287
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Numerical investigation on failure mechanism of tunnel lining with different fault dip angles and Geological Strength Index under geohazard of fault movement and seismic action

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2363425 | Received 15 Feb 2024, Accepted 29 May 2024, Published online: 22 Jun 2024

References

  • Ansari A, Rao KS, Jain AK, Ansari A. 2023a. Formulation of multi-hazard damage prediction (MhDP) model for tunnelling projects in earthquake and landslide-prone regions: a novel approach with artificial neural networking (ANN). J Earth Syst Sci. 132(4) doi: 10.1007/s12040-023-02178-y.
  • Ansari A, Rao KS, Jain AK, Ansari A. 2023b. Deep learning model for predicting tunnel damages and track serviceability under seismic environment. Model Earth Syst Environ. 9(1):1349–1368. doi: 10.1007/s40808-022-01556-7.
  • Ansari A, Seshagiri Rao K, Jain AK. 2023. Seismic response and fragility evaluation of circular tunnels in the Himalayan region: implications for post-seismic performance of transportation infrastructure projects in Jammu and Kashmir. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol. 137(January):105118. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105118.
  • Ansari A, Seshagiri Rao K, Jain AK. 2024. Seismic microzonation of the himalayan region considering site characterization: application toward seismic risk assessment for sustainable tunneling projects. Nat Hazards Rev. 25(1). doi: 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1815.
  • Ansari A, Seshagiri RK, Jain AK. 2023. Application of microzonation towards system-wide seismic risk assessment of railway network. Transp Infrastruct Geotech. 11(3):1119–1142. doi: 10.1007/s40515-023-00317-y.
  • Bao L, Wei F. 2023. Study on the response of tunnel lining under fault dislocation. Sustain. 15(6):5150. doi: 10.3390/su15065150.
  • Bilham R, Ambraseys N. 2005. Apparent Himalayan slip deficit from the summation of seismic moments for Himalayan earthquakes, 1500–2000. Curr Sci. 88(10):1658–1663.
  • Chen RP, Tang LJ, Ling DS, Chen YM. 2011. Face stability analysis of shallow shield tunnels in dry sandy ground using the discrete element method. Comput Geotech. 38(2):187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.11.003.
  • Chen S, Zhuang H, Quan D, Yuan J, Zhao K, Ruan B. 2019. Shaking table test on the seismic response of large-scale subway station in a loess site: a case study. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 123:173–184. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.023.
  • Chen X, Xiong Z, Zhuge Y, Chen Z. 2022. Shaking-table tests on seismic behavior of subway station intersecting the ground fissure. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 158:107272. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107272.
  • Do NA, Dias D, Oreste P, Djeran-Maigre I. 2015. 2D numerical investigation of segmental tunnel lining under seismic loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 72:66–76. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.01.015.
  • Gomes RC, Gouveia F, Torcato D, Santos J. 2015. Seismic response of shallow circular tunnels in two-layered ground. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 75:37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.03.012.
  • Hassani R, Basirat R. 2016. Application of hyperstatic reaction method for designing of tunnel permanent lining, Part I: 2D numerical modelling. Civ Eng J. 2(6):244–253. doi: 10.28991/cej-2016-00000030.
  • Hoek E, Brown ET. 2019. The Hoek–Brown failure criterion and GSI—2018 edition. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng [Internet]. 11(3):445–463. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.001.
  • IS-1893-Part-1-(2016). 2016. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1: general provisions and buildings. Bur Indian Stand New Delhi. 1893(December):1–44.
  • Lakirouhani A, Saberi M. 2022. Evaluation of analytical solutions and two ‑ dimensional models in estimating the internal forces of tunnel lining against seismic loading, compared with three ‑ dimensional analysis. Arab J Geosci. 15(12). doi: 10.1007/s12517-022-10385-y.
  • Lavasan AA, Zhao C, Barciaga T, Schaufler A, Steeb H, Schanz T. 2018. Numerical investigation of tunneling in saturated soil: the role of construction and operation periods. Acta Geotech. 13(3):671–691. doi: 10.1007/s11440-017-0595-4.
  • Li L, Guo X, Zou Z, Zhu Z, Guo Z, Xiao W, Guo D. 2021. Study on dynamic response characteristics and damage mechanism of tunnel lining at entrance of shallow bias tunnel. Shock Vib. 2021:1–15. doi: 10.1155/2021/8930560.
  • Li W, Chen Q. 2018. Seismic performance and failure mechanism of a subway station based on nonlinear finite element analysis. KSCE J Civ Eng. 22(2):765–776. doi: 10.1007/s12205-017-1840-y.
  • Liu G, Zhang Y, Ren J, Xiao M. 2021. Seismic response analysis of tunnel through fault considering dynamic interaction between rock mass and fault. Energies. 14(20):6700. doi: 10.3390/en14206700.
  • Nantes ECD. 1994. Shallow tunnels in cohesionless depth and type of soil or to make sure of the repeatability of tests. On the other hand, there are various experimental techniques by which this problem can be approached using small-scale models (Cort6 1989). For under. 120(7):1148–1165.
  • National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation. 2023. National highways & infrastructure development corporation. https://nhidcl.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/All-Projects.pdf.
  • PEER. No Title. 2000. Pacific Earthq Eng Res Cent (PEER) PEER strong motion database Berkeley Univ California; [Internet]. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
  • Qarmout M, König D, Wichtmann T. 2022. A review of seven tunnel face stability models. CivilEng. 3(1):116–134. doi: 10.3390/civileng3010008.
  • Renani HR, Cai M. 2022. Forty-Year Review of the Hoek–Brown Failure Criterion for Jointed Rock Masses. (December 2021). doi: 10.1007/s00603-021-02661-2.
  • Shi L, He J, Huang Z, Sun H, Yuan Z. 2022. Numerical investigations on influences of tunnel differential settlement on saturated poroelastic ground vibrations and lining forces induced by metro train. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 156:107202. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107202.
  • Singh T, Jain A, Rao KS. 2017. Physico-mechanical Behaviour of metamorphic rocks in Rohtang Tunnel, Himachal Pradesh, India. Procedia Eng. 191:419–425. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.199.
  • Sun Q, Dias D. 2019. Seismic behavior of circular tunnels: influence of the initial stress state. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 126:105808. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105808.
  • Terzaghi. 2018. Stress distribution in dry and in saturated sand above a yielding trap-door. Int Soc Soil Mech Geotech Eng. 536–537.
  • UBC. 1994. UBC 1994, International conference of Building officials, Whittier, California.
  • Wen YM, Xin CL, Shen YS, Huang ZM, Gao B. 2021. The seismic response mechanisms of segmental lining structures applied in fault-crossing mountain tunnel: the numerical investigation and experimental validation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 151:107001. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107001.
  • World Bank. 2023. India GDP. GDP Growth Annu [Internet]. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG.
  • Yu J, Wang ZZ. 2021. The dynamic interaction of the soil-tunnel-building system under seismic waves. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 144:106686. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106686.
  • Zhao K, Chen W, Yang D, Zhao W, Wang S, Song W. 2019. Mechanical tests and engineering applicability of fibre plastic concrete used in tunnel design in active fault zones. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol. 88:200–208. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.009.
  • Zhou Y, Wang H, Song D, Sheng Q, Fu X, Ding H, Chai S, Yuan W. 2022. Dynamic response of lining structure in a long tunnel with different adverse geological structure zone subjected to non-uniform seismic load. doi: 10.3390/en15134599.
  • Zhu D, Zhu Z, Zhang C, Xie X. 2021. Shaking table test on the tunnel dynamic response under different fault dip angles. Symmetry (Basel). 13(8):1375. doi: 10.3390/sym13081375.