Examination of particle shape on the shear behaviours of granules using 3D printed soil

References

• Afzali-Nejad, A., Lashkari, A., & Shourijeh, P. T. (2017). Influence of particle shape on the shear strength and dilation of sand-woven geotextile interfaces. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 45(1), 54–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshibli, K. A., & Cil, M. B. (2018). Influence of particle morphology on the friction and dilatancy of sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 144(3), 04017118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, P. J. (1980). The shape of rock particles, a critical review. Sedimentology, 27(3), 291–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1980.tb01179.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blott, S. J., & Pye, K. (2007). Particle shape: a review and new methods of characterization and classification. Sedimentology, 55(1), 2147483647–0.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2007.00892.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, M. D. (1987). Discussion: The strength and dilatancy of sands. Géotechnique, 37(2), 219–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1987.37.2.219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, E. R. (2008). A dense packing of regular tetrahedra. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 40(2), 214–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-008-9101-y.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, G.-C., Dodds, J., & Santamarina, J. C. (2006). Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: natural and crushed sands. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132(5), 591–602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:5(591).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, J. H., & Torquato, S. (2006). Packing, tiling, and covering with tetrahedra. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(28), 10612–10617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601389103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L., & O'Sullivan, C. (2006). Exploring the macro- and micro-scale response of an idealised granular material in the direct shear apparatus. Géotechnique, 56(7), 455–468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.7.455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, B. B., Yang, J., & Zhou, C. Y. (2016). Observed effects of interparticle friction and particle size on shear behavior of granular materials. International Journal of Geomechanics, 16(1), 04015011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fannin, R. J., Eliadorani, A., & Wilkinson, J. M. T. (2005). Shear strength of cohesionless soils at low stress. Géotechnique, 55(6), 467–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.6.467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, A., Bhattacharya, A., & Batish, A. (2016). On surface finish and dimensional accuracy of FDM parts after cold vapor treatment. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 31(4), 522–529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1070425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hales, T. (2005). A proof of the Kepler conjecture. Annals of Mathematics, 162(3), 1065–1185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2005.162.1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanaor, D. A. H., Gan, Y., Revay, M., Airey, D. W., & Einav, I. (2016). 3D printable geomaterials. Géotechnique, 66(4), 323–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.034.
   Google Scholar
• Härtl, J., & Ooi, J. Y. (2011). Numerical investigation of particle shape and particle friction on limiting bulk friction in direct shear tests and comparison with experiments. Powder Technology, 212(1), 231–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlsby, G. T. (2009). Potential particles: a method for modelling non-circular particles in DEM. Computers and Geotechnics, 36(6), 953–959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Hyslip, J. P., & Vallejo, L. E. (1997). Fractal analysis of the roughness and size distribution of granular materials. Engineering Geology, 48(3-4), 231–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(97)00046-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M. N., Siddika, A., Hossain, M. B., Rahman, A., & Asad, M. A. (2011). Effect of particle size on the shear strength behaviour of sands. Australian Geomechanics Journal,  46(3), 75–86.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. P., Bosscher, P. J., Plesha, M. E., & Edil, T. B. (1999). DEM simulation of granular media—structure interface: effects of surface roughness and particle shape. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 23(6), 531–547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199905)23:6 < 531::AID-NAG980 > 3.0.CO;2-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, X., Cheng, Y., & Ge, L. (2015). Radial strain behavior and stress state interpretation under direct simple shear. Journal of Testing & Evaluation, 43(6), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, X., Ge, L., Chang, K.-T., & Kwok, A. O.-L. (2016). Strain-controlled cyclic simple shear tests on sand with radial strain measurements. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28(4), 04015169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, X., & Kang, G.-C. (2015). Modified monotonic simple shear tests on silica sand. Mar. Georesources Geotechnol, 33(2), 122–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2013.805289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, L., & Peng, R. (2011). Particle flow simulation of influence of particle shape on mechanical properities of quasi-sands (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 30(10), 2112–2119.
   Google Scholar
• Lan, L., Tang-Dai, X., & Hao-Miao, Q. (2018). Effect of particle shape on shear modulus of sand in K_0 condition (in Chinese). Rock and Soil Mechanics, 39(10), 3695–3702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J., Lee, C. H., Shin, M., Bhattacharya, S., & Su, Y. F. (2019). Influence of coarse aggregate angularity on the mechanical performance of cement-based materials. Construction and Building Materials, 204, 184–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q. B., Xiang, W., Budhu, M., & Cui, D. S. (2011). Study of particle shape quantification and effect on mechanical property of sand. Yantu Lixue/Rock and Soil Mechanics, 32(1), 190–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2011.s1.121.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. R., Link, R. E., Kang, X., Cambio, D., & Ge, L. (2012). Effect of Parallel Gradations on Crushed Rock-Concrete Interface Behaviours. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 40(1), 103773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE103773.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, R. E., & Lai, J. (1989). Direct shear testing. Advanced Geotechnical Laboratory, Dept. od Construction Engineering Chaoyang University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, P. M., Reddy, N. V., & Dhande, S. G. (2003). Improvement of surface finish by staircase machining in fused deposition modeling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 132(1-3), 323–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00953-6.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, P. W. (1962). The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 269(1339), 500–527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1962.0193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamarina, J. C., & Cho, G. C. (2004). Soil behaviour: The role of particle shape [Paper presentation]. Advances in Geotechnical Engineering: The Skempton Conference - Proceedings of a Three Day Conference on Advances in Geotechnical Engineering, Organised by the Institution of Civil Engineers,.
   Google Scholar
• Shibuya, S., Mitachi, T., & Tamate, S. (1997). Interpretation of direct shear box testing of sands as quasi-simple shear. Géotechnique, 47(4), 769–790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.4.769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simoni, A., & Houlsby, G. T. (2006). The direct shear strength and dilatancy of sand–gravel mixtures. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 24(3), 523–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-004-5832-6.
   Google Scholar
• Su, Y. F., Bhattacharya, S., Lee, S. J., Lee, C. H., & Shin, M. (2020). A new interpretation of three-dimensional particle geometry: M-A-V-L. Transportation Geotechnics, 23, 100328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100328.
   Google Scholar
• Sukumaran, B., & Ashmawy, A. K. (2001). Quantitative characterisation of the geometry of discrete particles: Geotechnique, 51(7), 619–627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2001.51.7.619.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, Y., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Wei, W., & Tong, L. (2014). Prospective applications of 3D printing technology in civil engineering (in Chinese). Steel Construction, 29(8), 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13206/j.gjg201408001.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. W. (1948). Fundamentals of soil mechanics. Soil Science, 66(2), 161.
   Google Scholar
• Torquato, S., & Jiao, Y. (2009). Dense packings of the platonic and archimedean solids. Nature, 460(7257), 876–879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wadell, H. (1932). Volume, shape, and roundness of rock particles. The Journal of Geology, 40(5), 443–451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/623964.
   Google Scholar