First-order approximation towards empirical seismic vulnerability assessment of low-cost unreinforced masonry buildings in South Africa

References

• Ademović N, Hadzima-Nyarko M, Zagora N. 2020. Seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings in Banja Luka and Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina) using the macroseismic model. Bull Earthquake Eng. 18(8):3897–3933. doi: 10.1007/s10518-020-00846-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam MS, Haque SM. 2020. Seismic vulnerability evaluation of educational buildings of Mymensingh city, Bangladesh using rapid visual screening and index based approach. IJDRBE. 11(3):379–402. doi: 10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2019-0043.
   Google Scholar
• Arkan E, Işık E, Harirchian E, Topçubaşı M, Avcil F. 2023. Architectural characteristics and determination seismic risk priorities of traditional masonry structures: a case study for Bitlis (Eastern Türkiye). Buildings. 13(4):1042. doi: 10.3390/buildings13041042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batalha N, Rodrigues H, Varum H. 2019. Seismic performance of RC precast industrial buildings—learning with the past earthquakes. Innov Infrastruct Solut. 4(1):1–13. doi: 10.1007/s41062-018-0191-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S,Nayak S,Dutta SC. 2014. A critical review of retrofitting methods for unreinforced masonry structures. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 7:51–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglari M, Formisano A. 2020. Damage probability matrices and empirical fragility curves from damage data on masonry buildings after Sarpol-e-zahab and Bam Earthquakes of Iran. Front Built Environ. 6:2. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2020.00002.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin H, Shkodrani N, Hysenlliu M, Ozmen HB, Isik E, Harirchian E. 2022. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry buildings constructed in 1970s during the 2019 Albania earthquakes. Eng Fail Anal. 131:105824. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah B, Kaushik HB, Singhal V. 2023. Analysis and design of confined masonry structures: review and future research directions. Buildings. 13(5):1282. doi: 10.3390/buildings13051282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borcherdt RD. 1970. Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 60(1):29–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt M. 2011. Seismic Hazard in South Africa. Counc Geosci Rep. 61:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bruneau M. 1994. State-of-the-art report on seismic performance of unreinforced masonry buildings. J Struct Eng. 120(1):230–251. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:1(230).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chácara C, Cannizzaro F, Pantò B, Caliò I, Lourenço PB. 2018. Assessment of the dynamic response of unreinforced masonry structures using a macroelement modeling approach. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn. 47(12):2426–2446. doi: 10.1002/eqe.3091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadras Eslamlou S, Masia MJ, Totoev YZ, Page AW. 2019. Effect of retrofitting on the structural factors for seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry structures: a review. Aust J Struct Eng. 20(1):26–53. doi: 10.1080/13287982.2019.1565288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Altri AM, Presti NL, Grillanda N, Castellazzi G, de Miranda S, Milani G. 2021. A two-step automated procedure based on adaptive limit and pushover analyses for the seismic assessment of masonry structures. Comput Struct. 252:106561. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Amato M, Gigliotti R, Laguardia R. 2019. Seismic isolation for protecting historical buildings: a case study. Front Built Environ. 5:87. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2019.00087.
   Google Scholar
• Doğangün A, Ural A, Livaoğlu R. 2008. Seismic performance of masonry buildings during recent earthquakes in Turkey. The 14thWorld Conference on Earthquake Engineering October . p. 12 – 17.
   Google Scholar
• Domaneschi M, Cimellaro GP, Scutiero G. 2019. A simplified method to assess generation of seismic debris for masonry structures. Eng Struct. 186:306–320. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domaneschi M, Noori AZ, Pietropinto MV, Cimellaro GP. 2021. Seismic vulnerability assessment of existing school buildings. Comput. Struct. 248:106522. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughton S, Raghavendran B. 2015. Seattle’s old brick buildings could see huge damage in big quake, The Seattle Times, 10 August 2015, viewed 11 May 2023. https://www.seattletimes.com/business/real-estate/citys-old-brick-buildings-could-see-huge-damage-in-bigquake/#:∼:text=Preliminary%20surveys%20in%202007%20and,spend%20time%20in%20those%20buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Erdik M, Tümsa MBD, Pınar A, Altunel E, Zülfikar AC. 2023. A preliminary report on the February 6, 2023 earthquakes in Türkiye. Temblor. https://temblor.net/temblor/preliminary-report-2023-turkey-earthquakes-15027/
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira TM, Mendes N, Silva R. 2019. Multiscale seismic vulnerability assessment and retrofit of existing masonry buildings. Buildings. 9(4):91. doi: 10.3390/buildings9040091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkournelos PD, Triantafillou TC, Bournas DA. 2022. Seismic upgrading of existing masonry structures: a state-of-the-art review. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 161:107428. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünthal G. (1998). European macroseismic scale 1998 (EMS-98). European Seismological Commission. 15:1–99.
   Google Scholar
• Hadzima-Nyarko M, Mišetić V, Morić D. 2017. Seismic vulnerability assessment of an old historical masonry building in Osijek, Croatia, using Damage Index. J Cult Heritage. 28:140–150. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2017.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halder L, Dutta SC, Sharma RP. 2020. Damage study and seismic vulnerability assessment of existing masonry buildings in Northeast India. J Build Eng. 29:101190. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MP, Rossetto T. 2008. Do existing damage scales meet the needs of seismic loss estimation. Bull Earthquake Eng. 6(2):335–365. doi: 10.1007/s10518-007-9057-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannou I, Rossetto T, Grant DN. 2012, September. Use of regression analysis for the construction of empirical fragility curves. Proceedings of the Fifteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal . p. 24 – 28.
   Google Scholar
• Işık E. 2023. Structural failures of adobe buildings during the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) earthquakes. Appl Sci. 13(15):8937. doi: 10.3390/app13158937.
   Google Scholar
• Işık E, Avcil F, Büyüksaraç A, İzol R, Hakan Arslan M, Aksoylu C, Harirchian E, Eyisüren O, Arkan E, Şakir Güngür M, et al. 2023. Structural damages in masonry buildings in Adıyaman during the Kahramanmaraş (Turkiye) earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6) on 06 February 2023. Eng Fail Anal. 151:107405. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Işık E, Shendkar MR, Avcil F, Büyüksaraç A, Deshpande SS. 2023. A study on the determination of damage levels in reinforced concrete structures during the Kahramanmaraş Earthquake on February 06, 2023. E3S Web of Conferences . Vol. 405 . EDP Sciences. p. 04029. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202340504029.
   Google Scholar
• Jafari S, Rots JG, Esposito R, Messali F. 2017. Characterizing the material properties of Dutch unreinforced masonry. Procedia Eng. 193:250–257. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.211.
   Google Scholar
• Jogunoori P. 2012. Analysis of deaths caused by interplate and intraplate earthquakes [doctoral dissertation]. Texas A & M University.
   Google Scholar
• Kappos AJ, Panagopoulos G, Panagiotopoulos C, Penelis G. 2006. A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng. 4(4):391–413. doi: 10.1007/s10518-006-9023-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassem MM, Nazri FM, Farsangi EN. 2020. The seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies: a state-of-the-art review. Ain Shams Eng J. 11(4):849–864. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempfert HG, Raithel M. 2005. Soil improvement and foundation systems with encased columns and reinforced bearing layers. In Elsevier geo-engineering book series. Vol. 3. Kassel: Elsevier. p. 923–946.
   Google Scholar
• Khoyratty Z. 2016. Seismic vulnerability investigation of RDP homes in the city of Matlosana, North West province, South Africa [Degree of MSc]. University of KwaZuluu-Natal.
   Google Scholar
• Kiyono J, Kalantari A. 2004. Collapse mechanism of adobe and masonry structures during the 2003 Iran Bam earthquake. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo. 79(157):161.
   Google Scholar
• Lulić L, Ožić K, Kišiček T, Hafner I, Stepinac M. 2021. Post-earthquake damage assessment—case study of the educational building after the Zagreb Earthquake. Sustainability. 13(11):6353. doi: 10.3390/su13116353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzunzu B, Midzi V, Mangongolo A, Essrich F. 2017. The aftershock sequence of the 5 August 2014 Orkney earthquake (ML 5.5), South Africa. J Seismol. 21(6):1323–1334. doi: 10.1007/s10950-017-9667-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marasco S, Noori AZ, Domaneschi M, Cimellaro GP. 2021. A computational framework for large-scale seismic simulations of residential building stock. Eng Struct. 244:112690. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall JD, Lang AF, Baldridge SM, Popp DR. 2011. Recipe for disaster: construction methods, materials, and building performance in the January 2010 Haiti earthquake. Earthquake Spectra. 27(1_suppl1):323–343. doi: 10.1193/1.3637031.
   Google Scholar
• Menegon SJ, Tsang HH, Lumantarna E, Lam NTK, Wilson JL, Gad EF. 2019. Framework for seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in Australia. Aust J Struct Eng. 20(2):143–158. doi: 10.1080/13287982.2019.1611034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulabisana T, Midzi V, Manzunzu B. 2019. Local site effects during the Orkney earthquake of 5 August 2014. Pure Appl Geophys. 176(1):147–164. doi: 10.1007/s00024-018-1959-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura Y, Okada K. 2019. Review on seismic isolation and response control methods of buildings in Japan. Geoenviron Disasters. 6(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s40677-019-0123-y.
   Google Scholar
• Ozbulut OE. 2023. Buildings left standing in Turkey offer design guidance for future earthquake-resilient construction, The Conversation. [accessed 2023 Sep 4]. Available from: https://theconversation.com/buildings-left-standing-in-turkey-offer-design-guidance-for-future-earthquake-resilient-construction-202089#:∼:text=Much%20of%20the%20damage%20in,reinforcing%20bars%20at%20critical%20locations.
   Google Scholar
• Panzera F, Lombardo G, Imposa S, Grassi S, Gresta S, Catalano S, Romagnoli G, Tortorici G, Patti F, Di Maio E. 2018. Correlation between earthquake damage and seismic site effects: the study case of Lentini and Carlentini, Italy. Eng Geol. 240:149–162. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavić G, Hadzima-Nyarko M, Bulajić B, Jurković Ž. 2020. Development of seismic vulnerability and exposure models—a case study of Croatia. Sustainability. 12(3):973. doi: 10.3390/su12030973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perbix TW, Burke P. 1989. Toward a philosophy for seismic retrofit: the Seattle experience. Earthquake Spectra. 5(3):557–569. doi: 10.1193/1.1585540.
   Google Scholar
• Pule T, Fourie CJS, Kijko A, Midzi V. 2015. Comparison and quantitative study of vulnerability/damage curves in South Africa. South Afr J Geol. 118(4):335–354. doi: 10.2113/gssajg.118.4.335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rossetto T, Ioannou I, Grant DN, Maqsood T. 2014. Guidelines for the empirical vulnerability assessment, GEM Technical Report 2014-08 V1.0.0, 140 pp., GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy, doi: 10.13117/GEM.VULN-MOD.TR2014.11.
   Google Scholar
• Rosti A, Rota M, Penna A. 2018. Damage classification and derivation of damage probability matrices from L’Aquila (2009) post-earthquake survey data. Bull Earthquake Eng. 16(9):3687–3720. doi: 10.1007/s10518-018-0352-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosti A, Rota M, Penna A. 2022. An empirical seismic vulnerability model. Bull Earthquake Eng. 20(8):4147–4173. doi: 10.1007/s10518-022-01374-3
   Google Scholar
• Sorrentino L, Cattari S, Da Porto F, Magenes G, Penna A. 2019. Seismic behaviour of ordinary masonry buildings during the 2016 central Italy earthquakes. Bull Earthquake Eng. 17(10):5583–5607. doi: 10.1007/s10518-018-0370-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senaldi I, Magenes G, Penna A, Galasco A, Rota M. 2014. The effect of stiffened floor and roof diaphragms on the experimental seismic response of a full-scale unreinforced stone masonry building. J Earthquake Eng. 18(3):407–443. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2013.876946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabani A, Kioumarsi M, Zucconi M. 2021. State of the art of simplified analytical methods for seismic vulnerability assessment of unreinforced masonry buildings. Eng Struct. 239:112280. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha R, Brzev SN. 2002. Housing report: unreinforced brick masonry building with reinforced concrete roof slab. Delhi: World Housing Encyclopedia.
   Google Scholar
• Stone H, Putrino V, D'Ayala D. 2018. Earthquake damage data collection using omnidirectional imagery. Front Built Environ. 4:51. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2018.00051.
   Google Scholar
• Yepes-Estrada C, Silva V. 2017, January. Probabilistic seismic risk assessment of the residential building stock in South America. In 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Yepes-Estrada C, Silva V, Valcárcel J, Acevedo AB, Tarque N, Hube MA, Coronel G, María HS. 2017. Modeling the residential building inventory in South America for seismic risk assessment. Earthquake Spectra. 33(1):299–322. doi: 10.1193/101915eqs155dp.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yön B. 2021. Identification of failure mechanisms in existing unreinforced masonry buildings in rural areas after April 4, 2019 earthquake in Turkey. J Build Eng. 43:102586. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar