Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of the North-East India towards identification of contributing seismic sources

References

• Ambraseys NN, Douglas J. 2004. Magnitude calibration of North Indian earthquakes. Geophys J Int. 159(1):165–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambraseys N, Bilham R. 2000. A note on the Kangra M s = 7. 8 earthquake of 4 April 1905. Curr Sci. 79(1):45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambraseys N, Bilham R. 2003. Reevaluated intensities for the Great Assam Earthquake of 12 June 1897, Shillong, India. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 93(2):655–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbazhagan P, Kumar A, Sitharam TG. 2013. Ground motion prediction equation considering combined dataset of recorded and simulated ground motions. Soil Dynamic Earthquake Eng. 53:92–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbazhagan P, Vinod JS, Sitharam TG. 2009. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore. Nat Hazards. 48(2):145–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelier J, Baruah S. 2009. Seismotectonics in Northeast India : a stress analysis of focal mechanism solutions of earthquakes and its kinematic implications. Geophys J Int. 178(1):303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahuguna A, Sil A. 2020. Comprehensive seismicity, seismic sources and seismic hazard assessment of Assam, North East comprehensive seismicity, seismic sources and seismic. J Earthquake Eng. 24(2):254–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baro O, Kumar A. 2015. A review on the tectonic setting and seismic activity of the Shillong Plateau in the light of past studies. Disaster Adv. 8(7):34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Baro O, Kumar A, Ismail-Zadeh A. 2018. Seismic hazard assessment of the Shillong Plateau, India. Geom Nat Hazards Risk. 9(1):841–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baro O, Kumar A, Ismail-Zadeh A. 2020. Seismic hazard assessment of the Shillong Plateau using a probabilistic approach. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk. 11(1):2210–2238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender B, Perkins DM. 1987. SEISRISK III: A computer program for seismic hazard estimation. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1772.
   Google Scholar
• Bilham R. 2001. Slow tilt reversal of the Lesser Himalaya between 1862 and 1992 at 78 Deg. E, and Bounds to the Southeast rupture of the 1905 Kangra Earthquake. Geophys J Int. 144(3):713–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilham R, England P. 2001. Plateau pop-up during the 1897 Assam earthquake. Nature. 410(6830):806–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IS-1893 2016 Part 1: Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Borah N, Kumar A, Dhanotiya R. 2021. Seismic source zonation for NE India on the basis of past EQs and spatial distribution of seismicity parameters. J Seismol. 25(6):1483–1506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell AC. 1968. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 58 (5):1583–1606.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer CH. 2001. A seismic hazard uncertainty analysis for the new madrid seismic zone. Eng Geol. 62(1–3):251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer CH, Wheeler RL, Mueller CS. 2002. Uncertainty analysis for seismic hazard in the Southern Illinois Basin. Seismol Res Lett. 73(5):792–805.
   Google Scholar
• Das R, Sharma ML, Wason HR. 2016. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Northeast India Region. Pure Appl Geophys. 173(8):2653–2670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S, Nandy DR. 1982. Seismicity and tectonics of Meghalaya Plateau, Northeastern India. In Proc. VII Syrup. on Earthquake Engineering, Roorkee, p. 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• EM-1110-2-6050. 1999. Response spectra and seismic analysis for concrete hydraulic structures. Washington, DC: Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• England P, Bilham R. 2015. The Shillong Plateau and the Great 1897 Assam Earthquake. Tectonics. 34(9):1792–1812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteva L. 1969. Seismic prediction—a Baysen approach.pdf. In Fourth World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Chile, p. 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Esteva L. 1970. Seismic risk and seismic design decisions. Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., Cambridge. Univ. of Mexico, Mexico City.
   Google Scholar
• Fahmi KJ, Ayar BS, Hassan IA. 1988. The takab seismic gap-forecasting a major earthquake occureence off Northeastern Iraq. J Geodyn. 10(1):43–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahalaut VK, Kundu B. 2016. The 4 January 2016 Manipur Earthquake in the Indo-Burmese Wedge, an intra-slab event. Geom Nat Hazards Risk. 7(5):1506–1512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghione F, Poggi V, Lindholm C. 2021. A hybrid probabilistic seismic hazard model for Northeast India and Bhutan combining distributed seismicity and finite faults. Phys Chem Earth. 123:103029.
   Google Scholar
• Görgün E, Zang A, Bohnhoff M, Milkereit C, Dresen G. 2009. Analysis of izmit aftershocks 25 days before the November 12th 1999 Düzce Earthquake, Turkey. Tectonophysics. 474(3–4):507–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görgün E. 2013. Analysis of the B-values before and after the 23 October 2011 Mw 7.2 Van-Erciş, Turkey Earthquake. Tectonophysics. 603:213–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünthal G, Stromeyer D, Bosse C, Cotton F, Bindi D. 2018. The probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Germany—version 2016, considering the range of epistemic uncertainties and aleatory variability. Bull Earthquake Eng. 16(10):4339–4395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta ID. 2002. The state of the art in seismic hazard analysis. ISET J Earthquake Technol. 39(4):311–346.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta ID. 2006. Delineation of probable seismic sources in India and neighbourhood by a comprehensive analysis of seismotectonic characteristics of the region. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 26(8):766–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta ID. 2010. Response spectral attenuation relations for in-slab earthquakes in Indo-Burmese Subduction Zone. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng. 30(5):368–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutenberg B, Richter CF. 1956. Magnitude and Energy of Earthquakes. Ann Di Geofis. 9(1).
   Google Scholar
• Guttorp P. 1987. On least-squares estimation of b values. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 77(6):2115–2124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISC. 2019. Event CatalogueSearch. Accessed May 1. http://www.isc.ac.uk/iscbulletin/search/catalogue/.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar RN, Ghosh S. 2004. Microzonation of earthquake hazard in Greater Delhi area. Curr Sci. 87(9):1193–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalafat D, Görgün E. 2019. Source characteristics and B-values of the Tuz Gölü Fault Zone in Central Anatolia, Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci. 179:337–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayal JR. 1998. Seismotectonics of Northeast India: a review. Memoir Geological Society of India, 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kayal JR, Arefiev SS, Baruah S, Tatevossian R, Gogoi N, Sanoujam M, Gautam JL, Hazarika D, Borah D. 2010. The 2009 Bhutan and Assam felt earthquakes (Mw 6.3 and 5.1) at the Kopili Fault in the Northeast Himalaya Region. Geom Nat Hazards Risk. 1(3):273–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayal JR. 2008. Microearthquake Seismology and Seismotectonics of South Asia. India: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Khattri KN. 1987. Great earthquakes, seismicity gaps and potential for earthquakes along the Himalayan Plate Boundary. Tectonophysics. 138(1):79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattri K, Wyss M, Gaur VK, Saha SN, Bansal BK. 1983. Local seismic activity in the region of the Assam Gap, Northeast India. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 73:459–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kijko A. 2004. Estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude, Mmax. Pure Appl Geophys. 161(8):1655–1681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kijko A, Graham G. 1998. Parametric-historic procedure for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. part I: estimation of maximum regional magnitude m(Max). Pure Appl Geophys. 152(3):413–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kijko A, Sellevoll MA. 1989. Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files, part I: utilization of extreme and complete catalogues with different threshold magnitudes. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 79(3):645–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kijko A, Singh M. 2011. Statistical tools for maximum possible earthquake magnitude estimation. Acta Geophys. 59(4):674–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kijko A, Smit A, Sellevoll MA. 2016. Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part III. Incorporation of uncertainty of earthquake-occurrence model. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 106(3):1210–1222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolathayar S, Sitharam TG. 2012. Characterization of Regional Seismic Source Zones in and around India. Seismol Res Lett. 83(1):77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer SL. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire RK. 1976. FORTRAN computer program for seismic risk analysis. USGS Open-File Report. 76(67):90. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr7667.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal H, Kumar A, Ramhmachhuani R. 2012. Indian national strong motion instrumentation network and site characterization of its stations. IJG. 3(6):1151–1167.
   Google Scholar
• Morino M, Maksud Kamal AS, Muslim D, Ekram Ali RM, Kamal MA, Zillur Rahman M, Kaneko F. 2011. Seismic event of the Dauki fault in 16th century confirmed by trench investigation at Gabrakhari Village, Haluaghat, Mymensingh, Bangladesh. J Asian Earth Sci. 42(3):492–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay B. 2011. Clusters of moderate size earthquakes along main central thrust (MCT) in Himalaya. IJG. 2(3):318–325.
   Google Scholar
• Mulargia F, Tinti S. 1985. Seismic sample areas defined from incomplete catalogues: an application to the Italian Territory. Phys Earth Planetary Interior. 40(4):273–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandy DR. 2001. Geodynamics of Northeastern India and the Adjoining Region. Kolkata: ACB Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Nath SK, Adhikari MD, Maiti SK, Devaraj N, Srivastava N, Mohapatra LD. 2014. Earthquake scenario in West Bengal with emphasis on seismic hazard microzonation of the city of Kolkata, India. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 14(9):2549–2575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath SK, Thingbaijam KK. 2012. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of India. Seismol Res Lett. 83(1):135–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor M, Orfanogiannaki K, Harte D. 2010. Exploratory data analysis: magnitude, space, and time. Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysis. 10.5078/corssa-92330203
   Google Scholar
• NDMA. 2010. Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India [technical report]. Technical report by National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India. https://ndma.gov.in/images/pdf/Indiapshafinalreport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oldham RD. 1899. Report on the Great Earthquake of 12 June 1897. Mem Geol Soc India. 29:379.
   Google Scholar
• Pallav K, Raghukanth STG, Singh KD. 2012. Probabilistic seismic hazard estimation of Manipur, India. J Geophys Eng. 9(5):516–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey MR, Molnar P. 1988. The distribution of intensity of the Bihar-Nepal earthquake of 15 January 1934 and bounds on the extent of the rupture zone. J Geol Soc Nepal. 5:22–44.
   Google Scholar
• Raghu Kanth STG, Dixit J, Dash S. 2011. Ground motion for scenario earthquakes at Guwahati City. Acta Geodaet Geophys Hungar. 46(3):326–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajendran CP, Rajendran K, Duarah BP, Baruah S, Earnest A. 2004. Interpreting the style of faulting and paleoseismicity associated with the 1897 Shillong, Northeast India, earthquake: implications for regional tectonism. Tectonics. 23(4):1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao NP, Kumar MR. 1997. Uplift and tectonics of the Shillong Plateau, Northeast India. J Phys Earth. 45(3):167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter L. 1990 Earthquake hazard analysis: Issues and Insights. Columbia University Press
   Google Scholar
• Roe P, Georgsen F, Abrahamsen P. 2014. An uncertainty model for fault shape and location. Math Geosci. 46(8):957–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabri MSA. 2002. Earthquake intensity-attenuation relationship for bangladesh and its surrounding region. University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka.
   Google Scholar
• Scherbaum F, Delavaud E, Riggelsen C. 2009. Model Selection in Seismic Hazard Analysis: An Information-Theoretic Perspective. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 99(6):3234–3247. 10.1785/0120080347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma ML, Malik H. 2006. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and estimation of spectral strong ground motion on bed rock in North East India. In 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Bolt BA. 1982. The standard error of the magnitude frequency b value. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 72(5):1677–1687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sil A, Sitharam TG, Kolathayar S. 2013. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Tripura and Mizoram states. Nat Hazards. 68(2):1089–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitharam TG, Kolathayar S. 2013. Seismic hazard analysis of India using areal sources. J Asian Earth Sci. 62:647–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava HN, M, Verma BK, Bansal AK, Sutar 6. 2015. Discriminatory characteristics of seismic gaps in Himalaya. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 6(3):224–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thingbaijam KKS, Nath SK, Yadav A, Raj A, Walling MY, Mohanty WK. 2008. Recent seismicity in Northeast India and its adjoining region. J Seismol. 12(1):107–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro GR. 2002. Modification of the Toro et al. (1997) Attenuation Equations For Large Magnitudes And Short Distances. Risk Engineering, Inc, Allenwood, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2019. Search Earthquake Catalog. Accessed May 1. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/.
   Google Scholar
• USNRC RG-1.208. 2007. Performance-based approach to define the site-specific earthquake ground motion. Regulatory Guide. 1:24.
   Google Scholar
• Vernant P, Bilham R, Szeliga W, Drupka D, Kalita S, Bhattacharyya AK, Gaur VK, Pelgay P, Cattin R, Berthet T. 2014. Clockwise rotation of the Brahmaputra Valley relative to India: tectonic convergence in the Eastern Himalaya, Naga Hills, and Shillong Plateau. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 119(8):6558–6571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Sieh K, Tun ST, Lai K-Y, Myint T. 2014. Active tectonic and earthquake Myanmar region. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 119(4):3767–3822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weichart DH. 1980. Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observation periods for different magnitudes. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 70(4):1337–1346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ. 1994. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 84(4):974–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiemer S, Katsumata K. 1999. Spatial variability of seismicity parameters in aftershock zones. J Geophys Res. 104(B6):13135–13151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiemer S, McNutt S. 1997. Variations in frequency-magnitude distribution with depth in two volcanic areas: mount St. Helens, Washington, and Mt. Spurr, Alask. Geophys Res Lett. 24(2):189–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiemer S, Wyss M. 2000. Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 90(4):859–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar