Flood susceptibility mapping leveraging open-source remote-sensing data and machine learning approaches in Nam Ngum River Basin (NNRB), Lao PDR

References

• Adams G, Blakers RS, Someth P. 2018. Rapid initial assessment of the state of water resources in Lao PDR -Support the Lao National Water Strategy. Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed IA, Talukdar S, Shahfahad, Parvez A, Rihan M, Baig MRI, Rahman A. 2022. Flood susceptibility modeling in the urban watershed of Guwahati using improved metaheuristic-based ensemble machine learning algorithms. Geocarto Int. 37(26):12238–12266. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2066200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Abadi AM. 2018. Mapping flood susceptibility in an arid region of southern Iraq using ensemble machine learning classifiers: a comparative study. Arab J Geosci. 11(9):218. doi: 10.1007/s12517-018-3584-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Aizari AR, Al-Masnay YA, Aydda A, Zhang J, Ullah K, Islam A, Habib T, Kaku DU, Nizeyimana JC, Al-Shaibah B, et al. 2022. Assessment analysis of flood susceptibility in tropical desert area: a case study of Yemen. Remote Sens. 14(16):4050. doi: 10.3390/rs14164050.
   Google Scholar
• Aldiansyah S, Wardani F. 2023. Evaluation of flood susceptibility prediction based on a resampling method using machine learning. J Water Clim Change. 14(3):937–961. doi: 10.2166/wcc.2023.494.
   Google Scholar
• Alin A. 2010. Multicollinearity. WIREs Comput Stats. 2(3):370–374. doi: 10.1002/wics.84.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Kindi KM, Alabri Z. 2024. Investigating the role of the key conditioning factors in flood susceptibility mapping through machine learning approaches. Earth Syst Environ. 8(1):63–81. doi: 10.1007/s41748-023-00369-7.
   Google Scholar
• Amiri A, Soltani K, Ebtehaj I, Bonakdari H. 2024. A novel machine learning tool for current and future flood susceptibility mapping by integrating remote sensing and geographic information systems. J Hydrol. 632:130936. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andaryani S, Nourani V, Haghighi AT, Keesstra S. 2021. Integration of hard and soft supervised machine learning for flood susceptibility mapping. J Environ Manage. 291:112731. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Rezaei K, Cerdà A, Conoscenti C, Kalantari Z. 2019. A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in northern Iran. Sci Total Environ. 660:443–458. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Seyed Danesh A, Santosh M, Cerda A, Chandra Pal S, Ghorbanzadeh O, Roy P, Chowdhuri I. 2022. Flood susceptibility mapping using meta-heuristic algorithms. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 13(1):949–974. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2022.2060138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora A, Arabameri A, Pandey M, Siddiqui MA, Shukla UK, Bui DT, Mishra VN, Bhardwaj A. 2021. Optimization of state-of-the-art fuzzy-metaheuristic ANFIS-based machine learning models for flood susceptibility prediction mapping in the Middle Ganga Plain, India. Sci Total Environ. 750:141565. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askar S, Zeraat Peyma S, Yousef MM, Prodanova NA, Muda I, Elsahabi M, Hatamiafkoueieh J. 2022. Flood susceptibility mapping using remote sensing and integration of decision table classifier and metaheuristic algorithms. Water Switz. 14(19):3062. doi: 10.3390/w14193062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avand M, Kuriqi A, Khazaei M, Ghorbanzadeh O. 2022. DEM resolution effects on machine learning performance for flood probability mapping. J Hydro-Environ Res. 40:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jher.2021.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avand M, Moradi H, Lasboyee MR. 2021. Using machine learning models, remote sensing, and GIS to investigate the effects of changing climates and land uses on flood probability. J Hydrol. 595:125663. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baig MA, Xiong D, Rahman M, Islam MM, Elbeltagi A, Yigez B, Rai DK, Tayab M, Dewan A. 2022. How do multiple kernel functions in machine learning algorithms improve precision in flood probability mapping? Nat Hazards. 113(3):1543–1562. doi: 10.1007/s11069-022-05357-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett R, Baker J, Lacombe G, Douangsavanh S, Jeuland M. 2012. Analyzing economic tradeoffs of water use in the Nam Ngum River Basin, Lao PDR. Working Paper EE 12–10. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University. 38p. SSRN J. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2469222.
   Google Scholar
• Bera S, Das A, Mazumder T. 2022. Evaluation of machine learning, information theory and multi-criteria decision analysis methods for flood susceptibility mapping under varying spatial scale of analyses. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ. 25:100686. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100686.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattarai Y, Duwal S, Sharma S, Talchabhadel R. 2024. Leveraging machine learning and open-source spatial datasets to enhance flood susceptibility mapping in transboundary river basin. Int J Digit Earth. 17(1):2313857. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2024.2313857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekhuizen H, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Van Til JA, Hummel JM, IJzerman MJ. 2015. A review and classification of approaches for dealing with uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis for healthcare decisions. Pharmacoeconomics. 33(5):445–455. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0251-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitinck L, Louppe G, Blondel M, Pedregosa F, Mueller A, Grisel O, Niculae V, Prettenhofer P, Gramfort A, Grobler J, et al. 2013. API design for machine learning software: experiences from the scikit-learn project. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Chapi K, Singh VP, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Bui DT, Pham BT, Khosravi K. 2017. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment. Environ Model Softw. 95:229–245. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C-Y, Yu F-C. 2011. Morphometric analysis of debris flows and their source areas using GIS. Geomorphology. 129(3–4):387–397. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Huang W, Chen Y, Feng M. 2021. An adaptive thresholding approach toward rapid flood coverage extraction from Sentinel-1 SAR Imagery. Remote Sens. 13(23):4899. doi: 10.3390/rs13234899.
   Google Scholar
• Choubin B, Moradi E, Golshan M, Adamowski J, Sajedi-Hosseini F, Mosavi A. 2019. An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Sci Total Environ. 651(Pt 2):2087–2096. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirella GT, Iyalomhe FO. 2018. Flooding conceptual review: sustainability-focalized best practices in Nigeria. Appl Sci. 8(9):1558. doi: 10.3390/app8091558.
   Google Scholar
• Costache R, Popa MC, Tien Bui D, Diaconu DC, Ciubotaru N, Minea G, Pham QB. 2020. Spatial predicting of flood potential areas using novel hybridizations of fuzzy decision-making, bivariate statistics, and machine learning. J Hydrol. 585:124808. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Tien Bui D. 2019. Spatial prediction of flood potential using new ensembles of bivariate statistics and artificial intelligence: a case study at the Putna river catchment of Romania. Sci Total Environ. 691:1098–1118. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabija A, Kluczek M, Zagajewski B, Raczko E, Kycko M, Al-Sulttani AH, Tardà A, Pineda L, Corbera J. 2021. Comparison of support vector machines and random forests for Corine land cover mapping. Remote Sens. 13(4):777. doi: 10.3390/rs13040777.
   Google Scholar
• Davis J, Goadrich M. 2006. The relationship between precision-recall and ROC curves. In: Proc 23rd Int Conf Mach Learn – ICML 06 [Internet]. Pittsburgh (PA): ACM Press; p. 233–240. doi: 10.1145/1143844.1143874.
   Google Scholar
• Dhungana S, Shrestha S, Van TP, Kc S, Das Gupta A, Nguyen TPL. 2023. Evaluation of gridded precipitation products in the selected sub-basins of Lower Mekong River Basin. Theor Appl Climatol. 151(1–2):293–310. doi: 10.1007/s00704-022-04268-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre G, Montanari A, Lins H, Koutsoyiannis D, Brandimarte L, Blöschl G. 2010. Flood fatalities in Africa: from diagnosis to mitigation. Geophys Res Lett. 37(22): L22402. doi: 10.1029/2010GL045467.
   Google Scholar
• Dodangeh E, Choubin B, Eigdir AN, Nabipour N, Panahi M, Shamshirband S, Mosavi A. 2020. Integrated machine learning methods with resampling algorithms for flood susceptibility prediction. Sci Total Environ. 705:135983. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Fan Z, Pu J. 2020. Comparative study on flash flood hazard assessment for Nam Ou River Basin, Lao PDR. Nat Hazards. 102(3):1393–1417. doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-03972-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duwal S, Liu D, Pradhan PM. 2023. Flood susceptibility modeling of the Karnali river basin of Nepal using different machine learning approaches. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 14(1):2217321 doi: 10.1080/19475705.2023.2217321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkhrachy I, Pham QB, Costache R, Mohajane M, Rahman KU, Shahabi H, Linh NTT, Anh DT. 2021. Sentinel‐1 remote sensing data and Hydrologic Engineering Centres River Analysis System two‐dimensional integration for flash flood detection and modelling in New Cairo City. J Flood Risk Manage. 14(2):e12692. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Z, Wang Y, Peng L, Hong H. 2021. Predicting flood susceptibility using LSTM neural networks. J Hydrol. 594:125734–125734. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felix AY, Sasipraba T. 2019. Flood detection using gradient boost machine learning approach. In: 2019 Int Conf Comput Intell Knowl Econ ICCIKE [Internet]. Dubai: IEEE; p. 779–783. doi: 10.1109/ICCIKE47802.2019.9004419.
   Google Scholar
• FitzGerald G, Du W, Jamal A, Clark M, Hou X-Y. 2010. Flood fatalities in contemporary Australia (1997–2008). Emerg Med Australas. 22(2):180–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01284.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florinsky IV. 2017. An illustrated introduction to general geomorphometry. Prog Phys Geogr Earth Environ. 41(6):723–752. doi: 10.1177/0309133317733667.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T, Gholamnia K, Meena S, Tiede D, Aryal J. 2019. Evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide detection. Remote Sens. 11(2):196. doi: 10.3390/rs11020196.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Lao PDR, Asian Development Bank. 2022. Lao Peoples Democr Repub – Gov Asian Dev Bank [Internet]. [accessed 2023 Nov 17]. https://www.preventionweb.net/publication/national-strategy-disaster-risk-reduction-nsdrr-2021-2030-lao-pdr.
   Google Scholar
• Hamidi E, Peter BG, Munoz DF, Moftakhari H, Moradkhani H. 2023. Fast flood extent monitoring with SAR change detection using Google Earth Engine. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 61:1–19. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3240097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley JA. 1989. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 29(3):307–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansana P, Guo X, Zhang S, Kang X, Li S. 2023. Flood analysis using multi-scale remote sensing observations in Laos. Remote Sens. 15(12):3166. doi: 10.3390/rs15123166.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanuzzaman M, Islam A, Bera B, Shit PK. 2022. A comparison of performance measures of three machine learning algorithms for flood susceptibility mapping of river Silabati (tropical river, India). Phys Chem Earth Parts ABC. 127:103198. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2022.103198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ighile EH, Shirakawa H, Tanikawa H. 2022. Application of GIS and machine learning to predict flood areas in Nigeria. Sustainability. 14(9):5039. doi: 10.3390/su14095039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imamura Y. 2022. Development of a method for assessing country-based flood risk at the global scale. Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 13(1):87–99. doi: 10.1007/s13753-021-00388-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janizadeh S, Avand M, Jaafari A, Van Phong T, Bayat M, Ahmadisharaf E, Prakash I, Pham BT, Lee S. 2019. Prediction success of machine learning methods for flash flood susceptibility mapping in the Tafresh watershed, Iran. Sustain Switz. 11(19):5426. doi: 10.3390/su11195426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keophila V, Promwungkwa A, Ngamsanroaj K. 2019. Effectiveness of cascades reservoir for flood control operation and electricity production in Nam Ngum River. J Phys Conf Ser. 1175:012276. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012276.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil U, Khan NM. 2017. Floodplain mapping for Indus River: Chashma –Taunsa Reach.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Nohani E, Maroufinia E, Pourghasemi HR. 2016. A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique. Nat Hazards. 83(2):947–987. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Pham BT, Chapi K, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Revhaug I, Prakash I, Tien Bui D. 2018. A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran. Sci Total Environ. 627:744–755. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Shahabi H, Pham BT, Adamowski J, Shirzadi A, Pradhan B, Dou J, Ly HB, Gróf G, Ho HL, et al. 2019. A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods. J Hydrol. 573:311–323. (March): doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmany B, Ruangrassamee P, Visessri S. 2020. Optimal multi-reservoir operation for hydropower production in the Nam Ngum River Basin. Eng J. 24(5):1–13. doi: 10.4186/ej.2020.24.5.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulithalai SSP, Kundapura S. 2023. Spatial mapping of flood susceptibility using decision tree–based machine learning models for the Vembanad Lake System in Kerala, India. J Water Resour Plann Manage. 149(10):04023052. doi: 10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Acharya P. 2016. Flood hazard and risk assessment of 2014 floods in Kashmir Valley: a space-based multisensor approach. Nat Hazards. 84(1):437–464. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2428-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundzewicz ZW, Kanae S, Seneviratne SI, Handmer J, Nicholls N, Peduzzi P, Mechler R, Bouwer LM, Arnell N, Mach K, et al. 2014. Le risque d’inondation et les perspectives de changement climatique mondial et régional. Hydrol Sci J. 59(1):1–28. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2013.857411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Wu S, Dai E, Xu Z. 2012. Flood loss analysis and quantitative risk assessment in China. Nat Hazards. 63(2):737–760. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0180-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Wang J, Xiong J, Cheng W, Li Y, Cao Y, He Y, Duan Y, He W, Yang G. 2022. Assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using support vector machine, logistic regression and their ensemble techniques in the Belt and Road region. Geocarto Int. 37(25):9817–9846. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2025918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Xiong J, Chen Y, Sun H, Zhao X, Tu F, Gu Y. 2023. A new avenue to improve the performance of integrated modeling for flash flood susceptibility assessment: applying cluster algorithms. Ecol Indic. 146:109785. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Sahli H, Meng Y, Huang Q, Lin L. 2017. Flood inundation mapping from optical satellite images using spatiotemporal context learning and modest AdaBoost. Remote Sens. 9(6):617. doi: 10.3390/rs9060617.
   Google Scholar
• Ma M, Zhao G, He B, Li Q, Dong H, Wang S, Wang Z. 2021. XGBoost-based method for flash flood risk assessment. J Hydrol. 598:126382. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maharjan M, Timilsina S, Ayer S, Singh B, Manandhar B, Sedhain A. 2024. Flood susceptibility assessment using machine learning approach in the Mohana-Khutiya River of Nepal. Nat Hazards Res. 4(1):32-45. doi: 10.1016/j.nhres.2024.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Martinis S, Plank S, Ćwik K. 2018. The use of Sentinel-1 time-series data to improve flood monitoring in arid areas. Remote Sens. 10(4):583. doi: 10.3390/rs10040583.
   Google Scholar
• Meema T, Tachikawa Y, Ichikawa Y, Yorozu K. 2021. Uncertainty assessment of water resources and long-term hydropower generation using a large ensemble of future climate projections for the Nam Ngum River in the Mekong Basin. J Hydrol Reg Stud. 36:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100856.
   Google Scholar
• Mehravar S, Razavi-Termeh SV, Moghimi A, Ranjgar B, Foroughnia F, Amani M. 2023. Flood susceptibility mapping using multi-temporal SAR imagery and novel integration of nature-inspired algorithms into support vector regression. J Hydrol. 617:129100. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles J. 2014. Tolerance and variance inflation factor. In: Wiley StatsRef Stat Ref Online [Internet]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781118445112.stat06593.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzaei S, Vafakhah M, Pradhan B, Alavi SJ. 2021. Flood susceptibility assessment using extreme gradient boosting (EGB), Iran. Earth Sci Inform. 14(1):51–67. doi: 10.1007/s12145-020-00530-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojaddadi H, Pradhan B, Nampak H, Ahmad N, Ghazali AHb 2017. Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 8(2):1080–1102. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2017.1294113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison A, Westbrook C j, Noble B f 2018. A review of the flood risk management governance and resilience literature. J Flood Risk Manage. 11(3):291–304. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachappa TG, Piralilou ST, Gholamnia K, Ghorbanzadeh O, Rahmati O, Blaschke T, Gudiyangada Nachappa T, Tavakkoli Piralilou S, Gholamnia K, Ghorbanzadeh O, et al. 2020. Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory. J Hydrol. 590:125275. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler T, Rott H, Hetzenecker M, Wuite J, Potin P. 2015. The Sentinel-1 mission: new opportunities for ice sheet observations. Remote Sens. 7(7):9371–9389. doi: 10.3390/rs70709371.
   Google Scholar
• Natarajan L, Usha T, Gowrappan M, Palpanabhan Kasthuri B, Moorthy P, Chokkalingam L. 2021. Flood susceptibility analysis in Chennai Corporation using frequency ratio model. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 49(7):1533–1543. doi: 10.1007/s12524-021-01331-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen HD. 2022. Flood susceptibility assessment using hybrid machine learning and remote sensing in Quang Tri province, Vietnam. Trans GIS. 26(7):2776–2801. doi: 10.1111/tgis.12980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir A, Altural T. 2013. A comparative study of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: sultan Mountains, SW Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci. 64:180–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phrakonkham S, Kazama S, Komori D, Sopha S. 2019. Distributed hydrological model for assessing flood hazards in Laos. J Water Resour Prot. 11(08):937–958. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2019.118056.
   Google Scholar
• Poudyal CP, Chang C, Oh H-J, Lee S. 2010. Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: a case study from the Nepal Himalaya. Environ Earth Sci. 61(5):1049–1064. doi: 10.1007/s12665-009-0426-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Kariminejad N, Amiri M, Edalat M, Zarafshar M, Blaschke T, Cerda A. 2020. Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique. Sci Rep. 10(1):3203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60191-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priscillia S, Schillaci C, Lipani A. 2021. Flood susceptibility assessment using artificial neural networks in Indonesia. Artif Intell Geosci. 2:215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.aiig.2022.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H. 2016. Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan Province, Iran. Geocarto Int. 31(1):42–70. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2015.1041559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh V, Iqbal SS. 2022. Urban flood susceptibility zonation mapping using evidential belief function, frequency ratio and fuzzy gamma operator models in GIS: a case study of Greater Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Geocarto Int. 37(2):581–606. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2020.1730448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport EN. 2014. Fatalities in the United States from Atlantic tropical cyclones: new data and interpretation. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 95(3):341–346. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00074.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi-Termeh SV, Sadeghi-Niaraki A, Choi S-M. 2023. A new approach based on biology-inspired metaheuristic algorithms in combination with random forest to enhance the flood susceptibility mapping. J Environ Manage. 345:118790. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi-Termeh SV, Seo M, Sadeghi-Niaraki A, Choi S-M. 2023. Flash flood detection and susceptibility mapping in the Monsoon period by integration of optical and radar satellite imagery using an improvement of a sequential ensemble algorithm. Weather Clim Extrem. 41:100595. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2023.100595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saber M, Boulmaiz T, Guermoui M, Abdrabo KI, Kantoush SA, Sumi T, Boutaghane H, Hori T, Binh DV, Nguyen BQ, et al. 2023. Enhancing flood risk assessment through integration of ensemble learning approaches and physical-based hydrological modeling. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 14(1):2203798. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2023.2203798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saber M, Boulmaiz T, Guermoui M, Abdrabo KI, Kantoush SA, Sumi T, Boutaghane H, Nohara D, Mabrouk E. 2022. Examining LightGBM and CatBoost models for wadi flash flood susceptibility prediction. Geocarto Int. 37(25):7462–7487. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2021.1974959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha TK, Pal S, Talukdar S, Debanshi S, Khatun R, Singha P, Mandal I. 2021. How far spatial resolution affects the ensemble machine learning based flood susceptibility prediction in data sparse region. J Environ Manage. 297:113344. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan S, Abijith D, Reddy NM, Kss P, Janardhanam N, Sathiyamurthi S, Sivakumar V. 2023. Flood susceptibility mapping using machine learning boosting algorithms techniques in Idukki district of Kerala India. Urban Clim. 49:101503. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoppa L,Vogel T,Zöller G,Kreibich H. 2020. Probabilistic flood loss models for companies. Water Resour Res. 56, e2020WR027649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepp H, Jürgen S. 1997. Long short-term meomry. Neural Comput. 9(8):1735–1780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Valavi R, Shahabi H, Chapi K, Shirzadi A. 2018. Novel forecasting approaches using combination of machine learning and statistical models for flood susceptibility mapping. J Environ Manage. 217:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Ghaderi K, Omidvar E, Al-Ansari N, Clague JJ, Geertsema M, Khosravi K, Amini A, Bahrami S, et al. 2020. Flood detection and susceptibility mapping using Sentinel-1 remote sensing data and a machine learning approach: hybrid intelligence of bagging ensemble based on K-Nearest Neighbor classifier. Remote Sens. 12(2):266. doi: 10.3390/rs12020266.
