Segmenting the Construction Industry: A Quantitative Study of Business Interest Groups in a Low Salience Policy Setting

References

• ACEEE. (2021). The state energy efficiency scorecard. https://www.aceee.org/state-policy/scorecard.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, J., & Feiock, R. (2013). Forms of government and climate change policies in US cities. Urban Studies, 50(4), 776–788. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012450481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Leech, B. L. (1998). Basic interests: The importance of groups in politics and in political science. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M. (2010). Urban interest groups. In Maisel, L. S. & Berry, J. M. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups (pp. 502–518). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M., & Portney, K. E. (2013). Sustainability and interest group participation in city politics. Sustainability, 5, 2077–2097. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su5052077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M., Portney, K. E., Liss, R., Simoncelli, J., & Berger, L. (2006). Power and interest groups in city politics. Rappaport Institute of Greater Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M., & Wilcox, C. (2009). Interest group society (5th ed.). Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. P., & Hess, D. J. (2016). Pathways to policy: Partisanship and bipartisanship in renewable energy legislation. Environmental Politics, 25(6), 971–990. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1203523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Building Codes Assistance Project. (2017). Energy codes universe. http://bcapcodes.org/getting-started/energy-codes-universe/
   Google Scholar
• Building Codes Assistance Project. (2018). Local adoptions by state. http://bcapcodes.org/code-status/
   Google Scholar
• Cidell, J., & Cope, M. A. (2014). Factors explaining the adoption and impact of LEED-based green building policies at the municipal level. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(12), 1763–1781. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.835714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciochetti, B., & McGowan, M. (2010). Energy efficiency improvements: Do they pay? Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 2(1), 305–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2010.12091807
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, R., & Elder, C. (1972). American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building. Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Cort, K. A., & Butner, R. S. (2012). An analysis of statewide adoption rates of building energy code by local jurisdictions (No. PNNL-21963). Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, D. M., Sharp, E. B., & Bae, J. (2013). Understanding city engagement in community-focused sustainability initiatives. Cityscape, 15(1), 143–161.
   Google Scholar
• Darnall, N., Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2009). Sponsorship matters: Assessing business participation in government-and industry-sponsored voluntary environmental programs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 283–307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslatte, A., & Swann, W. L. (2016). Is the price right? Gauging the marketplace for local sustainable policy tools. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(4), 581–596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, A. (2017). Why energy-efficient commercial real estate matters. In Coulson, N. E., Wang, Y. & Lipscomb, C. A. (Eds.), Energy efficiency and the future of real estate (pp. 9–36). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, T., Bright, S., Mallaburn, P., Gabe, J., & Rehm, M. (2014). Do tenants pay energy efficiency rent premiums? Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 32(4), 333–351.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology—The issue-attention cycle. The Public Interest, 28, 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, D., & Yost, P. (2004). Sustainability and building codes. In Wheeler, S. M. & Beatley, T. (Eds.), The sustainable urban development reader (pp. 193–198). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Tavares, A., & Lubell, M. (2008). Policy instrument choices for growth management and land use regulation. Policy Studies Journal, 36, 461–480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00277.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garren, S. J., & Brinkmann, R. (2018). Sustainability definitions, historical context, and frameworks. In Garren, S. J., & Brinkmann, R. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of sustainability (pp. 1–18). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthrie, J., & Wooldridge, B. (2012). Influences on sustainable innovation: Evidence from leadership in energy and environmental design. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21, 98–110. 
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go, M. H. (2016). Building a safe state: Hybrid diffusion of building code adoption in American states. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(6), 713–733. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014563827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González‐Benito, J., & González‐Benito, Ó. (2006). A review of determinant factors of environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(2), 87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Gormley, W. T. Jr.(1986). Regulatory issue networks in a federal system. Polity, 18, 595–620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3234884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. (2017). The political economy of energy efficiency. In Coulson, N. E., Wang, Y., & Lipscomb, C. A. (Eds.), Energy efficiency and the future of real estate (pp. 81–98). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C. V., Krause, R. M., Feiock, R. C., & Curley, C. (2016). Making meaningful commitments: Accounting for variation in cities’ investments of staff and fiscal resources to sustainability. Urban Studies, 53(9), 1902–1924. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015580898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipp, D. R., Kennedy, D., Mistachkin, J. (2015). SQLite [Computer software]. SQLite Development Team.
   Google Scholar
• International Code Council. (2012). 2012 International energy conservation code. https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IECC2012/toc.
   Google Scholar
• International Code Council. (2017). Code adoption process by state. https://www.iccsafe.org/gr/Documents/AdoptionToolkit/HowStatesAdopt_I-Codes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jenner, S., Chan, G., Frankenberger, R., & Gabel, M. (2012). What drives states to support renewable energy? The Energy Journal, 33(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.33.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamieniecki, S. (2006). Corporate America and environmental policy: How often does business get its way? Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kneifel, J., & O’Rear, E. (2015). Benefits and costs of energy standard adoption for new residential buildings: National summary. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kontokosta, C. (2011). Greening the regulatory landscape: The spatial and temporal diffusion of green building policies in US cities. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 3(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2011.12091821
   Google Scholar
• Koski, C. (2010). Greening America’s skylines: The diffusion of low-salience policies. Policy Studies Journal, 38(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. E., & Kamieniecki, S. (2007). Analyzing the role of business in environmental policy. Business and environmental policy. Corporate Interests in the American Political System, 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, G. A., & Douglas, J. W. (2005). Institutional design versus reputational effects on bureaucratic performance: Evidence from U.S. government macroeconomic and fiscal projections. Journal of Policy Administration and Research, 15, 281–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, R. M. (2011). Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by US cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00510.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, R. M., Feiock, R. C., & Hawkins, C. V. (2014). The administrative organization of sustainability within local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, R. M., & Martel, J. C. (2018). Greenhouse gas management: A case study of a typical American city. In Garren, S. J., & Brinkmann, R. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of sustainability (pp. 119–138). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, E., Borick, C. P., & Rabe, B. (2012). Public attitudes toward climate science and climate policy in federal systems. Review of Policy Research, 29(3), 334–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00563.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W. L., & Yik, F. W. H. (2004). Regulatory and voluntary approaches for enhancing building energy efficiency. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 30(5), 477–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2004.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T., & Koski, C. (2015). Multilevel governance and urban climate change mitigation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(6), 1501–1517.
   Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. (2007). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77, 45–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1988). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, W. R., & Joslyn, M. (2014). The determinants of salience of energy issues. Review of Policy Research, 31(3), 153–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Feiock, R. C., La Cruz, D., & Ramirez, E. E. (2009). Local institutions and the politics of urban growth. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 649–665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00392.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1962). The business firm as a political coalition. The Journal of Politics, 24(4), 662–678. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381600016169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J. (2005). Compliance motivations: Perspectives of farmers, homebuilders, and marine facilities. Law Policy, 27(2), 317–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2005.00202.x
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J., & Koski, C. (2007). State environmental policies: Analyzing green building mandates. Review of Policy Research, 24(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00267.x
   Google Scholar
• Ball, M. (2003). Markets and the structure of the housebuilding industry: An international perspective. Urban Studies, 40(5–6), 897–916. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000074236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed, R. (2006). The psychology of residential developers: Lessons from behavioral economics and additional explanations for satisficing. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05282352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 309–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/226311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan, T. D., Mollaoğlu-Korkmaz, S., Cotner, R., & Goldsberry, A. D. (2014). Public policy and impacts on adoption of sustainable built environments: Learning from the construction industry playmakers. Journal of Green Building, 9(2), 182–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618-9.2.182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Homebuilders. (2017). About NAHB. https://www.nahb.org/en/about-nahb.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Defense Council and Lauren Urbanek. (2016). Building energy codes: A (slightly wonky) way to construct a cleaner, safer world. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/lauren-urbanek/building-energy-codes-slightly-wonky-way-construct-cleaner-safer-world.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, H. T. (2012). Lost opportunities: Modeling commercial building energy code adoption in the United States. Energy Policy, 49, 182–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2585925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. (1981). City limits. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portney, K. E. (2009). Sustainability in American cities: A comprehensive look at what cities are doing and why. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portney, K. E. (2013). Local sustainability policies and programs as economic development: Is the new economic development sustainable development? Cityscape, 15(1), 45–62.
   Google Scholar
• Portney, K. E., & Berry, J. M. (2016). The impact of local environmental advocacy groups on city sustainability policies and programs. Policy Studies Journal, 44(2), 196–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (2019). Beautiful Soup documentation. Crummy. https://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/bs4/doc/
   Google Scholar
• Saha, D. (2009). Factors influencing local government sustainability efforts. State and Local Government Review, 41(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X0904100105
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. (1975). The semi-sovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, L. (2003). Sustaining abundance: Environmental performance in industrial democracies. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumaker, P. (2013). Group involvements in city politics and pluralist theory. Urban Affairs Review, 49, 254–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087412473068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, E. B., Daley, D. M., & Lynch, M. S. (2011). Understanding local adoption and implementation of climate change mitigation policy. Urban Affairs Review, 47(3), 433–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087410392348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Explorer. (2019). Data dictionary: American community survey 2016 (5-year estimates). https://www.socialexplorer.com/data/ACS2016_5yr/metadata/?ds=ACS16_5yr
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, C. T. (1999). The industrial organization of housing supply: Market activity, land supply and the size of homebuilder firms. Real Estate Economics, 27(4), 669–694. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X., Brown, M. A., Cox, M., & Jackson, R. (2016). Mandating better buildings: A global review of building codes and prospects for improvement in the United States. Wires Energy and Environment, 5(2), 188–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.168
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy. (2014). Saving energy and money with building energy codes in the United States. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/05/f15/saving_with_building_energy_codes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy. (2017). State code adoption tracking analysis. https://www.energycodes.gov/adoption/state-code-adoption-tracking-analysis
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2017). Frequently asked questions: How much energy is consumed in residential and commercial buildings in the United States? https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=86&t=1
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2017). Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2015. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks-1990-2015
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Green Building Council. (2017). Profile. http://www.usgbc.org/profile
   Google Scholar
• Vilas, M. (2018). Project description. Google. https://pypi.org/project/google
   Google Scholar
• Wilms, W. W. (1982). Soft policies for hard problems: Implementing energy conserving building regulations in California. Public Administration Review, 12(6), 553–561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/976125
   Google Scholar
• Wlezien, C. (2005). On the salience of political issues: The problem with ‘most important problem’. Electoral Studies, 24(4), 555–579. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2005.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, L. J. (2018). CenPy. GitHub. https://github.com/ljwolf/cenpy.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, H., Krause, R. M., & Feiock, R. C. (2017). Back-pedaling or continuing quietly? Assessing the impact of ICLEI membership termination on cities’ sustainability actions. Environmental Politics, 26(1), 138–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1244968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar