Considering SSI by an equivalent linear method for nonlinear analysis of concrete moment frames

References

• ATC-40. (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Aydogan, M., & Uzgider, E. (1988). A numerical method for the earthquake response of brick masonry structures. Bulletin of the Technical University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey, 41(3), 415–431.
   Google Scholar
• Bardet, J. P., Ichii, K., & Lin, C. H. (2000). EERA: A computer program for equivalent-linear earthquake site response analyses of layered soil deposits. Department of Civil Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Chinmayi, H. K., & Jayalekshmi, B. R. (2013). Soil-structure interaction effects on seismic response of a 16 storey RC framed building with shear wall. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 2, 53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K., & Gutierrez, J. A. (1974). Earthquake response analysis of multistorey buildings including foundation interaction. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 3(1), 65–77.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, R. W., & Penzien, J. (1975). Dynamics of structures. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, C., & Miranda, E. (2017). Evaluation of soil-structure interaction effects on the damping ratios of buildings subjected to earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 100, 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darendeli, M. B. (2001). Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. PhD Dissertation, UT Austin, 362 P.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA 440a. (2009). Effects of strength and stiffness degradation on seismic response. Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Guerreiro, P., Kontoe, S., & Taborda, D. (2012, September). Comparative study of stiffness reduction and damping curves. Proc. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Jayalekshmi, B. R., & Chinmayi, H. K. (2015). Soil–structure interaction effect on seismic force evaluation of RC framed buildings with various shapes of shear Wall: As per IS 1893 and IBC. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 45(3), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-014-0134-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, P. C., & Bielak, J. (1973). Dynamics of building-soil interaction. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 63(1), 9–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawakami, H., & Oyunchimeg, M. (2004). Wave propagation modeling analysis of earthquake records for buildings. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 3(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.3.33
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Leet, K., & Bernal, D. (1982). Reinforced concrete design. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Luco, J. E., & Westmann, R. A. (1971). Dynamic response of circular footings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 97(5), 1381–1395.
   Google Scholar
• Luco, J. E., & Westmann, R. A. (1972). Dynamic response of a rigid footing bonded to an elastic half space. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 39(2), 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3422711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neelima, B. (2012). Earthquake response of structures under different soil conditions. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 1(7), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• NEHRP. (2003). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, 2003 Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y. J., Ang, A. H., & Wen, Y. K. (1987). Damage-limiting aseismic design of buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 3(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585416
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y.-J., & Ang, A. H.-S. (1985). Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 111(4), 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmelee, R. A., Perelman, D. S., & Lee, S. L. (1969). Seismic response of multiple-story structures on flexible foundations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 59(3), 1061–1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N., & Grant, D. N. (2005). Viscous damping in seismic design and analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9(sup2), 229–255. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246905002365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáez, E., Lopez-Caballero, F., & Modaressi-Farahmand-Razavi, A. (2011). Effect of the inelastic dynamic soil–structure interaction on the seismic vulnerability assessment. Structural Safety, 33(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şafak, E. (1998). Propagation of seismic waves in tall buildings. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 7(4), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(199812)7:4<295::AID-TAL117>3.0.CO;2-5
   Google Scholar
• Şafak, E. (1999). Wave-propagation formulation of seismic response of multistory buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(4), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(426)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaiefar, H. R., & Massumi, A. (2010). A simplified method to determine seismic responses of reinforced concrete moment resisting building frames under influence of soil–structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(11), 1259–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorovska, M. I., Ivanović, S. S., & Trifunac, M. D. (2001). Wave propagation in a seven-story reinforced concrete building: I. Theoretical models. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(01)00003-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorovska, M. I., & Rahmani, M. T. (2013). System identification of buildings by wave travel time analysis and layered shear beam models—Spatial resolution and accuracy. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 20(5), 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorovska, M. I., & Trifunac, M. D. (1990). Propagation of earthquake waves in buildings with soft first floor. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 116(4), 892–900. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:4(892)
   Google Scholar
• Uzgider, E., & Aydogan, M. (1986). Simple and efficient method for the dynamic response of 2D frames subject to ground motions. Proc., 8th Eur. Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Vol. 3. Lisboa, Portugal: Laboratorio Nacional de Engenharia Civil.
   Google Scholar
• Veletsos, A. S., & Meek, J. W. (1974). Dynamic behaviour of building‐foundation systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 3(2), 121–138.
   Google Scholar
• Veletsos, A. S., & Wei, Y. T. (1971). Lateral and rocking vibration of footings. Journal of Soil Mechanics & Foundations Division, 97(5), 1381–1395.
   Google Scholar
• Yong, Y., & Lin, Y. K. (1992). Dynamic response analysis of truss-type structural networks: A wave propagation approach. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 156(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(92)90810-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, N., Kobayashi, S., Suetomi, I., & Miura, K. (2002). Equivalent linear method considering frequency dependent characteristics of stiffness and damping. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(3), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar