Use of factorial experimental approach and effect size on the CBR testing results for the usable dosages of wastewater sludge ash with coarse-grained material

References

• Anderson, M., Skerratt, R. G., Thomas, J. P., & Clay, S. D. (1996). Case study involving using fluidised bed incinerator sludge ash as a partial clay substitute in brick manufacture. Water Science and Technology, 34, 507–515.10.1016/0273-1223(96)00618-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D 1557. (2007). Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D 1883. (2007). Standard test methods for CBR (California bearing ratio) laboratory-compacted soils. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Atil, H., & Unver, Y. (2001). Multiple comparisons. Online Journal of Biological Sciences, 1, 723–727.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, R., & Lange, S. (2001). Adjusting for multiple testing-when and how? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 343–349.10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00314-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, W. P. M. (1961). The calculation of laboratory and in-situ values of California bearing ratio from bearing capacity data. Géotechnique, 11, 14–21.10.1680/geot.1961.11.1.14
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., & Lin, D. F. (2009). Stabilization treatment of soft subgrade soil by sewage sludge ash and cement. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 162, 321–327.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chore, H. S., Kumthe, A. A., Abnave, S. B., Shinde, S. S., Dhole, S. S., & Kamerkar, S. G. (2011). Performance evaluation of polypropylene fibers on sand-fly ash mixtures in highways. Journal of Civil Engineering, 39, 91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R.W. (2011). Stabilization of Marginal Soils Using Geofibers and Nontraditional Additives ( MSc Thesis). University of Alaska Fairbanks.
   Google Scholar
• Consoli, N. C., Montardo, J. P., Prietto, P. D. M., & Pasa, G. S. (2002). Engineering behavior of a sand reinforced with plastic waste. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 128, 462–472.10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:6(462)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devant, M., Cusidó, J. A., & Soriano, C. (2011). Custom formulation of red ceramics with clay, sewage sludge and forest waste. Applied Clay Science, 53, 669–675.10.1016/j.clay.2011.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donatello, S., Tyrer, M., & Cheeseman, C. R. (2010). Comparison of test methods to assess pozzolanic activity. Cement & Concrete Composites, 32, 121–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, G. A. (1981). Statistical analysis in psychology and education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. J. (2007). Evidence for publication bias in video game violence effects literature: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 470–482.10.1016/j.avb.2007.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 532–538.10.1037/a0015808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gullu, H., & Hazirbaba, K. (2010). Unconfined compressive strength and post-freeze-thaw behavior of fine-grained soils treated with geofiber and synthetic fluid. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 62, 142–150.10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güllü, H. (2014). Factorial experimental approach for effective dosage rate of stabilizer: Application for fine-grained soil treated with bottom ash. Soils and Foundations, 54, 462–477.10.1016/j.sandf.2014.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazirbaba, K., & Gullu, H. (2010). California bearing ratio improvement and freeze–thaw performance of fine-grained soils treated with geofiber and synthetic fluid. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 63, 50–60.10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg, Y., & Tamhane, A. C. (1987). Multiple comparison procedures. New York, NY: Wiley.10.1002/SERIES1345
   Google Scholar
• Huang, W. H. (1990). The use of bottom ash in highway embankments, subgrades, and subbases. West Lafayette: Publication FHWA/IN/JHRP-90/04, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University. doi:10.5703/1288284313434
   Google Scholar
• Kaniraj, S. R., & Havanagi, V. G. (2001). Behavior of cement-stabilization fiber-reinforced fly ash-soil mixtures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127, 574–584.10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:7(574)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayri, M. (2009). The multiple comparison (post-hoc) techniques to determine the difference between groups in researches (in Turkish). Fırat University Journal of Social Science, 19, 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid, N., Arshad, M. F., Mukri, M., Kamarudin, F., & Abdul Ghani, A. H. (2014). The California bearing ratio (CBR) value for banting soft soil subgrade stabilized using lime-pofa mixtures. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 19, 155–163.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. T., & Do, T. H. (2012). Effect of bottom ash particle size on strength development in composite geomaterial. Engineering Geology, 139–140, 85–91.10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambe, T. W., & Whitman, R. V. (1979). Soil Mechanics. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, D. F., Luo, H. L., Hsiao, D. H., & Yang, C. C. (2005). The effects of sludge ash on the strength of soft subgrade soil. Journal of Chinese Institute of Environmental Engineering, 15(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, D. F., Lin, K. L., & Luo, H. L. (2007). A comparison between sludge ash and fly ash on the improvement in soft soil. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 57, 59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, D. F., Lin, K. L., Hung, M. J., & Luo, H. L. (2007). Sludge ash/hydrated lime on the geotechnical properties of soft soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 145, 58–64.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, I., & Miller, M. (2004). John E. Freund’s mathematical statistics with applications (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Monzó, J., Payá, J., Borrachero, M. V., & Córcoles, A. (1996). Use of sewage sludge ash(SSA)-cement admixtures in mortars. Cement and Concrete Research, 26, 1389–1398.10.1016/0008-8846(96)00119-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. R. (1983). A comparison of sample sizes for the analysis of means and the analysis of variance. Journal of Quality Technology, 15, 33–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8, 434–447.10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, J. R., Huang, C., Kuo, J. J., & Lin, S. H. (2008). Recycling MSWI bottom and fly ash as raw materials for Portland cement. Waste Management, 28, 1113–1118.10.1016/j.wasman.2007.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandian, N. S., & Krishna, K. C. (2002). California bearing ratio behavior of cement-stabilized fly ash-soil mixes. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 30, 492–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, D. S. V., Anjan Kumar, M., Prasada Raju, G. V. R., & Kondayya, V. (2011). A study on flexible pavement performance with reinforced fly ash subbase. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 4, 403–408.
   Google Scholar
• Ruffolo, R. M., & Shakoor, A. (2009). Variability of unconfined compressive strength in relation to number of test samples. Engineering Geology, 108, 16–23.10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiyouri, N., Alaiwa, A. A., & Hicher, P. Y. (2011). Permeability and porosity improvement of grouted sand. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 15, 313–333.10.1080/19648189.2011.9693329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffe, H. (1959). The Analysis of Variance. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shirvani, R. A., & Shooshpasha, I. (2015). Experimental study on load-settlement behaviour of cement stabilised footing with different dimensions on sandy soil. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 40, 397–406.10.1007/s13369-014-1444-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sink, C., & Stroh, H. (2006). Practical significance: The use of effect sizes in school counseling research. Professional School Counseling, 9, 401–411.10.5330/prsc.9.4.283746k664204023
   Google Scholar
• Waller, R. A., & Duncan, D. B. (1969). A Bayes rule for the symmetric multiple comparison problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, 1484–1503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walpole, R. E., Myers, R. H., Myers, S. L., & Ye, K. (2002). Probability & statistics for engineers & scientists (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K. S., Chiou, I. J., Chen, C. H., & Wang, D. (2005). Lightweight properties and pore structure of foamed material made from sewage sludge ash. Construction and Building Materials, 19, 627–633.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar