Estimation and correction of geometric distortion of stroke-based symbology for avionics display system using curve fitting

References

• Ahn, S.J., Rauh, W., and Warnecke, H.J., 2001. Least-squares orthogonal distances fitting of circle, sphere, ellipse, hyperbola, and parabola. Pattern Recognition, 34, 2283–2303. doi:10.1016/S0031-3203(00)00152-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, G., et al., 2006. Radix-2 dif fast algorithms for polynomial time-frequency transforms. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 42 (4), 1540–1546. doi:10.1109/TAES.2006.314595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blacknell, D., et al., 1989. Geometric accuracy in airborne SAR images. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, AES-25 (2), 241–258. doi:10.1109/7.18685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtberg, H., 1994. Electronic display system for the Swedish Jas39 Gripen Aircraft. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 9, 6–12. doi:10.1109/62.312972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, E., Kao, M., and Lee, B., 1995. Technology options for improved ITC test and alignment. In: SID display manufacturing technology conference, 31 January–2 February. Campbell, CA: Society for Information Display, 33–34.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, E.S., et al., 1999. Test and alignment system for electronics display devices and test fixtures for the same. Patent 5,969,756.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, D.P. and Braasch, M.S., 2003. Multi-view head-up synthetic vision display system. Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 4 (4), 1621–1630.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, R.J., et al., 2006. Measurement error in nonlinear models: a modern perspective. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chernov, N. and Lesort, C., 2004. Statistical efficiency of curve fitting algorithms. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 47, 713–728. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2003.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching-Liang, S., 2000. Correct CCD camera lens distortion by using XY correction coefficient. Sensors, Cameras, and Systems for Scientific/Industrial Applications and Applications for Digital Photography, 3965, 261–268.
   Google Scholar
• Ertem, M.C., 2005. An airborne synthetic vision system with hits symbology using X-plane for a head up display. In: 24th digital avionics systems conference, Vol. 2, 30 October–3 November. Washington, DC: IEEE, 13.C.2.1–2.6.
   Google Scholar
• Fadden, S., Ververs, P.M., and Wickens, C.D., 1998, Costs and benefits of head-up display use: a meta-analytic approach. In: 42nd annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomic society, 5–9 October. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Farebrother, R.W., 1999. Fitting linear relationships: a history of the calculus of observations. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, S.B. and Newton, M., 1969. Distortion correction circuitry. Patent 3422306.
   Google Scholar
• Hector, L., 2000. Multi-axis photometric inspection system and method for flat panel displays. Patent 6,111,243.
   Google Scholar
• Jadhav, D.G., Devi, S., and Pattnaik, S.S., 2012. Memetic algorithm with PSO or BFO’s chemotaxis mechanism as local search for function optimization. In: International conference on recent advances in computing and software systems (RACSS), 25–27 April. Chennai: IEEE, 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Karim, M.A., 2002. Electro-optical displays. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Launay, L., et al., 1995. Quantitative evaluation of an algorithm for correcting geometrical distortions in DSA images: applications to stereotaxy. SPIE, 2434, 520–529. doi:10.1117/12.208722.
   Google Scholar
• Ledvij, M., 2003. Curve fitting made easy. Industrial Physicist, 9 (April–May), 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lewiner, T., et al., 2005. Curvature and torsion estimators based on parametric curve fitting. Computers & Graphics, 29 (5), 641–655. doi:10.1016/j.cag.2005.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewins, L.J. and Rey, M.D., 1994. Head up display (HUD) incorporating cathode ray tube image generator with digital look up table for distortion correction. Patent 5302964.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. and Zhu, D., 2010. The geometric distortion correction algorithm for circular scanning SAR imaging. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 7 (2), 376–380. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2009.2036273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, R., 1988. Automated CRT inspection and alignment. Information Display, 4 (6), 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mumtaza, R., Palmerb, P.L., and Waqara, M.M., 2014. Georeferencing of UK DMC stereo-images without ground control points by exploiting geometric distortions. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 35 (6), 2136–2169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, K., 1992. Rectification of digital imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58, 339–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuyama, N., et al., 1988. Pincushion distortion correction device. Patent 4737692.
   Google Scholar
• Passino, K.M., 2002. Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 22 (3), 52–67. doi:10.1109/MCS.2002.1004010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattnaik, S.S., et al., 2013. Swine influenza models based optimization (SIMBO). Applied Soft Computing, 13 (1), 628–653. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman, D., Fisher, M., and Cubillo, J., 1998. Digital image processing – an object-oriented approach. IEEE Transactions on Education, 41, 331–333. doi:10.1109/13.728270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rong, J. and Valasek, J., 2004. Onboard pilot decision aid for high volume operations in self-controlled airspace. In: 23rd digital avionics systems conference, Vol. 1, 24–28 October. Salt Lake City, UT: IEEE, 4.B.5.1–5.12.
   Google Scholar
• Saini, S.S., Sardana, H.K., and Bajpai, P.P., 2012a. Spot symbol positioning techniques for an avionics display system: a review. In: National conference on advances in video, cyber learning and electronics – 2012 (ADVICE-2012), 1–2 March. Chandigarh: NITTTR, 69.
   Google Scholar
• Saini, S.S., et al., 2012b, Analysis of errors and distortions in stroke form of symbology for head-up displays. In: International multi conference of engineers and computer scientists (IAENG-IMECS-2012), 14–16 March. Hong Kong: IAENG, 1302–1306.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzer, C.R., 2001. Digital avionics handbook. Head-Up Displays. Boca Roton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Task, H.L., 1983. Measurement of HUD optical quality. Fairborn, OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, J., Summers, L., and Hammontre, P., 1995. Image quality issues for an enhanced vision head up display. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 10 (3), 40–44. doi:10.1109/62.391912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toutin, T., 2004. Review article: geometric processing of remote sensing images: models, algorithms and methods. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25 (10), 1893–1924. doi:10.1080/0143116031000101611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toutin, T., 2011. State-of-the-art of geometric correction of remote sensing data: a data fusion perspective. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 2 (1), 3–35. doi:10.1080/19479832.2010.539188.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, A.J., Willsky, A.S., and Levy, B.C., 1989. Nonuniform array processing via the polynomial approach. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, AES-25 (1), 48–55. doi:10.1109/7.18660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun-He, P., Jin-Xiang, D., and Chen, D.-R., 2003. Computer graphics—principle, method, and application. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., et al., 2013. Geometric model for high-resolution SAR-GEC images. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 4 (2), 159–170. doi:10.1080/19479832.2011.600255.
   Google Scholar