Measuring the Impact of Project-Based Learning in Six Sigma Education

REFERENCES

• Amante, B., Lacayo, A., Pique, M., Oliver, S., Ponsa, P., and Vilanova, R. (2010). Evaluation of methodology PBL done by students. IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments (pp. 1–21). Dublin, Ireland, April 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Cook, C.M., Lu, L., Clark, G., DeHart, S.P., Hoerl, R., Jones, B., et al. (2012). Statistical engineering—roles for statisticians and the path forward. Quality Engineering, 24(2), 133–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson-Cook, C.M., Patterson, A., and Hoerl, R. (2005). A structured problem-solving course for graduate students: Exposing students to Six Sigma as part of their university training. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 21(3), 249–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borror, C.M., Berger, R.L., LaFond, S., and Stull, M. (2012). Undergraduate statistics curriculum: A large, unstructured, complex problem. Quality Engineering, 24(2), 201–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chickering, A.W., and Gamson, Z.F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3–7, ED 282 491. 6 pp. MF-01; PC-01.
   Google Scholar
• Cudney, E., and Elrod, C. (2011). A comparative analysis of integrating lean concepts into supply chain management in manufacturing and service industries. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 2(1), 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Cudney, E., Furterer, S., and Dietrich, D. (2012). Design for Six Sigma in product and service development: Applications and case studies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elshorbagy, A., and Schönwetter, D.J. (2002). Engineering morphing: Bridging the gap between classroom teaching and the engineering profession. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(3), 295–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, N., Cook, R., and Hauser, K. (2007). Work in progress—an improved teaching strategy for lean manufacturing education. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (p. T3C1), Milwaukee, WI, October 10–13, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Furterer, S. (2007). Instructional strategies and tools to teach Six Sigma to engineering technology undergraduate students. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI, June 24–27, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, C., and Johnston, J. (2008). Graduate training: Evidence from FUSION projects in Ireland. Education + Training, 50(5), 391–405.
   Google Scholar
• Kanigolla, D., Cudney, E., and Corns, S. (2013). Employing project-based learning in Six Sigma education. Journal for Quality and Participation, 36(1), 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach, J., Cudney, E., and Elrod, C. (2011). The use of continuous improvement techniques: A survey-based study of current practices. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 3(7), 89–100.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L.R., Terenzini, P.T., Volkwein, J.F., and Peterson, G.D. (2006). The changing face of engineering education. The Bridge, 36(2), 6–44.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, A. (2004). Six Sigma education: A critical role for academia. The TQM Magazine, 16(4), 293–302.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D.C., Burdick, R.K., Lawson, C.A., Molnau, W.E., Zenzen, F., Jennings, C.L., et al. (2005). A university-based Six Sigma program. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 21(3), 243–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2004). The engineer of 2020: Vision of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozelkan, E., Teng, S.G., Johnson, T., Benson, T., and Nestvogel, D. (2007). A collaborative case study for teaching achieving lean system benefits in manufacturing and supply chains to engineering management students. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI, June 24–27, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M.J., and Felder, R.M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Siong, L.H. (2006). Six Sigma and educational excellence. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology (ICMIT 2006) (pp. 743–747), Singapore, China, June 21–23, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Stier, K.W. (2003). Teaching lean manufacturing concepts through project-based learning and simulation. Journal of Industrial Technology, 19(4), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Van til, R.P., Tracey, M.W., Sengupta, S., and Fliedner, G. (2009). Teaching lean with an interdisciplinary problem-solving learning approach. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 173–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivas, J.F., and Allada, V. (2006). Enhancing engineering education using thematic case-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(2), 236–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Shaver, G.M., and Meckl, P. (2010). Lessons learned: Implementing the case teaching method in a mechanical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, W., and Porter, J.R. (2010). Using project-based learning to teach Six Sigma principles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3), 655–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar