Extension of a simplified procedure for estimating nonlinear seismic responses of tall pier bridge systems

References

• Abbasnia, R., Davoudi, A. T., & Maddah, M. M. (2013). An adaptive pushover procedure based on effective modal mass combination rule. Engineering Structures, 52, 654–666. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantilas, K. E., Kavvadias, I. E., & Vasiliadis, L. K. (2017). Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic spectra for high viscous damped buildings. Earthquakes and Structures, 13(4), 337–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billah, A. H. M. M., & Alam, M. S. (2020). Seismic fragility assessment of multi-span concrete highway bridges in British Columbia considering soil-structure interaction. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2018-0667
   Google Scholar
• Caltrans, S. D. C. (2010). Caltrans seismic design criteria. California Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Casarotti, C., & Pinho, R. (2007). An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 5(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9031-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceravolo, R., Demarie, G. V., Giordano, L., Mancini, G., & Sabia, D. (2009). Problems in applying code-specified capacity design procedures to seismic design of tall piers. Engineering Structures, 31(8), 1811–1821. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Guan, Z., Li, J., & Spencer, B. F., Jr. (2018). Shake table tests of tall-pier bridges to evaluate seismic performance. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 23(9), 04018058. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Guan, Z., Spencer, B. F., Jr., & Li, J. (2018). A simplified procedure for estimating nonlinear seismic demand of tall piers. Engineering Structures, 174, 778–791. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Li, J., & Liu, X. (2017). Seismic performance of tall piers influenced by higher-mode effects of piers. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 45(2), 159–166. (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K. (2001). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K., & Goel, R. K. (1999). Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum. Earthquake Spectra, 15(4), 637–656. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586065
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K., & Goel, R. K. (2002). A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 561–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, Z., Li, J., Xu, Y., & Lu, H. (2011). Higher-order mode effects on the seismic performance of tall piers. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 5(4), 496–502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-011-0131-9
   Google Scholar
• Guirguis, J., & Mehanny, S. (2013). Evaluating code criteria for regular seismic behavior of continuous concrete box girder bridges with unequal height piers. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18(6), 486–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, B., & Kunnath, S. K. (2000). Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures. Earthquake Spectra, 16(2), 367–392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586117
   Google Scholar
• He, Z., Liu, W., Wang, X., & Ye, A. (2016). Optimal force-based beam-column element size for reinforced-concrete piles in bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 21(11), 06016006. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbsen, R. A. (2007). AASHTO guide specifications for LRFD seismic bridge design. American Association of State Highway Transport Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Klemencic, R., Fry, J. A., Hooper, J. D., & Morgen, B. G. (2007). Performance‐based design of ductile concrete core wall buildings—issues to consider before detailed analysis. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 16(5), 599–614. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Fan, L., & Song, X. (2005). Investigation of displacement ductility capacity for tall piers. Third PRC-US Workshop on Seismic Analysis and Design of Special Bridges, July.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, B., Luo, Y., Wang, L., & Guo, X. (2013). A new simplified method for the dynamic model of spatial strcutures based on mass participation factors. Journal of Hunan University (Natural and Science), 40(9), 7–13. (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., & Fenves, G. L. (2006). OpenSees command language manual. Report No. 264; Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, B. G., & DesRoches, R. (2007). Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and southeastern United States. Earthquake Spectra, 23(3), 615–633. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2756815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraskeva, T., Kappos, A., & Sextos, A. (2006). Extension of modal pushover analysis to seismic assessment of bridges. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35(10), 1269–1293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. N., Seible, F., Calvi, G. M., & Calvi, G. M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, K. N. (2012). Next generation seismic fragility curves for California bridges incorporating the evolution in seismic design philosophy. Dissertations & Theses Gradworks.
   Google Scholar
• Reza, S. M., Alam, M. S., & Tesfamariam, S. (2014). Lateral load resistance of bridge piers under flexure and shear using factorial analysis. Engineering Structures, 59, 821–835. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, B. D., Park, R., & Priestley, M. J. (1982). Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. Journal Proceedings, 79(1), 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Shan, D., Qu, F., & Deng, X. (2020). Seismic fragility analysis of irregular bridges with non-circular tall piers considering ground motion directionality. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18(4), 1723–1753. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00769-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soleimani, F. (2017). Fragility of California bridges-development of modification factors [Doctoral dissertation].
   Google Scholar
• Soleimani, F. (2020). Propagation and quantification of uncertainty in the vulnerability estimation of tall concrete bridges. Engineering Structures, 202, 109812. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soleimani, F., Vidakovic, B., DesRoches, R., & Padgett, J. (2017). Identification of the significant uncertain parameters in the seismic response of irregular bridges. Engineering Structures, 141, 356–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, B., & Dai, G. (2012). Importance index for modes of irregular continuous bridges. Engineering Mechanics, 30(9), 194–199. (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., Zheng, Q., Yang, C., Zhang, W., DesRoches, R., Padgett, J., & Taciroglu, E. (2019). Probabilistic models of abutment backfills for regional seismic assessment of highway bridges in California. Engineering Structures, 180, 452–467. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar