Comparison and validation of per-pixel and object-based approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping

References

• Baatz M, Schäpe A. 2000. Multi resolution segmentation: an optimum approach for high quality multi scale image segmentation. In: Beutrage zum AGIT-Symposium. Salzburg, Heidelberg, 2000. p. 12–23
   Google Scholar
• Baird C, Healy T, Johnson K, Bogie A, Dankert EW, Scharenbroch C. 2013. A comparison of risk assessment instruments in juvenile justice. Madison, (WI): National Council on Crime and Delinquency
   Google Scholar
• Bartelletti C, Giannecchini R, D’Amato Avanzi G, Galanti Y, Mazzali A. 2017. The influence of geological–morphological and land use settings on shallow landslides in the Pogliaschina T. basin (northern Apennines, Italy). J Maps. 13:142–152
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing ISPRS. J Photogramm Remote Sens. 65:2–16
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera-Barona P, Ghorbanzadeh O. 2018. Comparing classic and interval analytical hierarchy process methodologies for measuring area-level deprivation to analyze health inequalities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 15:140
   Google Scholar
• Casagli, N, Cigna, F, Bianchini, S, Holbling, D, Fureder, P, Righini, G, Del Conte, S, Friedl, B, Schneiderbauer, S, Iasio, C. et al. 2016. Landslide mapping and monitoring by using radar and optical remote sensing: Examples from the EC-FP7 project SAFER. RSA: Soc Envir. 4:92–108
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Naghibi SA. 2017. A comparative study of landslide susceptibility maps produced using support vector machine with different kernel functions and entropy data mining models in China. B Eng Geol Environ. 77:647–664
   Google Scholar
• Demir G, Aytekin M, Akgün A, İkizler SB, Tatar O. 2012. A comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping of the eastern part of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and analytic hierarchy process methods. Nat Hazards. 65:1481–1506
   Google Scholar
• Dragut L, Csillik O, Eisank C, Tiede D. 2014. Automated parameterisation for multi-scale image segmentation on multiple layers ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 88:119–127
   Google Scholar
• Drǎguţ L, Tiede D, Levick SR. 2010. ESP: a tool to estimate scale parameter for multiresolution image segmentation of remotely sensed data. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 24:859–871
   Google Scholar
• Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T. 2014. An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis approach for GIS-based multicriteria landslide susceptibility mapping. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 28:610–638
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T, Aryal J, Gholaminia K. 2018a. A new GIS-based technique using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for land subsidence susceptibility mapping. J Spat Sci. 94:1–17
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T. 2017. Multi-criteria risk evaluation by integrating an analytical network process approach into GIS-based sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. Geomat Nat Haz Risk. 9:127–151
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T, Khosravi R. 2018b. Spatially explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for the landslide risk assessment of the gas pipeline networks. Paper presented at: The 21st AGILE conference on Geo-information science., Lund, Sweden,
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Moslem S, Blaschke T, Duleba S. 2018c. Sustainable urban transport planning considering different stakeholder groups by an interval-AHP decision support model. Sustainability. 11:1–18
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Rostamzadeh H, Blaschke T, Gholaminia K, Aryal J. 2018d. A new GIS-based data mining technique using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and k-fold cross-validation approach for land subsidence susceptibility mapping. Nat Hazards. 94:497–517
   Google Scholar
• Glade T, Petschko H, Bell R, Bauer C, Granica K, Heiss G, Leopold P, Pomaroli G, Proske H, Schweigl J. 2012. Landslide susceptibility maps for Lower Austria–Methods and Challenges. Koboltschnig, G., Hübl, J., Braun, J, editors. International Research Society INTERPRAEVENT, vol. 1 Grenoble, France: p. 497–508
   Google Scholar
• Gordo C, Zêzere JL, Marques R. 2019. Landslide susceptibility assessment at the basin scale for rainfall- and earthquake-triggered shallow slides. Geosciences 9:1–22
   Google Scholar
• Guzzetti F, Mondini AC, Cardinali M, Fiorucci F, Santangelo M, Chang K-T. 2012. Landslide inventory maps: New tools for an old problem. Earth-Sci Rev. 112:42–66
   Google Scholar
• Hagenlocher M, Kienberger S, Lang S, Blaschke T. 2014. Implications of spatial scales and reporting units for the spatial modelling of vulnerability to vector-borne diseases GI_Forum 2014:197
   Google Scholar
• Haque U, Blum P, da Silva P F, Andersen P, Pilz J, Chalov SR, Malet J-P, Auflič MJ, Andres N, Poyiadji E. et al. 2016. Fatal landslides in Europe. Landslides. 13:1545–1554
   Google Scholar
• Höller P. 2009. Avalanche cycles in Austria: an analysis of the major events in the last 50 years. Nat Hazards. 48:399–424
   Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pradhan B, Xu C, Tien Bui D. 2015. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Yihuang area (China) using two-class kernel logistic regression, alternating decision tree and support vector machines. Catena. 133:266–281
   Google Scholar
• Kayastha P, Dhital MR, De Smedt F. 2013. Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study from the Tinau watershed, west Nepal. Comput Geosci. 52:398–408
   Google Scholar
• Kienberger S, Lang S, Zeil P. 2009. Spatial vulnerability units - expert-based spatial modelling of socio-economic vulnerability in the Salzach catchment, Austria. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 9:767–778
   Google Scholar
• Lang S, Kienberger S, Tiede D, Hagenlocher M, Pernkopf L. 2014. Geons – domain-specific regionalization of space. Cartography Geo Inf Sci. 41:214–226
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Pradhan B. 2006. Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides. 4:33–41
   Google Scholar
• Li R, Wang N. 2019. Landslide susceptibility mapping for the muchuan county (China): a comparison between bivariate statistical models (WoE, EBF, and IoE) and their ensembles with logistic regression. Symmetry. 11:762
   Google Scholar
• Lima P, Steger S, Glade T, Tilch N, Schwarz L, Kociu A (2017) Landslide susceptibility mapping at national scale: a first attempt for Austria. In: Mikos M, Tiwari B, Yin Y, Sassa K, editors. Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides. , Advances in Landslide Science. Volume 2. Springer, Cham, 2017, 943–951.
   Google Scholar
• Linden A. 2006. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. J Eval Clin Pract. 12:132–139
   Google Scholar
• Mahalingam R, Olsen MJ, O’Banion MS. 2016. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility mapping techniques using lidar-derived conditioning factors (Oregon case study) Geomatics, Nat Haz Risk. 7:1884–1907
   Google Scholar
• Malczewski J. 1999. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. :John Wiley & Sons, New York
   Google Scholar
• Malczewski J. 2006. GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 20:703–726
   Google Scholar
• Meena S, Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T. 2019a. A Comparative study of statistics-based landslide susceptibility models: a case study of the region affected by the Gorkha earthquake in Nepal. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 8: 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Meena S, Mishra B, Tavakkoli Piralilou S. 2019b. A hybrid spatial multi-criteria evaluation method for mapping landslide susceptible areas in Kullu Valley, Himalayas. Geosciences. 9: 1–18
   Google Scholar
• Persichillo MG, Bordoni M, Meisina C. 2017. The role of land use changes in the distribution of shallow landslides. Sci Total Environ. 574:924–937
   Google Scholar
• Petschko H, Brenning A, Bell R, Goetz J, Glade T. 2014. Assessing the quality of landslide susceptibility maps–case study Lower Austria Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 14:95–118
   Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Indra P, Khosravi K, Chapi K, Trinh PT. Ngo TQ, Hosseini SV, Bui DT. 2018. A comparison of Support Vector Machines and Bayesian algorithms for landslide susceptibility modelling. Geocarto Int. 34:1385–1407
   Google Scholar
• Pirnazar M, Karimi A, Feizizadeh B, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Eslamian S, Hasheminasab H, Ghorbanzadeh O, Hamedani M. 2017. Assessing flood hazard using gis based multi-criteria decision making approach; study area: east-azerbaijan province (Kaleybar Chay basin). J flood engr. 8: 203–223
   Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Rahmati O. 2018. Prediction of the landslide susceptibility: Which algorithm, which precision?. Catena. 162:177–192
   Google Scholar
• Raja NB, Çiçek I, Türkoğlu N, Aydin O, Kawasaki A. 2017. Correction to: landslide susceptibility mapping of the sera river Basin using logistic regression model. Nat Hazards. 91:1423–1423
   Google Scholar
• Roodposhti MS, Aryal J, Pradhan B. 2019. A Novel Rule-based Approach In Mapping Landslide Susceptibility.Sensors (Basel). 19(10), 2274.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1980. The analytic process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation New York: McGraw
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL, Vargas LG. 1984. Inconsistency and rank preservation. J Math Psychol. 28:205–214
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL, Vargas LG. 1991. Prediction, projection, and forecasting: applications of the analytic hierarchy process in economics, finance, politics, games, and sports. :Kluwer Academic Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Sahnoun H, Serbaji MM, Karray B, Medhioub K. 2011. GIS and multi-criteria analysis to select potential sites of agro-industrial complex. Envi Earth Sci. 66:2477–2489
   Google Scholar
• Scaioni M, Longoni L, Melillo V, Papini M. 2014. Remote sensing for landslide investigations: an overview of recent achievements and perspectives. Remote Sens. 6:9600–9652
   Google Scholar
• Schicker R, Moon V. 2012. Comparison of bivariate and multivariate statistical approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping at a regional scale. Geomorphology. 161-162:40–57
   Google Scholar
• Sestraș P, Bilașco Ș, Roșca S, Naș S, Bondrea MV, Gâlgău R, Vereș I, Sălăgean T, Spalević V, Cîmpeanu SM. 2019. Landslides Susceptibility Assessment Based on GIS Statistical Bivariate Analysis in the Hills Surrounding a Metropolitan Area. Sustainability. 11:
   Google Scholar
• Taha R, Dietrich J, Dehnhardt A, Hirschfeld J. 2019. Scaling effects in spatial multi-criteria decision aggregation in integrated river Basin management. Water 11, 355.
   Google Scholar
• Tay LT, Lateh H, Hossain K, KamilAA. 2014. Landslide Hazard Mapping of Penang Island Using Poisson Distribution with Dominant Factors. J Civ Eng Res. 4(3A): 72–77
   Google Scholar
• Tiede D, Lang S, Albrecht F, Holbling D. 2010. Object-based class modeling for cadastre-constrained delineation of geo-objects. Photogramm Eng Rem S. 76:193–202
   Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Khosravi K, Shahabi H, Daggupati P, Adamowski JF, Melesse AM, Pham BT, Pourghasemi HR, Mahmoudi M, Bahrami S. et al. 2019. Flood spatial modeling in Northern Iran using remote sensing and GIS: a comparison between evidential belief functions and its ensemble with a multivariate logistic regression model. Remote Sens. 11
   Google Scholar
• Tsangaratos P, Ilia I. 2016. Comparison of a logistic regression and Naïve Bayes classifier in landslide susceptibility assessments: The influence of models complexity and training dataset size. Catena 145:164–179
   Google Scholar
• Umar Z, Pradhan B, Ahmad A, Jebur MN, Tehrany MS. 2014. Earthquake induced landslide susceptibility mapping using an integrated ensemble frequency ratio and logistic regression models in West Sumatera province, Indonesia. Catena. 118:124–135
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Li W. 2017. A GIS-based comparative evaluation of analytical hierarchy process and frequency ratio models for landslide susceptibility mapping. Phys Geogr. 38:318–337
   Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Li W, Wang Q, Liu Q, Yang D, Xing M, Pei Y, Yan S. 2016. Landslide susceptibility assessment using frequency ratio, statistical index and certainty factor models for the Gangu County, China. Arab. J. Geosci. 9
   Google Scholar
• Yalcin A, Bulut F. 2006. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and digital photogrammetric techniques: a case study from Ardesen (NE-Turkey). Nat Hazards. 41:201–226
   Google Scholar