Identifying parameters of a discrete numerical model of soil from a geotechnical field test

References

• Aboul Hosn, R., Sibille, L., Benahmed, N., & Chareyre, B. (2017). Discrete numerical modeling of loose soil with spherical particles and interparticle rolling friction. Granular Matter, 19(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-016-0687-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahar, R. (1992). Analyse numérique de l’essai pressiométrique: Application à l’identification de paramètres de comportement des sols [PhD thesis]. Ecole centrale de Lyon.
   Google Scholar
• Bardet, J. (1994). Numerical simulations of the incremental responses of idealized granular materials. International Journal of Plasticity, 10(8), 879–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(94)90019-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biarez, J., Gambin, M., Gomes-Correia, A., Flavigny, E., & Branque, D. (1998). Using pressuremeter to obtain parameters to elastic-plastic models for sands. In Peter K. Robertson & Paul W. Mayne (Eds.), Geotechnical site characterization (pp. 747–752). Netherlands: A.A. Balkema, Brookfield.
   Google Scholar
• Boubanga, A. (1990). Identification de paramètres de comportement des sols à partir de l’essai pressiométrique [PhD thesis]. Thèse de doctorat.
   Google Scholar
• Butlanska, J., Arroyo, M., Gens, A., & O’Sullivan, C. (2014). Multi-scale analysis of cone penetration test (cpt) in a virtual calibration chamber. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 51(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chareyre, B., Briançon, L., & Villard, P. (2002). Theoretical versus experimental modeling of the anchorage capacity of geotextiles in trenches. Geosynthetics International, 9(2), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.9.0212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciantia, M., Arroyo, M., Calvetti, F., & Gens, A. (2016). A numerical investigation of the incremental behavior of crushable granular soils. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 40(13), 1773–1798. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cundall, P. A., & Strack, O. D. (1979). A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique, 29(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darve, F., & Dendani, H. (1988). An incrementally non-linear constitutive relation and its predictions. In A. Saada & G. Bianchini (Eds.), Constitutive Equations for Granular Non-Cohesive soils - Proceedings of the International Workshop on Constitutive Equations for Granular Non-Cohesive Soils, Balkema, Rotterdam, July 22–24, 1987 (pp. 237–254).
   Google Scholar
• Fahey, M., & Carter, J. P. (1993). A finite element study of the pressuremeter test in sand using a nonlinear elastic plastic model. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 30(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1139/t93-029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavigny, E., Desrues, J., & Palayer, B. (1990). Le sable d’hostun rf. Revue Française de Géotechnique, 53, 67–70. https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/1990053067
   Google Scholar
• Geng, Y. (2010). Discrete element modelling of cavity expansion in granular materials [PhD thesis]. University of Nottingham Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini-Sadrabadi, H., Celeste, F., Chareyre, B., Dano, C., Sibille, L., & Riegel, P. (2019). Interpretation of a cyclic cone penetration test (cpt) under saturated conditions: Numerical and experimental approaches. In Proceedings of the XVII ECSMGE-2019 Geotechnical Engineering Foundation of the Future. https://doi.org/10.32075/17ECSMGE-2019-0260
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini-Sadrabadi, H. (2019). Identificiation insitu des sols liquéfiables par pénétromètre statique cyclique: modélisations physiques et numériques [PhD thesis]. Université Grenoble Alpes.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, A. B., & Ma, M. Y. (1994). An analytical study of cone penetration tests in granular material. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 31(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwashita, K., & Oda, M. (2000). Micro-deformation mechanism of shear banding process based on modified distinct element method. Powder Technology, 109(1–3), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00236-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, R., Ando, E., Viggiani, C., & Andrade, J. (2018). All you need is shape: Predicting shear banding in sand with ls-dem. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 111, 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2017.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanier, J., & Zitouni, Z. (1988). Development of a data base using the grenoble true triaxial apparatus. In A. Saada & G. Bianchini (Eds.), Constitutive Equations for Granular Non-Cohesive soils - Proceedings of the International Workshop on Constitutive Equations for Granular Non-Cohesive Soils, Balkema, Rotterdam, July 22–24, 1987 (pp. 47–58).
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Wu, W., Hesham El Naggar, M., Mei, G., & Liang, R. (2019). Dem analysis of the sand plug behavior during the installation process of open-ended pile. Computers and Geotechnics, 109, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokrani, L. (1991). Simulation physique du comportement des pieux à grande profondeur en chambre de calibration [PhD thesis]. Grenoble INPG.
   Google Scholar
• Radjai, F., Jean, M., Moreau, J. J., & Roux, S. (1996). Force distribution in dense two-dimensional granular systems. Physical Review Letters, 77(2), 274–277. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux, J., & Chevoir, F. (2005). Discrete numerical simulation and the mechanical behavior of granular materials. Bulletin Des Laboratoires Des Ponts et Chaussées, 254, 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• Roux, J., & Combe, G. (2010). How granular materials deform in quasistatic conditions. In J. D. Goddard & J. T. Jenkins (Eds.), IUTAM-ISIMM Symposium on Mathematical Modeling and Physical Instances of Granular Flow, AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1227, p. 260).
   Google Scholar
• Saada, A., & Bianchini, G. (1988). Constitutive equations for granular non-cohesive soils. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Constitutive Equations for Granular Non-Cohesive Soils, Balkema, Rotterdam, July 22–24, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Sibille, L., Benahmed, N., & Darve, F. (2021). Constitutive response predictions of both dense and loose soils with a discrete element model. Computers and Geotechnics, 135, 104161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibille, L., Villard, P., Darve, F., & Aboul Hosn, R. (2019). Quantitative prediction of discrete element models on complex loading paths. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 43(5), 858–887. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smilauer, V., 2015. Yade Documentation 2nd ed. The Yade Project. http://yade-dem.org/doc/, doi:10.5281/zenodo.34073.
   Google Scholar
• Villard, P., Huckert, A., & Briançon, L. (2016). Load transfer mechanisms in geotextile-reinforced embankments overlying voids: Numerical approach and design. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 44(3), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesley, L. D. (2002). Interpretation of calibration chamber tests involving cone penetrometers in sands. Géotechnique, 52(4), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2002.52.4.289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zentar, R., Hicher, P. Y., & Moulin, G. (2001). Identification of soil parameters by inverse analysis. Computers and Geotechnics, 28(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(00)00020-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., Evans, T., & Zhou, X. (2018). Effects of curvature-related dem contact model on the macro-and micro-mechanical behaviours of granular soils. Géotechnique, 68(12), 1085–1098. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitouni, Z. (1988). Comportement tridimensionnel des sables [PhD thesis]. Université Joseph Fourier.
   Google Scholar