240
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Examining a Coaching Routine to Support Teacher Learning

&

References

  • Aguirre, J., Mayfield-Ingram, K., & Martin, D. (2013). The impact of identity in K-8 mathematics: Rethinking equity-based practices. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Anthony, G., Hunger, R., Hunter, J., & Duncan, S. (2015). How ambitious is ‘ambitious mathematics teaching. SET: Research Information for Teachers, 2, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0017
  • Baldinger, E. (2018). Learning Together: Investigating Possibilities for Mathematics Teachers' Equity-Focused Learning Through Coaching. ( Doctoral Dissertation). University of California,
  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 3–31). Jossey-Bass.
  • Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T. A., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1086/596996
  • Battey, D., & Franke, M. (2015). Integrating professional development on mathematics and equity: Countering deficit views of students of color. Education and Urban Society, 47(4), 433–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124513497788
  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
  • Chapin, S. H., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2013). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn, Grades K-6 (3rd ed.). Math Solutions.
  • Collinson, V. (2008). Leading by learning: New directions in the 21st century. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(4), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810881992
  • Dunscombe, R., & Armour, K. (2004). Collaborative professional learning: From theory to practice. Journal of In-Service Education, 30(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580400200287
  • Elkjaer, B. (2004). Organizational learning: The ‘third way.’ Management Learning, 35(4), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507604048271
  • Ellis, A., Özgür, Z., & Reiten, L. (2019). Teacher moves for supporting student reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31(2), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0246-6
  • Empson, S., & Levi, L. (2011). Extending children’s mathematics: Fractions & decimals. Heinemann.
  • Engeström, Y., & Middleton, D. (1996). Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge University Press.
  • Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620.
  • Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Turrou, A. (2018). Choral counting & counting collections: Transforming the PreK-5 math classroom. Stenhouse.
  • Ghousseini, H. (2017). Rehearsals of teaching and opportunities to learn mathematical knowledge for teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 35(3), 188–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1323903
  • Gibbons, L. K., Kazemi, E., Hintz, A., & Okun, A. (underreview). Teacher time outs: Mathematics teachers learning together to manage complex decision-making.
  • Gibbons, L. K., Kazemi, E., & Lewis, R. (2017b). Developing collective capacity to improve mathematics instruction: Coaching as a lever for school-wide improvement. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46, 231–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.12.002
  • Goldsmith, L. T., Doerr, H. M., & Lewis, C. C. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ learning: A conceptual framework and synthesis of research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(1), 5–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9245-4
  • Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 77, 15–46.
  • Greeno, J. G., & Gresalfi, M. S. (2008). Opportunities to learn in practice and identity. In P. A. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 170–199). Cambridge University Press.
  • Hopkins, M., & Spillane, J. P. (2015). Conceptualizing relations between instructional guidance infrastructure (IGI) and teachers’ beliefs about mathematics instruction: Regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive considerations. Journal of Educational Change, 16(4), 421–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9257-1
  • Hopkins, M., Spillane, J. P., Jakopovic, P., & Heaton, R. M. (2013). Infrastructure redesign and instructional reform in mathematics: Formal structure and teacher leadership. The Elementary School Journal, 114(2), 200–224. https://doi.org/10.1086/671935
  • Hopkins, M., Spillane, J. P., & Shirrell, M. (2018). Designing educational infrastructures for improvement. Networked by Design, 174–195. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315122991-10
  • Huguet, A., Marsh, J. A., & Farrell, C. C. (2014). Building teachers’ data-use capacity: Insights from strong and developing coaches. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 22, 1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n52.2014
  • Jayanti, R. K., & Singh, J. (2010). Pragmatic learning theory: An inquiry-action framework for distributed consumer learning in online communities. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 1058–1081.
  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
  • Kazemi, E. (2008). School development as a means of improving mathematics teaching and learning. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teacher education (pp. 209–230). Sense.
  • Kazemi, E., Franke, M., & Lampert, M. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teacher’s ability to enact ambitious instruction. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 12–30).
  • Kazemi, E., Gibbons, L. K., Lewis, R. M., Fox, A., Hintz, A., Kelly-Petersen, M., Cunard, A., Lomax, K., Lenges, A., & Balf, R. (2018). Math labs: Teacher, teacher educators, and school leaders learning together with and from their own students. Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 19(1), 23–36.
  • Kazemi, E., & Resnick, A. F. (2019). Organising schools for teacher and leader learning O, Chapman ed. . In International handbook of mathematics teacher education, Rotterdam, the Netherlans: Sense. (Vol. 3, pp. 393–420).
  • Kazemi, E., Resnick, A. F., & Gibbons, L. K. (n.d.). Principal leadership for school-wide transformation of elementary mathematics teaching: Why the principal’s conception of teacher learning matters. American Educational Research Journal.
  • Kelly, P. (2006). What is teacher learning? A socio‐cultural perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 32(4), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980600884227
  • Lampert, M., Boerst, T., & Graziani, F. (2011). Organizational resources in the service of school-wide ambitious teaching practice. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 113(7), 1361–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300706
  • Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., Cunard, A., & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112473837
  • Levine, A. (2010). Teacher education must respond to changes in America. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(2), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200205
  • Lewis, R. (2016). Understanding teacher and student learning situated in a school-wide implementation of fractions instruction, (University of Washington, Seattle) (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Lind, T., & Lomax, K. (2018). Choral Counting 3-5. In M. L. Franke, E. Kazemi, & A. C. Turrou (Eds.), Choral counting & counting collections: Transforming the PreK-5 math classroom (pp. 113–140). Stenhouse.
  • Mangin, M. M., & Dunsmore, K. (2015). How the framing of instructional coaching as a lever for systemic or individual reform influences the enactment of coaching. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(2), 179–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X14522814
  • Munson, J. (2020). Noticing aloud: Uncovering mathematics teacher noticing in the moment. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 8(2), 25–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5951/MTE-2019-0006
  • Munson, J., & Dyer, E. (2020). Collaborative sensemaking through side-by-side coaching: Examining in-the-moment discursive reasoning opportunities for teachers and coaches. In M. Gresalfi & I. S. Horn (Eds.), The interdisciplinarity of the learning sciences, 14th international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 1831–1838). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014) . Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.
  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics (CCSSM). http://www.corestandards.org/Math/
  • Poglinco, S. M., Bach, A. J., Hovde, K., Rosenblum, S., Saunders, M., & Supovitz, J. A. (2003). The heart of the matter: The coaching model in America’s choice schools. University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
  • Ramkellawan, R., & Bell, J. (2017). Raising the bar: Using coaching conversations to address. issues of low expectations for students in urban settings. The Educational Forum, 81(4), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2017.1350238
  • Robertson, A. D., Richards, J., Elby, A., & Walkoe, J. (2015). Documenting variability within teacher attention and responsiveness to the substance of student thinking. In A. D. Robertson, R. E. Sherr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics (pp. 227–247). Routledge.
  • Woulfin, S. L. (2018). Mediating instructional reform: An examination of the relationship between district policy and instructional coaching. AERA Open, 4(3), 233285841879227. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418792278
  • Woulfin, S. L., Jones-Lawal, B., & Gabriel, R. (2018). The terrain of intermediary organizations’ professional development offerings. Professional Development in Education, 44(2), 302–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1299030

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.