   Google Scholar
• Sharir K, Roslee R. 2022. Flood susceptibility assessment (FSA) using GIS-based frequency ratio (FR) model in Kota Belud, Sabah, Malaysia. Int J Des Nat Ecodynamics. 17(2):203–208. doi: 10.18280/ijdne.170206.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen R, Zinko U, Seibert J. 2006. On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 10(1):101–112. doi: 10.5194/hess-10-101-2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar S, Ghose B, Shahfahad, Salam R, Mahato S, Pham QB, Linh NTT, Costache R, Avand M. 2020. Flood susceptibility modeling in Teesta River basin, Bangladesh using novel ensembles of bagging algorithms. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 34(12):2277–2300. doi: 10.1007/s00477-020-01862-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang X, Li J, Liu M, Liu W, Hong H. 2020. Flood susceptibility assessment based on a novel random Naïve Bayes method: a comparison between different factor discretization methods. Catena. 190:104536. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Jones S, Shabani F. 2019. Identifying the essential flood conditioning factors for flood prone area mapping using machine learning techniques. Catena. 175:174–192. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Kumar L, Shabani F. 2019. A novel GIS-based ensemble technique for flood susceptibility mapping using evidential belief function and support vector machine: brisbane, Australia. PeerJ. 7(10):e7653. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7653.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN. 2014. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J Hydrol. 512:332–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN. 2015. Flood susceptibility analysis and its verification using a novel ensemble support vector machine and frequency ratio method. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 29(4):1149–1165. doi: 10.1007/s00477-015-1021-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Mansor S, Ahmad N. 2015. Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. Catena. 125:91–101. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Khosravi K, Li S, Shahabi H, Panahi M, Singh V, Chapi K, Shirzadi A, Panahi S, Chen W, et al. 2018. New hybrids of ANFIS with several optimization algorithms for flood susceptibility modeling. Water. 10(9):1210. doi: 10.3390/w10091210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towfiqul Islam ARM, Talukdar S, Mahato S, Kundu S, Eibek KU, Pham QB, Kuriqi A, Linh NTT. 2021. Flood susceptibility modelling using advanced ensemble machine learning models. Geosci Front. 12(3):101075. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathy P. 2019. Neural network for satellite data classification using tensorfow in python. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Twele A, Cao W, Plank S, Martinis S. 2016. Sentinel-1-based flood mapping: a fully automated processing chain. Int J Remote Sens. 37(13):2990–3004. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2016.1192304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN, World Bank, GFDRR, EU. 2018. UN, World Bank, GFDRR & EU. UNDP [Internet]. [accessed 2023 Nov 29]. https://www.undp.org/laopdr/publications/post-disaster-needs-assessment-2018-floods-lao-pdr.
   Google Scholar
• UNDRR. 2019. Disaster risk reduction in Lao PDR: status report 2019 [Internet]. Bangkok: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. https://reliefweb.int/attachments/11ee7862-c016-37c0-81e0-06504dad05f5/68230_3laopdrdrmstatusreport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vilandone Keophila 2018. Multi-objective optimization for flood control operation and electricity production of Nam Ngum 1 and 2 hydropower plants. J Thai Interdiscip Res. 13:58. doi: 10.14456/JTIR.2018.52.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Fang Z, Hong H, Peng L. 2020. Flood susceptibility mapping using convolutional neural network frameworks. J Hydrol. 582:124482. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Hong H, Chen W, Li S, Panahi M, Khosravi K, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Panahi S, Costache R. 2019. Flood susceptibility mapping in Dingnan County (China) using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with biogeography based optimization and imperialistic competitive algorithm. J Environ Manage. 247:712–729. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei X, Cai S, Ni P, Zhan W. 2020. Impacts of climate change and human activities on the water discharge and sediment load of the Pearl River, southern China. Sci Rep. 10(1):16743. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73939-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wubalem A, Tesfaw G, Dawit Z, Getahun B, Mekuria T, Jothimani M. 2021. Comparison of statistical and analytical hierarchy process methods on flood susceptibility mapping: in a case study of the Lake Tana sub-basin in northwestern Ethiopia. Open Geosci. 13(1):1668–1688. doi: 10.1515/geo-2020-0329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yariyan P, Avand M, Abbaspour RA, Torabi Haghighi A, Costache R, Ghorbanzadeh O, Janizadeh S, Blaschke T. 2020. Flood susceptibility mapping using an improved analytic network process with statistical models. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 11(1):2282–2314. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2020.1836036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Sefry SA. 2016. Flash flood susceptibility assessment in Jeddah city (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) using bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Environ Earth Sci. 75(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4830-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeleňáková M, Fijko R, Labant S, Weiss E, Markovič G, Weiss R. 2019. Flood risk modelling of the Slatvinec stream in Kružlov village, Slovakia. J Clean Prod. 212:109–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Feng Y, Hu L, Tapete D, Pan L, Liang Z, Cigna F, Yue P. 2022. A domain adaptation neural network for change detection with heterogeneous optical and SAR remote sensing images. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinformation. 109:102769. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar