Development of fly ash-based composite binder and its application in construction materials

References

• Antiohos, S., Papageorgiou, A., & Tsimas, S. (2006). Activation of fly ash cementitious systems in the presence of quicklime. Part II: Nature of hydration products, porosity and microstructure development. Cement and Concrete Research, 36, 2123–2131.10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antiohos, S., & Tsimas, S. (2004). Activation of fly ash cementitious systems in the presence of quicklime. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 769–779.10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM C 952. (2012). Standard test method for bond strength of mortar to masonry units. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 1288. (1999). Methods of test for mineral gypsum. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 12894. (2002). Fly ash–lime bricks-specification. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 1489. (2009). Specification for Portland pozzolana cement. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 1727. (2003). Methods of test for pozzolanic materials. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 2250. (2000). Code of practice for preparation and use of masonry mortars. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 2542. (2007). Specification for methods of tests for gypsum plaster, concrete and products. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 269. (2013). Specification for 33 grade ordinary Portland Cement. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 3466. (2004). Specification for masonry cement. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 4031. (2002). Specification for methods of physical tests for hydraulic cements. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 4032. (2005). Methods of chemical analysis of hydraulic cement. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 4139. (2004). Specification for calcium silicate bricks. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 456. (2005). Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 516. (2004). Methods of tests for strength of concrete. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 6909. (2004). Specification for super sulphated cement. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS 6932. (2009). Methods of test for building limes. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. J., Sagoe-Crentsil, K. K., & Taylor, A. H. (2007). Comparative assessment of medium-term properties and performance of fly ash and metakaolin geopolymer. Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society, 43, 131–137.
   Google Scholar
• EN 14216. (2004). Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for very low heat special cements. London: British Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Colak, A. (2002). The long-term durability performance of gypsum–Portland cement–natural pozzolan blends. Cement and Concrete Research, 32, 109–115.10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00637-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraire-Luna, P. E., Escalante-Garcia, J. I., & Gorokhovsky, A. (2006). Composite systems fluorgypsum–blastfurnance slag–metakaolin, strength and microstructures. Cement and Concrete Research, 36, 1048–1055.10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frany, A. L. A., Bijen, J. M., & de Haan, Y. M. (1989). The reaction of fly ash in concrete, a critical examination. Cement and Concrete Research, 19, 235–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, M., Jain, N., & Singh, M. (2009). Development of alpha plaster from phosphogypsum for cementitious binders. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 3138–3143.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J., Zhang, J., Yu, Y., & Zhang, G. (2012). The strength and microstructure of two geopolymers derived from metakaolin and red mud-fly ash admixture: A comparative study. Construction and Building Materials, 30, 80–91.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikal, M., Morsy, M. S., & Abo-El-Enein, S. A. (2005). Influence of hydrothermal condition on the physico-mechanical, phase composition and microstructure of autoclaved granulated slag-ground sand mixes using an industrial lime rich sludge as an activator. Advances in Cement Research, 17, 153–160.10.1680/adcr.2005.17.4.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, D. C. (1985). Sulphate resistance of OPC, OPC/fly ash and SRPC pastes: Pore structure and permeability. Cement and Concrete Research, 15, 1003–1012.10.1016/0008-8846(85)90091-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadilkar, S. A., Karandikar, M. A., Tiwari, A. K., & Cursetji. (2003, September). RM assessment of pozzolanic reactivity – An attempt on formulating a hydraulic index. In 11th International Conference on Chemistry of Cement, Durban, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, D. L., Sanjayan, J. G., & Sagoe-Crentsil, K. (2007). Comparative performance of geopolymers made with metakaolin and fly ash after exposure to elevated temperatures. Cement and Concrete Research, 37, 1583–1589.10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, F. M. (1970). The chemistry of cement and concrete (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold (Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. Y., Lee, H. K., & Lee, K. M. (2003). Strength and microstructural characteristics of chemically activated fly ash–cement systems. Cement and Concrete Research, 33, 425–431.10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00973-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, R., Misra, A. K., & Pankaj, G. (2007). Marble slurry dust and wollastonite – Inert mineral admixtures for cement concrete. Indian Highway, 35, 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Min, Y., Jueshi, Q., & Ying, P. (2008). Activation of fly ash–lime systems using calcined phosphogypsum. Construction and Building Materials, 22, 1004–1008.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsy, M. S. (2005). Effect of silica fume addition on physical properties of metakaolin-lime sludge bricks for low cost housing. Silicates Industriels, 71, 75–78.
   Google Scholar
• Morsy, M. S., Alsayed, S. H., & Salloum, Y. A. (2012). Development of eco-friendly binder using metakaolin-fly ash–lime-anhydrous gypsum. Construction and Building Materials, 35, 772–777.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon, C. S., Kou, S. C., Lam, L., & Lin, Z. S. (2001). Activation of fly ash/cement systems using calcium sulfate anhydrite (CaSO4). Cement and Concrete Research, 31, 873–881.10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00478-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ransinchung, G. D., Kumar, B., & Kumar, V. (2009). Assessment of water absorption and chloride ion penetration of pavement quality concrete admixed with wollastonite and microsilica. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 1168–1177.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashad, A. M., & Zeedan, S. R. (2011). The effect of activator concentration on the residual strength of alkali-activated fly ash pastes subjected to thermal load. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 3098–3107.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusch, A. K., Guo, T., & Roger, K. S. (2002). Stabilization of phosphogypsum using class C fly ash and lime: Assessment of the potential for marine applications. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 93, 167–186.10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00009-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, C. J. (1996). Early microstructure development of activated lime-fly ash pastes. Cement and Concrete Research, 26, 1351–1359.10.1016/0008-8846(96)00123-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, C. J. (1998). Pozzolanic reaction and microstructure of activated lime-fly ash pastes. ACI Materials Journal, 95, 537–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, C., & Day, R. L. (2000). Pozzolanic reaction in the presence of chemical activators. Cement and Concrete Research, 30, 607–613.10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00214-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, M., & Garg, M. (1995). Phosphogypsum – Fly ash cementitious binder – Its hydration and strength development. Cement and Concrete Research, 25, 752–758.10.1016/0008-8846(95)00065-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snelson, D. G., Wild, S., & O’Farrell, M. (2008). Heat of hydration of Portland cement–metakaolin–fly ash (PC–MK–PFA) blends. Cement and Concrete Research, 38, 832–840.10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutzman, P. E. (1996). Guide for X-ray diffraction analysis of Portland cement and clinker. Gaithersburg, MD: Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Vance, K., Kumar, A., Sant, G., & Neithalath, N. (2013). The rheological properties of ternary binders containing Portland cement, limestone, and metakaolin or fly ash. Cement and Concrete Research, 52, 196–207.10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiguo, S., Mingkai, Z., & Qinglin, Z. (2007). Study on lime-fly ash-phosphogypsum binder. Construction and Building Materials, 21, 1480–1485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, A., & Sarkar, S. L. (1991). Microstructural study of gypsum activated fly ash hydration in cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research, 21, 1137–1147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Kodur, V., Qi, S., Cao, L., & Wu, B. (2014). Development of metakaolin–fly ash based geopolymers for fire resistance applications. Construction and Building Materials, 55, 38–45.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar