A semi-quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment framework for European coastal urban areas

References

• Alfieri L, Salamon P, Bianchi A, Neal J, Bates P, Feyen L. 2014. Advances in pan‐European flood hazard mapping. Hydrol Process. 28(13):4067–4077. doi: 10.1002/hyp.9947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B. 2017. Semi-quantitative landslide risk assessment using GIS-based exposure analysis in Kuala Lumpur City. Geomatics, Nat Hazards Risk. 8(2):706–732. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2016.1255670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARPA Piemonte. 2023. Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione Ambientale del Piemonte – Fenomeni meteo – Pioggia. https://www.arpa.piemonte.it/rischinaturali/approfondimenti/pericoli-meteo/fenomeni_meteo/pioggia.html.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard C. 2022. UTCI – User Guide. https://confluence.ecmwf.int/display/CEMS/UTCI+-+User+Guide.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolini G, Magno R, Vallorani R, Petralli M, Massetti L. 2012. Clima che cambia – uno sguardo sulla Toscana. Sesto Fiorentino: Consorzio LaMMA.
   Google Scholar
• Bashfield A, Keim A. 2011. Continent-wide DEM creation for the European Union. In 34th Int Symp Remote Sens Environ. Sydney: International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
   Google Scholar
• Bates PD. 2022. Flood inundation prediction. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 54(1):287–315. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-030121-113138.
   Google Scholar
• Błażejczyk K, Broede P, Fiala D, Havenith G, Holmér I, Jendritzky G, Kampmann B, Kunert A. 2010. Principles of the new universal thermal climate index (UTCI) and its application to bioclimatic research in European scale. Misc Geogr. 14(1):91–102. doi: 10.2478/mgrsd-2010-0009.
   Google Scholar
• Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft. 2021. Methodological Notes of the WorldRiskIndex: edition 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Büttner G, Kosztra B, Maucha G, Pataki R, Kleeschulte S, Hazeu G, Vittek M, Schröder C, Littkop A. 2021. CORINE Land Cover User Manual.
   Google Scholar
• Carpignano A, Golia E, Di Mauro C, Bouchon S, Nordvik J. 2009. A methodological approach for the definition of multi‐risk maps at regional level: first application. J Risk Res. 12(3-4):513–534. doi: 10.1080/13669870903050269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K, McAneney J, Blong R, Leigh R, Hunter L, Magill C. 2004. Defining area at risk and its effect in catastrophe loss estimation: a dasymetric mapping approach. Appl Geogr. 24(2):97–117. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2004.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley H, Despotaki V, Rodrigues D, Silva V, Toma-Danila D, Riga E, Karatzetzou A, Fotopoulou S, Zugic Z, Sousa L, et al. 2020. Exposure model for European seismic risk assessment. Earthq Spectra. 36(1_suppl):252–273. doi: 10.1177/8755293020919429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dottori F, Alfieri L, Bianchi A, Lorini V, Feyen L, Salamon P. 2016. River flood hazard maps for Europe – version 1. http://data.europa.eu/89h/8e49997c-ba99-4ed1-9aec-059bb440001b.
   Google Scholar
• Dottori F, Alfieri L, Bianchi A, Skoien J, Salamon P. 2021. River Flood Hazard Maps for Europe and the Mediterranean Basin Region. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC). doi: 10.2905/1D128B6C-A4EE-4858-9E34-6210707F3C81.
   Google Scholar
• Dottori F, Alfieri L, Bianchi A, Skoien J, Salamon P. 2022. A new dataset of river flood hazard maps for Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Earth Syst Sci Data. 14(4):1549–1569. doi: 10.5194/essd-14-1549-2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dottori F, Figueiredo R, Martina M, Molinari D, Scorzini AR. 2016. INSYDE: a synthetic, probabilistic flood damage model based on explicit cost analysis. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 16(12):2577–2591. doi: 10.5194/nhess-16-2577-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K. 2003. A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. J Hydrol. 277(1-2):24–49. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00084-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emberson R, Kirschbaum D, Stanley T. 2020. New global characterisation of landslide exposure. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 20(12):3413–3424. doi: 10.5194/nhess-20-3413-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 of 4 June 2021. Off J Eur Union. 442(09.12.2021):1–349. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2021/2139/oj.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2023. EU Taxonomy Navigator. https://ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance-taxonomy/home.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2008. NACE Rev. 2 – Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo R, Martina M. 2016. Using open building data in the development of exposure data sets for catastrophe risk modelling. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 16(2):417–429. doi: 10.5194/nhess-16-417-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo R, Romão X, Paupério E. 2020. Flood risk assessment of cultural heritage at large spatial scales: framework and application to mainland Portugal. J Cult Herit. 43:163–174. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2019.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser S, Douglas J, Simpson A, Fraser S, Kuijper M, Winsemius H, Burzel A, Hohmann A, Taillefer N, Jacon F, et al. 2017. ThinkHazard! Identify natural hazards in your project area and understand how to reduce their impact. Methodology report. Updated for ThinkHazard! Version 2. http://thinkhazard.org/static/documents/thinkhazard-methodology-report_v2_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Galasso C, Pregnolato M, Parisi F. 2021. A model taxonomy for flood fragility and vulnerability assessment of buildings. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 53:101985. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gründemann G, Zorzetto E, Beck H, Schleiss M, Giesen NVd, Marani M, Ent R v d 2021. GPEX: global Precipitation EXtremes. doi: 10.4121/12764429.v4.
   Google Scholar
• Gründemann GJ, Zorzetto E, Beck HE, Schleiss M, van de Giesen N, Marani M, van der Ent RJ. 2023. Extreme precipitation return levels for multiple durations on a global scale. J Hydrol. 621(July 2022):129558. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129558.
   Google Scholar
• Güneş S, Efe B. 2022. Samsun İli için Sıcak Hava ve Soğuk Hava Dalgalarının Zamansal Analizleri. Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Derg. 8(2):359–367. doi: 10.21324/dacd.1064235.
   Google Scholar
• Hallegatte S, Green C, Nicholls RJ, Corfee-Morlot J. 2013. Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nature Clim Change. 3(9):802–806. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller V, van Diemen R, Matthews JBR. 2022. Annex II: glossary. [C. Méndez, S. Semenov, J.S. Fuglestvedt, A. Reisinger (eds.)]. In: clim Chang 2022 Impacts, Adapt Vulnerability Contrib Work Gr II to Sixth Assess Rep Intergov Panel Clim Chang. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; p. 2897–2930. doi: 10.1017/9781009325844.029.
   Google Scholar
• Jendritzky G, de Dear R, Havenith G. 2012. UTCI – Why another thermal index? Int J Biometeorol. 56(3):421–428. doi: 10.1007/s00484-011-0513-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappes MS, Keiler M, von Elverfeldt K, Glade T. 2012. Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review. Nat Hazards. 64(2):1925–1958. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0294-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappes MS, Papathoma-Köhle M, Keiler M. 2012. Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicator-based methodology. Appl Geogr. 32(2):577–590. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaynia AM, Papathoma-Köhle M, Neuhäuser B, Ratzinger K, Wenzel H, Medina-Cetina Z. 2008. Probabilistic assessment of vulnerability to landslide: application to the village of Lichtenstein, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Eng Geol. 101(1-2):33–48. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumer P, Meulenberg C, Kralj E. 2022. Challenges for planning climate change resilience through the co-creation living lab approach in the Mediterranean coastal town of Piran. J Geogr. 17(2):89–106. doi: 10.18690/rg.17.2.2737.
   Google Scholar
• Laino E, Iglesias G. 2023a. Extreme climate change hazards and impacts on European coastal cities: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 184(July):113587. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113587.
   Google Scholar
• Laino E, Iglesias G. 2023b. High-level characterisation and mapping of key climate-change hazards in European coastal cities. Nat Hazards. 120(4):3623–3659. doi: 10.1007/s11069-023-06349-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenôtre N, Thierry P, Batkowski D, Vermeersch F. 2004. EUROSION project – The Coastal Erosion Layer - WP 2.6.
   Google Scholar
• Marin-Ferrer M, Venaccini L, Polljansek K. 2017. INFORM – Index for Risk Management. Concept and Methodology 2017. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2760/094023.
   Google Scholar
• Marosz K. 2007. Studies on historical floods in Gdańsk (a methodological background). Geogr Pol. 80(2):111–116.
   Google Scholar
• McGranahan G, Balk D, Anderson B. 2007. The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environ Urban. 19(1):17–37. doi: 10.1177/0956247807076960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz B, Kreibich H, Schwarze R, Thieken A. 2010. Review article “Assessment of economic flood damage.”. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 10(8):1697–1724. doi: 10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messner F, Penning-Rowsell E, Green C, Meyer V, Tunstall S, Veen A v d 2007. Evaluating flood damages: guidance and recommendations on principles and methods. [place unknown]: FLOODsite Project Deliverable D9.1.
   Google Scholar
• Muis S, Verlaan M, Winsemius HC, Aerts JCJH, Ward PJ. 2016. A global reanalysis of storm surges and extreme sea levels. Nat Commun. 7:11969. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Napoli C, Pappenberger F, Cloke HL. 2019. Verification of heat stress thresholds for a health-based heat-wave definition. J Appl Meteorol Climatol. 58(6):1177–1194. doi: 10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0246.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolova M. 2021. Slovenia’s coastal gem becomes an open lab seeking solutions to climate change. Emerg Eur. https://emerging-europe.com/after-hours/slovenias-coastal-gem-becomes-an-open-lab-seeking-solutions-to-climate-change/.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2008. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. https://www.oecd.org/els/soc/handbookonconstructingcompositeindicatorsmethodologyanduserguide.htm.
   Google Scholar
• OSM. 2023. OpenStreetMap. https://www.openstreetmap.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Palla A, Colli M, Candela A, Aronica GT, Lanza LG. 2018. Pluvial flooding in urban areas: the role of surface drainage efficiency. J Flood Risk Management. 11(S2):S663–S676. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12246.
   Google Scholar
• Poljanšek K, Casajus Valles A, Marin Ferrer M, De Jager A, Dottori F, Galbusera L, Garcia Puerta B, Giannopoulos G, Girgin S, Hernandez Ceballos M, et al. 2019. Recommendations for national risk assessment for disaster risk management in EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2760/084707.
   Google Scholar
• Poljanšek K, Ferrer MM, De Groeve T, Clark I. 2017. Science for disaster risk management 2017: knowing better and losing less. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Pyatkova K, Chen AS, Butler D, Vojinović Z, Djordjević S. 2019. Assessing the knock-on effects of flooding on road transportation. J Environ Manage. 244(January):48–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reder A, Raffa M, Padulano R, Rianna G, Mercogliano P. 2022. Characterizing extreme values of precipitation at very high resolution: an experiment over twenty European cities. Weather Clim Extrem. 35:100407. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2022.100407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentschler J, Salhab M. 2020. People in Harm’s Way: Flood Exposure and Poverty in 189 Countries. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/34655.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson PJ. 2001. On the definition of a heat wave. J Appl Meteor. 40(4):762–775. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<0762:OTDOAH>2.0.CO;2.
   Google Scholar
• Schär C, Jendritzky G. 2004. Hot news from summer 2003. Nature. 432(7017):559–560. doi: 10.1038/432559a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahdani FJ, Santamaria-Ariza M, Sousa HS, Coelho M, Matos JC. 2022. Assessing flood indirect impacts on road transport networks applying mesoscopic traffic modelling: the case study of Santarém, Portugal. Appl Sci. 12(6):3076. doi: 10.3390/app12063076.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley T, Kirschbaum DB. 2017. A heuristic approach to global landslide susceptibility mapping. Nat Hazards. 87(1):145–164. doi: 10.1007/s11069-017-2757-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens FR, Gaughan AE, Linard C, Tatem AJ. 2015. Disaggregating census data for population mapping using Random forests with remotely-sensed and ancillary data. PLoS One. 10(2):e0107042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatem AJ. 2017. WorldPop, open data for spatial demography. Sci Data. 4(1):170004. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• United Nations. 2015. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. [place unknown]: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR). https://www.unisdr.org/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vahtar M. 2003. EUROSION Case Study – Slovenia Coast (Slovenia). http://www.eurosion.org/index.html%5Cnhttp://www.eurosion.org/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Vousdoukas MI, Bouziotas D, Giardino A, Bouwer LM, Mentaschi L, Voukouvalas E, Feyen L. 2018. Understanding epistemic uncertainty in large-scale coastal flood risk assessment for present and future climates. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 18(8):2127–2142. doi: 10.5194/nhess-18-2127-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vousdoukas MI, Voukouvalas E, Mentaschi L, Dottori F, Giardino A, Bouziotas D, Bianchi A, Salamon P, Feyen L. 2016. Developments in large-scale coastal flood hazard mapping. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 16(8):1841–1853. doi: 10.5194/nhess-16-1841-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward PJ, Winsemius HC, Kuzma S, Bierkens MFP, Bouwman A, Moel HD, Loaiza AD, Eilander D, Englhardt J, Erkens G, et al. 2020. Aqueduct Floods Methodology. Washington, D.C. www.wri.org/publication/aqueduct-floods-methodology.
   Google Scholar
• Wilde M., Günther A, Reichenbach P, Malet J-P, Hervás J. 2018. Pan-European landslide susceptibility mapping: ELSUS Version 2. J Maps. 14(2):97–104. doi: 10.1080/17445647.2018.1432511.
   Google Scholar
• Woloszyn E. 2003. The Catastrophic Flood in Gdansk on July 2001. In: Arsov R, Marsalek J, Watt E, Zeman E, editors. Urban Water Manag Sci Technol Serv Deliv. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 115–124. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0057-4_12.
   Google Scholar
• WorldPop. 2023. Top-down estimation modelling: Constrained vs Unconstrained. https://www.worldpop.org/methods/top_down_constrained_vs_unconstrained/.
   Google Scholar
• Ying X, Ni T, Lu M, Li Z, Lu Y, Bamisile O, Pelling M. 2023. Sub-catchment-based urban flood risk assessment with a multi-index fuzzy evaluation approach: a case study of Jinjiang district, China. Geomatics, Nat Hazards Risk. 14(1):173. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2023.2182173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Shi X, Xu H, Jing Q, Pan X, Liu T, Wang H, Hou H. 2020. A GIS-based spatial multi-index model for flood risk assessment in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 83(January):106397. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106397.
   Google Scholar