science.aba5504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickle AD, Won SM, Noh KN, et al. A wireless closed-loop system for optogenetic peripheral neuromodulation. Nature. 2019;565(7739):361–365. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0823-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu SM, Matsuhisa N, Beker L, et al. A Wireless body area sensor network based on stretchable passive tags. Nat Electron. 2019;2(8):361–368. doi: 10.1038/s41928-019-0286-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou ZH, Chen K, Li XS, et al. Sign-to-speech translation using machine-learning-assisted stretchable sensor arrays. Nat Electron. 2020;3(9):571–578. doi: 10.1038/s41928-020-0428-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai NN, Wang L, Wang Q, et al. Graded intrafillable architecture-based iontronic pressure sensor with ultra-broad-range high sensitivity. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):209. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14054-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannsfeld SCB, Tee BCK, Stoltenberg RM, et al. Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers. Nat Mater. 2010;9(10):859–864. doi: 10.1038/nmat2834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuhisa N, Kaltenbrunner M, Yokota T, et al. Printable elastic conductors with a high conductivity for electronic textile applications. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):7461. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8461
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang F, Zang Y, Huang D, et al. Flexible and self-powered temperature–pressure dual-parameter sensors using microstructure-frame-supported organic thermoelectric materials. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):8356. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang C, Koo JH, Nguyen A, et al. Highly skin-conformal microhairy sensor for pulse signal amplification. Adv Mater. 2015;27(4):634–640. doi: 10.1002/adma.201403807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan Y, Han D, Pierre A, et al. A flexible organic reflectance oximeter array. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 2018, 115. p. E11015–E11024.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz G, Tee BC, Mei J, et al. Flexible polymer transistors with high pressure sensitivity for application in electronic skin and health monitoring. Flexible polymer transistors with high pressure sensitivity for applications in electron skin and health monitoring. Nat Commun. 2013;4(1):1859. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2832
   Google Scholar