Productive Disciplinary Engagement as a Framework to Support Mathematics Teacher Leaders

References

• Agarwal, P., & Sengupta-Irving, T. (2018). Power in the digital age: A critical revision to productive disciplinary Engagement (PDE). Proceedings of the International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS].
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, P., & Sengupta-Irving, T. (2019). Integrating power to advance the study of connective and productive disciplinary engagement in mathematics and science. Cognition and Instruction, 37(3), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1624544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beisiegel, M., Mitchell, R., & Hill, H. C. (2018). The design of video-based professional development: An exploratory experiment intended to identify effective features. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117705096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beswick, K., & Chapman, O. (Eds.). (2020). International handbook of mathematics teacher education, Volume 4: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (2nd ed.). Brill-Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., & Sengupta-Irving, T. (2016). The many colors of algebra: The impact of equity focused teaching upon student learning and engagement. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Carlson, J., Deutscher, R., Boles, K. L., Delaney, V., Fong, A., Jarry-Shore, M., Malamut, J., Million, S., Mozenter, S., & Villa, A. M. (2021). Learning to lead: An approach to mathematics teacher leader development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(1), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10157-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Koellner, K., & Jacobs, J. (2014). Examining novice teacher leaders’ facilitation of mathematics professional development. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. P., & Elliott, R. (2011). An analytic frame for examining teachers’ collaborative mathematics work to develop specialized content knowledge. In L. R. Wiest & T. Lamberg (Eds.). Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Reno, NV University of Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom third edition. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crookes, G. (1990). The utterance, and other basic units for second language discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, R., Kazemi, E., Lesseig, K., Mumme, J., Carroll, C., & Kelley-Petersen, M. (2009). Conceptualizing the work of leading mathematical tasks in professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109341150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A. (2012). The productive disciplinary engagement framework: Origins, key concepts and developments. In D. Y. Dai (Ed.), Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning (pp. 161–200). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., & Adiredja, A. A. (2008). Increasing the cognitive demand of mathematical tasks. Paper Presented at the Research Pre-session of the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Salt Lake City, UT
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I. (2009). Mathematics learning in groups: Analyzing equity in two cooperative activity structures. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 247–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400902797958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Even, R. (2014). Challenges associated with the professional development of didacticians. ZDM, Mathematics Education, 46(2), 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0573-3
   Google Scholar
• Forman, E. A., Engle, R. A., Venturini, P., & Ford, M. J. (2014). Introduction to special issue: International examinations and extensions of the productive disciplinary engagement framework. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, L. K., & Cobb, P. (2017). Focusing on teacher learning opportunities to identify potentially productive coaching activities. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(4), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–96). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hjalmarson, M. A., & Baker, C. K. (2020). Mathematics specialists as the hidden players in professional development: Researchable questions and methodological considerations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10077-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2009). Social practice theory and the historical production of persons. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity, 2, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6826-4_15
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, K., Cobb, P., Wilson, J., Webster, M., Dunlap, C., & Appelgate, M. (2015). Investigating the development of mathematics leaders’ capacity to support teachers’ learning on a large scale. ZDM, Mathematics Education, 47(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0652-5
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B., & Huang, R. (2014). Teachers and didacticians: Key stakeholders in the processes of developing mathematics teaching. ZDM, Mathematics Education, 46(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0574-2
   Google Scholar
• Kane, B. D., & Saclarides, E. S. (2022). Doing the math together: Coaches’ professional learning through engagement in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09527-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsenty, R. (2020). The role of frameworks in researching knowledge and practices of mathematics teachers and teacher educators. In S. Zehetmeier, D. Potari, & M. Ribeiro (Eds.), Professional development and knowledge of mathematics teachers (ERME Book Series: New perspectives on research in mathematics education (pp. 62–84). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karsenty, R., Pöhler, B., Schwarts, G., Prediger, S., & Arcavi, A. (2021). Processes of decision-making by mathematics PD facilitators: The role of resources, orientations, goals, and identities. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09518-z
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, E., Elliott, R., Lesseig, K., Mumme, J., Carroll, C., & Kelley-Petersen, M. (2009). Doing mathematics in professional development: Working with leaders to cultivate mathematically rich teacher learning environments. In D. Mewborn & H. S. Lee (Eds.), Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators Monograph VI: Scholarly practices and inquiry into the mathematics preparation of teachers (pp. 171–186). Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
   Google Scholar
• Koretsky, M. D., Vauras, M., Jones, C., Iiskala, T., & Volet, S. (2021). Productive disciplinary engagement in high-and low-outcome student groups: Observations from three collaborative science learning contexts. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9838-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., Cunard, A., & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112473837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J., Munson, J., Gargroetzi, E., Williams, I., & Chavez, R. (2020). “So what are we working on?”: How student authority relations shift during collaborative mathematics activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09962-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesseig, K., Elliott, R., Kazemi, E., Kelley-Petersen, M., Campbell, M. P., Mumme, J., & Carroll, C. (2017). Leader noticing of facilitation in videocases of mathematics professional development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(6), 591–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-016-9346-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.) ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Noyce Foundation. (2005). Problem of the month growing stairs. https://www.insidemathematics.org/sites/default/files/materials/growing%20staircases.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Polly, D., Algozzine, R., Martin, C. S., & Mraz, M. (2015). Perceptions of the roles and responsibilities of elementary school mathematics coaches. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 4(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-08-2014-0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prediger, S., Roesken-Winter, B., & Leuders, T. (2019). Which research can support PD facilitators? content-related PD research in the three-tetrahedron model. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09434-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, I., Krange, I., & Ludvigsen, S. R. (2003). The process of understanding the task: How is agency distributed between students, teachers and representations in technology-rich learning environments? International Journal of Educational Research, 39(8), 839–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2004.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Saclarides, E. S., & Kane, B. D. (2021). Understanding mathematics coaches’ development: Coaches’ attributions of their professional learning in school districts. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, 101815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd) ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., Kwako, A. J., Modrek, A. S., & Kawasaki, J. (2018). Patterns of classroom talk through participation in discourse-focused teacher professional development. In K.J. and L. R. (Eds.) Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age: Making the Learning Sciences Count, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), Volume 2. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675
   Google Scholar
• Tekkumru-Kisa, M., & Okan, O. A. (2020). Designing and implementing cognitively demanding science tasks for fostering productive disciplinary engagement. In M. Gresalfi & I. S. Horn (Eds.), The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, Volume 4 (pp. 2038–2045). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., & Thompson, J. (2006). Transcending simple forms of school science investigation: The impact of preservice instruction on teachers’ understandings of model-based inquiry. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 783–835. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043004783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.4.0458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaslavsky, O. (2005). Seizing the opportunity to create uncertainty in learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-0606-5
   Google Scholar