1,044
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Innovation in Research and Scholarship Features

Conscientious Practice: Post-Master’s Student Affairs Professionals’ Perspectives on Engaging Social Justice

ORCID Icon, , , &

References

  • Abes, E. S. (2016). Situating paradigms in student development theory. In E. S. Abes, S. R. Jones, & S. K. Watt (Eds.), Critical perspectives on student development theory. New directions for student services (Vol. 154, pp. 9–16). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Abes, E. S., Jones, S. R., & McEwen, M. K. (2007). Reconceptualizing the model of multiple dimensions of identity: The role of meaning-making capacity in the construction of multiple identities. Journal of College Student Development, 48(1), 1–22.
  • Abes, E. S., Jones, S. R., & Watt, S. K. (Eds.). (2016). Critical perspectives on student development theory. New directions for student services (Vol. 154). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • ACPA–College Student Educators International, & NASPA–Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education. (2015). ACPA/NASPA professional competency areas for student affairs educators. Washington, DC: Authors.
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Knopp Biklen, S. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Bradley-Levine, J. (2012). Developing critical consciousness through teacher leader preparation. Journal of School Leadership, 22(4), 751–770.
  • Carlson, E., Engebretson, J., & Chamberlain, R. (2006). Photovoice as a social process of critical consciousness. Qualitative Health Research, 16(6), 836–852.
  • Clark-Ibáñez, M. (2004). Framing the social world with photoelicitation interviews. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(12), 1507–1526.
  • Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS). (2015). CAS standards and guidelines (9th ed.). Washington, DC: Authors.
  • Freire, P. (2002). Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: Continuum.
  • Gaston Gayles, J., & Kelly, B. T. (2007). Experiences with diversity in the curriculum: Implications for graduate programs and student affairs practice. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators Journal, 44(1), 193–208.
  • Gay, G., & Kirkland, K. (2003). Developing cultural critical consciousness and self-reflection in preservice teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 42(3), 181–187.
  • Goodhart, F. W., Hsu, J., Baek, J. H., Coleman, A. L., Maresca, F. M., & Miller, M. B. (2006). A view through a different lens: Photovoice as a tool for student advocacy. Journal of American College Health, 55(1), 53–56. doi:10.3200/JACH.55.1.53-56
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 255–286). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
  • Harrison, L. M. (2010). Consequences and strategies student affairs professionals engage in their advocacy roles. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 47(2), 197–214. doi:10.2202/1949-6605.6003
  • Harrison, L. M. (2014). How student affairs professionals learn to advocate: A phenomenological study. Journal of College & Character, 15(3), 165–177.
  • Jones, S. R., & Abes, E. S. (2013). Identity development of college students: Advancing frameworks for multiple dimensions of identity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Jones, S. R., & McEwen, M. K. (2000). Conceptual model of multiple dimensions of identity. Journal of College Student Development, 41(4), 405–414.
  • Jones, S. R., & Stewart, D. L. (2016). Evolution of student development theories. In E. S. Abes, S. R. Jones, & S. K. Watt (Eds.), Critical perspectives on student development theory. New directions for student services (Vol. 154, pp. 13–24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kelly, B. T., & Gaston-Gayles, J. (2011). Resistance to racial/ethnic dialogue in graduate preparation programs: Implications for multicultural competence. College Student Affairs Journal, 29(1), 77–87.
  • Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413–431.
  • McEwen, M. (2003). The nature and uses of theory. In S. R. Komives & D. B. Woodard Jr., & Associates (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (pp. 153–178). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Means, D. R. (2017). “Quaring” spirituality: The spiritual counterstories and spaces of black gay and bisexual male college students. Journal of College Student Development, 58(2), 229.
  • Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Minthorn, R. S., & Marsh, T. E. J. (2016). Centering indigenous college student voices and perspectives through photovoice and photo-elicitation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 47, 4–10. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.04.010
  • Patton, L. D., Renn, K. A., Guido, F. M., & Quaye, S. J. (2016). Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. HSR: Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189–1208.
  • Reason, R. D., & Kimball, E. W. (2012). A new theory-to-practice model for student affairs: Integrating scholarship, context, and reflection. Journal of Student Affairs Research & Practice, 49(4), 359–376.
  • Reissman, C. (2003). Analysis of personal narratives. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 331–346). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Renn, K. A. (2000). Patterns of situational identity among biracial and multiracial college students. The Review of Higher Education, 23(4), 399–420.
  • Renn, K. A., & Jessup-Anger, E. R. (2008). Preparing new professionals: Lessons for graduate preparation programs from the national study of new professionals in student affairs. Journal of College Student Development, 49(4), 319–335.
  • Rhoads, R. A. (2016). Student activism, diversity, and the struggle for a just society. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(3), 189–202.
  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Steinke Wawrzynski, K., & Jessup-Anger, J. E. (2014). Building bridges: Using the office consultation project to connect students to theory and practice. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 51(1), 85–97.
  • Strier, R., & Shechter, D. (2016). Visualizing access: Knowledge development in university–Community partnerships. Higher Education, 71(3), 343–359. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9907-5
  • Torres, V., Jones, S. R., & Renn, K. A. (2009). Identity development theories in student affairs: Origins, current status, and new approaches. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 577–593.
  • Watts, R., Diemer, M., & Voight, A. (2011). Critical consciousness: Current status and future directions. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 134, 43–57.
  • Winkle-Wagner, R. (2012). Self, college experiences, and society: Rethinking the theoretical foundations of student development theory. College Student Affairs Journal, 30(2), 45–60.
  • Zamudio, M., Bridgeman, J., Russell, C., & Rios, F. (2009). Developing a critical consciousness: Positionality, pedagogy, and problems. Race Ethnicity and Education, 12(4), 455–472.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.