Evaluation of different strengthening techniques’ efficiency for a soft storey building

References

• Alinouri, H., Danesh, F., & Bharam, S. (2013). Effect of soft-storey mechanism caused by infill elimination on displacement demand in nonlinear static procedure using coefficient method. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 22, 1269–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou, S., & Pinho, R. (2006). Development and verification of a displacement based adaptive pushover procedure. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8, 643–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beigi, H., Sullivan, T., Calvi, G., & Christopoulos, C. (2012). Characteristics affecting the vulnerability of soft storey mechanisms. Presented at the 15th WCEE – World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Crisafulli, F. (1997). Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills ( PhD thesis). University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R., Krishnan, P., Menon, D., & Prasad, A. (2004). Effect of infill stiffness on seismic performance of multi-storey RC framed buildings in India. Presented at the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Dolsek, M., & Fajfar, P. (2001). Soft storey effects in uniformly infilled reinforced concrete frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 5, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC2. (2004). Design of concrete structure, part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Brussels: European standard EN 1992-1-1. European Committee for Standardization (CEN).
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization. (2003). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1–3: Strengthening and repair of buildings – European prEN 1998-1-3. Belgium: B. European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Fardis, M. (1998). Seismic assessment and retrofit of RC structures. Presented at the 11th European Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency. (1999). Evaluation of earthquake damage concrete and masonry wall buildings – Basic Procedures Manual Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA 306, Applied Technology Council (ATC-43 Project).
   Google Scholar
• FEMA356. (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, ed: Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, A., Rodrigues, H., Arêde, A., & Costa, C. (in press). Geometric characterization of Portuguese RC buildings with masonry infill walls. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering.  DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2015.1039660. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19648189.2015.1039660?journalCode=tece20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobarah, A. (2004). On drift limits associated with different damage levels. In Peter Fajfar and Helmut Krawinkler (Eds.), Proceedings of the international workshop Bled (pp. 321–332). Slovenia.  http://peer.berkeley.edu/publications/peer_reports/reports_2004/0405.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Guney, D., & Aydin, E. (2012). The nonlinear effect of infill walls stiffness to prevent soft story collapse of RC structures. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 6, 74–80.10.2174/1874836801206010074
   Google Scholar
• Magenes, G., & Pampanin, S. (2004). Seismic response for gravity-load designed frame systems with masonry infills. Presented at the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (13WCEE), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, J., Priestleyand, M., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114, 1804–1826.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredi, G., Ricci, P., & Verderame, G. (2012). Influence of infill panels and their distribution on seismic behavior of existing reinforced concrete buildings. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 6, 236–253.10.2174/1874836801206010236
   Google Scholar
• Markulak, D., Radić, I., & Sigmund, V. (2013). Cyclic testing of single bay steel frames with various types of masonry infill. Engineering Structures, 51, 267–277.10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menegotto, M., & Pinto, P. (1973). Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending. Lisbon.  http://retro.seals.ch/digbib/view?pid=bse-re-001:1973:13::9
   Google Scholar
• Romão, X., Costa, A. A., Paupério, E., Rodrigues, H., Vicente, R., Varum, H., & Costa, A. (2013). Field observations and interpretation of the structural performance of constructions after the 11 May 2011 Lorca earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis, 34, 670–692.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, H., Arêde, A., Furtado, A., & Rocha, P. (2015). Seismic rehabilitation of RC columns under biaxial loading: An experimental characterization. Structures,  3,  43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, H., Varum, H., & Costa, A. (2008). A non-linear masonry infill macro-model to represent the global behaviour of buildings under cyclic loading. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials Design, 4, 123–135.10.1007/s10999-008-9070-6
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, H., Varum, H., & Costa, A. (2010). Simplified macro-model for infill masonry panels. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, 14, 390–416.10.1080/13632460903086044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RSA. (1983). Regulamento de Segurança e Acções para Estruturas de Edifício e Pontes [Rules of safety and actions for building structures and bridge], Decreto-Lei n.º 235/83, de 31 de Maio, ed.
   Google Scholar
• SEAOC-Vision2000. (1995). Performance based seismic engineering of buildings, vols. I and II: Conceptual framework, ed: Sacramento, CA: Structural Engineers Association of California.
   Google Scholar
• SeismoSoft. (2004). SeismoStruc – A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures [online]. Retrieved from http://www.seismosoft.com
   Google Scholar
• Smyrou, E., Blandon, C., Antoniou, S., Pinho, R., & Crisafulli, F. (2011). Implementation and verification of a masonry panel model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of infilled RC frames. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 9, 1519–1534.10.1007/s10518-011-9262-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thermou, G., & Elnashai, A. (2005). Seismic retrofit schemes for RC structures and local-global consequences. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials,  8,  1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Varum, H. (2003). Seismic assessment, strengthening and repair of existing buildings. Aveiro: Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Universidade de Aveiro.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, R., Rodrigues, H., Varum, H., Costa, A., & Mendes da Silva, J. (2012). Performance of masonry enclosure walls: Lessons learned from recent earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 11, 23–34.10.1007/s11803-012-0095-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, R., Rodrigues, H., Varum, H., Costa, A., & Silva, J. M. (2012). Performance of masonry enclosure walls: Lessons learned from recent earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 11,  23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar