The Role of Units Coordination in Preservice Elementary Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching

References

• Ball, D. L. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.2307/749140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behr, M. J., Wachsmuth, I., Post, T. R., & Lesh, R. (1984). Order and equivalence of rational numbers: A clinical teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(5), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.2307/748423
   Google Scholar
• Busi, R., Gibson, J., Stevens, A., & Lovin, L. (2023). Engaging and empowering prospective teachers through their ability to coordinate units. In T. Lamberg & D. Moss (Eds.). Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1. pp. 407–412). University of Nevada, Reno.
   Google Scholar
• Busi, R., Lovin, L. A., Norton, A., Siegfried, J. M., Stevens, A. L., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2015). An investigation of PreK-8 preservice teachers’ construction of fraction schemes and operations. In T. G. Bartell, K. N. Bieda, R. T. Putnam, K. Bradfield, & H. Dominguez (Eds.). Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 616–623). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crammer, K., Post, T., & Currier, S. (1993). Learning and teaching ratio and proportion: Research implications. In D. T. Owens (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: Middle grades mathematics (pp. 159–178). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, M., Borko, H., Underhill, R., Brown, C., Jones, D., & Agard, P. (1993). Conceptual knowledge falls through the cracks: Complexities of learning to teach mathematics for understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 8–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/749384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuson, K. C., Weame, D., Hiebert, J. C., Murray, H. G., Human, P. G., Olivier, A. I., Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1997). Children’s conceptual structures for multidigit numbers and methods of multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(2), 130–162. https://doi.org/10.2307/749759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A. J. (2010). Students’ reasoning with reversible multiplicative relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 28(4), 383–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2010.511565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A. J., Aydeniz-Temizer, F., & Borowski, R. S. (2023). Middle school students at three stages of units coordination learn to make same speeds. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A. J., & Lee, M. Y. (2015). Relationships between students’ fractional knowledge and equation writing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(2), 196–243. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.2.0196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A. J., & Sevinc, S. (2022). Middle school students’ construction of reciprocal reasoning with unknowns. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 65, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A. J., & Sevinc, S. (2024). Students’ units coordinations. In Piaget’s genetic epistemology for mathematics education research (pp. 371–411). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A. J., & Tillema, E. S. (2009). Students’ whole number multiplicative concepts: A critical constructive resource for fraction composition schemes. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, C. (2021). Progressions in mathematical reasoning: A case study of two teachers’ levels of units coordination. University of Colorado at Denver.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izsák, A. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching fraction multiplication. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 95–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izsák, A., & Jacobson, E. (2017). Preservice teachers’ reasoning about relationships that are and are not proportional: A knowledge-in-pieces account. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(3), 300–339. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.3.0300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izsák, A., Jacobson, E., & Bradshaw, L. (2019). Surveying middle-grades teachers’ reasoning about fraction arithmetic in terms of measured quantities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(2), 156–209. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.2.0156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izsák, A., Jacobson, E., De Araujo, Z., & Orrill, C. H. (2012). Measuring mathematical knowledge for teaching fractions with drawn quantities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 391–427. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.4.0391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, E., & Izsák, A. (2014). Using coordination classes to analyze preservice middle-grades teachers’ difficulties indetermining direct proportion relationships. In J.-J. Lo, K. R. Leatham, & L. R. Van Zoest (Eds.), Research Trends in Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 47–65). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02562-9
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, E., & Simpson, A. (2019). Prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of multidigit number: Exemplifying a replication framework for mathematics education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0242-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, E. (2019). Quantitative reasoning with transforming fractions. In S. Otten, A. G. Candela, Z. de Araujo, C. Haines, & C. Munter (Eds.). Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, University of Missouri, St Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 629–668). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics Bulletin, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   Google Scholar
• Lo, J. J., & Luo, F. (2012). Prospective elementary teachers’ knowledge of fraction division. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(6), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9221-4
   Google Scholar
• Lovin, L. A., Stevens, A. L., Siegfried, J. M., Wilkins, J. L. M., & Norton, A. (2018). Prek-8 prospective teachers’ understanding of fractions: An extension of fraction schemes and operations. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(3), 207–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-016-9357-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, N. K. (1995). Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(5), 422–441. https://doi.org/10.2307/749431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, K. J. (2008). An extensive analysis of preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of fractions. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1080–1110. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208320851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, A., Boyce, S., Phillips, N., Anwyll, T., Ulrich, C., & Wilkins, J. L. (2015). A written instrument for assessing students’ units coordination structures. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/295
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., Boyce, S., Ulrich, C., & Phillips, N. (2015). Students’ units coordination activity: A cross-sectional analysis. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 39, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., Ulrich, C., & Kerrigan, S. (2020). Unit transformation graphs: A case study. In A. I. Sacristán, J. C. Cortés-Zavala, & P. M. Ruiz-Arias (Eds.), Mathematics education across cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Cinvestav/AMIUTEM/PME-NA. https://doi.org/10.51272/pmena.42.2020
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., Ulrich, C., & Kerrigan, S. (2023). Unit transformation graphs: Modeling students’ mathematics in meeting the cognitive demands of fractions multiplication tasks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 54(4), 240–259. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2021-0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipp, R., Schappelle, B., Siegfried, J., Jacobs, V., & Lamb, L. (2008). The effects of professional development on the mathematical content of K-3 teachers. Paper presented at the American education research association. NY.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, K. R. (2010). Teachers’ understanding of proportional reasoning. In P. Brosnan, D. B. Erchick, & L. Flevares (Eds.).Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1055–1061). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Saderholm, J., Ronau, R., Brown, E. T., & Collins, G. (2010). Validation of the diagnostic teacher assessment of mathematics and science (DTAMS) instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 110(4), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00021.x
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., Lee, S. J., & Steffe, L. P. (2020). Problem solving activities of two middle school students with distinct levels of units coordination. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 59, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, J., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Toward a framework for the development of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(6), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9089-5
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P. (1992). Schemes of action and operation involving composite units. Learning and Individual Differences, 4(3), 259–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(92)90005-Y
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P., Liss, D. R., II, & Lee, H. Y. (2014). On the operations that generate intensive quantity. In L. P. Steffe, K. C. Moore, & L. Hatfield (Eds.), Epistemic algebraic students: Emerging models of students’ algebraic knowing (Vol. 4, pp. 49–79). University of Wyoming.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (2010). Children’s fractional knowledge. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A., Busi, R., Gibson, J., & Lovin, L. (2021). Rethinking how units coordination is assessed in preservice teacher populations. In D. Olanoff, K. Johnson, & S. Spitzer (Eds.), Proceedings of the forty-third annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 832–841). Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. L., Wilkins, J. L., Lovin, L. H., Siegfried, J., Norton, A., & Busi, R. (2020). Promoting sophisticated fraction constructs through instructional changes in a mathematics course for PreK-8 prospective teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(2), 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9415-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streefland, L. (1991). Fractions in realistic mathematics education. Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Thanheiser, E. (2009). Preservice elementary school teachers’ conceptions of multidigit whole numbers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.3.0251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanheiser, E. (2010). Investigating further preservice teachers’ conceptions of multidigit whole numbers: Refining a framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9252-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzur, R. (2004). Teacher and students’ joint production of a reversible fraction conception. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, C. (2015). Stages in constructing and coordinating units additively and multiplicatively (Part 1). For the Learning of Mathematics, 35(3), 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, C. (2016). Stages in constructing and coordinating units additively and multiplicatively (part 2). For the Learning of Mathematics, 36(1), 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2008). The linear imperative: An inventory and conceptual analysis of students’ overuse of linearity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(3), 311–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Steenbrugge, H., Lesage, E., Valcke, M., & Desoete, A. (2014). Preservice elementary school teachers’ knowledge of fractions: A mirror of students’ knowledge? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.839003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergnaud, G. (1982). Cognitive and developmental psychology and research in mathematics education: Some theoretical and methodological issues. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 31–41.
   Google Scholar
• Vergnaud, G. (1994). Multiplicative conceptual field: What and why? In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 41–59). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vergnaud, G. (2009). The theory of conceptual fields. Human development, 52(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1159/000202727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar