A side-sampling based Linformer model for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of the railways in China

References

• Abedini M, Ghasemian B, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Chapi K, Pham BT, Bin Ahmad B, Tien Bui D. 2019. A novel hybrid approach of Bayesian logistic regression and its ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment. Geocarto Int. 34(13):1427–1457. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2018.1499820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ado M, Amitab K, Maji AK, Jasińska E, Gono R, Leonowicz Z, Jasiński M. 2022. Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning: a literature survey. Remote Sens (Basel). 14(13):3029. doi: 10.3390/rs14133029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal K, Baweja Y, Dwivedi D, Saha R, Prasad P, Agrawal S, Kapoor S, Chaturvedi P, Mali N, Kala VU, et al. 2017. A comparison of class imbalance techniques for real-world landslide predictions. In: Proceedings - 2017 International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Science, MLDS 2017. Vol. 2018-January. doi: 10.1109/MLDS.2017.21.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal N, Dixit J. 2022. Assessment of landslide susceptibility for Meghalaya (India) using bivariate (frequency ratio and Shannon entropy) and multi-criteria decision analysis (AHP and fuzzy-AHP) models. All Earth. 34(1):179–201. doi: 10.1080/27669645.2022.2101256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akgun A, Dag S, Bulut F. 2008. Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environ Geol. 54(6):1127–1143. doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-0882-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinci H, Zeybek M. 2021. Comparing classical statistic and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping in Ardanuc (Artvin), Turkey. Nat Hazards. 108(2):1515–1543. doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-04743-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Najjar HAH, Pradhan B, Sarkar R, Beydoun G, Alamri A. 2021. A new integrated approach for landslide data balancing and spatial prediction based on generative adversarial networks (GAN). Remote Sens (Basel). 13(19):4011. doi: 10.3390/rs13194011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avand M, Janizadeh S, Tien Bui D, Pham VH, Ngo PTT, Nhu VH. 2020. A tree-based intelligence ensemble approach for spatial prediction of potential groundwater. Int J Digit Earth. 13(12):1408–1429. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2020.1718785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayalew L, Yamagishi H. 2005. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology. 65(1-2):15–31. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azarafza M, Azarafza M, Akgün H, Atkinson PM, Derakhshani R. 2021. Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Sci Rep. 11(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03585-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeza C, Lantada N, Amorim S. 2016. Statistical and spatial analysis of landslide susceptibility maps with different classification systems. Environ Earth Sci. 75(19) doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-6124-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrami Y, Hassani H, Maghsoudi A. 2021. Landslide susceptibility mapping using AHP and fuzzy methods in the Gilan province, Iran. GeoJournal. 86(4):1797–1816. doi: 10.1007/s10708-020-10162-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao S, Liu J, Wang L, Zhao X. 2022. Application of transformer models to landslide susceptibility mapping. Sensors (Basel). 22(23):9104. doi: 10.3390/s22239104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagya SB, Sumi AS, Balaji S, Danumah JH, Costache R, Rajaneesh A, Gokul A, Chandrasenan CP, Quevedo RP, Johny A, et al. 2023. Landslide susceptibility assessment of a part of the Western Ghats (India) employing the AHP and F-AHP models and comparison with existing susceptibility maps. Land (Basel). 12(2):468. doi: 10.3390/land12020468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourenane H, Bouhadad Y, Guettouche MS, Braham M. 2015. GIS-based landslide susceptibility zonation using bivariate statistical and expert approaches in the city of Constantine (Northeast Algeria). Bull Eng Geol Environ. 74(2):337–355. doi: 10.1007/s10064-014-0616-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenning A. 2005. Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 5(6):853–862. doi: 10.5194/nhess-5-853-2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeckx J, Vanmaercke M, Duchateau R, Poesen J. 2018. A data-based landslide susceptibility map of Africa. Earth Sci Rev. 185:102–121. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Jia H, Xiong J, Cheng W, Li K, Pang Q, Yong Z. 2020. Flash flood susceptibility assessment based on geodetector, certainty factor, and logistic regression analyses in Fujian province, China. IJGI. 9(12):748. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9120748.
   Google Scholar
• Chang Z, Huang F, Huang J, Jiang SH, Liu Y, Meena SR, Catani F. 2023. An updating of landslide susceptibility prediction from the perspective of space and time. Geosci Front. 14(5):101619. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Fan L. 2023. Selection of contributing factors for predicting landslide susceptibility using machine learning and deep learning models. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. doi: 10.1007/s00477-023-02556-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi F, Han H. 2023. The impact of high-speed rail on economic development: a county-level analysis. Land (Basel). 12(4):874. doi: 10.3390/land12040874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang VH, Hoang ND, Nguyen LMD, Bui DT, Samui P. 2020. A novel GIS-Based random forest machine algorithm for the spatial prediction of shallow landslide susceptibility. Forests. 11(1):118. doi: 10.3390/f11010118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yunus AP, Bui DT, Merghadi A, Sahana M, Zhu Z, Chen CW, Han Z, Pham BT. 2020. Improved landslide assessment using support vector machine with bagging, boosting, and stacking ensemble machine learning framework in a mountainous watershed, Japan. Landslides. 17(3):641–658. doi: 10.1007/s10346-019-01286-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erener A, Sivas AA, Selcuk-Kestel AS, Düzgün HS. 2017. Analysis of training sample selection strategies for regression-based quantitative landslide susceptibility mapping methods. Comput Geosci. 104:62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2017.03.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feizizadeh B, Jankowski P, Blaschke T. 2014. A GIS based spatially-explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis approach for multi-criteria decision analysis. Comput Geosci. 64:81–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2013.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florinsky IV. 1998. Accuracy of local topographic variables derived from digital elevation models. Intern J Geograph Inform Sci. 12(1):47–62. doi: 10.1080/136588198242003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu B, Li Y, Han Z, Fang Z, Chen N, Hu G, Wang W. 2023. RIPF-Unet for regional landslides detection: a novel deep learning model boosted by reversed image pyramid features. Nat Hazards. 119(1):701–719. doi: 10.1007/s11069-023-06145-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao H, Fam PS, Tay LT, Low HC. 2020. Three oversampling methods applied in a comparative landslide spatial research in Penang Island, Malaysia. SN Appl Sci. 2(9) doi: 10.1007/s42452-020-03307-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T. 2019. Optimizing sample patches selection of CNN to improve the MIOU on landslide detection. In: GISTAM 2019 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management. doi: 10.5220/0007675300330040.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Xu Y, Ghamisi P, Kopp M, Kreil D. 2022. Landslide4Sense: reference Benchmark Data and Deep Learning Models for Landslide Detection. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 60:1–17. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3215209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Xu Y, Zhao H, Wang J, Zhong Y, Zhao D, Zang Q, Wang S, Zhang F, Shi Y, et al. 2022. The outcome of the 2022 Landslide4Sense competition: advanced landslide detection from multisource satellite imagery. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sensing. 15:9927–9942. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3220845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M. 2006. Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology. 81(1-2):166–184. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habumugisha JM, Chen N, Rahman M, Islam MM, Ahmad H, Elbeltagi A, Sharma G, Liza SN, Dewan A. 2022. Landslide susceptibility mapping with deep learning algorithms. Sustainability (Switzerland.). 14(3):1734. doi: 10.3390/su14031734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamedi H, Alesheikh AA, Panahi M, Lee S. 2022. Landslide susceptibility mapping using deep learning models in Ardabil province, Iran. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 36(12):4287–4310. doi: 10.1007/s00477-022-02263-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He K, Gan C, Li Z, Rekik I, Yin Z, Ji W, Gao Y, Wang Q, Zhang J, Shen D. 2023. Transformers in medical image analysis. Intel Med. 3(1):59–78. doi: 10.1016/j.imed.2022.07.002.
   Google Scholar
• Huang F, Chen J, Liu W, Huang J, Hong H, Chen W. 2022. Regional rainfall-induced landslide hazard warning based on landslide susceptibility mapping and a critical rainfall threshold. Geomorphology. 408:108236. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang W, Ding M, Li Z, Yu J, Ge D, Liu Q, Yang J. 2023. Landslide susceptibility mapping and dynamic response along the Sichuan-Tibet transportation corridor using deep learning algorithms. Catena (Amst). 222:106866. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Zhao L. 2018. Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machines. Catena (Amst). 165:520–529. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang N, Li Y, Han Z, Li J, Fu B, Yang J. 2023. A dataset-enhanced Linformer model for geo-hazards susceptibility assessment: a case study of the railway in Southwest China. Environ Earth Sci. 82(17) doi: 10.1007/s12665-023-11080-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantar B, Pradhan B, Amir Naghibi S, Motevalli A, Mansor S. 2018. Assessment of the effects of training data selection on the landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 9(1):49–69. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2017.1407368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyan KS, Rajasekharan A, Sangeetha S. 2022. AMMU: a survey of transformer-based biomedical pretrained language models. J Biomed Inform. 126:103982. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavzoglu T, Sahin EK, Colkesen I. 2014. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Landslides. 11(3):425–439. doi: 10.1007/s10346-013-0391-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavzoglu T, Teke A. 2022. Predictive performances of ensemble machine learning algorithms in landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and Natural Gradient Boosting (NGBoost). Arab J Sci Eng. 47(6):7367–7385. doi: 10.1007/s13369-022-06560-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HI, Kim BH. 2020. Flood hazard rating prediction for urban areas using random forest and LSTM. KSCE J Civ Eng. 24(12):3884–3896. doi: 10.1007/s12205-020-0951-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Zeng L. 2003. Logistic regression in rare events data. J Stat Soft. 8(2) doi: 10.18637/jss.v008.i02.
   Google Scholar
• LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. 2015. Deep learning. Nature. 521(7553):436–444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Yang J, Han Z, Li J, Wang W, Chen N, Hu G, Huang J. 2023. An ensemble deep-learning framework for landslide susceptibility assessment using multiple blocks: a case study of Wenchuan area, China. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 14(1) doi: 10.1080/19475705.2023.2221771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Shi A, Li X, Dou J, Li S, Chen T, Chen T. 2024. Deep learning-based landslide recognition incorporating deformation characteristics. Remote Sens (Basel). 16(6):992. doi: 10.3390/rs16060992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Q, Lima P, Steger S, Glade T, Jiang T, Zhang J, Liu T, Wang Y. 2021. National-scale data-driven rainfall induced landslide susceptibility mapping for China by accounting for incomplete landslide data. Geosci Front. 12(6):101248. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Liu J, Xu S, Zhou T, Ma Y, Zhang F, Konečný M. 2021. Landslide susceptibility mapping with the fusion of multi-feature SVM model based FCM sampling strategy: a case study from Shaanxi Province. Int J Image Data Fusion. 12(4):349–366. doi: 10.1080/19479832.2021.1961316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu R, Li L, Pirasteh S, Lai Z, Yang X, Shahabi H. 2021. The performance quality of LR, SVM, and RF for earthquake-induced landslides susceptibility mapping incorporating remote sensing imagery. Arab J Geosci. 14(4) doi: 10.1007/s12517-021-06573-x.
   Google Scholar
• Liu S, Wang L, Zhang W, He Y, Pijush S. 2023. A comprehensive review of machine learning-based methods in landslide susceptibility mapping. Geol J. 58(6):2283–2301. doi: 10.1002/gj.4666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu W, Hu Y, Shao W, Wang H, Zhang Z, Wang M. 2024. A multiscale feature fusion enhanced CNN with the multiscale channel attention mechanism for efficient landslide detection (MS2LandsNet) using medium-resolution remote sensing data. Int J Digit Earth. 17(1) doi: 10.1080/17538947.2023.2300731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv Z, Zhang P, Benediktsson JA. 2017. Automatic object-oriented, spectral-spatial feature extraction driven by Tobler’s first law of geography for very high resolution aerial imagery classification. Remote Sens (Basel). 9(3):285. doi: 10.3390/rs9030285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham K, Frazier AE, Singh KK, Madden M. 2023. A review of methods for scaling remotely sensed data for spatial pattern analysis. Landsc Ecol. 38(3):619–635. doi: 10.1007/s10980-022-01449-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merghadi A, Abderrahmane B, Tien Bui D. 2018. Landslide susceptibility assessment at Mila basin (Algeria): a comparative assessment of prediction capability of advanced machine learning methods. IJGI. 7(7):268. doi: 10.3390/ijgi7070268.
   Google Scholar
• Merghadi A, Yunus AP, Dou J, Whiteley J, ThaiPham B, Bui DT, Avtar R, Abderrahmane B. 2020. Machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility studies: a comparative overview of algorithm performance. Earth Sci Rev. 207:103225. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR. 1991. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process. 5(1). doi: 10.1002/hyp.3360050103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam K, Wang F. 2019. The performance of using an autoencoder for prediction and susceptibility assessment of landslides: a case study on landslides triggered by the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi earthquake in Japan. Geoenviron Disasters. 6(1). doi: 10.1186/s40677-019-0137-5.
   Google Scholar
• Nami MH, Jaafari A, Fallah M, Nabiuni S. 2018. Spatial prediction of wildfire probability in the Hyrcanian ecoregion using evidential belief function model and GIS. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 15(2):373–384. doi: 10.1007/s13762-017-1371-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H. 2008. An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. Eng Geol. 97(3-4):171–191. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikoobakht S, Azarafza M, Akgün H, Derakhshani R. 2022. Landslide susceptibility assessment by using convolutional neural network. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 12(12):5992. doi: 10.3390/app12125992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Cui P, Zhuang J. 2020. Challenges to engineering geology of Sichuan-Tibet railway. Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese J Rock Mech Engng. 39(12). doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0446.
   Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Bui DT, Indra P, Dholakia MB. 2015. Landslide susceptibility assessment at a part of Uttarakhand Himalaya, India using GIS–based statistical approach of frequency ratio method. Int J Eng Res Technol. 4(11):338–344.
   Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Prakash I, Chen W, Ly HB, Ho LS, Omidvar E, Tran VP, Bui DT. 2019. A novel intelligence approach of a sequential minimal optimization-based support vector machine for landslide susceptibility mapping. Sustainability (Switzerland). 11(22, 6323). doi: 10.3390/su11226323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Kornejady A, Kerle N, Shabani F. 2020. Investigating the effects of different landslide positioning techniques, landslide partitioning approaches, and presence-absence balances on landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena (Amst). 187:104364. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao B, Zhu L, Yang R. 2019. Temporal-spatial differences in lake water storage changes and their links to climate change throughout the Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sens Environ. 222:232–243. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbach P, Rossi M, Malamud BD, Mihir M, Guzzetti F. 2018. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth Sci Rev. 180:60–91. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riitters K. 2019. Pattern metrics for a transdisciplinary landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol. 34(9):2057–2063. doi: 10.1007/s10980-018-0755-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rong G, Li K, Han L, Alu S, Zhang J, Zhang Y. 2020. Hazard mapping of the rainfall-landslides disaster chain based on geodetector and Bayesian network models in Shuicheng County, China. Water (Switzerland). 12(9):2572. doi: 10.3390/w12092572.
   Google Scholar
• Saha S, Saha A, Hembram TK, Kundu B, Sarkar R. 2022. Novel ensemble of deep learning neural network and support vector machine for landslide susceptibility mapping in Tehri region, Garhwal Himalaya. Geocarto Int. 37(27):17018–17043. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2120638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin EK, Colkesen I, Acmali SS, Akgun A, Aydinoglu AC. 2020. Developing comprehensive geocomputation tools for landslide susceptibility mapping: LSM tool pack. Comput Geosci. 144:104592. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameen MI, Pradhan B, Lee S. 2020. Application of convolutional neural networks featuring Bayesian optimization for landslide susceptibility assessment. Catena (Amst). 186:104249. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satarzadeh E,Sarraf A,Hajikandi H,Sadeghian MS. 2022. Flood hazard mapping in western Iran: assessment of deep learning vis-à-vis machine learning models. Nat Hazards. 111:1355–1373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao X, Ma S, Xu C, Zhou Q. 2020. Effects of sampling intensity and non-slide/slide sample ratio on the occurrence probability of coseismic landslides. Geomorphology. 363:107222. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao X, Xu C. 2022. Earthquake-induced landslides susceptibility assessment: A review of the state-of-the-art. Nat Hazards Res. 2(3):172–182. doi: 10.1016/j.nhres.2022.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Shijin W, Yanqiang WEI, Chunhua NIU, Zahng Y. 2021. Integrated risk management of multi-hazard natural disasters on the Tibetan Plateau. Glacial Permafrost. 43(06):1848–1860.
   Google Scholar
• Sonker, Irjesh, Tripathi, Jayant Nath, Swarnim, Swarnim. 2022. Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio method in Sikkim Himalaya. Quaternary Sci Adv., 100067. 8. doi: 10.1016/j.qsa.2022.100067.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler WR. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr. 46:234. doi: 10.2307/143141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsangaratos P, Ilia I. 2016. Comparison of a logistic regression and Naïve Bayes classifier in landslide susceptibility assessments: the influence of models complexity and training dataset size. Catena (Amst). 145:164–179. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser Ł, Polosukhin I. 2017. Attention is all you need. In: Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2017-December[place unknown].
   Google Scholar
• Wang S, Li BZ, Khabsa M, Fang H, Ma H. 2020. Linformer: self-attention with linear complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:200604768.
   Google Scholar
• Wang S, Zhuang J, Mu J, Zheng J, Zhan J, Wang J, Fu Y. 2022. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility of the Ya’an–Linzhi section of the Sichuan–Tibet Railway based on deep learning. Environ Earth Sci. 81(9) doi: 10.1007/s12665-022-10375-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang WD, Li J, Han Z. 2020. Comprehensive assessment of geological hazard safety along railway engineering using a novel method: a case study of the Sichuan-Tibet railway, China. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 11(1):1–21. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2019.1699606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wu X, Chen Z, Ren F, Feng L, Du Q. 2019. Optimizing the predictive ability of machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility mapping using smote for Lishui city in Zhejiang province, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(3) doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Chen T, Zhu D, Jia K, Plaza A. 2023. RSEIFE: A new remote sensing ecological index for simulating the land surface eco-environment. J Environ Manage. 326(Pt A):116851. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116851.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss GM, Provost F. 2003. Learning when training data are costly: the effect of class distribution on tree induction. Jair. 19:315–354. doi: 10.1613/jair.1199.
   Google Scholar
• Wu J. 2004. Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landsc Ecol. 19(2):125–138. doi: 10.1023/B:LAND.0000021711.40074.ae.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi C, Han M, Hu X, Liu B, He K, Luo G, Cao X. 2022. Effectiveness of Newmark-based sampling strategy for coseismic landslide susceptibility mapping using deep learning, support vector machine, and logistic regression. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 81(5). doi: 10.1007/s10064-022-02664-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Song Y, Hao X. 2022. A comparative study of shallow machine learning models and deep learning models for landslide susceptibility assessment based on imbalanced data. Forests. 13(11):1908. doi: 10.3390/f13111908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan C, Ren X, Cheng Y, Song B, Li Y, Tian W. 2020. Geomechanical issues in the exploitation of natural gas hydrate. Gondwana Res. 81:403–422. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2019.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Liu LL, Huang F, Huang L, Wang XM. 2023. Machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessment with optimized ratio of landslide to non-landslide samples. Gondwana Res. 123:198–216. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2022.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Yu W, Liu Z, Zhao L, Lu C, Wu M, Niu R. 2022. Optimization of the Landslide Susceptibility Model based on Deep Forest and Twice-Sample. In. Proceedings - 2022 Chinese Automation Congress, CAC 2022. Vol. 2022-January. [place unknown]. doi: 10.1109/CAC57257.2022.10055494.
   Google Scholar
• Yi Y, Zhang W, Xu X, Zhang Z, Wu X. 2022. Evaluation of neural network models for landslide susceptibility assessment. Int J Digit Earth. 15(1):934–953. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2022.2062467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong C, Peijun S. 2008. Natural disasters. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Dikshit A, Al-Katheri MM, Matar SS, Mahdi AM. 2022. Landslide susceptibility mapping using CNN-1D and 2D deep learning algorithms: comparison of their performance at Asir Region, KSA. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 81(4). doi: 10.1007/s10064-022-02657-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Zhang K, Song Y, Jiang W, Zhou J. 2021. Study on landslide susceptibility mapping based on rock–soil characteristic factors. Sci Rep. 11(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94936-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabihi M,Mirchooli F,Motevalli A,Khaledi Darvishan A,Pourghasemi HR,Zakeri MA,Sadighi F. 2018. Spatial modelling of gully erosion in Mazandaran Province, northern Iran. Catena. 161:1–13. 10.1016/j.catena.2017.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng Q, Yuan G, McSaveney M, Ma F, Wei R, Liao L, Du H. 2020. Timing and seismic origin of Nixu rock avalanche in southern Tibet and its implications on Nimu active fault. Eng Geol. 268:105522. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Wu J, Zhan S, Pan B, Cai Y. 2021. Environmental geochemical characteristics and the provenance of sediments in the catchment of lower reach of Yarlung Tsangpo River, southeast Tibetan Plateau. Catena (Amst). 200:105150. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yan Q. 2022. Landslide susceptibility prediction based on high-trust non-landslide point selection. IJGI. 11(7):398. doi: 10.3390/ijgi11070398.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Wu X, Niu R, Wang Y, Zhang K. 2020. Using the rotation and random forest models of ensemble learning to predict landslide susceptibility. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 11(1):1542–1564. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2020.1803421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao P, Masoumi Z, Kalantari M, Aflaki M, Mansourian A. 2022. A GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping and variable importance analysis using artificial intelligent training-based methods. Remote Sens (Basel). 14(1):211. doi: 10.3390/rs14010211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Wen H, Zhang Y, Xu J, Zhang W. 2021. Landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid random forest with GeoDetector and RFE for factor optimization. Geosci Front. 12(5):101211. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu D, Chen T, Wang Z, Niu R. 2021. Detecting ecological spatial-temporal changes by remote sensing ecological index with local adaptability. J Environ Manage. 299:113655. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu D, Chen T, Zhen N, Niu R. 2020. Monitoring the effects of open-pit mining on the eco-environment using a moving window-based remote sensing ecological index. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27(13):15716–15728. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08054-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuo L, Huang Y, Zheng J, Cao J, Guo D. 2023. Landslide susceptibility mapping in Guangdong Province, China, using random forest model and considering sample type and balance. Sustainability (Switzerland). 15(11):9024. doi: 10.3390/su15119024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar