556
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Connected by sea, disconnected by tuna? Challenges to regionalism in the Southwest Indian Ocean

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 58-77 | Received 01 Oct 2018, Accepted 18 Dec 2018, Published online: 16 Jan 2019

References

  • Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Community, intimate government, and the making of environmental subjects in Kumaon, India. Current Anthropology, 46(2), 161–190.
  • Association thoniere. (1990). Projet Thonier Régional Numéro I. Rapport de Synthèse. Archive document retrieved from the library of the Ministry of fisheries in Antananarivo, Madagascar.
  • Baglioni, E., & Campling, L. (2017). Natural resource industries as global value chains: Frontiers, fetishism, labour and the state. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(11), 2437–2456.
  • Barclay, K., & Cartwright, I. (2007). Governance of tuna industries: The key to economic viability and sustainability in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. Marine Policy, 31(3), 348–358.
  • Barnes, C., & Mfodwo, K. (2012, February). A market price valuation of tuna resources in the Western Indian Ocean – An indicative regional and country/eez perspective. A WWF report. 100 p.
  • Beaujard, P. (2005). The Indian Ocean in Eurasian and African world-systems before the sixteenth century. Journal of World History, 16(4), 411–465.
  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Bigger, P., & Neimark, B. D. (2017). Weaponizing nature: The geopolitical ecology of the US Navy’s biofuel program. Political Geography, 60, 13–22.
  • Blaikie, P. M., & Brookfield, H. (Eds.). (1987). Land degradation and society. London: Methuen.
  • Boivin, N., Crowther, A., Helm, R., & Fuller, D. Q. (2013). East Africa and Madagascar in the Indian Ocean world. Journal of World Prehistory, 26, 213–281.
  • Breuil, C., & Grima, D. (2014). Baseline report Madagascar. SmartFish Programme of the Indian Ocean Commission, Fisheries Management FAO component, Ebene, Mauritius. 35 p.
  • Campling, L. (2012a). The tuna ‘commodity frontier’ – Business strategies and environment in the industrial tuna fisheries of the Western Indian Ocean. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12(2), 252–278.
  • Campling, L. (2012b). The EU-centered commodity chain in canned tuna and upgrading in Seychelles (Doctoral dissertation). University of London, London. Retrieved from https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/
  • Campling, L. (2017). Stratégies d’accumulation impérialiste de la pêche européenne du thon. Alternatives Sud, 24(1), 133–157.
  • Campling, L., & Colás, A. (2017). Capitalism and the sea: Sovereignty, territory and appropriation in the global ocean. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36(4), 776–794.
  • Campling, L., & Havice, E. (2014). The problem of property in industrial fisheries. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(5), 707–727.
  • Campling, L., & Havice, E. (2018). The global environmental politics and political economy of seafood systems. Global Environmental Politics, 18(2), 72–92.
  • Campling, L., Lewis, A., & McCoy, M. (2017). The tuna longline industry in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean and its market dynamics. Honiara: Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency.
  • COFREPECHE, NFDS, MRAG, & POSEIDON. (2016). Ex post and ex ante evaluation of the protocol to the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the EU and the Republic of Mauritius (Framework contract MARE/2011/01 – Lot 3, specific contract 16). Brussels. 141 p.
  • Craig, G. (2015). Migration and integration, a local and experiential perspective (Paper IRiS WP 7-2015). Institute for Research into Superdiversity (IRiS) University of Birmingham.
  • Dagorn, L. (1994). Le comportement des thons tropicaux modélisé selon les principes de la vie artificielle (Doctoral dissertation). École Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Rennes, Montpellier. Retrieved from http://www.documentation.ird.fr/
  • de Haas, H. (2010). Migration and development: A theoretical perspective. International Migration Review, 44(2010), 227–264.
  • Doyle, T. (2018). Blue economy and the Indian Ocean Rim. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 14(1), 1–6.
  • European Union. (2014a). The national indicative programme for the Republic of Seychelles. 11th European Development Fund. Retrieved from the EU website: https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/national-indicative-programme-seychelles-2014-2020_en
  • European Union. (2014b). Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Republic of Madagascar and the European community. Retrieved from the EU website: https://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/international/agreements/madagascar
  • European Union. (2016a). Les relations Madagascar Union Européenne. Service européen des relations exterieures. Retrieved from the EU website: https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/madagascar/1467/madagascar-et-l%E2%80%99ue_fr
  • European Union. (2016b). The national indicative programme for the Republic of Mauritius. 11th European Development Fund. Retrieved from the EU website: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/nip-mauritius-edf11-2016_en.pdf
  • Fonteneau, A. (2010). Atlas of Indian Ocean tuna fisheries. Marseille: IRD Éditions.
  • Fonteneau, A. (2014). On the movements and stock structure of skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis). Document submitted to the IOTC. IOTC 2014-WPTT-16-36.
  • Forsyth, T. (2003). Critical political ecology. The politics of environmental science. London: Routledge.
  • FPAOI. (2017). Position statement of FPAOI for the 21st annual session of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission. Provided by the FPAOI (Fédération des pêcheurs artisans de l’océan Indien) during interview with two members in Victoria, Seychelles in June 2017.
  • Fry, G., & Tarte, S. (2015). The new Pacific diplomacy. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
  • Fuma, S. (2013). La Route de l’esclave et de l’engagé dans les îles et pays du Sud-Ouest de l’océan Indien. Études Océan Indien [Online], 49–50. Online since 24 September 2015.
  • Gagern, A., & van den Bergh, J. (2013). A critical review of fishing agreements with tropical developing countries. Marine Policy, 38, 375–386.
  • Galt, R. E. (2016). The relevance of regional political ecology for agriculture and food systems. Journal of Political Ecology, 23(2016), 126–133.
  • Gautier, D., & Benjaminsen, T. A. (Eds.). (2012). Environnement, discours et pouvoir. L’approche political ecology. Paris: Éditions Quæ.
  • Gilbert, F., & Rabenomanana, L. D. (1996). Aperçu de la pêche thonière à Madagascar. Retrieved from the library of the Ministry of fisheries in Antananarivo, Madagascar.
  • Gillet, R. (2011). Tuna for tomorrow. Working paper 011 prepared for the IOC in collaboration with the IOTC. SF/2013/011. 88 p.
  • Gjerde, K., Boteler, B., Durussel, C., Rochette, J., Unger, S., & Wright, G. (2018). Conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction: Options for underpinning a strong global BBNJ Agreement through regional and sectoral governance. STRONG High Seas Project. 24 p.
  • Glassman, J. (2017). Geopolitical economies of development and democratization in East Asia: Themes, concepts, and geographies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(2), 407–415.
  • Government of Mauritius (GoMu). (2017a). Compilation of tuna data provided by the Ministry of Ocean Economy during fieldwork in April 2017.
  • Government of Mauritius (GoMU). (2017b). Annual report on performance – Fiscal year 2016/17 (pp. 19–20, Section 2.2. Status on implementation of budget measures for financial year 2016/2017). Retrieved from the Ministry of Ocean Economy’s website: http://oceaneconomy.govmu.org/English/Publication/Annual%20Report/Pages/default.aspx
  • Government of Seychelles (GoS). (2011). 2011 Annual report (pp. 68–69, Section 9. International cooperation). Seychelles Fishing Authority (SFA). Retrieved from the SFA website: http://www.sfa.sc/index.php/publications
  • Government of Seychelles (GoS). (2013). 2013 Annual report (pp. 82–84, Chapter 10. International cooperation). Seychelles Fishing Authority (SFA). Retrieved from the SFA website: http://www.sfa.sc/index.php/publications
  • Government of Seychelles (GoS). (2016). 2016 Fisheries statistical report (pp. 6–8). Seychelles Fishing Authority (SFA). Retrieved from the SFA Library.
  • Guillotreau, P., & Le Roy, F. (2001). Raising rivals’ costs in the tuna industry. In Microbehavior and macroresults: Proceedings of the tenth biennial conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade, July 10–14, 2000, Corvallis, OR, USA. Edited by Richard S. Johnston and compiled by Ann L. Shriver. International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET), Corvallis, OR, 2001.
  • Guillotreau, P., Mongruel, R., & Jiménez-Toribio, R. (2008). Market power and the European tuna oligopsony: Implications for fisheries and trade. In Proceedings of the fourteenth biennial conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics & Trade, July 22–25, 2008, Nha Trang, Vietnam: Achieving a Sustainable Future: Managing Aquaculture, Fishing, Trade and Development. Compiled by Ann L. Shriver. International Institute of Fisheries Economics & Trade, Corvallis, Oregon, USA, 2008.
  • Hanazaki, M. (2017). L’OFCF du Japon rénove les installations des pêcheurs pour l’Association TAZARA à Toamasina, Madagascar. Press release. Retrieved from the Japanese Embassy’s website: https://www.mg.emb-japan.go.jp/files/000228251.pdf
  • Hanich, Q. A., Parris, H., & Tsamenyi, B. M. (2010). Sovereignty and cooperation in regional Pacific tuna fisheries management: Politics, economics, conservation and the Vessel Day Scheme. Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs, 2(1), 2–15.
  • Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm.
  • Havice, E. (2013). Rights-based management in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean tuna fishery: Economic and environmental change under the Vessel Day Scheme. Marine Policy, 42(February), 259–267.
  • Havice, E. (2018). Unsettled sovereignty and the Sea: Mobilities and more-than-territorial configurations of state power. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(5), 1–18.
  • Havice, E., & Campling, L. (2010). Shifting tides in the Western Central Pacific Ocean tuna fishery: The political economy of regulation and industry responses. Global Environmental Politics, 10(1), 89–114.
  • Havice, E., & Campling, L. (2017). Where chain governance and environmental governance meet: Interfirm strategies in the canned tuna global value chain. Economic Geography, 93(3), 292–313.
  • Hewamanage, L. A. K. (2010). Economic efficiency of the deep sea fishing fleet of Sri Lanka. United Nations University Fisheries Training Programme, Iceland. Retrieved from http://www.unuftp.is/static/fellows/document/lalith09prf.pdf
  • Hoarau, P. (2013). Un nouvel espace géopolitique se dessine: l’Indianocéanie. Études Océan Indien [Online], 49–50. Online since 22 September 2015.
  • Hussain, S. (2018). Colonialism and imperialism still strong in one of world’s largest tuna fisheries regions. Indian Ocean Observatory. News entry. Diplomacy section.
  • ICTSD. (2018, September). Formal negotiations on UN high seas biodiversity pact get underway. Bridges, 22(30).
  • IOC. (2013). Rapport annuel 2013 – Indianocéanie. Indian Ocean Commission. Retrieved from the IOC website.
  • IOC. (2015a). Les pêcheurs artisans de l’océan Indien se fédèrent pour parler d’une seule voix. Press release. Indian Ocean Commission.
  • IOC. (2015b). A propos du PRSP. PRSP Webpage on the IOC website. Retrieved from http://commissionoceanindien.org/activites/programme-regional-de-surveillance-des-peches/a-propos/
  • IOC. (2016). Surveillance régionale des pêches dans le Sud-Ouest de l’océan Indien – 2,5 millions d’euros mobilisés. Press release. Indian Ocean Commission.
  • IOC. (2017). Le plan régional de sruveillance des pêches au coeur d’une conférence ministérielle de la COI. Press release. Indian Ocean Commission.
  • IOC. (2018). Premier plan d’action régional sur la pêche thonière côtière pour le Sud-Ouest de l’océan Indien. Press release. Indian Ocean Commission.
  • IOTC. (1993). Agreement for the establishment of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission. Available on the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission Webpage.
  • IOTC. (2011, March 18–22). Report of the 15th session of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission. Colombo, Sri Lanka. IOTC–2011–S15–R[E]. 110 p.
  • IOTC. (2017, November 30–December 4). Report of the 20th session of IOTC Scientific Committee. Mahe, Seychelles. IOTC–2017–SC20–R. 232 p.
  • IOTC. (2018a, May 21–25). Report of the 22nd session of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission. Bangkok, Thailand. IOTC–2018–S22–R[E]. 114 p.
  • IOTC. (2018b). Seychelles national report to the Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, 2018. IOTC–2018–SC21–NR22. 26 p.
  • Kaplan, D. M., Chassot, E., Amandé, J. M., Dueri, S., Demarcq, H., Dagorn, L., & Fonteneau, A. (2014). Spatial management of Indian Ocean tropical tuna fisheries: Potential and perspectives. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 71(7), 1728–1749.
  • Kasprzyk, Z. (1996). Étude d’impacts des activités thonières industrielles sur l’éconmie des états-membres de la Commission de l’Océan Indien. Archive retrieved from the library of the Ministry of fisheries in Antananarivo, Madagascar.
  • Le Manach, F., Chaboud, C., Copeland, D., Cury, P., Gascuel, D., Kleisner, K. M., … Pauly, D. (2013). European Union’s public fishing access agreements in developing countries. PLoS One, 8(11), e79899.
  • Longo, S. B., & Clausen, R. (2011). Thetragedy of the commodity: The overexploitation of the Mediterranean bluefin tuna fishery. Organization & Environment, 20(10), 1–17.
  • Longo, S., & Clark, B. (2012). The commodification of bluefin tuna: The historical transformation of the Mediterranean fishery. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12(2–3), 204–226.
  • Marashi, S. M. (1996). Summary information on the role of international fishery and other bodies with regard to the conservation and management of living resources of the high seas ( FAO Fisheries Circular – C908). Roma: FAO.
  • Marsac, F., Fonteneau, A., & Michaud, P. (2014). L’or bleu des Seychelles: Histoire de la pêche industrielle au thon dans l’Océan Indien. Marseille: IRD Editions.
  • McWhinnie, S. F. (2009). The tragedy of the commons in international fisheries: An empirical examination. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57(3), 321–333.
  • Michaud, P. (1992). The complementarity between the Western Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (WIOTC) and the proposed Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC). Paper prepared for the Conference for the Adoption of a Draft Agreement on the Establishment of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, Roma, 2–26 June 1992.
  • Miller, A. M. M., Bush, S. R., & van Zwieten, P. A. M. (2014). Sub-regionalisation of fisheries governance: The case of the Western and Central Pacific Ocean tuna fisheries. Maritime Studies, 13(1), 1–20.
  • Miller, N. A., Roan, A., Hochberg, T., Amos, J., & Kroodsman, D. A. (2018). Identifying global patterns of transshipment behavior. Frontiers in Marine Science. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00240
  • Moorthy, S., & Jamal, A. (2010). New conjunctures in maritime imaginaries. In Indian Ocean Studies: Cultural, social, and political perspectives (pp. 1–31). London: Routledge.
  • Nikolic, N., & Bourjea, J. (2013). Differentiation of albacore stock: Review by oceanic regions. ICCAT Recueil de Documents Scientifiques, 70(3), 1340–1354. SCRS, 126 Open access version. Retrieved from https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00149/25990/
  • OEPA. (2017). Présentation des impacts socioéconomiques de la pêche thonière industrielle à Madagascar par l’Observatoire Economique de la Pêche et de l’Aquaculture. Evènement de lancement de la campagne thonière de mars 2017.
  • Paasi, A. (2003). Region and place: Regional identity in question. Progress in Human Geography, 27(4), 475–485.
  • Pajot, G. (1978). Fishing gear and methods for off-shore fishing in Sri Lanka. Online resources on Aquatic commons. Retrieved from http://aquaticcommons.org/17252/1/NARA28_059.pdf
  • Peet, R., Robbins, P., & Watts, M. J. (2011). Global nature. In R. Peet, P. Robbins, & M. J. Watts (Eds.), Global political ecology (pp. 1–48). London: Routledge.
  • POSEIDON, NFDS, & COFREPECHE. (2014). Review of tuna fisheries in the western Indian Ocean. (Framework contract MARE/2011/01 – Lot 3, specific contract 7). Brussels. 165 p. Retrieved from EU website: https://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/sites/fisheries/files/docs/body/report-tuna-fisheries-western-indian-ocean_en.pdf
  • Rangan, H., & Kull, C. (2009). What makes ecology ‘political’? Rethinking ‘scale’ in political ecology. Progress in Human Geography, 33, 28–45.
  • Reygondeau, G., Maury, O., Beaugrand, G., Fromentin, J. M., Fonteneau, A., & Cury, P. (2012). Biogeography of tuna and billfish communities. Journal of Biogeography, 39, 114–129.
  • Robbins, P. (2003). Political ecology in political geography. Political Geography, 22(6), 641–645.
  • Robbins, P. (2012). Political ecology: A critical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Sabarros, P. S., Romanov, E. V., & Bach, P. (2017). Movements and behaviour of yellowfin and bigeye tuna associated to oceanic structures in the western Indian Ocean. Document submitted to the IOTC. IOTC–2017–WPTT19–25.
  • Schurman, R. A. (1998). Tuna dreams: Resource nationalism and the Pacific Islands’ tuna industry. Development and Change, 29, 107–136.
  • Sellström, T. (2015). Africa in the Indian Ocean: Islands in ebb and flow. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.
  • Seychelles Nation. (2017, February 27). Seychelles signs new fisheries agreement with Mauritius. Newspaper article in Seychelles Nation.
  • Simon, G. (2016). How regions do work, and the work we do: A constructive critique of regions in political ecology. Journal of Political Ecology, 23(1), 197–203.
  • Standing, A. (2016). Are The EU’s Fisheries Agreements helping to develop African fisheries? Coalition for Fair Fisheries Agreements (CFFA-CAPE). Retrieved from the CFFA-CAPE website.
  • Steinberg, P. E. (2001). Ocean-space in non-modern societies. In Social construction of the ocean (pp. 38–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tarte, S. (1997). Diplomatic strategies: The Pacific Islands and Japan (Pacific economic paper no. 269). Canberra: Australia-Japan Research Centre.
  • Tarte, S. (2014). Regionalism and changing regional order in the Pacific Islands. Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, 1(2), 312–324.
  • UNDP. (2016). Human development report 2016. Human development for everyone (pp. 212–214). New York. ISBN: 978-92-1-126413-5.
  • USTA. (2017). Bulletin statistque thonier 2017 de l’Unité Statistique Thoniere d’Antsiranana. Consulted at the USTA in October 2018. 75 p.
  • van der Elst, R., & Everett, B. (Eds.). (2015). Offshore fisheries of the Southwest Indian Ocean: Their status and the impact on vulnerable species ( Special publication, 10). Durban: Oceanographic Research Institute.
  • Walker, P. A. (2005). Political ecology: Where is the ecology? Progress in Human Geography, 29(1), 73–82.
  • Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures, spaces. London: Sage.
  • WIOTO. (1991, June). Western Indian Ocean Tuna Organisation convention. Mahé, Seychelles. Retrieved from https://www.jus.uio.no/english/services/library/treaties/08/8-02/west-indian-ocean-tuna.xml
  • World Bank. (2017). The Ocean Economy in Mauritius: Making it happen, making it last (R. Cervigni and P.L. Scandizzo, eds). Washington, DC: The World Bank Group, 301 p.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.