Beyond housing: on the role of commoning in the establishment of a Community Land Trust project

References

• Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. (1994). Observing techniques. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 377–392). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aernouts, N., & Ryckewaert, M. (2015). Reconceptualizing the “Publicness” of public housing: The case of Brussels. Social Inclusion, 3(2), 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angotti, T. (2008). New York for sale. Community planning confronts global real estate. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N. (2010). Building sustainable communities from the grassroots: How community land trust can create social sustainability. In T. Manzi, K. Lucas, T. Lloyd-Jones, & J. Allen ( Eds.), Social sustainability in urban areas: Communities, connectivity and the urban fabric (pp. 49–64). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Baily, S. (2013). Beyond ownership: Governing the wealth of urban commons. Paper presented at the Commoning the City conference, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, E. M. (2005). Tinkering with tenure: The Community Land Trust experiment in Voi, Kenya. Habitat International, 29, 375–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, N., & Van Mieghem, W. (2005). La crise du logement á Bruxelles: Probléme d'accés et/ou de pénurie [The housing crisis in Brussels: Problem of access and/or scarcity]? Brussels: Brylant.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, N., Zimmer, P., & Surkin, J. (2009). Housing, control over land use and public space. Brussels Studies, Synthesis Note, 6, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2008). Enclosure, common right and the property of the poor. Social and Legal Studies, 17(3), 311–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest (2009). Regeerakkoord 2009--2014: Een duurzame ontwikkeling van het Gewest ten dienste van de Brusselaars [Government agreement 2009–2014: A sustainable development of the Region at the service of the inhabitants of Brussels]. Brussels: Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, S. (2015). Pursuing urban commons: Politics and alliances in Community Land Trust activism in East London. Antipode, 48(1), 134–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, S., Khimani, N., Sungu-Eryilmaz, Y., & Earle, E., (2013). Urban community land trusts. Toronto: Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest.
   Google Scholar
• Community Investments (2008). Community Land Trusts. Preserving long-term housing affordability. Community Investments, 20(1), 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J.E. (2014). Origins and evolution of the Community Land Trust in the United States. In J.E. Davis ( Ed.), The community land trust reader (pp. 3–47). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• De Angelis, M. (2007). The beginning of history: Value struggles and global capital. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Decker, P. (2002). On the genesis of social rental agencies in Belgium. Urban Studies, 39(2), 297–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Keersmaecker, M.L. (2014). Observatiecentrum van de huurprijzen: Enquête 2013 [Observatory of the rents: Survey 2013]. Brussels: Gewestelijk Observatiecentrum voor de huisvesting
   Google Scholar
• Dzokic, A., & Neelen, M. (2015). Instituting commoning. Footprint, 9(1), 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Englert, M., Luyten, S., Mazina, D., & Yannart, M. (2015). Welzijnsbarometer 2015 [Social barometer 2015]. Brussels: Brussels-Capital Health and Social Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Grippa, T., Marissal, P., May, X., Wertz, I., Loopmans, M., & Van Hamme, G. (2015). Dynamiek van de buurten in moeilijkheden in de Belgische stadsgewesten [Dynamics of neighbourhoods in difficulty in Belgian urban regions]. Brussels: POD Maatschappelijke Integratie.
   Google Scholar
• Haffner, M. (1999). Kosten en uitgaven van eigenaar-bewoners. Een fiscaal-economische vergelijking tussen West-Europese landen [Costs and expenses of owner-occupiers. A fiscal-economic comparison between Western-European countries] (doctoral thesis). Delft: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helfrich, S., & Haas, J. (2009). The commons: A new narrative for our times. Washington, DC: Heinrich Böll Stiftung North America.
   Google Scholar
• Heylen, K., & Haffner, M. (2012). The effect of housing expenses and subsidies on the income distribution in Flanders and the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 27(8), 1142–1161.
   Google Scholar
• Heylen, K., & Van den Broeck, K. (2015). Discrimination and selection in the Belgian private rental market. Housing Studies, 31(2), 223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesteloot, C. (2000). Brussels: Post-Fordist polarization in a Fordist spatial canvas. In P. Marcuse ( Ed.), Globalizing cities: A new spatial order? (pp. 186–210). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Knops, G., Alleman, J., & Notredame, L. (1994). De nieuwe wooninitiatieven [The new housing initiatives]. Brussels: Koning Boudewijnstichting.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantos, H., Siatitsa, D., & Vaiou, D. (2013). Qualitative approaches for the study of socially innovative initiatives. In: F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, D.A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch ( Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation (pp. 274–284). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, P. (2009). The magna carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loopmans, M., & Kesteloot, C. (2009). Social inequalities. Brussels Studies, 16, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mattei, U. (2012). Providing direct access to social justice by renewing common sense. In Council of Europe ( Eds.), Redefining and combatting poverty (pp. 363–374). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• McCay, B.J., & Jentoft, S. (1998). Market or community failure? Critical perspectives on common property research. Human Organizations, 57(1), 21–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midheme, E., & Moulaert, F. (2013). Pushing back the frontiers of property: Community land trusts and low-income housing in urban Kenya. Land Use Policy, 25, 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T., & McKee, K. (2012). Empowering local communities? An international review of Community Land Trusts. Housing Studies, 27(2), 280–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T., & Mullins, D. (2013). Scaling-up or going viral? Comparing self-help housing and community land trust facilitation. Voluntary Sector Review, 4(3), 333–353.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T.K. (2007). The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action. In G.T. Svendsen & G.L.H. Svendsen ( Eds.), Handbook of social capital: The troika of sociology, political science and economics (pp. 17–35). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Romainville, A. (2010). Who benefits from home ownership support. Brussels Studies, 34, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Van Criekingen, M. (2008). Towards a geography of displacement. Moving out of Brussels’ gentrifying neighbourhoods. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 23, 199–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, S., & Heylen, K. (2014). How housing outcomes vary between the Belgian regions. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29, 541–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar