From big data to big analysis: a perspective of geographical conditions monitoring

References

• AI, N. and DJ, W., 2013. Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Mathematics & Computer Education, 47 (17), 181–183.
   Google Scholar
• Aschbacher, J., et al., 2012. Global monitoring for environment and security: GMES space component getting ready for operations. Esa Bulletin. Bulletin Ase.European Space Agency, 2012 (149), 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Big data, 2008. Nature, 455 (7209), 1–136. 10.1038/455001a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E. and Mcafee, A., 2012. Big data’s management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90 (10), 60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D, L., et al. 2014. Big data. The parable of Google Flu: traps in big data analysis. Science (New York, N.Y.), 343 (6176), 1203. doi:10.1126/science.1248506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debattista, J., et al., Linked ‘big’ data: towards a manifold increase in big data value and veracity. ed. Ieee/acm International Symposium on Big Data Computing, 2016, 92-98.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, K.Y., Li, J.P., and Liu, J.X., 2015. Application research of national geographical condition in monitoring for ecological environment of natural reserve: a case study of Xingkai Lake National Natural Reserve. Geomatics＆ Spatial Information Technology, 11 (38), 99–101, 108.
   Google Scholar
• Geospatial Information Authority of Japan. 2010. “Heisei 23 annual emphasis of the geographical survey institute implementation” [ online]. Available from: http://www.gsi.go.jp/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Greengard, S., 2014. Weathering a new era of big data. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gui, D., et al. 2012. On the national geographical condition monitoring several strategic issues. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXIX (B4), 539–541. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B4-539-2012
   Google Scholar
• Guindon, B. and Zhang, Y., 2007. Using satellite remote sensing to survey transport-related urban sustainability: part II. results of a Canadian urban assessment. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation & Geoinformation, 9 (3), 276–293. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2006.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, H., 2010. Understanding global natural disasters and the role of earth observation. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3 (3), 221–230. doi:10.1080/17538947.2010.499662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, A. and Institute, W.R., 1995. Environmental indicators: a systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. Washington, D.C: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Heink, U. and Kowarik, I., 2010. What are indicators? On the definition of indicators in ecology and environmental planning. Ecological Indicators, 10 (3), 584–593. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbert, M. and Priscila, L., 2011. The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information[J]. Science, 332 (6025), 60–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L.L. and Liu, H.J, 2017. Geographical conditions census data in forest land monitoring application research. Geomatics & Spatial information Technology, 40 (02), 127–129.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D., Tran-Gia, P., and Hartmann, M., 2013. Big data. Informatik-Spektrum, 36 (3), 319–323. doi:10.1007/s00287-013-0702-3
   Google Scholar
• Kozak, J., Estreguil, C., and Ostapowicz, K., 2008. European forest cover mapping with high resolution satellite data: the Carpathians case study. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 10 (1), 44–55. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2007.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajeunesse, T.C., et al., 2010. Long-standing environmental conditions, geographic isolation and host-symbiont specificity influence the relative ecological dominance and genetic diversification of coral endosymbionts in the genus Symbiodinium. Journal of Biogeography, 37 (5), 785–800. doi:10.1111/jbi.2010.37.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laney, D., 2001. “3-D data management: controlling data volume, velocity. Gartner” [online]. Available from: http://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/fles/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-Data-Volume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf  [Accessed 12 June 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., 2016. Towards geo-spatial information science in big data era. Acta Geodaetica Et Cartographica Sinica, 45 (4), 379–384.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., Sui, H., and Shan, J., 2012. Discussion on key technologies of geographic national conditions monitoring. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 37 (5), 505–512.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., et al., 2014. Research progress in location big data analysis and processing. Geomatics & Information Science of Wuhan University, 39 (4), 379–385.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Y., et al., 2014. 2014b Fine urban simulation in the big data era: methods, data, cases and frameworks. Human Geography, 29 (03), 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Y., et al. 2014a. Big models: a novel paradigm for urban and regional studies. Urban Planning Forum, 6, 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Loveland, T.R., et al. 2000. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21 (6–7), 1303–1330. doi:10.1080/014311600210191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukoianova, T. and Rubin, V.L., 2014. Veracity roadmap: is big data objective, truthful and credible? 24, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Mahrt, M. and Scharkow, M., 2013. The value of big data in digital media research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57 (1), 20–33. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.761700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAfee, A. and Brynjolfsson, E., 2012. Big data: the management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90 (10), 60–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H.G. and Mork, P., 2013. From data to decisions: a value chain for big data. It Professional, 15 (1), 57–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probeck, M., et al., 2014. European forest monitoring approaches. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Publications, M. 2011. Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. Mckinsey & company
   Google Scholar
• Sato, H.P., et al., 2010. Preparation of high-resolution digital elevation models by the geospatial information authority of Japan and their applications to geographic information analysis. Transactions Japanese Geomorphological Union, 31 (4), 359–382.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, C., 2000. Review on environmental indicator research. Research of Environmentalences, 13 (4), 53–55.
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2008. “Geographic analysis and monitoring program-5 year program plan (2008–2013)” [online]. Available from: http://gam.cr.usgs.gov/pubs.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Van Beijma, S., Balzter, H., and Nicolasperea, V., 2013. Earth observation research for GMES initial operations. Egu General Assembly, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., et al., 2013. Data mining with big data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering, 26 (1), 97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., et al. 2015. Simulation optimization: a review and exploration in the new era of cloud computing and big data. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 32 (03), 1550019. doi:10.1142/S0217595915500190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al. 2015. Understanding geographical conditions monitoring: a perspective from China. International Journal of Digital Earth, 8 (1), 36–55. doi:10.1080/17538947.2013.846418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al., 2016a. Research framework of geographical conditions and big data. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20 (5), 1017–1026.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al. 2016b. Implementation of geographical conditions monitoring in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China. International Journal of Geo-Information, 5 (6), 89. doi:10.3390/ijgi5060089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar