Design of geopolymer grouts: the effects of water content and mineral precursor

References

• Alonso, S., & Palomo, A. (2001). Alkaline activation of metakaolin and calcium hydroxide mixtures : Influence of temperature, activator concentration and solids ratio. Materials Letters, 47, 55–62.10.1016/S0167-577X(00)00212-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autef, A., Joussein, E., Gasgnier, G., Pronier, S., Sobrados, I., Sanz, J., & Rossignol, S. (2013). Role of metakaolin dehydroxylation in geopolymer synthesis. Powder Technology, 250, 33–39.10.1016/j.powtec.2013.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakharev, T. (2006). Thermal behaviour of geopolymers prepared using class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing. Cement and Concrete Research, 36, 1134–1147.10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal, S. A., San Nicolas, R., Myers, R. J., Mejía de Gutiérrez, R., Puertas, F., van Deventer, J. S. J., & Provis, J. L. (2014). MgO content of slag controls phase evolution and structural changes induced by accelerated carbonation in alkali-activated binders. Cement and Concrete Research, 57, 33–43. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilim, C., Karahan, O., Atiş, C. D., & İlkentapar, S. (2013). Influence of admixtures on the properties of alkali-activated slag mortars subjected to different curing conditions. Materials & Design, 44, 540–547.10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bras, A., Gião, R., Lúcio, V., & Chastre, C. (2013). Development of an injectable grout for concrete repair and strengthening. Cement and Concrete Composites, 37, 185–195.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera, J., & Rojas, M. F. (2001). Mechanism of hydration of the metakaolin–lime–water system. Cement and Concrete Research, 31, 177–182.10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00456-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, E. T. (1956). Hydrogarnet formation in the system lime-alumina-silica-water. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards (1934), 56, 327–335.
   Google Scholar
• Chen-Tan, N. W., van Riessen, A., Ly, C. V., & Southam, D. C. (2009). Determining the reactivity of a fly ash for production of geopolymer. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 92, 881–887.10.1111/jace.2009.92.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chindaprasirt, P., Chareerat, T., & Sirivivatnanon, V. (2007). Workability and strength of coarse high calcium fly ash geopolymer. Cement and Concrete Composites, 29, 224–229.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristelo, N., Soares, E., Rosa, I., Miranda, Oliveira, D. V., Silva, R. A., & Chaves, A. (2013). Rheological properties of alkaline activated fly ash used in jet grouting applications,” Construction and Building Materials, 48, 925–933. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovits, J., & Quentin, S. (1991). Geopolymers. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 37, 1633–1656.10.1007/BF01912193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deventer, J. S. J., Provis, J. L., Duxson, P., & Brice, D. G. (2010). Chemical research and climate change as drivers in the commercial adoption of alkali activated materials. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 1, 145–155.10.1007/s12649-010-9015-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, S. (2000). Mercury porosimetry. Cement and Concrete Research, 30, 1517–1525.10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00370-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duxson, P., Mallicoat, S. W., Lukey, G. C., Kriven, W. M., & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2007). The effect of alkali and Si/Al ratio on the development of mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 292, 8–20.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.05.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duxson, P., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., Mallicoat, S. W., Kriven, W. M., & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2005). Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties. Colloids Surfaces A-Physicochemical Eng. Asp., 269, 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espino E. I. (1966). An Investigation into the relation between the strength and density of normal concrete. University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station. College of Engineering. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,  Illinois, Civil Engineering Studies SRS-313, Aug.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Y., & Kayali, O. (2013). The fate of water in fly ash-based geopolymers. Construction and Building Materials, 39, 89–94.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Jiménez, A., & Palomo, A. (2003). Characterisation of fly ashes. Potential reactivity as alkaline cements. Fuel, 82, 2259–2265.10.1016/S0016-2361(03)00194-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Jiménez, A., Palomo, A., & Criado, M. (2005). Microstructure development of alkali-activated fly ash cement: A descriptive model. Cement and Concrete Research, 35, 1204–1209.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner, E. (2004). Industrially interesting approaches to ‘low-CO2’ cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 1489–1498.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharzouni, A., Joussein, E., Samet, B., Baklouti, S., & Rossignol, S. (2015). Effect of the reactivity of alkaline solution and metakaolin on geopolymer formation. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 410, 127–134.10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glendinning, S., Teixeira Pinto, A., & Cristelo, N. (2011). Deep soft soil improvement by alkaline activation. Proc. ICE – Gr. Improv, 164, 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Glukhovskii, V. D., Pashkov, I. A., Starchevskaya, E. A., & Rostovskaya, G. S. (1967). Soil-silicate concrete for hydraulic and irrigation structures. Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroit, 2, 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, X., Shi, H., & Dick, W. A. (2010). Compressive strength and microstructural characteristics of class C fly ash geopolymer. Cement and Concrete Composites, 32, 142–147. .10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardjito, D., Asia, E., & Asia, S. S. E. (2010). The use of fly ash to reduce the environmental impact of concrete. Proceedings of EnCon2007,  Sarawak, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, A. J., & Thompson, A. H. (1986). Quantitative prediction of permeability in porous rock. Physical Review B, 34, 8179–8181.10.1103/PhysRevB.34.8179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocaba, V. (2009). Development and evaluation of methods to follow microstructural development of cementitious systems including slags (PhD Thesis). Ecole Polytechnique Fédarale de Lausanne,  Lausanne, 4523.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W. K. W., & Van Deventer, J. S. J. (2002). Structural reorganisation of class F fly ash in alkaline silicate solutions. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 211, 49–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, P., Li, Q., & Zhai, J. (2008). Mineralogical characterizations and reaction path modeling of the pozzolanic reaction of fly ash–lime systems. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 91, 955–964.10.1111/jace.2008.91.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, R. E., Balaguru, P. N., Foden, A., Sorathia, U., Davidovits, J., & Davidovics, M. (1997). Fire-resistant Aluminosilicate Composites. Fire and Materials, 21, 67–73.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1018
   Google Scholar
• Nematollahi, B., & Sanjayan, J. (2014). Effect of different superplasticizers and activator combinations on workability and strength of fly ash based geopolymer. Materials & Design, 57, 667–672.10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V.-H., Remond, S., & Gallias, J.-L. (2011). Influence of cement grouts composition on the rheological behaviour. Cement and Concrete Research, 41, 292–300.10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios, M., & Puertas, F. (2005). Effect of superplasticizer and shrinkage-reducing admixtures on alkali-activated slag pastes and mortars. Cement and Concrete Research, 35, 1358–1367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provis, J. L., Duxson, P., Van Deventer, J. S. J., & Lukey, G. C. (2005). The role of mathematical modelling and gel chemistry in advancing geopolymer technology. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 83, 853–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahier, H., Van Mele, B., & Wastiels, J. (1996). Low-temperature synthesized aluminosilicate glasses. Journal of Materials Science, 31, 80–85.10.1007/BF00355129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashad, A. M. (2014). A comprehensive overview about the influence of different admixtures and additives on the properties of alkali-activated fly ash. Materials & Design, 53, 1005–1025.10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riahi, S., Nazari, A., Zaarei, D., Khalaj, G., Bohlooli, H., & Kaykha, M. M. (2012). Compressive strength of ash-based geopolymers at early ages designed by Taguchi method. Materials & Design, 37, 443–449.10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, M. F., & Cabrera, J. (2001). Influence of MK on the reaction kinetics in MK/lime and MK-blended cement systems at 20 °C. Cement and Concrete Research, 31, 519–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozière, E., Loukili, A., & Cussigh, F. (2009). A performance based approach for durability of concrete exposed to carbonation. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 190–199.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathonsaowaphak, A., Chindaprasirt, P., & Pimraksa, K. (2009). Workability and strength of lignite bottom ash geopolymer mortar. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 168, 44–50.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serry, M. A., Taha, A. S., El-Hemaly, S. A. S., & El-Didamony, H. (1984). Metakaolin—lime hydration products. Thermochimica Acta, 79, 103–110.10.1016/0040-6031(84)87097-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonebi, M., Lachemi, M., & Hossain, K. M. A. (2013). Optimisation of rheological parameters and mechanical properties of superplasticised cement grouts containing metakaolin and viscosity modifying admixture. Construction and Building Materials, 38, 126–138. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinner, S., Reichard, T., & Tefft, W. (1934). A comparison of experimental and theoretical relations between Young’s modulus and the flexural and longitudinal resonance frequencies of uniform bars. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards  - A. Physics and chemistry, 64, 147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Steveson, M., & Sagoe-Crentsil, K. (2005). Relationships between composition, structure and strength of inorganic polymers. Journal of Materials Science, 40, 4247–4259.10.1007/s10853-005-2794-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukmak, P., Horpibulsuk, S., Shen, S.-L., Chindaprasirt, P., & Suksiripattanapong, C. (2013). Factors influencing strength development in clay–fly ash geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 1125–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deventer, J. S. J., Provis, J. L., & Duxson, P. (2012). Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement. Minerals Engineering, 29, 89–104.10.1016/j.mineng.2011.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedalakshmi, R., Sundara Raj, A., Srinivasan, S., & Ganesh Babu, K. (2003). Quantification of hydrated cement products of blended cements in low and medium strength concrete using TG and DTA technique. Thermochim. Acta, 407, 49–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. P., Hart, R. D., & van Riessen, A. (2011). Quantification of the extent of reaction of metakaolin-based geopolymers using x-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive spectroscopy. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 94, 2663–2670.10.1111/jace.v94.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, C. K., & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2003). Microanalysis of calcium silicate hydrate gel formed within a geopolymeric binder. Journal of Materials Science, 38, 3851–3860.10.1023/A:1025904905176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar