Morphometric analysis of sub-watershed in parts of Western Ghats, South India using ASTER DEM

References

• Chorley RJ. 1969. Introduction to fluvial processes. London: Methuen; p. 30–52.
   Google Scholar
• Chow VT, editor. 1964. Handbook of applied hydrology. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Clark MK, Schoenbohm LM, Royden LH, Whipple KX, Burchfiel BC, Zhang X, Tang W, Wang E, Chen L. 2004. Surface uplift, tectonics, and erosion of eastern Tibet from large-scale drainage patterns. Tectonics. 23. doi:10.1029/2002TC001402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forkuor G, Maathuis B. 2012. Comparison of SRTM and ASTER derived digital elevation models over two regions in Ghana – implications for hydrological and environmental modeling. In: Piacentini T, editor. Studies on environmental and applied geomorphology. InTech; p. 219–240.
   Google Scholar
• Frissel CA, Liss WJ, Warren CE, Hurley MD. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ Manag. 10:199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory KJ, Walling DE. 1973. Drainage basin form and process: a geomorphological approach. New York: Wiley; p. 456.
   Google Scholar
• Grohmann CH, Riccomini C, Alves FM. 2007. SRTM-based morphotectonic analysis of the Poços de Caldas Alkaline Massif southeastern Brazil. Comput Geosci. 33:10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadely RF, Schumm SA. 1961. Sediment sources and drainage basin characteristics in upper Cheyenne River basin. United States Geological Survey water-supply paper, 1531-B. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; p. 137–196.
   Google Scholar
• Hengl T, Evans IS. 2009. Mathematical and digital models of the land surface. In: Hengl T, Reuter HI, editors. Geomorphometry: concepts, software, applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 31–63.
   Google Scholar
• Horton RE. 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage density: hydrophysical approach to quantitative geomorphology. Geol Soc Am Bull. 56:275–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imran Malik M, Sultan Bhat M, Kuchay NA. 2011. Morphometric analysis of Lidder catchment in Kashmir valley using geographical information system. Recent Res Sci Technol. 3(4):118–126.
   Google Scholar
• Markose VJ, Jayappa KS. 2011. Hypsometric analysis of Kali River Basin, Karnataka, India, using geographic information system. Geocarto Int. 26(7):553–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekel JFM. 1970. The use of aerial photographs in geological mapping. ITC text book of photo-interpretations. Delft (The Netherlands): International Institute for Aerial Survey and Earth Sciences. Volume 8; p. 1–169.
   Google Scholar
• Mesa LM. 2006. Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucumam, Argentina). Environ Geol. 50(8):1235–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nag SK. 1998. Morphometric analysis using remote sensing techniques in the Chaka sub basin Purulia district, West Bengal. J Indian Soc Remote Sensing. 26:69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Pareta K, Pareta U. 2011. Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of Yamuna basin using ASTER (DEM) data and GIS. Int J Geomatics. 2(1):248–269.
   Google Scholar
• Patton PC, Baker VR. 1976. Morphometry and floods in small drainage basins subject to diverse hydrogeomorphic controls. Water Resour Res. 12:941–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike RJ. 2000. Geomorphometry: diversity in quantitative surface analysis. Prog Phys Geography. 24:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastogi RA, Sharma TC. 1976. Quantitative analysis of drainage basin characteristics. J Soil Water Conservation India. 26(1–4):18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Scheidegger AE. 1970. Theoretical geomorphology. London: George Allen and Unwin; p. 243–248.
   Google Scholar
• Schumm SA. 1956. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in Badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Bull Geol Soc Am. 67:597–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm SA. 1963. Sinuosity of alluvial rivers on the great plains. Bull Geol Soc Am. 74:1089–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater JA, Garvey G, Johnston C, Haase J, Heady B, Kroenung G and Little J. 2006. The SRTM data “finishing” process and products. Photogrammetric Eng Remote Sensing. 72:237–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KG. 1950. Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. Am J Sci. 248:655–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreedevi PD, Subrahmanyam K, Shakeel A. 2005. The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain. Environ Geol. 47(3):412–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasa R, Nagesh KD. 2011. Classification of microwatersheds based on morphological characteristics. J Hydro-Environ Res. 5:101–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler AN. 1952. Hyposometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geol Soc Am Bull. 63:1117–1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler AN. 1964. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow VT, editor. Handbook of applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill; p. 439–476.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Joseph S, Thrivikramji KP, Abe G. 2011. Morphometric analysis of the drainage system and its hydrological implications in the rain shadow regions, Kerala, India. J Geographical Sci. 21(6):1077–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JR, Taylor MP, Fryirs KA, Brierley GJ. 2001. A geomorphological framework for river characterization and habitat assessment. Aquatic Conservation Marine Freshwater Ecosystem. 11:373–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstappen H. 1983. The applied geomorphology. Enschede (The Netherlands): International Institute for Aerial Survey and Earth Science (ITC).
   Google Scholar
• Vincy MV, Rajan B, Pradeepkumar AP. 2012. Geographic information system-based morphometric characterization of sub-watersheds of Meenachil river basin, Kottayam district, Kerala, India. Geocarto Int. 27(8):661–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar