University students’ graph interpretation and comprehension abilities

References

• Beichner, R. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics, 29695(October 1993). Retrieved from http://link.aip.org/link/?AJPIAS/62/750/1
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., & Janvier, C. (1981). Interpretation of graphs representing situations. Learning, 2(1), 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bragdon. (2014). University students’ graph interpretation and comprehension abilities (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, P. A., & Shah, P. (1998). A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 75–100.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (2001). Models of data : A theory of how people evaluate data. Cognition, 19(3), 323–393.
   Google Scholar
• Curcio, F. (1987). Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(5), 382–393. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/749086
   Google Scholar
• Elby, A. (2001). Helping physics students learn how to learn. American Journal of Physics, 69, S54. doi:10.1119/1.1377283
   Google Scholar
• Friel, S., Curcio, F., & Bright, G. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics, 32(2). Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/749671
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory (Vol. 2). Mill Valley, CA: Sociology press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjidemetriou, C., & Williams, J. (2002). Children’s graphical conceptions. Research in Mathematics, 1–19. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14794800008520103
   Google Scholar
• Holdren, J. P., & Lander, E. S. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Report to the President (ED541511). Washington, D.C: Executive Office of the President.
   Google Scholar
• Hunting, R. P. (1997). Clinical interview methods in mathematics education research and practice. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(2), 145–165. doi:10.1016/S0732-3123(97)90023-7
   Google Scholar
• Janvier, C. (1984, October). Constructing the notion of variable using history and bottles. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME-NA), Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Kerslake, D. (1981). Graphs. In K. M. Hart (Ed.), Children’s understanding of mathematics concepts: 11-16 (pp. 120–136). London, UK: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Educational Research, 60(1), 1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald-Ross, M. (1977). Graphics in texts. Review of Research in Education, 5, 49–85.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved September, 2013 http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_MathStandards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Planinic, M., Milin-Sipus, Z., Katic, H., Susac, A., & Ivanjek, L. (2012). Comparison of student understanding of line graph slope in physics and mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6), 1393–1414. doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9344-1
   Google Scholar
• Shah, P., & Hoeffner, J. (2002). Review of graph comprehension research: Implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), Mathematics Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., & Ryan, J. (2000). National testing and the improvement of classroom teaching: Can they coexist? British Educational Research Journal, 26(1), 49–73. doi:10.1080/014119200109516
   Google Scholar