Temporal detection of sharp landslide deformation with ensemble-based LSTM-RNNs and Hurst exponent

References

• Box GEP, Cox DR. 1964. An analysis of transformations. J R Stat Soc: Ser B. 26(2):211–252.
   Google Scholar
• Chousianitis K, Del Gaudio V, Kalogeras I, Ganas A. 2014. Predictive model of Arias intensity and Newmark displacement for regional scale evaluation of earthquake-induced landslide hazard in Greece. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 65:11–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couillard M, Davison M. 2005. A comment on measuring the Hurst exponent of financial time series. Physica A. 348:404–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich WE, Reiss R, Hsu ML, Montgomery DR. 1995. A process‐based model for colluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data. Hydrol Process. 9(3-4):383–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efstratiadis A, Nalbantis I, Koutsoyiannis D. 2015. Hydrological modelling of temporally-varying catchments: facets of change and the value of information. Hydrol Sci J. 60(7-8):1438–1461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans DL, Drew JH, Leemis L. 2008. M., The distribution of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Cramer–von Mises, and Anderson–Darling test statistics for exponential populations with estimated parameters. Commun Stat-Simulat Comput. 37(7):1396–1421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk T, Mai D, Bensch R, Çiçek Ö, Abdulkadir A, Marrakchi Y, Böhm A, Deubner J, Jäckel Z, Seiwald K, et al. 2019. A., U-Net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry. Nat Methods. 16(1):67–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao G, Meguid MA. 2018. On the role of sphericity of falling rock clusters—insights from experimental and numerical investigations. Landslides. 15(2):219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T, Gholamnia K, Meena S, Tiede D, Aryal J. 2019. Evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide detection. Remote Sens. 11(2):196..
   Google Scholar
• Greenspan H, Van Ginneken B, Summers RM. 2016. Guest editorial deep learning in medical imaging: Overview and future promise of an exciting new technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 35(5):1153–1159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudiyangada Nachappa T, Kienberger S, Meena SR, Hölbling D, Blaschke T. 2020. Comparison and validation of per-pixel and object-based approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 11(1):572–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn SR. 1998. Support vector machines for classification and regression. ISIS Technic Rep. 14:5–16. http://see.xidian.edu.cn/faculty/chzheng/bishe/indexfiles/new_folder/svm.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• He Y, Fei F, Wang W. 2018. Predicting manufactured shapes of a projection micro-stereolithography process via convolutional encoder-decoder networks. Paper presented at: ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers: V01BT02A033-V01BT02A033.
   Google Scholar
• Huang GB, Zhu QY, Siew CK. 2006. Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing. 70(1–3):489–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst HE. 1956. Methods of using long-term storage in reservoirs. Proc Inst Civ Eng. 5(5):519–543.
   Google Scholar
• Hurst HE. 1957. A suggested statistical model of some time series which occur in nature. Nature. 180(4584):494–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irie K, Lei Z, Schlüter R, Ney H. 2018. Prediction of LSTM-RNN full context states as a subtask for N-gram feedforward language models. Paper presented at 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE. p. 6104–6108.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Xu Q, Lu Z, Luo H, Liao L, Dong X. 2021. Modelling and predicting landslide displacements and uncertainties by multiple machine-learning algorithms: application to Baishuihe landslide in Three Gorges Reservoir, China, Geomatics. Nat Hazards Risk. 12(1):741–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jibson RW. 2007. Regression models for estimating coseismic landslide displacement. Eng Geol. 91(2–4):209–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee T. 2016. Wild bootstrap Ljung–Box test for cross correlations of multivariate time series. Econ Lett. 147:59–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Borcard D. 2018. Box–Cox‐chord transformations for community composition data prior to beta diversity analysis. Ecography. 41(11):1820–1824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis R, Reinsel GC. 1985. Prediction of multivariate time series by autoregressive model fitting. J Multivariate Anal. 16(3):393–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Xu Q, He Y, Deng J. 2018. Prediction of landslide displacement with an ensemble-based extreme learning machine and copula models. Landslides. 15(10):2047–2059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Xu Q, He Y, Fan X, Li S. 2020b. Modeling and predicting reservoir landslide displacement with deep belief network and EWMA control charts: a case study in Three Gorges Reservoir. Landslides. 17(3):693–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SH, Wu LZ, Chen JJ, Huang RQ. 2020a. Multiple data-driven approach for predicting landslide deformation. Landslides. 17(3):709–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian C, Philip Chen CL, Zeng Z, Yao W, Tang H. 2016. Prediction intervals for landslide displacement based on switched neural networks. IEEE Trans Rel. 65(3):1483–1495. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TR.2016.2570540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian C, Zhu L, Zeng Z, Su Y, Yao W, Tang H. 2018. Constructing prediction intervals for landslide displacement using bootstrapping random vector functional link networks selective ensemble with neural networks switched. Neurocomputing. 291:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu P, Rosenbaum MS. 2003. Artificial neural networks and grey systems for the prediction of slope stability. Nat Hazards. 30(3):383–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Sun B, Li Z. 2017. Bagging likelihood-based belief decision trees. Paper presented at 2017 20th International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion). IEEE. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Massey CI, Petley DN, McSaveney MJ. 2013. Patterns of movement in reactivated landslides. Eng Geol. 159:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meena S, Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T. 2019. A comparative study of statistics-based landslide susceptibility models: a case study of the region affected by the Gorkha earthquake in Nepal. IJGI. 8(2):94..
   Google Scholar
• Meena SR, Ghorbanzadeh O, van Westen CJ, Nachappa TG, Blaschke T, Singh RP, Sarkar R. 2021. Rapid mapping of landslides in the Western Ghats (India) triggered by 2018 extreme monsoon rainfall using a deep learning approach. Landslides. 18(5):1937–1950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng Q, Wang H, He M, Gu J, Qi J, Yang L. 2020. Displacement prediction of water-induced landslides using a recurrent deep learning model. Eur J Environ Civil Eng. 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghaddam AH, Moghaddam MH, Esfandyari M. 2016. Stock market index prediction using artificial neural network. J Econ, Fin Administrat Sci. 21(41):89–93.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi M, Al-Fuqaha A, Sorour S, Guizani M. 2018. Deep learning for IoT big data and streaming analytics: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials. 20(4):2923–2960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE. 1994. A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resour Res. 30(4):1153–1171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang T, He Y, Li H, Sun Z, Baek S. 2019. Modeling and forecasting short-term power load with copula model and deep belief network. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput Intell. 3(2):127–136.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan B. 2013. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci. 51:350–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razali NM, Wah YB. 2011. Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. J Stat Model Anal. 2:21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Saito M. 1965. Forecasting the time of occurrence of a slope failure. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Montre al, Que. Pergamon Press, Oxford. p. 537–541. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10003436025/.
   Google Scholar
• Shihabudheen KV, Pillai GN, Peethambaran B. 2017. Prediction of landslide displacement with controlling factors using extreme learning adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ELANFIS). Appl Soft Comput. 61:892–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutskever I, Vinyals O, Le QV. 2014. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst. 3104–3112. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5346-sequence-to-sequence-learning-with-neural-networks.
   Google Scholar
• Tao ZG, Zhu C, He MC, Karakus M. 2021. A physical modeling-based study on the control mechanisms of Negative Poisson's ratio anchor cable on the stratified toppling deformation of anti-inclined slopes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 138:104632..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao ZG, Zhu C, He MC, Liu KM. 2020. Research on the safe mining depth of anti-dip bedding slope in Changshanhao Mine. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Resour. 36(6):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tashman LJ. 2000. Out-of-sample tests of forecasting accuracy: an analysis and review. Int J Forecast. 16(4):437–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakkoli S, Shahabi H, Jarihani B, Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T, Gholamnia K, Meena S, Aryal J. 2019. Landslide detection using multi-scale image segmentation and different machine learning models in the higher Himalayas. Remote Sens. 11(21):2575..
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari AK, Albulescu CT, Yoon SM. 2017. A multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of financial market efficiency: comparison using Dow Jones sector ETF indices. Physica A. 483:182–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turaga P, Chellappa R, Subrahmanian VS, Udrea O. 2008. Machine recognition of human activities: a survey. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol. 18(11):1473–1488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voight B. 1989. A relation to describe rate-dependent material failure. Science. 243(4888):200–203. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/243/4888/200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Tang H, Wen T, Ma J. 2019. A hybrid intelligent approach for constructing landslide displacement prediction intervals. Appl Soft Comput. 81:105506–105516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Li H, He Y, Liu F, Peng D. 2019. Comparison of data-driven models of loess landslide runout distance estimation. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 78(2):1281–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu W, Meng Q, Wang R, Zhang J. 2016. A study on the fractal characteristics of displacement time-series during the evolution of landslides. Geomat Nat Hazards & Risk. 7(5):1631–1644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Yin K, Lacasse S, Liu Z. 2019. Time series analysis and long short-term memory neural network to predict landslide displacement. Landslides. 16(4):677–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim O, Baloglu UB, Tan RS, Ciaccio EJ, Acharya UR. 2019. A new approach for arrhythmia classification using deep coded features and LSTM networks. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 176:121–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu C, He MC, Karakus M, Cui XB, Tao ZG. 2020. Investigating toppling failure mechanism of anti-dip layered slope due to excavation by physical modelling. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 53(11):5029–5050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu C, He MC, Karakus M, Zhang XH, Tao ZG. 2021. Numerical simulations of the failure process of anaclinal slope physical model and control mechanism of negative Poisson's ratio cable. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 80(4):3365–3380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou H, Hastie T. 2005. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J Royal Stat Soc B. 67(2):301–320.
   Google Scholar