Social class, familism, interest in children, and childbearing: A preliminary test of a “commitment” model of fertility

References

• Banks , Joseph A. 1954 . Prosperity and parenthood , London : Routledge and Kegan Paul .
   Google Scholar
• Bell , Wendell . 1968 . “ The city, the suburb and a theory of social choice ” . In The new urbanization , Edited by: Greer , Scott . 132 – 168 . New York : St. Martin's Press .
   Google Scholar
• Beshers , James . 1962 . Urban social structure , New York : The Free Press .
   Google Scholar
• Blake , Judith . 1968 . Are babies consumer durables? A critique of the economic theory of reproduction motivation . Pop. Stud. , 22 March : 5 – 25 .
   Google Scholar
• Burgess , Ernest and Locke , Harvey J. 1950 . The family , New York : American Book Company .
   Google Scholar
• Goldscheider , Calvin and Uhlenberg , Peter R. 1969 . Minority group status and fertility . Amer. J. Sociol. , 74 january : 361 – 372 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley , Amos . 1950 . Human ecology , New York : Ronald Press .
   Google Scholar
• Heer , David M. 1968 . Population and society , Englewood Cliffs , N. J. : Prentice‐Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Heise , David R. 1975 . Causal analysis , New York : Wiley Interscience .
   Google Scholar
• Heller , Peter L. 1970 . Familism scale: A measure of family solidarity . J. Marr. Fam. , 32 February : 73 – 80 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill , Reuben . 1966 . “ The significance of the family in population research ” . In Family and fertility , Edited by: Liu , William T. 3 – 22 . Notre Dame : Univ. of Notre Dame Press .
   Google Scholar
• _____ . 1968 . Research on human fertility . Intl. Soc. Sci. J. (Paris) , 20 (2) : 226 – 262 .
   Google Scholar
• Hollingshead , A. B. 1957 . Two‐factor index of social position New Haven , Connecticut Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Kephart , William . 1961 . The family, society and the individual , Boston : Houghton Mifflin .
   Google Scholar
• Kiser , Clyde V. 1967 . The growth of American families studies: An assessment of significance . Demography , 4 (1) : 388 – 396 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rainwater , Lee . 1965 . Family design: Marital sexuality, family size and contraception , Chicago : Aldine .
   Google Scholar
• Ryder , Norman B. and Westoff , Charles F. 1969 . Relationships among intended, expected, desired, and ideal family size: United States, 1965 , Princeton : Center for Population Research (March), Princeton University .
   Google Scholar
• Straus , Murray A. 1969 . Family measurement techniques , Minneapolis : Univ. of Minnesota Press .
   Google Scholar
• Tamney , Joseph B. 1966 . “ Family solidarity and fertility ” . In Family and fertility , Edited by: Liu , William T. Notre Dame : Univ. of Notre Dame Press .
   Google Scholar
• Thompson , Barbara and Illsley , Raymond . 1969 . Family growth in Aberdeen . J. Biosoc. Sci. , 1 : 23 – 29 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westoff , Charles F. , Mishler , Elliot G. and Kelley , Lowell . 1957 . Preferences in family size and eventual fertility twenty years later . Amer. J. Sociol. , 62 March : 494 – 496 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrong , Dennis . 1958 . Trends in class fertility in Western nations . Can. J. Econo. Polit. Sci. , 24 May : 216 – 229 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar