Simulation of seismic liquefaction: 1-g model testing system and shaking table tests

References

• Abdoun, T., Dobry, R., O’Rourke, T. D., & Goh, S. H. (2003). Pile response to lateral spreads: Centrifuge modeling. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129, 869–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arulanandan, K., & Scott, R. F. (1993). Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems. Proceedings of the International Conference on the verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems, Davis, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM. Designation D3441 – Standard test method for deep quasi-static, cone, and friction cone penetration tests of soil. In soil and rock: Building Stones. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, vol. 4.08, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Beaty, M. H., & Byrne, P. M. (1998). An effective stress model for predicting liquefaction behaviour of sand. Proceedings of Specialty Conf., Geotechnical Earthquake Eng. and Soil Dynamics III, vol. 1, ASCE GSP no. 75, pp. 766–777.
   Google Scholar
• Beaty, M. H., & Byrne, P. M. (2011). UBCSAND constitutive model version 904aR, Documentation report. Retrieved from UBCSAND constitutive model on Itasca UDM website. http://www.itascaudm.com/media/download/UBCSand/UBCSAND_UDM_Documentation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, P. M., Park, S., Beaty, M. H., Sharp, M., Gonzales, L., & Abdoun, T. (2004). Numerical modelling of liquefaction and comparison with centrifuge tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 41, 193–211.
   Google Scholar
• Brandenberg, S. J., Boulanger, R. W., Kutter, B. L., & Chang, D. (2005). Behaviour of pile foundations in laterally spreading ground during centrifuge tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131, 1378–1391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• >Dobry, R., Taboada, V., & Liu, L. (1995). Centrifuge modelling of liquefaction effects during earthquakes. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Earthq. Geotech. Eng. (ISTokyo), Keynote Lecture, Tokyo, Japan, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam/Brookfield, 1291–1324.
   Google Scholar
• Elgamal, A., & Zeghal, M. (1992). Analysis of wildlife site liquefaction during the 1987 superstition hills earthquake (Rep. No. NCEER-92-O019). Proc. 4th U.S. Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Des. of Lifeline Fac. and Countermeasures against Soil Liquefaction. In M. Hamada & T. O’Rourke (Eds.), National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (pp. 87–96). Buffalo, NY: SUNY at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Elgamal, A., Zeghal, M., Taboada, V., & Dobry, R. (1996). Analysis of site liquefaction and lateral spreading using centrifuge testing records. Soils and Foundations, 36, 111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Fiegel G. L., Hudson M., Idriss I. M., Kutter B. L., & Zeng X. (1994). Effect of model container on dynamic soil response. In C. F. Leung, F.-H. Lee, & T. S. Tan (Eds.), Centrifuge 94 (pp. 145–150). Singapore: Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh S. K., & Madabhushi, S. P. G. (2005). The effect of pile flexibility on pile-loading in lateral spreading slopes. Geotechnical Special Publications, 145. In R. W. Boulanger & K. Tokimatsu (Eds.), 2005, pp. 24–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hamada, M., Yasuda, S., Isoyama, R., & Emoto, K. (1986). Study on liquefaction induced permanent ground displacements. Japan: Research Report, Assn. for Development of Earthquake Prediction.
   Google Scholar
• He, L., Elgamal, A., Abdoun, T., Abe, A., Dobry, R., Meneses, J., … Tokimatsu, K. (2006). Lateral load on piles due to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading during 1g shake table experiments. Proceedings of the Eighth US National Conference on Earthquake Eng., no. 881, San Francisco, EERI, Oakland, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara, K., & Yoshimine, M. (1996). Evaluation of settlements in sands following liquefaction during earthquakes. Soils Foundation, 32, 173–188.
   Google Scholar
• Itasca Consulting Group (1986). FLAC, fast lagrangian analysis of continua, version 6.0. Minneapolis, MN: Itasca Consulting Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jafarzadeh, F. (2004). Design and evaluation concepts of laminar shear box for 1g shaking table tests. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Eng., Vancouver, BC, Canada, p. 1391.
   Google Scholar
• Koloski, J. W., Schwarz, S. D., & Tubbs, D. W. (1989). Geotechnical properties of geologic materials. Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources, Bulletin, 78, 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Lunne, T., Robertson, P. K., & Powell, J. J. M. (1997). Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. New York, NY: Blackie Academic, FF Spon/Routledge . p. 312.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, K. J., Turner, J. P., & Charton, G. (2005). Inclined reinforcement to prevent soil liquefaction. Proceedings, Technical Conf., New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wairakei, New Zealand, pp. 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mesri, G., Feng, T. W., & Benak, J. M. (1990). Post-densification penetration resistance of clean sands. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 116, 1095–1115.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. E. (1998). Densification and improvement of hydraulic fills. Proc., Specialty Conf. on Hydraulc Fill Structures, ASCE GSP No. 21. In D. G. A. Van Zyl & S. G. Vick, (Eds.). ASCE, New York, pp. 606–633.
   Google Scholar
• Oda, M., Kawamoto, K., Fujimori, H., & Sato, M. (2001). Microstructural interpretation on reliquefaction of saturated granular soils under cyclic loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127, 416–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puebla, H., Byrne, P. M., & Phillips, R. (1997). Analysis of CANLEX liquefaction embankments: Prototype and centrifuge models. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 34, 641–657.
   Google Scholar
• Poulos, S. J., & Hed, A. (1973). Density measurements in a hydraulic fill. Evaluation of Relative Density and its Role in Geotechnical Projects Involving Cohesionless Soils, ASTM STP 523. In E. T. Selig & R. S. Ladd, (Eds.), ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 402–424.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1971). A simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Journal of Soil Mechanics Found Division, ASCE, 97(SM9), 1249–1273.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H. B., Wong, R. T., Idriss, I. M., & Tokimatsu, K. (1986). Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 112, 1016–1032.
   Google Scholar
• Skempton, A. W. (1986). Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, ageing and overconsolidation. Geotechnique, 36, 425–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, H., Tokimatsu, K., Sato, M., & Abe, A. (2005). Factor affecting horizontal subgrade reaction of piles during soil liquefaction and lateral spreading. In R. Boulanger & K. Tokimatsu, (Eds.), Seismic performance and simulation of pile foundations in liquefied and laterally spreading ground (pp. 1–10). Geotechnical Special Publications No. 145.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura, S., & Tokimatsu, K. (2005). Seismic earth pressure acting on embedded footing based on large-scale shaking table tests. Geotechnical Special Publications, 145. In R. W. Boulanger & K. Tokimatsu, (Eds.), 2005, pp. 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Thevanayagam, S., Kanagalingam, T., Reinhorn, A., Tharmendhira, R., Dobry, R., Pitman, M., … El Shamy, U. (2009). Laminar box system for 1-g physical modelling of liquefaction and lateral spreading. Journal of ASTM Geotechnical Testing, 32, 438–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokimatsu, K., & Seed, H. B. (1987). Evaluation of settlements in sands due to earthquake shaking. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 113, 861–878.
   Google Scholar
• Towhata, I., Sesov, V., Motamed, R., & Gonzalez, M. (2006). Model tests on lateral earth pressure on large group pile exerted by horizontal displacement of liquefied sandy ground. Proceedings of the Eighth US National Conference on Earthq. Eng., no.1227, San Francisco, CA, EERI, Oakland, CA.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke T. D., & Hamada, M. (1992). Case studies of liquefaction and lifeline performance during past earthquakes. United States Case Studies. Tech. Report, vol. 2, no: NCEER-92-0002, NCEER, SUNY-Buffalo, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R. V. (1970). Hydraulic fills to support structural loads. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 96, 23–47.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R. V. (1985). Liquefaction of soils during earthquakes. Washington, DC: Committee on Earthquake Engineering, National Research Council, National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R. V., & Lambe, P. C. (1986). Effect of boundary conditions upon centrifuge experiments using ground motion simulation. Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, 9, 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Youd, T. L., Idriss, I. M., Andrus, R., Arango, I., Castro, G., Christian, J., … Stokoe, K. H. (2001). Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127, 817–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziotopoulou, K., Boulanger, R. W., & Kramer, S. L. (2012). Site response analysis of liquefying sites. Geo-Congress, ASCE, 1799–1808. doi:10.1061/9780784412121.185.
   Google Scholar