3,861
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The September 2011 Sikkim Himalaya earthquake Mw 6.9: is it a plane of detachment earthquake?

, , , , &
Pages 248-263 | Received 16 Jul 2013, Accepted 16 Feb 2014, Published online: 19 Mar 2014

References

  • Acharya SK, Sastry MVA. 1979. Stratigraphy of Eastern Himalaya. Geol Surv India Misc Publ. 41:49–67.
  • Acton CE, Priestley K, Mitra S, Gaur VK. 2011. Crustal structure of the Darjeeling–Sikkim Himalaya and southern Tibet. Geophys J Int. 184:829–852.
  • Allègre CJ, Courtillot V, Tapponnier P, Hirn A, Mattauer M, Coulon C, Jaeger JJ, Achache J, Schärer U, Marcoux J, et al. 1984. Structure and evolution of the Himalaya-Tibet orogenic belt. Nature. 307:17–22.
  • Anderson EM. 1951. The dynamics of faulting and dyke formation with applications to Britain. 2nd ed. London: Oliver and Boyd.
  • Angelier J. 1975. Sur l’analyse de mrsures recueillies dans des sites failles: l’utilite d’une conformation entre les methods dynamiques et cinematiques. C R Acad Sci Paris, D. 284:1805–1808.
  • Angelier J. 1989. From orientation to magnitudes in paleostress determination using fault slip data. J Struct Geol. 11:37–50.
  • Angelier J. 2002. Inversion of earthquake focal mechanisms to obtain the seismotectonic stress, IV: a new method free of choice among nodal planes. Geophys J Int. 150:588–609.
  • Angelier J, Baruah S. 2009. Seismotectonics in northeast India: a stress analysis of focal mechanism solutions of earthquakes and its kinematic implications. Geophys J Int. 178:303–326.
  • Banghar AR. 1991. Mechanism solution of Nepal-Bihar earthquake of August 20, 1988. J Geol Soc India. 37:25–30.
  • Baruah S, Baruah S, Bora P, Duarah R, Kalita A, Biswas R, Gogoi N, Kayal JR. 2012a. Moment magnitude (MW) and local magnitude (ML) relationship for earthquakes innortheast India. Pure Appl Geophys. 169:1977–1988.
  • Baruah S, Baruah S, Kalita A, Biswas R, Gogoi N, Gautam JL, Sanoujam M, Kayal JR. 2012b. Moment magnitude – local magnitude relationship for the earthquakes of the Shillong-Mikir plateau, northeastern India region: a new perspective. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 3:365–375.
  • Baruah S, Baruah S, Kayal JR. 2013. State of tectonic stress in Northeast India and adjoining South Asia region. Bull Seismol Soci Am. 103:894–910.
  • Bilham R, Frederick B, Rebecca B, Gaur VK. 1998. Geodetic constraints on the translation and deformation of India: implications for future great Himalayan earthquakes. Curr Sci. 74:213–229.
  • [BIS] Bureau of Indian Standards-1893. 2002. Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, 458 part 1 – general provisions and buildings. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
  • Brown RJS, Korringa J. 1975. On the dependence of the elastic properties of a porous rock on the compressibility of the pore fluid. Geophys. 40:608–616.
  • Catlos EJ, Dubey CS, Harrison TM, Edwards MA. 2004. Late Miocene movement within the Himalayan main central thrust shear zone, Sikkim, north-east. India J Metamorph Geol. 22:207–226.
  • D’Amico S, Gervasi A, Guerra I, Neri G, Orecchio B, Presti D, Totaro C. 2012. Seismicity and focal mechanisms at the Calabro-Lucanian boundary along the Apennine chain (southern Italy), Rend. Online Soc Geol It. 21:778–779.
  • D’Amico S, Orecchi B, Presti D, Neri G, Wu WN, Sandhu I, Zhu L, Herrmann RB. 2013. Source parameters of small and moderate earthquakes in the area of 2009 L’Aquila seismic sequence (central Italy). Phys Chem Earth. 63:77–91.
  • D’Amico S, Orecchio B, Presti D, Zhu L, Herrmann RB, Neri G. 2010. Broadband waveform inversion of moderate earthquakes in the Messina straits, southern Italy. Phys Earth Planetary Inter. 179:97–106.
  • Dasgupta S, Mukhopadhyay B, Mukhopadhyay M, Nandy DR. 2013. Role of transverse tectonics in the Himalayan collision: further evidences from two contemporary earthquakes. J Geol Soc India. 81:241–247.
  • Dasgupta S, Mukhopadhyay M, Nandy DR. 1987. Active transverse features in the central portion of the Himalaya. Tectonophysics. 136:255–264.
  • De R, Kayal JR. 2003. Seismotectonic model of the Sikkim Himalaya: constraint from microearthquake surveys. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 93:1395–1400.
  • De R, Kayal JR. 2004. Seismic activity at the MCT in Sikkim Himalaya. Tectonophysics. 386:243–248.
  • Engdahl ER, van der Hillst R, Buland RP. 1998. Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 88:3295–3314.
  • Gahalaut VK. 2006. 2005 Kashmir earthquake: not a Kashmir Himalaya seismic gap event. Curr Sci. 90:507–508.
  • [GSI] Geological Survey of India. 1993. Bihar-Nepal earthquake, August 20, 1988. In: Nandy DR, Choudhury AK, Chakraborty C, Narula PL, editors. Kolkata: Geological survey of India, Special Pub. 31; p. 1–104.
  • [GSI] Geological Survey of India. 2000. Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its environs. In: Narula PL, Acharya SK, Banerjee J, editors. Kolkata: Geological survey of India, Special Pub.; p. 86.
  • Holt WE, Ni JF, Wallace TC, Haines AJ. 1991. The active tectonics of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis and surrounding regions. J Geophys Res. 96:14,595–14,632.
  • Ichihara H, Honda R, Mogi T, Hase H, Kamiyama H, Yamay Y, Ogawa Y. 2008. Resistivity structure around the focal area of the 2004 Rumoi-Nanbu earthquake (M 6.1), northern Hokkaido, Japan. Earth Planets Space. 60:883–888.
  • INTACH. 2012. Earthquake damage assessment vulnerability of Sikkim's built heritage, Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage, New Delhi. Available from: http://www.intach.org/
  • Jain AK, Singh S, Manickavasagam RM, Joshi M, Verma PK. 2003. HIMPROBE program: integrated studies on geology, petrology, geochemistry and geophysics of the Trans-Himalaya and Karakoram. In: Mahadeven TM, Arora BR, Gupta KR, editors. Indian continental lithosphere: emerging research trend. 53. Bangalore: Geological Society of India.
  • Joshi A, Kumari P, Singh S, Sharma ML. 2012. Near-field and far-field simulation of accelerograms of Sikkim earthquake of September 18, 2011 using modified semi-empirical approach. Nat Hazards. 64:1029–1054.
  • Joshi KC, Sengupta S, Kandpal GC. 2010. Macroseismic study of 20th May 2007 Sikkim Earthquake – its seismotectonics implications for the region. J Geol Soc India. 75:383–392.
  • Kayal JR. 1996. Earthquake source process in northeast India: a review. J Himalayan Geol. 17:53–69.
  • Kayal JR. 2001. Microearthquake activity in some parts of the Himalaya and the tectonic model. Tectonophysics. 339:331–351.
  • Kayal JR. 2008. Microearthquake seismology and seismotectonics of South Asia. Germany: Springer; p. 503.
  • Kayal JR. 2010. Himalayan tectonic model and the great earthquakes: an appraisal. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 1:51–67.
  • Kayal JR, Arefiev SS, Baruah S, Tatevossian R, Gogoi N, Sanoujam M, Gautam JL, Hazarika D, Borah D. 2010. The 2009 Bhutan and Assam felt earthquakes (Mw 6.3 and 5.1) at the Kopili fault in the northeast Himalaya region. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 1:273–281.
  • Kayal JR, De R, Chakraborty P. 1993. Microearthquakes at the main boundary thrust in eastern Himalaya and the present day tectonic model. Tectonophysics. 218:375–381.
  • Kayal JR, Ram S, Singh OP, Chakraborty PK, Karunakar G. 2003. Aftershocks of the March 1999 Chamoli earthquake and seismotectonic structure of the Garhwal Himalaya. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 93:109–117.
  • King GCP, Stein RS, Lin J. 1994. Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 84:935–993.
  • Ma KF, Chan CH, Stein RS. 2005. Response of seismicity to Coulomb stress triggers and shadows of the 1999 Mw = 7.6 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. J Geophys Res. 110:B05S19, doi:10.1029/2004JB003389
  • Mahajan AK, Gupta V, Thakur VC. 2012. Macroseismic field observations of 18 September 2011 Sikkim earthquake. Nat Hazards. 63:589–603.
  • Michael AJ. 1984. Determination of stress from slip data: faults and folds. J Geophys Res. 89:11517–11526.
  • Michael AJ. 1987. Stress rotation during the Coalinga aftershock sequence. J Geophys Res. 92:7963–7979.
  • Mohan A, Windley BF, Searle MP. 1989. Geothermobarometry and development of inverted metamorphism in the Darjeeling–Sikkim region of the eastern Himalaya. J Metamorph Geol. 7:95–110.
  • Monsalve G, Sheehan AF, Pandey MR, Rajanre S, Wu F. 2006. Seismicity and 1-D velocity structure of the Himalayan collision zone: results from the Himalayan Nepal Tibet SeismicExperiment (HIMNT). J Geophys Res. 111:B10301, doi:10.1029/2005JB004062
  • Mukhopadhyay M. 1984. Seismotectonics of transverse lineaments in the eastern Himalaya and its foredeep. Tectonophysics. 109:227–240.
  • Nakata T. 1989. Active fault of the Himalayas of India and Nepal. In: Malinconico Jr. LL, LillieR, editors. Tectonics of Western Himalayas. Geological Society of America. SpecialPaper, 232; p. 243–264.
  • Nath SK, Vyas M, Pal I, Sengupta P. 2005. A seismic hazard scenario in the Sikkim Himalaya from seismotectonics, spectral amplification, source parameterization, and spectral attenuation laws using strong motion seismometry. J Geophys Res. 110:B01301, doi:10.1029/2004JB003199
  • Ni J, Barazangi M. 1984. Seismotectonics of the Himalayan collision zone: geometry of the underthrusting Indian plate beneath the Himalaya. J Geophys Res. 89:1147–1163.
  • Patro P, Harinarayana T. 2009. Deep geoelctric structure of the Sikkim Himalaya (NE India) using magnetotelluric studies. Phys Earth Planetary Inter. 173:171–176.
  • Pradhan R, Prajapati S, Chopra S, Kumar A, Bansal BK, Reddy CD. 2013. Causative source of Mw 6.9 Sikkim-Nepal border earthquake of September 2011: GPS baseline observations and strain analysis. J Asian Earth Sci. 70–71:179–192.
  • Rai DC, Singhal V, Mondal G, Parool N, Pradhan T, Mitra K. 2012. The M 6.9 Sikkim(India–Nepal Border) earthquake of 18 September 2011. Curr Sci. 102:1437–1446.
  • Rajendran K, Rajendran CP, Thulasiraman N, Andrews R, Sherpa N. 2011. The 18 September 2011, north Sikkim earthquake. Curr Sci. 101:1475–479.
  • Ravi Kumar M, Hazarika P, Prasad GS, Singh A, Saha S. 2012. Tectonic implications of the September 2011 Sikkim earthquake and its aftershocks. Curr Sci. 102:788–792.
  • Seeber L, Armbruster JG, Quittmeyer R. 1981. Seismicity and continental subduction in the Himalayan Arc. In: Gupta HK, Delany FM, editors. Zagros, Hindu Kush, Himalaya, geodynamic evolution, geodynamics series. Washington (DC): American Geophysical Union; p. 215–242.
  • Sengupta A, Gupta S, Anbarasu K. 2010. Landslides – investigations and mitigation in eastern Himalayan region. J Indian Roads Congr. Paper No. 560, 133–142.
  • Sharma ML, Sinvhal A, Singh Y, Maheshwari BK. 2013. Damage survey report for Sikkim earthquake of 18 September 2011. Seismol Res Lett. 84:49–56.
  • Singh DD, Gupta HK. 1980. Source dynamics of two great earthquakes of Indian Subcontinent: the Bihar-Nepal earthquake of January 15, 1934 and the Queta earthquake of May 30, 1935. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 70:757–773.
  • Skempton AW. 1954. The pore water coefficient A and B. Geotechnique. 4:143–147.
  • Stein RS, King GCP, Lin J. 1994. Stress triggering of the 1994 M = 6.7 Northridge, California earthquake by its predecessors. Science. 265:1432–1435.
  • Thakur VC, Mahajan AK, Gupta V. 2012. Seismotectonics of 18 September 2011 Sikkim earthquake: a component of transcurrent deformation in eastern Himalaya. Himalayan Geol. 33:89–96.
  • Tiwari VM, Vyghreswara Rao MBS, Misra DC, Singh B. 2006. Crustal structure across Sikkim, NE Himalay from new gravity and magnetic data. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 247:61–69.
  • Toda S, Stein RS, Reasenberg PA, Dieterich JH. 1998. Stress transferred by the Mw = 6.5 Kobe, Japan, shock: effect on aftershocks and future earthquake probabilities. J GeophysRes. 103:24543–24565.
  • Zhang Y, Huang F, Lai G. 2009. Research on Skempton's coefficient B based on the observation of groundwater of Changping station. Earthquake Sci. 22:631–638.
  • Zalohar J, Vrabec M. 2007. Paleostress analysis of heterogeneous fault-slip data: the Gauss method. J Struct Geol. 29:1798–1810.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.