Seismic vulnerability through drift assessment for bridges with geometrical irregularities

References

• AASTHO. (2009). AASTHO guide specifications for LRFD seismic bridge design. Washington DC, USA: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASTHO. (2012). AASHTO LRFD. Bridge design specifications. Washington DC, USA: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Amiri-Hormozaki, E., Pekcan, G., & Itani, A. (2014). Analytical fragility functions for horizontally curved steel I-girder highway bridges. Earthquake Spectra, 31, 2235–2254. doi:10.1193/022213EQS049M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayala, G., & Escamilla, M. A. (2013). Modal irregularity in continuous irregular bridges. Detection, effect on the simplified seismic performance evaluation and ways of solution. In O. Lavan, & M. De Stefano (Eds.), Seismic behaviour and design of irregular and complex civil structures, Chapter 8. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• BMSF. (2000). Strong ground motions Mexican database. Mexican Society of Earthquake Engineering, CD (in Spanish).
   Google Scholar
• Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (SDC) Version 1.6. (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Calvi, G. M., & Kingsley, G. R. (1995). Displacement-based seismic design of multi-degree-of-freedom bridge structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 24(9), 1247–1266.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. (2003). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 2: Bridges. European Standard EN 1998-2. Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, P., Costa, A., & Delgado, R. (2005). Seismic safety assessment of irregular bridges. In 4th European Workshop on Seismic Behaviour of Irregular and Complex Structures, Paper 28, Thessalonica, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, C., & Barrera, L. A. (2007). Modifications of the preliminary bridge evaluation by the communication and transportation secretary of Mexico to define maintenance politics for seismic action. In IABSE Symposium Improving Infrastructure Bringing People Closer Worldwide, Weimar, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, C., & Salas, D. (2012). Parametric study of bridges with substructure irregular conditions. In IABMAS 6th Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, Paper 1242.
   Google Scholar
• Isakovic, T., & Fischinger, M. (2000). Regularity indices for bridge structures. In 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper 1725, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Isakovic, T., & Fischinger, M. (2005). Pushover analysis of irregular bridges. In Proceedings 4th European Workshop on Seismic Behaviour of Irregular and Complex Structures, Paper 37, Thessalonica, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Jara, J. M., Galván, A., Jara, M., & Olmos, B. (2013). Procedure of determining the seismic vulnerability of an irregular isolated bridge. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9(6), 516–528. doi:10.1080/15732479.2011.576255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappos, A. J., Manolis, G. D., & Moschonas, I. F. (2002). Seismic assessment and design of R/C bridges with irregular configuration, including SSI effects. Engineering Structures, 24(10), 1337–1348. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00068-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohrangi, M., Bento, R., & Lopes, M. (2012). Evaluation of nonlinear static procedures for seismic assessment of irregular bridges. In 15 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper 5834, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Maalek, S., Akbari, R., & Maheri, M. R. (2009). The effect of higher modes on the regularity of single-column-bent highway viaducts. Bridge Structures, 5(1), 29–43. doi:10.1080/15732480902775573
   Google Scholar
• Muljati, I., & Warnitchai, P. (2007). A modal pushover analysis on multi-span concrete bridges to estimate inelastic seismic responses. Civil Engineering Dimension, 9(1), 33–41. doi:10.9790/1684-12131116www.iosrjournals.org.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J., Seible, N., & Calvi, G. M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Nueva York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, S., & Gaus, M. P. (1996). GIS tools for regional bridge seismic risk assessment (Technical Report GIS-2). Buffalo: Department of Civil Engineering, State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• SAP-14. (2000). Integrated solutions for structural analyses and design. San Francisco, CA, USA: Computers and Structures, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, J., & Linzell, D. (2013). Use of response surface metamodels to generate system level fragilities for existing curved steel bridges. Engineering Structures, 52, 642–653. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrani, P., & Michell, D. (2010). Seismic behaviour and analysis of irregular bridges with different column heights. In CEISCE, Seminar, Quebec, Canada.
   Google Scholar