Enhancing prospective teachers’ views of doing mathematics: Documenting and reflecting on mathematical investigations

References

• Applebee, A. N. (1984). Contexts for learning to write. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing to learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29–58. doi:10.3102/00346543074001029
   Google Scholar
• Blachman, N. (n.d.). Palindromes. Retrieved from http://mathdelights.org/delights/activities/palindromes.html
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities. Schools Council Research Studies Series. London, England: Macmillan. 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, L. (1999). Why is intuition so important to mathematicians but missing from mathematics education? For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(3), 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, L. (2004). Mathematicians as enquirers: Learning about learning mathematics. In A. J. Bishop (Ed.), Mathematics education library (Vol. 34). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Byers, W. (2007). How mathematicians think: Using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, B., & Fulton, L. (2003). Science notebooks. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. P., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45–75. doi:10.1007/s10649-005-0808-x
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, P. (1989). Writing and the ecology of learning. In P. Connolly & T. Vilardi (Eds.), Writing to learn mathematics and science (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuoco, A. (2001). Mathematics for teaching. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 48(2), 168–174.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, P. J., Hersh, R., & Marchisotto, E. A. (2012). The mathematical experience, study edition. Boston, MA: Birkhauser.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, K. (1994). Mathematics: The science of patterns (Scientific American Library). New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson, E. (2013, November). Being good at math is not about natural ability. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/being-good-at-math-is-not-about-natural-ability-2013-11
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B., Wallace, C. W., & Yang, E. (2004). Using a science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh-grade science: Quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 131–149. doi:10.1080/0950069032000070252
   Google Scholar
• Henrion, C. (1997). Women in mathematics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hersh, R. (1997). What is mathematics, really? New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 393–425. doi:10.3102/00028312030002393
   Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W. (2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 676–690. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Google Scholar
• King, B. (1982). Using writing in the mathematics class: Theory and practice. In C. W. Griffin (Ed.), Teaching writing in all disciplines (pp. 15–26). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lockhart, P. (2009). A mathematician’s lament: How school cheats us out of our most fascinating and imaginative art form. New York, NY: Bellevue Literary Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, L. (2011, September). Using low threshold high ceiling tasks in ordinary classrooms. Retrieved from http://nrich.maths.org/7701
   Google Scholar
• Melzer, D. (2009). Writing assignments across the curriculum: A national study of college writing. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), 240–261.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (1998). Writing mathematically: The discourse of investigation. In P. Ernest (Eds..), Studies in mathematics education series (Vol. 9, Series ed.). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Nesbit, C. R., Hargrove, T. Y., Harrelson, L., & Maxey, B. (2004). Implementing science notebooks primary grades. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 40(4), 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. A., Thaiss, C., Katkin, W., & Thompson, R. J. (2012). Writing-to-learn in undergraduate science education: A community-based, conceptually driven approach. Life Sciences Education, 11, 17–25. doi:10.1187/cbe.11-08-0064
   Google Scholar
• Rivard, L. P. (1994). A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 969–983. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310910
   Google Scholar
• Romagnano, L. (2003). Mathematics for elementary teaching: An instructor’s guide. Denver, CO: Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Metropolitan State College of Denver.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Ayala, C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). Evaluating students’ science notebooks as an assessment tool. International Journal of Science Education, 26(12), 1477–1506. doi:10.1080/0950069042000177299
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of “well-taught” mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 145–166. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2302_5
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). Reflections on doing and teaching mathematics. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 53–68). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. (1993). Writing for conceptual development in mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12(3), 287–293.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50–80. doi:10.1080/1380361960020103
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2009). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stenmark, J. K., Thompson, V., & Cossey, R. (1986). Family math. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Lawrence Hall of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Tarr, J. E., Reys, R. E., Reys, B. J., Chavez, O., Shih, J., & Osterlind, S. (2008). The impact of middle-grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 247–280.
   Google Scholar