Diego’s Number Understanding Development through His Subitizing and Counting

References

• Baroody, A. J., & Purpura, D. J. (2017). Early number and operations: Whole numbers. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 308–354). NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Björklund, C., Ekdahl, A. L., & Runesson Kempe, U. (2020). Implementing a structural approach in preschool number activities. Principles of an intervention program reflected in learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1756027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. (2011). Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia. In S. Dehaene, & E. Brannon (Eds.), Space, time and number in the brain (pp. 249–265). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B., Varma, S., & Laurillard, D. (2011). Dyscalculia: From brain to education. Science, 332(6033), 1049–1053. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2008). Experimental evaluation of the effects of a research-based preschool mathematics curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 443–494.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & MacDonald, B. L. (2019). Subitizing: The neglected quantifier. In A. Norton & M. W. Alibali (Eds.), Constructing number (pp. 13–45). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Spitler, M. E., Lange, A. A., & Wolfe, C. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: A large-scale cluster randomized trial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 127–166. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.2.0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, N., Cannistraci, C. J., Rogers, B. P., Gatenby, J. C., Fuchs, L. S., Anderson, A. W., & Gore, J. C. (2009). Aberrant functional activation in school age children at-risk for mathematical disability: A functional imaging study of simple arithmetic skill. Neuropsychologia, 47(12), 2470–2479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.04.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye, D., Baroody, A. J., Burchinal, M., Carver, S. M., Jordan, N. C., & McDowell, J. (2013). Teaching math to young children: A practice guide. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bailey, D. H. (2013). Adolescents’ functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge. PLoS One, 8(1), e54651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, H., & Baroody, A. J. (2003). TEMA-3: Test of early mathematics ability (Pro ed.). Pro-ed Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. H., Welch-Ptak, J. J., & Silva, J. M. (2016). Initial understandings of fraction concepts evidenced by students with mathematics learning disabilities and difficulties: A framework. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(4), 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., & Ramineni, C. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, N. C., & Levine, S. C. (2009). Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young children. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. The American Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 498–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/1418556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroesbergen, E. H., Van Luit, J. E. H., Van Lieshout, E. C. D. M., Van Loosbroek, E., & Van de Rijt, B. A. M. (2009). Individual differences in early numeracy: The role of executive functions and subitizing. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282908330586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, M. D. (2017). Investigating task design, classroom culture and mathematics learning: An enactivist approach. ZDM, 49(6), 895–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0890-4
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, B. L. (2018). Relationships Between Units Coordination and Subitizing. In T. E. Hodges, G. J. Roy, A. M. Tyminski (Eds.). Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 155–162). Greenville, SC: University of South Carolina and Clemson.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, B. L., Hunt, J. H., & Thomas, J. N. (In Preparation). Gabby’s strategy variability when constructing units: A case study.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, B. L. & Wilkins, J. L. M.. (2016). Seven types of subitizing activity characterizing young children’s mental activity (pp. 256–286). In S. Marx (Ed.), Qualitative research in STEM. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, B. L. & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2019). Subitising Activity Relative to Units Construction: A Case Study. Research in Mathematics Education. 21(1), pp. 77–95.doi: 10.1080/14794802.2019.1579667
   Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National research council. (2001a). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (Vol. 2101). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National research council. (2001b). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, D.C.:National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., & Boyce, S. (2015). Provoking the construction of a structure for coordinating n+ 1 levels of units. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, P., & Fuchs, D. (2016). A meta-analysis of working memory deficits in children with learning difficulties: Is there a difference between verbal domain and numerical domain? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414521667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterize it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2/3), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273662
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W. (2009). The Brown legacy and the O’Connor challenge: Transforming schools in the images of children’s potential. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09334840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P., & Cobb, P. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelly, & R. A. Lesh (Eds.). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–306).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. (1979, March). The constructivist teaching experiment in mathematics education research. In research reporting session, annual meeting of NCTM, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Von Glasersfeld, E. (1981). An Attentional Model for the Conceptual Construction of Units and Number. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12(2), 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of learning and knowing. New York, NY: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, J. L. M., MacDonald, B. L., & Norton, A.. (Under Review). Construction of subitizing units is related to the construction of arithmetic units. Educational Studies, X(X), pp. XXX–XXX.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R. J., Ellemor-Collins, D., & Tabor, P. D. (2012). Developing number knowledge: Assessment, teaching and intervention with 7–11 year olds (Vol. 4). SAGE.
   Google Scholar