Robustness of machine learning algorithms to generate flood susceptibility maps for watersheds in Jordan

References

• Ababsa M, editor. 2013. Atlas of Jordan. In: Beyrouth: Presses de l’Ifpo. doi: 10.4000/books.ifpo.4560. Digital ISBN: 978-2-35159-438-4.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelal Q, Al-Rawabdeh A, Al Qudah K, Hamarneh C, Abu-Jaber N. 2021. Hydrological assessment and management implications for the ancient Nabataean flood control system in Petra, Jordan. J Hydrol. 601:126583. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu El-Magd SA, Maged A, Farhat HI. 2022. Hybrid-based Bayesian algorithm and hydrologic indices for flash flood vulnerability assessment in coastal regions: machine learning, risk prediction, and environmental impact. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 29(38):57345–57356. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19903-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu Islaih A, Yaghan R, Al Kuisi M, Al-Bilbisi H. 2020. Impact of climate change on flash floods using hydrological modelling and GIS: case study Zarqa Ma’in area. Int J Appl Nat Sci (IJANS). 9:29–52.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Juaidi AEM, Nassar AM, Al-Juaidi OEM. 2018. Evaluation of flood susceptibility mapping using logistic regression and GIS conditioning factors. Arab J Geosci. 11(24):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s12517-018-4095-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Taani A, Al-Husban Y, Ayan A. 2023. Assessment of potential flash flood hazards. Concerning land use/land cover in Aqaba Governorate, Jordan, using a multi-criteria technique. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci. 26(1):17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrs.2022.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askar S, Zeraat Peyma S, Yousef MM, Prodanova NA, Muda I, Elsahabi M, Hatamiafkoueieh J. 2022. Flood susceptibility mapping using remote sensing and integration of decision table classifier and metaheuristic algorithms. Water (Switzerland). 14(19):3062. doi: 10.3390/w14193062.
   Google Scholar
• Avand M, Moradi H, Lasboyee MR. 2021. Spatial modeling of flood probability using geo-environmental variables and machine learning models, case study: Tajan watershed, Iran. Adv Space Res. 67(10):3169–3186. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2021.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattarai Y, Duwal S, Sharma S, Talchabhadel R. 2024. Leveraging machine learning and open-source spatial datasets to enhance flood susceptibility mapping in transboundary river basin. Int J Digit Earth. 17(1):1–24. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2024.2313857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop CM. 1995. Neural networks for pattern recognition CLARENDON PRESS • OXFORD 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Khosravi K, Shahabi H, Daggupati P, Adamowski JF, Melesse M, Pham A, Pourghasemi BT, Mahmoudi HR, Bahrami M, et al. 2019. Flood spatial modeling in Northern Iran using remote sensing and GIS: a comparison between evidential belief functions and its ensemble with a multivariate logistic regression model. Remote Sens (Basel). 11(13):1589. doi: 10.3390/rs11131589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapi K, Singh VP, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Bui DT, Pham BT, Khosravi K. 2017. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment. Environ Modell Software. 95:229–245. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Huang G, Chen W. 2021. Towards better flood risk management: assessing flood risk and investigating the potential mechanism based on machine learning models. J Environ Manage. 293:112810. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J. 2023. Dynamic and loss analysis of flood inundation in the floodplain area of the lower Yellow River considering ecological impact. J Eng Appl Sci. 70(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s44147-023-00197-6.
   Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Vapnik V. 1995. Support-vector networks editor. Mach Learn. 20(3):273–297. doi: 10.1007/BF00994018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costabile P, Costanzo C, Ferraro D, Barca P. 2021. Is HEC-RAS 2D accurate enough for storm-event hazard assessment? Lessons learnt from a benchmarking study based on rain-on-grid modelling. J Hydrol (Amst). 603:126962. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darabi H, Choubin B, Rahmati O, Torabi Haghighi A, Pradhan B, Kløve B. 2019. Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: a comparative study of machine learning techniques. J Hydrol (Amst). 569:142–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deroliya P, Ghosh M, Mohanty MP, Ghosh S, Rao KHVD, Karmakar S. 2022. A novel flood risk mapping approach with machine learning considering geomorphic and socio-economic vulnerability dimensions. Sci Total Environ. 851(Pt 1):158002. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duwal S, Liu D, Pradhan PM. 2023. Flood susceptibility modeling of the Karnali river basin of Nepal using different machine learning approaches. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 14(1):1–25. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2023.2217321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edamo ML, Ukumo TY, Lohani TK, Ayana MT, Ayele MA, Mada ZM, Abdi DM. 2022. A comparative assessment of multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods for flood susceptibility mapping and socio-economic impacts on flood risk in Abela-Abaya floodplain of Ethiopia. Environ Challenges. 9:100629. doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2022.100629.
   Google Scholar
• Fang L, Huang J, Cai J, Nitivattananon V. 2022. Hybrid approach for flood susceptibility assessment in a flood-prone mountainous catchment in China. J Hydrol (Amst). 612:128091. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhadi H, Najafzadeh M. 2021. Flood risk mapping by remote sensing data and random forest technique. Water (Switzerland). 13(21):3115. doi: 10.3390/w13213115.
   Google Scholar
• Farhan Y, Ayed A. 2017. Assessment of flash-flood hazard in arid watersheds of Jordan. JGIS. 09(06):717–751. doi: 10.4236/jgis.2017.96045.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraro D, Costabile P, Costanzo C, Petaccia G, Macchione F. 2020. A spectral analysis approach for the a priori generation of computational grids in the 2-D hydrodynamic-based runoff simulations at a basin scale. J Hydrol (Amst). 582:124508. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudiyangada Nachappa T., Tavakkoli Piralilou, S., Gholamnia, K., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Rahmati, O., Blaschke, T., 2020. Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multicriteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory. J Hydrol (Amst). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125275.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanuzzaman M, Islam A, Bera B, Shit PK. 2022. A comparison of performance measures of three machine learning algorithms for flood susceptibility mapping of river Silabati (tropical river, India). Phys Chem Earth. 127:103198. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2022.103198.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Pham BT, Chapi K, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Revhaug I, Prakash I, Tien Bui D. 2018. A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran. Sci Total Environ. 627:744–755. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kia MB, Pirasteh S, Pradhan B, Mahmud AR, Sulaiman WNA, Moradi A. 2012. An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci. 67(1):251–264. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1504-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Hong H. 2023. Modelling flood susceptibility based on deep learning coupling with ensemble learning models. J Environ Manage. 325(Pt A):116450. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116450.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li Z, Liu H, Luo C, Fu G. 2021. Assessing surface water flood risks in urban areas using machine learning. Water (Switzerland). 13(24):3520. doi: 10.3390/w13243520.
   Google Scholar
• Liao M, Wen H, Yang L, Wang G, Xiang X, Liang X. 2024. Improving the model robustness of flood hazard mapping based on 2 hyperparameter optimization of random forest.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Wang J, Xiong J, Cheng W, Li Y, Cao Y, He Y, Duan Y, He W, Yang G. 2022. Assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using support vector machine, logistic regression and their ensemble techniques in the belt and road region. Geocarto Int. 37(25):9817–9846. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2025918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdizadeh Gharakhanlou N, Perez L. 2023. Flood susceptible prediction through the use of geospatial variables and machine learning methods. J Hydrol (Amst). 617:129121. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield ER, Helms BP. 1982. Detecting multicollinearity. Am Stat. 36(3a):158–160. doi: 10.1080/00031305.1982.10482818.
   Google Scholar
• Marco Z, Elena A, Anna S, Silvia T, Andrea C. 2022. Spatio-temporal cross-validation to predict pluvial flood events in the metropolitan city of Venice. J Hydrol (Amst). 612:128150. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehravar S, Razavi-Termeh SV, Moghimi A, Ranjgar B, Foroughnia F, Amani M. 2023. Flood susceptibility mapping using multi-temporal SAR imagery and novel integration of nature-inspired algorithms into support vector regression. J Hydrol (Amst). 617:129100. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meliho M, Khattabi A, Driss Z, Orlando CA. 2022. Spatial prediction of flood-susceptible zones in the Ourika watershed of Morocco using machine learning algorithms. ACI. vol (ahed-of-print):1–13. doi: 10.1108/ACI-09-2021-0264.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi SM, Ataie-Ashtiani B, Hosseini SM. 2022. Comparison of statistical and MCDM approaches for flood susceptibility mapping in northern Iran. J Hydrol (Amst). 612:128072. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhury N, Apan AA, Marasani TN, Ayele GT. 2022. Modelling floodplain vegetation response to groundwater variability using the ArcSWAT hydrological model, MODIS NDVI data, and machine learning. Land (Basel). 11(12):2154. doi: 10.3390/land11122154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen HD. 2022. GIS-based hybrid machine learning for flood susceptibility prediction in the Nhat Le–Kien Giang watershed, Vietnam. Earth Sci Inform. 15(4):2369–2386. doi: 10.1007/s12145-022-00825-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Jaafari A, Phong TV, Yen HPH, Tuyen TT, Luong V, Van Nguyen HD, Le H, Foong LK. 2021a. Improved flood susceptibility mapping using a best first decision tree integrated with ensemble learning techniques. Geosci Front. 12(3):101105. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Luu C, Phong TV, Nguyen HD, Le HV, Tran TQ, Ta HT, Prakash I. 2021b. Flood risk assessment using hybrid artificial intelligence models integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam. J Hydrol (Amst). 592:125815. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plataridis K, Mallios Z. 2023. Flood susceptibility mapping using hybrid models optimized with Artificial Bee Colony. J Hydrol (Amst). 624:129961. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan A. 2012. Support vector machine-a survey. Int J Emerg Tech Adv Eng. 2:82–85.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Lee S, Dikshit A, Kim H. 2023. Spatial flood susceptibility mapping using an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) model. Geosci Front. 14(6):101625. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi-Termeh SV, Sadeghi-Niaraki A, Seo MB, Choi SM. 2023. Application of genetic algorithm in optimization parallel ensemble-based machine learning algorithms to flood susceptibility mapping using radar satellite imagery. Sci Total Environ. 873:162285. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saber M, Boulmaiz T, Guermoui M, Abdrabo KI, Kantoush SA, Sumi T, Boutaghane H, Hori T, Binh DV, Nguyen BQ, et al. 2023. Enhancing flood risk assessment through integration of ensemble learning approaches and physical-based hydrological modeling. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 14(1):1–38. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2023.2203798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdeva S, Kumar B. 2022. Flood susceptibility mapping using extremely randomized trees for Assam 2020 floods. Ecol Inform. 67:101498. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikh NI, Mondal P. 2023. GIS-based machine learning algorithm for flood susceptibility analysis in the Pagla river basin, Eastern India. Natural Hazards Res. 3(3):420–436. doi: 10.1016/j.nhres.2023.05.004.
   Google Scholar
• Seleem O, Ayzel G, de Souza ACT, Bronstert A, Heistermann M. 2022. Towards urban flood susceptibility mapping using data-driven models in Berlin, Germany. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 13(1):1640–1662. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2022.2097131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seleem O, Heistermann M, Bronstert A. 2021. Efficient hazard assessment for pluvial floods in urban environments: a benchmarking case study for the city of Berlin, Germany. Water (Switzerland). 13(18):2476. doi: 10.3390/w13182476.
   Google Scholar
• Taromideh F, Fazloula R, Choubin B, Emadi A, Berndtsson R. 2022. Urban flood-risk assessment: integration of decision-making and machine learning. Sustainability (Switzerland). 14(8):4483. doi: 10.3390/su14084483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN. 2014. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J Hydrol (Amst). 512:332–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towfiqul Islam ARM, Talukdar S, Mahato S, Kundu S, Eibek KU, Pham QB, Kuriqi A, Linh NTT. 2021. Flood susceptibility modelling using advanced ensemble machine learning models. Geosci Front. 12(3):101075. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Lai C, Chen X, Yang B, Zhao S, Bai X. 2015. Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest. J Hydrol (Amst). 527:1130–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef AM, Pourghasemi HR, El-Haddad BA. 2022. Advanced machine learning algorithms for flood susceptibility modeling—performance comparison: red Sea, Egypt. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 29(44):66768–66792. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20213-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Sefry SA. 2016. Flash flood susceptibility assessment in Jeddah city (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) using bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Environ Earth Sci. 75(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4830-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar