DEM fusion concept based on the LS-SVM cokriging method

References

• Arief, R., et al., 2019. Quality assessment of DEM generated from SAR radargrammetry based on cross-correlation and spatial resolution setting. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1201. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1201/1/012027
   Google Scholar
• Arun, P.V., 2013. A comparative analysis of different DEM interpolation methods. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, 16 (2), 133–139. doi:10.1016/j.ejrs.2013.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri, H., Schmitt, M., and Zhu, X., (2017). Fusion of TAndem-X and Cartosat-1 DEMS using tv-norm regularization and ann-predicted weights. 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 3369–3372. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2017.8127720
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C.M., 2006. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Burrough, P.A. and McDonnell, R.A., 2000. Principles of Geographical information systems. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=PAzBnQEACAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Burrough, P.A. and McDonnel, R.A., 1998. Principles of Geographical information systems. Oxford, New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crosetto, M. and Crippa, B., 1998. Optical and radar data fusion for dem generation. IAPRS, 32, 128–134.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, S., et al. (2011). DEM fusion and its application in mapping topographyi of complex areas. 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Image and Data Fusion, 1-4. doi:10.1109/ISIDF.2011.6024255.
   Google Scholar
• Gonnuru, P. and Kumar, S. (2018). remote sensing applications: society and environment psinsar based land subsidence estimation of burgan oil fi eld using TerraSAR-X data. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 9 September 2017, 17–25. doi:10.1016/j.rsase.2017.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Hong, M., Lim, H., and Kim, C., 2014. A study on improving dem-based forest biomass estimation using palsar and forest inventory data. 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 745-748. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2014.6946531.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Z., Wang, H., and Zhang, R., 2012a. An improved kriging interpolation technique based on SVM and its recovery experiment in oceanic missing data*. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2 (41276036), 56–60. doi:10.4236/ajcm.2012.21007
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Z., Wang, H., and Zhang, R., 2012b. An improved kriging interpolation technique based on SVM and its recovery experiment in oceanic missing data*. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 02 (01), 56–60. doi:10.4236/ajcm.2012.21007
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, C., et al., 2017. Fusion of photogrammetric and photoclinometric information for high-resolution DEMs from Mars in-orbit imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 130, 418–430. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, K., et al., 2001. ArcGIS 9 ® using ArcGIS geostatistical analyst. ESRI, 5, 131–166. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00074
   Google Scholar
• Kanevski, M., Pozdnoukhov, A., and Timonin, V., 2009. Machine learning for spatial environmental data theory, applications and software. Boca Raton, FL: EPFL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.H., Baek, S., and Shum, C.K. (2005). Multi-temporal, multi-resolution data fusion for antarctica DEM determination using InSAR and altimetry. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 4, 2827–2829. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2005.1525656
   Google Scholar
• Marsland, S., 2015. MACHINE LEARNING an algorithmic perspective. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Memarsadeghi, N., Le, M.J., and Mount, D.M. (1999). Image fusion using cokriging. 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (pp. 2518–2521).doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2006.651
   Google Scholar
• Memarsadeghi, N., et al. (2008). Efficient kriging via fast matrix-vector products. IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings. doi:10.1109/AERO.2008.4526433
   Google Scholar
• Meng, Q., Borders, B., and Madden, M., 2010. High-resolution satellite image fusion using regression kriging. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31 (7), 1857–1876. doi:10.1080/01431160902927937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, A.H., et al., 2012. Mapping land subsidence in Jakarta, Indonesia using persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI) technique with ALOS PALSAR. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 18, 232–242. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2012.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papasaika, H., Poli, D., and Baltsavias, E., 2008. A framework for the fusion of digital elevation models. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, 811–818. Availabe from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.155.3867&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Papasaika, H., et al., 2011. Fusion of digital elevation models using sparse representations. Photogrammetric Image Analysis, 171–184. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24393-6_15
   Google Scholar
• Persson, H., et al., 2012. Estimating biomass and height using DSM from satellite data and DEM from high-resolution laser scanning data. 2012IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1649-1651. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6351211
   Google Scholar
• Petrasova, A., et al., 2017. Fusion of high-resolution DEMs for water flow modeling. Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards, 2 (1), 1–8. doi:10.1186/s40965-017-0019-2
   Google Scholar
• Qiming, Z., Xiaojie, Z., and Jian, J., 2017. Research on fusion strategy of ascending and descending multi-baseline multi-frequency INSAR results to generate high quality DEM. Ieee Igars, 5, 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sales, M.H.R., Souza, C.M., and Kyriakidis, P.C., 2013. Fusion of MODIS images using kriging with external drift. Ieee Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51 (4), 2250–2259. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2012.2208467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, A.L., 1959. Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 3 (3), 210–229. doi:10.1147/rd.33.0210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler, K., et al., 2011. Improving wide - area dems through data fusion - chances and limits. Proceedings of the Photogrammetric Week 11, 159-170. Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Setiyoko, A. and Arymurthy, A.M. (2017). Accuracy analysis of DEM generated from cokriging interpolators. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 88(1). doi:10.1088/1755-1315/88/1/012021
   Google Scholar
• Setiyoko, A., et al., 2018. Semivariogram fitting based on SVM and GPR for DEM interpolation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1-6. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/311/1/012076.
   Google Scholar
• Setiyoko, A. (2013). Analysis of spatial interpolation techniques for dem generation using IRS-1C data. 34th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2013, ACRS 2013, 2, 789-794. Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Suykens, J.A.K., Vandewalle, J., and De Moor, B., 2001. Optimal control by least squares support vector machines. Neural Networks, 14 (1), 23–35. doi:10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00077-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toutin, T., et al., 2013. Stereo radargrammetry with Radarsat-2 in the Canadian Arctic. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51 (5), 2601–2609. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2012.2211605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, H., et al., 2017. Effects of different sampling densities on geographically weighted regression kriging for predicting soil organic carbon. Spatial Statistics, 20, 76–91. doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youkuo, C., Yongguo, Y., and Wangwen, W., 2015. Coal seam thickness prediction based on least squares support vector machines and kriging method. EJGE, 20, 167–176.
   Google Scholar