First-year secondary mathematics teachers’ metacognitive knowledge of communication activities

References

• Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. (2009). The influence of metacognitive training on preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2161–2184. doi:10.1080/09500690802563324
   Google Scholar
• Azer, S. A. (2009). Problem-based learning in the fifth, sixth, and seventh grades: Assessment of students’ perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1033–1042. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.023
   Google Scholar
• Balcikanli, C. (2011). Metacognitive awareness inventory for teachers (MAIT). Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(3), 1309–1332.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, C., & Beaver, S. (2011). The effect of peer-assessment on the attitudes of pre-service elementary and middle school teachers about writing and assessing mathematics. Accessed on November 11, 2015. IUMPST: The Journal, 5(December). Retrieved from www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu
   Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2010). Problem-based learning and argumentation: Testing a scaffolding framework to support middle school students’ creation of evidence-based arguments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 667–694. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9148-z
   Google Scholar
• Boss, M. J. (2008). Learning and assessing mathematics through reading and writing. School Science and Mathematics, 108(1), 8–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bräuning, K., & Steinbring, H. (2011). Communicative characteristics of teachers’ mathematical talk with children: From knowledge transfer to knowledge investigation. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(6–7), 927–939. doi:10.1007/s11858-011-0351-4
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, exective control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kliwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S. (2009). Connecting mathematics and writing workshop: It’s kinda like ice skating. The Reading Teacher, 62(7), 606–610. doi:10.1598/RT.62.7.7
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, B. (2010). In search of profound empathy in learning relationships: Understanding the mathematics of moral learning environments. Journal of Moral Education, 39(1), 79–99. doi:10.1080/03057240903528717
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Puublications.
   Google Scholar
• Demircioǧlu, H., Argün, Z., & Bulut, S. (2010). A case study: Assessment of preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ metacognitive behaviour in the problem-solving process. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(5), 493–502. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0263-8
   Google Scholar
• Desoete, A. (2007). Evaluating and improving the mathematics teaching-learning process through metacognition. Accessed on January 4, 2018. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(3), 705–730. Retrieved from http://www.investigacion-psicopedagogica.org/revista/articulos/13/english/Art_13_186.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, D. B. (2008). Communication theory offers insight into mathematics teachers’ talk. The Mathematics Educator, 18(2), 23.
   Google Scholar
• Freiman, V., Vézina, N., & Gandaho, I. (2005). New Brunswick pre-service teachers communicate with schoolchildren about mathematical problems: CAMI project. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37(3), 178–189. doi:10.1007/s11858-005-0007-3
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyte.
   Google Scholar
• Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K., & Sherin, M. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2), 81–116. doi:10.2307/30034933
   Google Scholar
• Jung, H. Y., & Reifel, S. (2011). Promoting children’s communication: A kindergarten teacher’s conception and practice of effective mathematics instruction. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25(2), 194–210. doi:10.1080/02568543.2011.555496
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, S. (2013). Helping teachers connect writing to doing mathematics. SRATE Journal, 23(1), 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B. (2008). Promoting teachers’ algebraic reasoning and self-regulation with metacognitive guidance. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 83–99. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9020-6
   Google Scholar
• Leou, M., Abder, P., Riordan, M., & Zoller, U. (2006). Using “HOCS-centered learning” as a pathway to promote science teachers’ metacognitive development. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 69–84. doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3916-9
   Google Scholar
• Linhart, J. M. (2014). Teaching writing and communication in a mathematical modeling course. Primus, 24(7), 594–607. doi:10.1080/10511970.2014.895459
   Google Scholar
• Liyanage, I., & Bartlett, B. J. (2010). From autopsy to biopsy: A metacognitive view of lesson planning and teacher trainees in ELT. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(7), 1362–1371. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Loizidou, A., & Koutselini, M. (2007). Metacognitive monitoring: An obstacle and a key to effective teaching and learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(5), 499–519. doi:10.1080/13540600701561711
   Google Scholar
• Memnum, D. S., & Hart, L. C. (2012). Elementary school mathematics teacher trainees’ metacognitive awareness levels: Turkey case. Journal of International Education Research, 8(2), 173–183.
   Google Scholar
• Memnun, D. S. (2014). A comparison of metacognitive awareness levels of future elementary teachers in Turkey and USA. Educational Research Review, 1(1), 277–287. doi:10.5897/ERR2012.1109
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Metallidou, P. (2009). Pre-service and in-service teachers’ metacognitive knowledge about problem-solving strategies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 76–82. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.002
   Google Scholar
• NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Nührenbörger, M., & Steinbring, H. (2009). Forms of mathematical interaction in different social settings: Examples from students’, teachers’ and teacher–Students’ communication about mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(2), 111–132. doi:10.1007/s10857-009-9100-9
   Google Scholar
• Pugalee, D. K. (2001). Writing, mathematics, and metacognition: Looking for connections through students’ work in mathematical problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 236–245. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18026.x
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and Learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1), 113–125. doi:10.1023/A:1003044231033
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1, 19, 460–475.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2012). Introduction: Developing mathematical discourse—Some insights from communicational research. International Journal of Educational Research, 51–52, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.12.013
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, M., Borasi, R., & Fonzi, J. (1998). Supporting Students’ Mathematical Inquiries Through. ournal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 378–413.
   Google Scholar
• Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9–21. doi:10.1002/sce.3730750103
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, B., & Monroe, E. E. (2011). Integrating writing and mathematics. The Reading Teacher, 64(7), 521–530.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. S., & Bai, H. (2010). The relationships and impact of teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and pedagogical understandings of metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5(3), 269–288. doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9062-4
   Google Scholar
• Wirkala, C., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Problem-based learning in K-12 education: Is it effective and how does it achieve its effects? American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 157–1186. doi:10.3102/0002831211419491
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D.-C. (2005). Number sense. Austrailian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 10(4), 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2011). QualitativeResearch from Start to Finish. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar