References
- Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Breyfogle, M. L., McDuffie, A. R., & Wohlhuter, K. A. (2010). Developing curricular reasoning for grade preK-12 mathematics instruction. In B. J. Reys, R. E. Reys, & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum: Issues, trends, and future directions (pp. 307–320). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Brown, M. W. (2002). Teaching by design: Understanding the intersection between teacher practice and the design of curricular innovations. Northwestern University.
- Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher-tools relationship. In J. T. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Chval, K., Chavez, O., Reys, B. J., & Tarr, J. (2009). Considerations and limitations related to conceptualizing and measuring textbook integrity. In J. T. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 70–84). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Cuoco, A., Benson, J., Kerins, B., Sword, S., & Waterman, K. (2010). Mathematics applied to curriculum development: Lessons learned on the job. In B. J. Reys, R. E. Reys, & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum: Issues, trends, and future directions (pp. 181–196). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in the era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597.
- Dingman, S. W. (2010). Curriculum alignment in an era of standards and high-stakes testing. In B. J. Reys, R. E. Reys, & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum: Issues, trends, and future directions (pp. 103–114). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Geertz, C. (1974). “From the native’s point of view”: On the nature of anthropological understanding. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 28(1), 26–45. doi:10.2307/3822971
- Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205. doi:10.3102/000283120
- Hochberg, E. D., & Desimone, L. M. (2010). Professional development in the accountability context: Building capacity to achieve standards. Educational Psychologist, 45(2), 89–106. doi:10.1080/00461521003703052
- Irwin, J. (2011). File: Oklahoma population map.png. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Oklahoma_population_map.png
- McClure, P. (2005). Where standards come from. Theory Into Practice, 44(1), 4–10. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4401_2
- McDuffie, A. R., & Mather, M. (2009). Middle school mathematics teachers’ use of curricular reasoning in a collaborative professional development project. In J. T. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 302–320). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Nadelson, L., Pluska, H., & Moorcroft, S. (2014). Educators’ perceptions and knowledge of the Common Core State Standards. Issues in Teacher Education, 22(2), 47–66.
- Oklahoma State Department of Education. (2016). Oklahoma academic standards for mathematics. Oklahoma City,Oklahoma. Retrieved from http://sde.Oklahoma.gov/sde/sites/Oklahoma.gov.sde/files/OklahomaAS-Math-FinalVersion_3.pdf
- Oklahoma State Department of Education. (2018). Oklahoma curriculum frameworks. Retrieved from http://sde.Oklahoma.gov/sde/Oklahoma-curriculum-frameworks
- Polikoff, M. S. (2015). How well aligned are textbooks to the Common Core standards in mathematics? American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1185–1211. doi:10.3102/0002831215584435
- Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. doi:10.3102/00346543075002211
- Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352–388. doi:10.2307/30034820
- Seidman, I. (2005). Interviewing as qualitative research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1175860
- Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
- Thompson, D., & Senk, S. L. (2010). Myths about curriculum implementation. In B. J. Reys, R. E. Reys, & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum: Issues, trends, and future directions (pp. 249–264). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- US Census Bureau. (2012). 2010 census summary file 1: 2010 census of population and housing. Washington, DC.
- Valverde, G., & Schmidt, W. (2000). Greater expectations: Learning from other nations in the quest for “world-class standards” in US school mathematics and science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(5), 651–687. doi:10.1080/00220270050116932