Home swapping as instrument for more housing sufficiency!

References

• Alcott, B. (2015). Jevons’ paradox (rebound effect). In G. D’Alisa, F. Demaria, & G. Kallis (Eds.), Degrowth – A vocabulary for a new era (pp. 121–124). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, S. (2015). Simplicity. In G. D’Alisa, F. Demaria, & G. Kallis (Eds.), Degrowth – A vocabulary for a new era. (pp. 131–136). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andriotis, K., & Agiomirgianakis, G. (2014). Market escape through exchange: Home swap as a form of non-commercial hospitality. Current Issues in Tourism, 17(7), 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.837868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayalon, L., Roy, S., Aloni, O., & Keating, N. (2023). A scoping review of research on older people and intergenerational relations in the context of climate change. Gerontologist, 63(5), 945–958. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnac028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierwirth, A. (2015). Strategische Entwicklung eines zukunftsfähigen Wohnraumangebots – ein Suffizienz-Szenario [Strategic development of a sustainable housing provision – A sufficiency scenario]. Uwf UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 23(1–2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-015-0355-6
   Google Scholar
• BMVBS (Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung). (2011). Wohnen im Alter. Marktprozesse und wohnungspolitischer Handlungsbedarf [Housing in old age market processes and housing political demand for action].
   Google Scholar
• Bohnenberger, K. (2021). Can ‘sufficiency’ reconcile social and environmental goals? A Q-methodological analysis of German housing policy. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09762-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born, J. (2019). Meins gegen Deins [Mine against yours]. In Vonovia SE (Ed.), Wohnen & Gesellschaft – Bauen für eine neue Zeit (pp. 28–29). Vonovia SE.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, M., Peterson, M. N., & Liu, J. (2014). Long-term dynamics of household size and their environmental implications. Population and Environment, 36, 73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröchner, J. (2010). Innovation in construction. In F. Gallouj, & D. Djellal (Eds.), The handbook of innovation and services – A multi-disciplinary perspective (pp. 743–767). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Casado-Diaz, M. A., Casado-Díaz, A. B., & Hoogendoorn, G. (2020). The home exchange phenomenon in the sharing economy: A research agenda. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 20(3), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2019.1708455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, S. L. (2019). A quest for status or a desire to fit in? An examination of suburban “monster homes” as a positional good. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(4), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1478227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, W. A. V., & Deurloo, M. C. (2006). Aging in place and housing over-consumption. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21(3), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-006-9048-3
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. J. (2021). New conceptions of sufficient home size in high-income countries: Are we approaching a sustainable consumption transition. Housing, Theory and Society, 38(2), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1722218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groote, P., & Nicasi, F. (1994). Home exchange: An alternative form of tourism and case study of the Belgian market. Tourist Review, 49(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb058147
   Google Scholar
• Destatis (Statistisches Bundesamt). (2021a). Gebäude und Wohnungen – Bestand an Wohnungen und Wohngebäuden: Bauabgang von Wohnungen und Wohngebäuden. Lange Reihen ab 1969-2020 [Buildings and housing units – Stock of housing units and apartment buildings: Building changes in housing units and apartment buildings. Long series 1969-2020].
   Google Scholar
• Destatis (Statistisches Bundesamt). (2021b). Energieverbrauch privater Haushalte für Wohnen 2019 weiter gestiegen [Energy consumption of private households for housing increased again in 2019] (Press Release No. 383). https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2021/08/PD21_383_85.html
   Google Scholar
• Die Landeseigenen (Die sechs landeseigenen Wohnungsbaugesellschaften Berlins). (2018). Wohnungstausch – Ihr Weg zum neuen Zuhause [Home swap – the way into your new home]
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth-Krebs, K. (2019). Implications of declining household sizes and expectations of home comfort for domestic energy demand. Nature Energy, 5(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0512-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erba, S., & Pagliano, L. (2021). Combining sufficiency, efficiency and flexibility to achieve positive energy districts targets. Energies, 14(15), 4697. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, K., & Sjöstrand, J. (2007). On two theorems of Quinzii and rent controlled housing allocation in Sweden. International Game Theory Review, 09(03), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219198907001576
   Google Scholar
• Falletta, V. (2021). Meine Wohnung, deine Wohnung: Koordinierungsstelle organisiert Wohnungstausch in Potsdam [My home, your home: Coordination office organises home swapping in Potsdam]. Polis. https://polis-magazin.com/2021/02/meine-wohnung-deine-wohnung-eine-koordinierungstelle-organsiert-wohnungstausch-in-potsdam/
   Google Scholar
• Ferreri, M. (2019). Refurbishment vs demolition? Social housing campaigning for degrowth. In A. Nelson & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for Degrowth: Principles, Models, Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 109–119). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreri, M., Dawson, G., & Vasudevan, A. (2017). Living precariously: Property guardianship and the flexible city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(2), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J., & Gomez-Lanier, L. (2017). Are tiny homes here to stay? A review of literature on the tiny house movement. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 45(4), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forno, F., & Garibaldi, R. (2015). Sharing economy in travel and tourism: The case of home-swapping in Italy. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 16(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2015.1013409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fremstad, A., Underwood, A., & Zahran, S. (2018). The environmental impact of sharing: Household and urban economies in CO2 emissions. Ecological Economics, 145, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, K. (2015). The multiple policy failures of the UK bedroom tax. International Journal of Housing Policy, 15(2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2014.992681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagbert, P. (2016). ‘It’s just a matter of adjustment’: Residents’ perceptions and the potential for low-impact home practices. Housing, Theory and Society, 33(3), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2016.1141797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagbert, P., & Bradley, K. (2017). Transitions on the home front: A story of sustainable living beyond eco-efficiency. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, E., & Nowicki, M. (2020). ‘Get smaller’? Emerging geographies of micro-living. Area, 52(3), 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HDB (Housing & Development Board). (2022). Silver housing bonus. https://www.hdb.gov.sg/residential/living-in-an-hdb-flat/for-our-seniors/monetising-your-flat-for-retirement/silver-housing-bonus
   Google Scholar
• Heyen, D. A., Fischer, C., Barth, R., Brunn, C., Grießhammer, R., Keimeyer, F., & Wolff, F. (2013). When less is more: Sufficiency – Need and options for policy action (Working Paper, 3/2013). Öko-Institut.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2015). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of climate change – Working group III contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2018). Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2023). Synthesis report on the IPCC sixth assessment report (AR6): Summary for policymakers. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kanschik, P. (2016). Eco-sufficiency and distributive sufficientarianism – Friends or foes? Environmental Values, 25(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327116X14703858759099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzmann, R. (2022). Home swapping as a degrowth strategy for housing. Urban Geography, 43(8), 1231–1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2022.2093503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzmann, R. (2023a). Der deutsche Wohnungsmarkt [The German housing market]. In E. Kulke (Ed.), Wirtschaftsgeographie Deutschlands (3rd ed., pp. 311–332). Springer Spektrum.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzmann, R. (2023b). Tauschst du schon oder suchst du noch? Kommunaler Wohnungstausch ist keine Erfolgsgeschichte [Are you already swapping or still searching? Municipal home exchange is not a success story]. Forum Wohnen und Stadtentwicklung, 5, 273–275.
   Google Scholar
• Kopatz, M. (2015). Politik und Bürger haben es in der Hand! [It is up to policy and citizens!]. In Deutsche Bauzeitung (Ed.), Besser, anders, weniger – Suffizienz in der Baukultur. Der Bericht zum db-Kongress, 21. Mai 2014 (pp. 16–17). Konradin Mediengruppe.
   Google Scholar
• Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., & Haberl, H. (2020). Growing stocks of buildings, infrastructures and machinery as key challenge for compliance with climate targets. Global Environmental Change, 61, 102034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, D. (2020). Coveting your neighbour’s house: Understanding the positional nature of residential satisfaction. Housing Studies, 35(6), 1142–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1651832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landeshauptstadt Potsdam. (2020). Eröffnung der Koordinierungsstelle Wohnungstausch Yorckstraße 24 (Press Release No. 550, 14.09.2020). https://www.potsdam.de/550-eroeffnung-der-koordinierungsstelle-wohnungstausch-yorckstrasse-24
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, L., & Müller, D. K. (2019). Coping with second home tourism: Responses and strategies of private and public service providers in western Sweden. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(16), 1958–1974. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1411339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. (2019). Bekommt Hamburg eine Wohnungstauschbörse? [Is Hamburg getting a home swap exchange?]. Hinz&Kunzt. https://www.hinzundkunzt.de/bekommt-hamburg-eine-wohnungstauschboerse/
   Google Scholar
• Lauterbach, J. (2019). Warum Wohnungstausch in Hamburg so schwierig ist [Why home swapping is so difficult in Hamburg]. Hamburger Abendblatt. https://www.abendblatt.de/hamburg/article227655465/Wohnungstausch-Mietrecht-Immobilien-Hamburg.html
   Google Scholar
• Leiß, B. (2020). Wohnungstausch bei landeseigenen Wohnungsbaugesellschaften: Krasses Missverhältnis [Home swap with the state-owned housing companies: Distinct mismatch]. MieterMagazin, 9(2020), 8.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, H. C., & Chang, T. F. (2002). Space-heating and water-heating energy demands of the aged in the U.S. Energy Economics, 24(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00014-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, M. (2002). Warum Suffizienz unentbehrlich ist [Why sufficiency is indispensable]. In M. Linz (Ed.), Von Nichts zu viel. Suffizienz gehört zur Nachhaltigkeit (pp. 7–14). Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, M. (2004). Weder Mangel noch Übermaß: Über Suffizienz und Suffizienzforschung [Neither shortage nor excel: About sufficiency and sufficiency research] (Wuppertal Papers, No. 145). Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., & Luck, G. W. (2003). Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature, 421(6922), 530–533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LMSGW (Landeshauptstadt München – Sozialreferat Gesamtplanung Wohnen). (2021). Wohnungsbörse [Housing exchange]. https://stadt.muenchen.de/service/info/gesamtplanung-wohnen/10338615/
   Google Scholar
• Lorek, S., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Energy sufficiency through social innovation in housing. Energy Policy, 126, 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangold, S., & Zschau, T. (2019). In search of the good life: The appeal of the tiny house lifestyle in the USA. Social Sciences, 8(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8010026
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, M., & Stratford, E. (2021). Housing aspirations, pathways, and provision: Contradictions and compromises in pursuit of voluntary simplicity. Housing Studies, 36(5), 714–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1720614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mete, S., & Xue, J. (2021). Integrating environmental sustainability and social justice in housing development: Two contrasting scenarios. Progress in Planning, 151, 100504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2020.100504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzner-Szigeth, A. (2019). Strategies for eco-social transformation: comparing efficiency, sufficiency and consistency. In Designing Sustainability for All: Proceedings of the 3rd LeNS World Distributed Conference (pp. 649–654).
   Google Scholar
• Mieder, R. (2020). Grüne fordern bundesweites Wohnungstausch-Modell: Kein durchschlagender Erfolg [Green party calls for German-wide home swap model: No sweeping success]. MieterMagazin, 1 + 2(2020), 12.
   Google Scholar
• Moffatt, S., Lawson, S., Patterson, R., Holding, E., Dennison, A., Sowden, S., & Brown, J. (2016). A qualitative study of the impact of the UK ‘bedroom tax. Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England), 38(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdv031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, C. H., & Tatum, C. B. (1988). Major characteristics of constructed products and resulting limitations of construction technology. Construction Management and Economics, 6(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446198800000012
   Google Scholar
• Nässén, J., & Holmberg, J. (2009). Quantifying the rebound effects of energy efficiency improvements and energy conserving behaviour in Sweden. Energy Efficiency, 2(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-009-9046-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. (2018). Small is necessary: Shared living on a shared planet. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. (2019). Housing for growth narratives. In A. Nelson & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 3–13). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A., & Schneider, F. (2019). Summary and research futures for housing for degrowth. In A. Nelson & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 256–264). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paech, N. (2010). Eine Alternative zum Entkopplungsmythos: Die Postwachstumsökonomie [An alternative to the myth of decoupling: The post growth economy]. Humane Wirtschaft, 5, 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Palm, P. (2013). Energy efficiency in tenant-owners’ residences: The process of going from objective to implementation. Housing Studies, 28(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2013.729266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penfold, H., Waitt, G., & McGuirk, P. (2018). Portrayals of the tiny house in electronic media: Challenging or reproducing the Australian dream home. Australian Planner, 55(3–4), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2019.1632360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phua, V. C. (2019). Perceiving Airbnb as sharing economy: The issue of trust in using Airbnb. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(17), 2051–2055. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2018.1440539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roquette, P. (1927). Das Wesen des Wohnungstauschvertrages [The characteristics of the home swap contract]. Juristische Rundschau, 3(8), 226–239.
   Google Scholar
• Royston, S., Selby, J., & Shove, E. (2018). Invisible energy policies: A new agenda for energy demand reduction. Energy Policy, 123, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAGA. (2023). Wohnungstauschbörse: Von groß nach klein – passgenau für Ihre Lebenssituation: Unser besonderer Service für Tauschkunden im Seniorenalter [Home swap exchange: From big to small – fitting exactly to your current life situation: Our special service for swap willing households of older age]. https://www.saga.hamburg/fuer-unsere-mieter/meine-saga/wohnungstauschboerse
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, M. (2018). Downsizing of housing: Negotiating sufficiency and spatial norms. Journal of Macromarketing, 38(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146717748355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santin, O. G., Itard, L., & Visscher, H. (2009). The effect of occupancy and building characteristics on energy use for space and water heating in Dutch residential stock. Energy and Buildings, 41(11), 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F. (2021). Towards an urban degrowth: Habitability, finity and polycentric autonomism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(5), 1076–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20981391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäpke, N., & Rauschmayer, F. (2014). Going beyond efficiency: Including altruistic motives in behavioral models for sustainability transitions to address sufficiency. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 10(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2014.11908123
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, F. (2019). Housing for degrowth narratives. In A. Nelson & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 14–29). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schneidewind, U. (2017). Einfacher gut leben: Suffizienz und Postwachstum [Living better the simpler way: Sufficiency and post growth]. Politische Ökologie, 148, 98–103.
   Google Scholar
• Schuckert, M., Peters, M., & Pilz, G. (2018). The co-creation of host-guest relationships via couchsurfing: A qualitative study. Tourism Recreation Research, 43(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2017.1384127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, C. (2012). Post-Wachstums-Ökonomien – (k)ein Thema für die Wirtschaftsgeographie [Post growth economy – no/a topic for economic geography. Zeitschrift Für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 56(1–2), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw.2012.0018
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, C., Lange, B., Hülz, M., & Schmid, B. (2020). Postwachstumsgeographien – Konzeptionelle und thematische Eckpunkte der Anthologie [Post-growth geographies – Conceptual and thematic key points of the anthology]. In B. Lange, M. Hülz, B. Schmid, & C. Schulz (Eds.), Postwachstumsgeographien – Raumbezüge diverser und alternativer Ökonomien (pp. 13–32). Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, M. (1991). Der Tauschwohnungsmarkt in der zentralistischen Planwirtschaft – das Beispiel von Ostberlin [The home swap market in the centralistic planned economy – the case of East Berlin] (ISR-Forschungsberichte, No. 3). Akademie der Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Sethmann, J. (2018). Wohnungstausch bei den Städtischen: Dürftige Bilanz [Home swap with the municipal housing companies: Weak results]. MieterMagazin, 1 + 2(2018), 16.
   Google Scholar
• Shearer, H., & Burton, P. (2019). Towards a typology of tiny houses. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2018.1487879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, A., & Wahlström, M. (2023). Climate change or what? Prognostic framing by fridays for future protesters. Social Movement Studies, 22(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2021.1988913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., Brischke, L.-A., Thema, J., & Kopatz, M. (2015). Energy sufficiency policy: An evolution of energy efficiency policy or radically new approaches? In A. Gomes Martins & J. Wade (Eds.), Panel 1 – Foundations of future energy policy. ECEEE – Summer Study on Energy Efficiency. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Trainer, T. (2019). The simpler way – Housing, living and settlements. In A. Nelson & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp.120–130). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). (2019). World Population Prospects 2019 – Highlights.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Wohnen. (2020). Damit Ihre Wohnung zu Ihnen passt – Wohnungstausch.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, J. (2019). Housing for degrowth – Space, planning and distribution. In A. Nelson & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 185–195). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, J. (2022). Urban planning and degrowth: A missing dialogue. Local Environment, 27(4), 404–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2020.1867840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar