Vulnerability of asymmetric multi-storey buildings in the context of performance-based seismic design

References

• Ali, A., Abu Hayah, N., Kim, D., & Cho, S. G. (2017). Design response spectra-compliant real and synthetic GMS for seismic analysis of seismically isolated nuclear reactor containment building. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 49(4), 825–837. Republic of Korea. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2017.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambraseys, N., & Vogt, J. (1988). Material for the investigation of the seismicity of the region of Algiers. European Earthquake Engineering, 3, 16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Antoniou, S., & Pinho, R. (2004). Development and verification of a displacement based adaptive pushover procedure. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(5), 643–661. doi: 10.1080/13632460409350504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council, ATC-40. (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. (ATC-40 Report, Volume 1and2). Redwood City, CA: Author, Seismic Safety Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council, ATC-55. (2005). Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. (FEMA-440 Report). Redwood City, CA: Author, ATC-55.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, C. (2012). Seismic assessment of existing buildings using nonlinear static procedures (NSPS) – a new 3D pushover procedure (master’s thesis). Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, C., & Bento, R. (2014). The extended adaptive capacity spectrum method for the seismic assessment of plan-asymmetric buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 30(2), 683–703. doi: 10.1193/022112EQS048M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casarotti, C., & Pinho, R. (2007). An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 5(3), 377–390. doi: 10.1007/s10518-007-9031-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN (2003). Eurocode 8: Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. European Prestandard ENV (1998). Brussels: Final Draft.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K., & Goel, G. K. (2004). A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 33, 903–927. doi: 10.1002/eqe.380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. (2006). Strong-motion records selection for structural testing. First European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology (a joint event of the 13th ECEE & 30th General Assembly of the ESC), Genève, Switzerland. Paper Number 5.
   Google Scholar
• Elnashai, A. S. (2001). Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 12(1), 51–69. doi: 10.12989/sem.2001.12.1.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESM (2012). European strong motion database (http://www.isesd.hi.is/).
   Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P., Marušic, D., & Perus, I. (2005a). The extension of the N2 method to asymmetric buildings. Proceedings of the 4th European workshop on the seismic behaviour of irregular and complex structures. Thessaloniki, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P., Marusic, D., & Perus, I. (2005b). Torsional effects in the pushover-based seismic analysis of buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9(6),831–854. doi: 10.1080/13632460509350568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA. (1997). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (Report No. 273). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2003a). Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology: Earthquake model (HAZUS-MHMR3) (Technical Report). Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security. National Institute of Building Sciences and Author.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, A., Guadagnuolo, M., & Faella, G. (2008). Pushover analysis of plan irregular masonry buildings. In the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering (pp. 12–17). Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, B., & Kunnath, S. K. (2000). Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures. Earthquake Spectra, 16(2), 367–391. doi: 10.1193/1.1586117
   Google Scholar
• Han, S. W., Moon, K. H., & Chopra, A. K. (2010). Application of MPA to estimate probability of collapse of structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 39(11), 1259–1278. doi: 10.1002/eqe.992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsas, M. (2010). Modélisation par macro-élément du comportement non linéaire des ouvrages à voiles porteurs en béton armé sous action sismique (développement de méthodes simplifiées d'analyse dynamique et de vulnérabilité sismique), Thèse de doctorat, Université de Bordeaux 1, France.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsas, M., Elachachi, S. M., & Breysse, D. (2010). Evaluation of the seismic vulnerability of quasi-symmetrical reinforced concrete structures with shear walls. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 14(5), 617–636. doi: 10.1080/19648189.2010.9693250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsas, M., Elachachi, S. M., & Breysse, D. (2014). Seismic response and damage development analyses of an RC structural wall building using macro-element. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 51(3), 447–470. doi: 10.12989/sem.2014.51.3.447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsanos, E. I., Sextos, A. G., & Manolis, G. D. (2010). Selection of earthquake ground motion records: A state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(4), 157–169. 26:doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maio, R., & Tsionis, G. (2016). Seismic fragility curves for the European building stock: Review and evaluation of analytical fragility curves. Ispra (VA), Italy: Publications Office of the European Union, Joint Research Centre. doi: 10.2788/586263.
   Google Scholar
• Math-Works Inc. (2007). MATLAB Version 7.4.0.287 (R2007a). Natick, MA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., & Fenves, G. L. (2009). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user command-language manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam, A. S., & Tso, W. K. (2000). 3-D push-over analysis for damage assessment of buildings. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 2(3), 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Oktavianus, Y., Hsiao, F. P., & Ou, Y. C. (2012). Study on advanced pushover analysis applied in tall and asymmetric buildings. The eleventh national conference on structural engineering/the first national conference on earthquake engineering no. 13015. Taichung, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• OpenSEES (2015). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (Version 2.2.2). Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California. http://opensees.berkeley.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y. J., & Ang, A. H.-S. (1985). Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete, ASCE. Journal of Structural Engineering, 111(4), 722–739. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEER, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, http://peer.berkeley.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Penelis, Gr. G., & Kappos, A. J. (2002). 3-D pushover analysis: The issue of torsion. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, U.K., Paper No. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Philip, A., & Elavenil, S. (2017). Torsional behavior of multistory buildings with different structural irregularities – a review. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 8(4), 1365–1375.
   Google Scholar
• Pinho, R. (2007). Nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures subjected to seismic action. In Pecker A. (eds) Advanced Earthquake Engineering Analysis. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences (vol. 494, 63–89). Vienna: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-74214-3_5
   Google Scholar
• Pinho, R., & Antoniou, S. (2005). A displacement-based adaptive pushover algorithm for assessment of vertically irregular frames. In Proceedings of the 4thEuropean Workshop on the Seismic Behavior of Irregular and Complex structures. Thessaloniki, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• RPA99. (2003). Règles Parasismiques Algériennes, RPA99-Version 2003, Document technique règlementaire, DTR-BC, 248-CGS, Alger.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, B. D., Park, R., & Priestley, M. J. N. (1982). Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 79(1), 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• SeismoMatch 2.1.2. (2013). A computer program for an application capable of adjusting earthquake records. Through Wavelet Addition. Retrieved from http://www.seismosoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, V., Crowley, H., Pinho, R., Varum, H., & Sousa, R. (2014). Evaluation of analytical methodologies to derive vulnerability functions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 43(2), 181–204. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas, Y. F., Pujades, L. G., Barbat, A. H., & Hurtado, J. E. (2013). Probabilistic seismic risk evaluation of RC buildings. Proceedings of the ICE-Structures and Buildings, 167(6),327–336. doi: 10.1680/stbu.12.00031
   Google Scholar
• Watson-Lamprey, J., & Abrahamson, N. (2006). Selection of ground motion time series and limits on scaling. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26(5), 477–482. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yassin, M. H. M. (1994). Nonlinear analysis of prestressed concrete structures under the monotonic and cycle loads (master’s thesis). University of California at Berkeley, California.
   Google Scholar