Land use change modelling using a Markov model and remote sensing

References

• Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE. 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Baker WL. 1989. A review of models of landscape change. Landscape Ecol. 2:111–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke KC, Gaydos LJ. 1998. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int J Geograph Inf Sci. 12:699–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke KC, Hoppen S, Gaydos L. 1997. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environ Plan B: Plan Des. 24:247–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton RG. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ. 37:35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coskun GH, Alganci U, Usta G. 2008, Analysis of land use change and urbanization in the Kucukcekmece water basin (Istanbul, Turkey) with temporal satellite data using remote sensing and GIS. Sensors. 8:7213– 7223.
   Google Scholar
• Dadhich PN, Hanaoka S. 2010. Remote sensing, GIS and Markov's method for land use change detection and prediction of Jaipur district. J Geomatics. 4:9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dongjie G, Weijun G, Kazuyuki W, Hidetoshi F. 2008. Land use change of Kitakyushu based on landscape ecology and Markov model. J Geogr Sci. 18:455–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang W, Liu H, Luan Q, Bai M, Mu X. 2008. Monitoring urban expansion in Beijing, China by multi temporal TM and spot images. IEEE Proc, IGARSS. 4:695–698.
   Google Scholar
• Jianping LI, Bai Z, Feng G. 2005. RS-and-GIS-supported forecast of grassland degradation in southwest Songnen plain by Markov model. Geo-spatial Inf Sci. 8:104–06.
   Google Scholar
• Lambin EF. 1997. Modelling and monitoring land cover change processes in tropical regions. Prog Phys Geogr. 21:375–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JD. 1994. The California urban future model: a new-generation of metropolitan simulation-models. Environ Plan B. 21:399–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW. 2003. Remote sensing and image interpretation. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Logsdon MG, Bell JE, Westerlund VF. 1996, Probability mapping of land use change: a GIS interface for visualizing transition probability. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 20:389–398.
   Google Scholar
• Muller RM, Middleton J. 1994. A Markov model of land-use change dynamics in the Niagara region, Ontario, Canada. Landscape Ecol. 9:151–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Informatics Centre (NIC), Department of Information Technology, Government of India, 2010. [cited 2012 June 25]. Available from: http://www.trichy.tn.nic.in/distprof.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Opeyemi ZA. 2006. Change detection in land use and land cover using remote sensing data and GIS : a case study of Ilorin its environs in Kwara state [MSc dissertation]. Ibadan: University of Ibadan.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy AM. 2002. Text book of remote sensing and geographical information systems. Saint John: B.S. Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sylla, L., Xiong, D., Zhang, H.Y., Bangoura, S.T., 2012, A GIS technology and method to assess environmental problems from land use/cover changes: Conakry, Coyah and Dubreka region case study. Egypt J Remote Sensing Space Sci. 15:31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald DM, Hobbs NT. 1998. Forecasting rural land-use change: a comparison of regression and spatial transition-based models. Geogr Environ Model. 2:65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Tiruchirappalli Local Planning Authority, The Director of Town and Country Planning, Government of Tamil Nadu, 2012. [cited 2012 May 20]. Available from: http://www.trichy.tn.nic.in/tlpa/.
   Google Scholar
• Turner MG. 1987. Spatial simulation of landscape changes in Georgia: a comparison of three transition models. Landscape Ecol. 1:29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner BL, Skole D, Sanderson S. 1995. Land use and land cover change (LUCC): science/research plan. IGBP Report No. 35, HDP Report No.7, Stovkholm, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Verbyla DL. 2005. Satellite remote sensing of natural resources. New York: Lewis.
   Google Scholar
• Vitousek PM. 1994. Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology. 75(7):1861–1876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wear DN, Turner MG, Naiman RJ. 1998. Land cover along an urban-rural gradient: implications for water quality. Ecol Appl. 8:619–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Q. 2002. Land use change analysis in the Zhujiang delta of China using satellite remote sensing, GIS and stochastic modeling. J Environ Manage. 64:273–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin D, Chen X, Yan L, Huang Z. 2007. The research and realization of the land-use change forecasting model in development zones based on RS and GIS. IEEE Proc, IGARSS. 3429–3432.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Tang C, Ma S, Yuan H, Gao L, Fan W. 2011. Using Markov chains to analyze changes in wetland trends in arid Yinchuan plain, China. Math Comput Modell. 54:924–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar