An interpretable model for landslide susceptibility assessment based on Optuna hyperparameter optimization and Random Forest

References

• Abdollahi A, Pradhan B. 2023. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for interpreting the contributing factors feed into the wildfire susceptibility prediction model. Sci Total Environ. 879:163004. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akiba T, Sano S, Yanase T, Ohta T, Koyama M. 2019. Optuna: a next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. KDD '19: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data; p. 2623–2631. doi: 10.1145/3292500.3330701.
   Google Scholar
• Berhane G, Kebede M, Alfarrah N. 2021. Landslide susceptibility mapping and rock slope stability assessment using frequency ratio and kinematic analysis in the mountains of Mgulat area, Northern Ethiopia. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 80(1):285–301. doi: 10.1007/s10064-020-01905-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrara A, Crosta G, Frattini P. 2008. Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment. Geomorphology. 94(3–4):353–378. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Fan L. 2023a. An attribution deep learning interpretation model for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 61:1–15. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3323668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Fan L. 2023b. Selection of contributing factors for predicting landslide susceptibility using machine learning and deep learning models. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess.1–26. doi: 10.1007/s00477-023-02556-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Zhou H, Ye F, Liu B, Fu W. 2022. Landslide susceptibility mapping along the Anninghe fault zone in China using SVM and ACO-PSO-SVM models. Lithosphere. 2022(1):5216125. doi: 10.2113/2022/5216125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu H-J, Lin Y-P, Huang Y-L, Wang Y-C. 2009. Detecting the land-cover changes induced by large-physical disturbances using landscape metrics, spatial sampling, simulation and spatial analysis. Sensors (Basel). 9(9):6670–6700. doi: 10.3390/s90906670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikshit A, Pradhan B. 2021. Interpretable and explainable AI (XAI) model for spatial drought prediction. Sci Total Environ. 801:149797. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett T. 2006. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett. 27(8):861–874. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froude MJ, Petley DN. 2018. Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 18(8):2161–2181. doi: 10.5194/nhess-18-2161-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Can T. 2005. The 17 March 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Sivas, Turkey) and landslide-susceptibility map of its near vicinity. Eng Geol. 81(1):65–83. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guliyev H, Mustafayev E. 2022. Predicting the changes in the WTI crude oil price dynamics using machine learning models. Resour Policy. 77:102664. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He F, Tan S, Liu H. 2022. Mechanism of rainfall induced landslides in Yunnan Province using multi-scale spatiotemporal analysis and remote sensing interpretation. Microprocess Microsyst. 90:104502. doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2022.104502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Q, Wang M, Liu K. 2021. Rapidly assessing earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility on a global scale using random forest. Geomorphology. 391:107889. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Miao Y, Liu J, Zhu AX. 2019. Exploring the effects of the design and quantity of absence data on the performance of random forest-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena. 176:45–64. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Tsangaratos P, Ilia I, Chen W, Xu C. 2017. Comparing the performance of a logistic regression and a random forest model in landslide susceptibility assessments. The Case of Wuyaun Area, China. In: Mikos M, Tiwari B, Yin Y, and Sassa K, editors. Advancing culture of living with landslides. Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 1043–1050. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-53498-5_118.
   Google Scholar
• Hong H, Tsangaratos P, Ilia I, Liu J, Zhu AX, Chen W. 2018. Application of fuzzy weight of evidence and data mining techniques in construction of flood susceptibility map of Poyang County, China. Sci Total Environ. 625:575–588. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilia I, Tsangaratos P. 2016. Applying weight of evidence method and sensitivity analysis to produce a landslide susceptibility map. Landslides. 13(2):379–397. doi: 10.1007/s10346-015-0576-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imani M, Arabnia HR. 2023. Hyperparameter optimization and combined data sampling techniques in machine learning for customer churn prediction: a comparative analysis. Technologies. 11(6):167. doi: 10.3390/technologies11060167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Nohani E, Maroufinia E, Pourghasemi HR. 2016. A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique. Nat Hazards. 83(2):947–987. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J-C, Lee S, Jung H-S, Lee S. 2018. Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest and boosted tree models in Pyeong-Chang, Korea. Geocarto Int. 33(9):1000–1015. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2017.1323964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Lan H, Guo C, Zhang Y, Li Q, Wu Y. 2016. A modified frequency ratio method for landslide susceptibility assessment. Landslides. 14(2):727–741. doi: 10.1007/s10346-016-0771-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XZ, Kong JM. 2014. Application of GA–SVM method with parameter optimization for landslide development prediction. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 14(3):525–533. doi: 10.5194/nhess-14-525-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y-G, He D, Hu J-M, Cao J. 2015. Variability of extreme precipitation over Yunnan Province, China 1960–2012. Intl J Climatol. 35(2):245–258. doi: 10.1002/joc.3977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao M, Wen H, Yang L. 2022. Identifying the essential conditioning factors of landslide susceptibility models under different grid resolutions using hybrid machine learning: a case of Wushan and Wuxi counties, China. Catena. 217:106428. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin N, Zhang D, Feng S, Ding K, Tan L, Wang B, Chen T, Li W, Dai X, Pan J, et al. 2023. Rapid landslide extraction from high-resolution remote sensing images using SHAP-OPT-XGBoost. Remote Sens. 15(15):3901. doi: 10.3390/rs15153901.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Li S, Chen T. 2018. Landslide susceptibility assesment based on optimized random forest model. Geomatics Inf Sci Wuhan Univ. 43(7):1085–1091. doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20160515.
   Google Scholar
• Liu M, Xu B, Li Z, Mao W, Zhu Y, Hou J, Liu W. 2023. Landslide susceptibility zoning in Yunnan Province based on SBAS-InSAR technology and a random forest model. Remote Sens. 15(11):2864. doi: 10.3390/rs15112864.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Ma J, Xia D, Jiang S, Ren Z, Tan C, Lei D, Guo H. 2023. Toward the reliable prediction of reservoir landslide displacement using earthworm optimization algorithm-optimized support vector regression (EOA-SVR). Nat Hazards. 120(4):3165–3188. doi: 10.1007/s11069-023-06322-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long Y, Li W, Huang R, Xu Q, Yu B, Liu G. 2023. A comparative study of supervised classification methods for investigating landslide evolution in the Mianyuan River Basin, China. J Earth Sci. 34(2):316–329. doi: 10.1007/s12583-021-1525-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg SM, Erion G, Chen H, DeGrave A, Prutkin JM, Nair B, Katz R, Himmelfarb J, Bansal N, Lee S-I. 2020. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat Mach Intell. 2(1):56–67. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundberg SM, Lee S-I. 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. 31st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS); Dec 4–9; Long Beach, CA; p. 30.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg SM, Erion GG, Lee S-I. 2019. Consistent individualized feature attribution for tree ensembles. arXiv:1802.03888v3. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1802.03888.
   Google Scholar
• Ma J, Lei D, Ren Z, Tan C, Xia D, Guo H. 2023. Automated machine learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping for the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Math Geosci. 55:1–36. doi: 10.1007/s11004-023-10116-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojaddadi H, Pradhan B, Nampak H, Ahmad N, bin Ghazali AH. 2017. Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 8(2):1080–1102. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2017.1294113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prodhan FA, Zhang J, Hasan SS, Sharma TPP, Mohana HP. 2022. A review of machine learning methods for drought hazard monitoring and forecasting: current research trends, challenges, and future research directions. Environ Model Softw. 149:105327. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu H, Cui P, Regmi AD, Hu S, Zhang Y, He Y. 2018. Landslide distribution and size versus relative relief (Shaanxi Province, China). Bull Eng Geol Environ. 77(4):1331–1342. doi: 10.1007/s10064-017-1121-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbach P, Rossi M, Malamud BD, Mihir M, Guzzetti F. 2018. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth Sci Rev. 180:60–91. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro da Silva C, Luo X, Lin F, Zhu S, Yu M, Zhang Z, Meng L, Peng J. 2019. Mine landslide susceptibility assessment using IVM, ANN and SVM models considering the contribution of affecting factors. PLoS One. 14(4):e0215134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez E, Morris CS, Belz JE. 2006. A global assessment of the SRTM performance. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing. 72(3):249–260. doi: 10.14358/PERS.72.3.249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Arabameri A, Saha A, Blaschke T, Ngo PTT, Nhu VH, Band SS. 2021. Prediction of landslide susceptibility in Rudraprayag, India using novel ensemble of conditional probability and boosted regression tree-based on cross-validation method. Sci Total Environ. 764:142928. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayre R, Dangermond J, Frye C, Vaughan R, Aniello P, Breyer S, Cribbs D, Hopkins D, Naumann R, Derrenbacher B. 2014. A new map of global ecological land units—an ecophysiographic stratification approach. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers. doi: 10.13140/2.1.2167.8887.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt KM, Montgomery DR. 1995. Limits to relief. Science. 270(5236):617–620. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5236.617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirani K, Pasandi M, Arabameri A. 2018. Landslide susceptibility assessment by Dempster-Shafer and Index of Entropy models, Sarkhoun basin, Southwestern Iran. Nat Hazards. 93(3):1379–1418. doi: 10.1007/s11069-018-3356-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu H, Hürlimann M, Molowny-Horas R, González M, Pinyol J, Abancó C, Ma J. 2019. Relation between land cover and landslide susceptibility in Val d‘Aran, Pyrenees (Spain): historical aspects, present situation and forward prediction. Sci Total Environ. 693:133557. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Li Y, Zou Y, Wang R, Liang Y, Xu S, He Y, Yu X, Wu W. 2024. Synergizing multiple machine learning techniques and remote sensing for advanced landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Environ Earth Sci. 83(8):227. doi: 10.1007/s12665-024-11521-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Wang J, Ge Y, Xu C. 2020. An optimal parameters-based geographical detector model enhances geographic characteristics of explanatory variables for spatial heterogeneity analysis: cases with different types of spatial data. GIsci Remote Sens. 57(5):593–610. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2020.1760434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpf A, Kerle N. 2011. Object-oriented mapping of landslides using Random Forests. Remote Sens Environ. 115(10):2564–2577. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun D, Shi S, Wen H, Xu J, Zhou X, Wu J. 2021. A hybrid optimization method of factor screening predicated on GeoDetector and Random Forest for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping. Geomorphology. 379:107623. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun D, Wen H, Wang D, Xu J. 2020. A random forest model of landslide susceptibility mapping based on hyperparameter optimization using Bayes algorithm. Geomorphology. 362:107201. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Wang D, Gu X, Abdel-Aty M, Xing Y, Wang J, Lu H, Chen Y. 2023. A hybrid approach of random forest and random parameters logit model of injury severity modeling of vulnerable road users involved crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 192:107235. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang X, Hong H, Shu Y, Tang H, Li J, Liu W. 2019. Urban waterlogging susceptibility assessment based on a PSO-SVM method using a novel repeatedly random sampling idea to select negative samples. J Hydrol. 576:583–595. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatem AJ. 2017. WorldPop, open data for spatial demography. Sci Data. 4(1):170004. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trigila A, Iadanza C, Esposito C, Scarascia-Mugnozza G. 2015. Comparison of Logistic Regression and Random Forests techniques for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in Giampilieri (NE Sicily, Italy). Geomorphology. 249:119–136. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Eeckhaut M, Vanwalleghem T, Poesen J, Govers G, Verstraeten G, Vandekerckhove L. 2006. Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: a case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium). Geomorphology. 76(3-4):392–410. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J-F, Li X-H, Christakos G, Liao Y-L, Zhang T, Gu X, Zheng X-Y. 2010. Geographical detectors-based health risk assessment and its application in the Neural Tube Defects Study of the Heshun Region, China. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 24(1):107–127. doi: 10.1080/13658810802443457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J-l, Yu Y-h 2021. Comprehensive drought monitoring in Yunnan Province, China using multisource remote sensing data. J Mt Sci. 18(6):1537–1549. doi: 10.1007/s11629-020-6333-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Li W, Wu Y, Pei Y, Xie P. 2016. Application of statistical index and index of entropy methods to landslide susceptibility assessment in Gongliu (Xinjiang, China). Environ Earth Sci. 75(7):599. doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-5400-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Zhuang J, Zheng J, Fan H, Kong J, Zhan J. 2021. Application of Bayesian hyperparameter optimized Random Forest and XGBoost model for landslide susceptibility mapping. Front Earth Sci. 9:712240. doi: 10.3389/feart.2021.712240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Sun D, Wen H, Zhang H, Zhang F. 2020. Comparison of random forest model and frequency ratio model for landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing, China). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(12):4206. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei A, Li D, Zhou Y, Deng Q, Yan L. 2021. A novel combination approach for karst collapse susceptibility assessment using the analytic hierarchy process, catastrophe, and entropy model. Nat Hazards. 105(1):405–430. doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-04317-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Winter JCF, Gosling SD, Potter J. 2016. Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: a tutorial using simulations and empirical data. Psychol Methods. 21(3):273–290. doi: 10.1037/met0000079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Song Y, Chen W, Kang G, Qu R, Wang Z, Wang J, Lv P, Chen H. 2023. Analysis of geological hazard susceptibility of landslides in Muli County based on random forest algorithm. Sustainability. 15(5):4328. doi: 10.3390/su15054328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Li W, Wang Q, Liu Q, Yang D, Xing M, Pei Y, Yan S. 2016. Landslide susceptibility assessment using frequency ratio, statistical index and certainty factor models for the Gangu County, China. Arab J Geosci. 9(2):84. doi: 10.1007/s12517-015-2112-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao X, Ming W, Luo X, Yang L, Li M, Yang P, Ji X, Li Y. 2024. Leveraging multisource data for accurate agricultural drought monitoring: a hybrid deep learning model. Agric Water Manag. 293:108692. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie W, Nie W, Saffari P, Robledo LF, Descote P-Y, Jian W. 2021. Landslide hazard assessment based on Bayesian optimization-support vector machine in Nanping City, China. Nat Hazards. 109(1):931–948. doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-04862-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Z, Chen G, Meng X, Zhang Y, Qiao L, Tan L. 2017. A comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping using weight of evidence, logistic regression and support vector machine and evaluated by SBAS-InSAR monitoring: Zhouqu to Wudu segment in Bailong River Basin, China. Environ Earth Sci. 76(8):313. doi: 10.1007/s12665-017-6640-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu C, Xu X, Yao X, Dai F. 2013. Three (nearly) complete inventories of landslides triggered by the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan Mw 7.9 earthquake of China and their spatial distribution statistical analysis. Landslides. 11(3):441–461. doi: 10.1007/s10346-013-0404-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef K, Shao K, Moon S, Bouchard LS. 2023. Landslide susceptibility modeling by interpretable neural network. Commun Earth Environ. 4(1):162. doi: 10.1038/s43247-023-00806-5.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Ma X, Zhang J, Sun D, Zhou X, Mi C, Wen H. 2023. Insights into geospatial heterogeneity of landslide susceptibility based on the SHAP-XGBoost model. J Environ Manage. 332:117357. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XB, Alexander L, Hegerl GC, Jones P, Tank AK, Peterson TC, Trewin B, Zwiers FW. 2011. Indices for monitoring changes in extremes based on daily temperature and precipitation data. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2(6):851–870. doi: 10.1002/wcc.147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Lan H, Li L, Wu Y, Chen J, Tian N. 2020. Optimizing the frequency ratio method for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of the Caiyuan Basin in the southeast mountainous area of China. J Mt Sci. 17(2):340–357. doi: 10.1007/s11629-019-5702-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Wang R, Jiang Y, Liu H, Wei Z. 2019. GIS-based logistic regression for rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility mapping under different grid sizes in Yueqing, Southeastern China. Eng Geol. 259:105147. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Wen H, Li Z, Zhang H, Zhang W. 2022. An interpretable model for the susceptibility of rainfall-induced shallow landslides based on SHAP and XGBoost. Geocarto Int. 37(26):13419–13450. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2076928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar