1,204
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Innovation in Research and Scholarship Feature

Assessment: The “Wild Card” in Student Affairs

References

  • ACPA–College Student Educators International & NASPA–Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education. (2015). Professional competency areas for student affairs practitioners. Washington, DC: ACPA & NASPA.
  • Antony, J. S. (2002). Reexamining doctoral student socialization and professional development: Moving beyond the congruence and assimilation orientation. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 349–380). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Antony, J. S., & Taylor, E. (2004). Theories and strategies of academic career socialization: Improving paths to the professoriate for Black graduate students. In D. H. Wulff & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 92–114). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, XXI, 397–456.
  • Blimling, G. S. (2013). Challenges of assessment in student affairs. In J. H. Schuh (Ed.), Special issue: Selected contemporary assessment issues. New directions for student services, 142 (pp. 5–14). Malden, MA: Wiley.
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Bresciani, M. J. (2011). Making assessment meaningful: What new student affairs professionals and those new to assessment need to know. Retrieved from http://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/
  • Castillo-Montoya, M. (2017). Deepening understanding of prior knowledge: What diverse first- generation college students in the U.S. can teach us. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(5), 587–603. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1273208
  • Castillo-Montoya, M., Abreu, J., & Abad, A. (2019). Racially liberatory pedagogy: A Black lives matter approach to education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32, 1125–1145. doi:10.1080/09518398.2019.1645904
  • Castillo-Montoya, M., & Torres-Guzmán, M. (2012). Thriving in our identity and in the academy: Latina epistemology as a core resource. Harvard Educational Review, 82(4), 540–558. doi:10.17763/haer.82.4.k483005r768821n5
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
  • Daniel, C. A. (2007). Outsiders-within: Critical race theory, graduate education and barriers to professionalization. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 34(1), 25–42.
  • Delgado Bernal, D. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical raced- gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 105–126. doi:10.1177/107780040200800107
  • Esmonde, I. (2017). Power and sociocultural theories of learning. In I. Esmonde & A. N. Booker (Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning (pp. 6–27). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Felder, P., Stevenson, H., & Gasman, M. (2014). Understanding race in doctoral student socialization. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 21–42. doi:10.28945/1947
  • Finney, S. J., & Horst, S. J. (2019). Standards, standards, standards: Mapping professional standards for outcomes assessment to assessment practice. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 1–16. doi:10.1080/19496591.2018.1559171
  • Fuller, M. B. (2013). Student affairs staff support, resistance, or indifference to assessment. Developments, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.myacpa.org/article/student-affairs-staff-support-resistance-or-indifference-assessment
  • Gardner, S. K. (2008). Fitting the mold of graduate school: A qualitative study of socialization in doctoral education. Innovative Higher Education, 33(2), 125–138. doi:10.1007/s10755-008-9068-x
  • Gildersleeve, R. E., Croom, N. N., & Vasquez, P. L. (2011). “Am I going crazy?!”: A critical race analysis of doctoral education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 44(1), 93–114. doi:10.1080/10665684.2011.539472
  • González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum Associates.
  • Haynes, C., & Bazner, K. J. (2019). A message for faculty from the present-day movement for black lives. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(9), 1146–1161. doi:10.1080/09518398.2019.1645909
  • Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2016). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective neuroscience. New York, NY: Norton & Company.
  • Kiyama, J. M., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2018). Funds of knowledge in higher education: Honoring students’ cultural experiences and resources as strengths. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Livingston, C. H., & Zerulik, J. D. (2013). The role of the assessment coordinator in a division of student affairs. In J. H. Schuh (Ed.), Special issue: Selected contemporary assessment issues. New directions for student services, 142 (pp. 15–24). Malden, MA: Wiley.
  • Miles, M. G., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
  • Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Ryder, A. J., & Kimball, E. W. (2015). Assessment as reflexive practice: A grounded model for making evidence-based decisions in student affairs. Research & Practice in Assessment, 10, 30–45.
  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Sallee, M. W. (2011). Performing masculinity: Considering gender in doctoral student socialization. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 187–216. doi:10.1353/jhe.2011.0007
  • Schuh, J. H. (2009). Assessment as an essential dimension of contemporary student affairs practice. In J. H. Schuh (Ed.), Assessment methods for student affairs (pp. 1–22). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schuh, J. H., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2010). The role of student affairs in student learning assessment. Retrieved from learningoutcomesassessment.org
  • Seagraves, B., & Dean, L. A. (2010). Conditions supporting a culture of assessment in student affairs divisions at small colleges and universities. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 47(3), 307–324. doi:10.2202/1949-6605.6073
  • Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences, (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Shutt, M. D., Garrett, J. M., Lynch, J. W., & Dean, L. A. (2012). An assessment model as best practice in student affairs. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 49(1), 65–82. doi:10.1515/jsarp-2012-6227
  • Tuitt, F. (2003). Afterword: Realizing a more inclusive pedagogy. In A. Howell & F. Tuitt (Eds.), Race and higher education: Rethinking pedagogy in diverse college classrooms (pp. 243–268). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review.
  • Tuitt, F. (2016). Conclusion: Inclusive pedagogy 2.0: Implications for race, equity, and higher education in a global context. In F. Tuitt, C. Haynes, & S. Stewart (Eds.), Race, equity, and the learning environment: The global relevance of critical and inclusive pedagogies in higher education (pp. 205–221). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Tuitt, F., Haynes, C., & Stewart, S. (2018). Transforming the classroom at traditionally white institutions to make Black lives matter. To Improve the Academy, 37(1), 63–76. doi:10.1002/tia2.2018.37.issue-1
  • Twale, D. J., Weidman, J. C., & Bethea, K. (2016). Conceptualizing socialization of graduate students of color: Revisiting the Weidman-Twale-Stein framework. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 40(2), 80–94.
  • Upcraft, M. L., & Schuh, J. H. (2002). Assessment vs. research: Why we should care about the difference. About Campus, March-April, 16–20.
  • Ward, K., & Bensimón, E. (2002). Socialization. In A. M. Martinez Aleman & K. A. Renn (Eds.), Women in higher education: An encyclopedia (pp. 431–435). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
  • Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28(3)). Washington, DC: Jossey-Bass.
  • Williams, B. C. (2016). Radical honesty: Truth-telling as pedagogy for working through shame in academic spaces. In F. Tuitt, C. Haynes, & S. Stewart (Eds.), Race, equity, and the learning environment: The global relevance of critical and inclusive pedagogies in higher education (pp. 71–82). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Williams, M. S., Brown Burnett, T. J., Carroll, T. K., & Harris, C. J. (2018). Mentoring, managing, and helping: A critical race analysis of socialization in doctoral education. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 20(2), 253–278. doi:10.1177/1521025116657834
  • Winkle-Wagner, R., & McCoy, D. L. (2014). Entering the (postgraduate) field: Underrepresented students’ acquisition of cultural and social capital in graduate school preparation programs. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(2), 178–205.
  • Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.