561
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The roles of intermediaries and the development of their capabilities in sectoral innovation systems: a case study of Thailand

&
Pages 99-114 | Published online: 31 Oct 2013

References

  • Bell, M. (2006), ‘Time and technological learning in industrialising countries: how long does it take? How fast is it moving (if at all)?’ International Journal of Technology Management, 36(1–3), 25–39. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2006.009959
  • Berger, M. (2005), ‘Upgrading the system of innovation in late-industrializing countries – the role of transnational corporations in Thailand's manufacturing sector’, Dissertation, Kiel University, Germany. March.
  • Bessant, J., and Rush, H. (1995), ‘Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer’, Research Policy, 24(1), 97–114. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00751-E
  • Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M., and Rickne, A. (2002), ‘Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues’, Research Policy, 31(2), 233–245. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X
  • Dodgson, M., and Bessant, J. (1996), Effective Innovation Policy: A New Approach, London: International Thomson Business Press.
  • Food Processing Industry Club, federation of Thai Industries (2013), ‘18th News Announcement’, February 20. http://www.foodfti.com (accessed April 28, 2013)
  • Fujita, M. (2011), ‘Value chain dynamics and local suppliers’ capability building: an analysis of the vietnamese motorcycle industry’, in The Dynamics of Local Learning in Global Value Chains: Experiences from East Asia, eds. M. Kawakami and T. J. Sturgeon, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 68–99.
  • Goto, A. (1997), ‘Cooperative research in Japanese manufacturing industries’, in Innovation In Japan, eds. A. Goto and H. Odagiri, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 256–264.
  • Howard Partners (2007), ‘The Role of Intermediaries in Support of Innovation’, Report prepared for the Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, Australia. April 2007.
  • Howells, J. (2006), ‘Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation’, Research Policy, 35(5), 715–728. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
  • Intarakumnerd, P., and Virasa, T. (2002), ‘Broader roles of RTOs in developing countries: from knowledge creators to strengtheners of national innovation system’, Paper presented at Science, Technology and Innovation Conference, JFK School of government, Harvard University, – September 23–24, 2002.
  • Intarakumnerd, P., Chatratana, S., Jirathumkitkul, Pand T., and Smitinont, T. (2010), ‘Successes and failures of an intermediary in triple helix relationships in developing economy: the Case of Thailand's Food industry’, Paper presented in the VIII Triple Helix International Conference on University, Industry and Government Linkages, Madrid, October 20–22.
  • Klerkx, L., and Leeuwis, C. (2008), ‘Balancing multiple interests: embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure’, Technovation, 28(6), 364–378. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.005
  • Kolodny, H., Stymne, B., Shani, R., figuera, J. R., and Lillrank, P. (2001), ‘Design and policy choices for technology extension organizations’, Research Policy, 30(2), 201–225. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00119-5
  • Lema, R. (2010), ‘Adoption of open business models in the west and innovation in India's software industry’, IDS Research Report 62. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
  • Lynn, L., Reddy, N., and Aram, J. (1996), ‘Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework’, Research Policy, 25(1), 91–106. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(94)00817-5
  • Malerba, B. (2002), ‘Sectoral systems of innovation and production’, Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
  • Murray, E.V. (2007), ‘Thailand – the kitchen of the world origin and growth of the Thai food industry & lessons for India’. http://cab.org
  • National Food Institute (2008), Thai Food Industry Master Plan: The Final Report. Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Smits, R., and Kuhlmann, S. (2004), ‘The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy’, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1/2), 4–30. doi: 10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004621
  • Stankiewicz, R. (1995), ‘The role of the science and technology infrastructure in the development and diffusion of industrial automation in Sweden’, in B. Carlsson (ed.), Technological Systems and Economic Performance: The Case of Factory Automation, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 165–210.
  • Techakanont, K., and Terdudomtham, T. (2004), ‘Evolution of inter-firm technology transfer and technological capability formation of local parts firms in the Thai automobile industry’, Journal of Technology and Innovation, 12(2), 151–183. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2004.9668602
  • Van der Meulen, B., Nedeva, M., and Braun, D. (2005), ‘Intermediaries organisation and processes: theory and research issues’, Position Paper for the PRIME Workshop, 6–7 October 2005, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Van de Ven, H., and Poole, M. (1995), ‘Methods for studying innovation development in the Minnesota innovation research program’, in Longitudinal Field Research Methods: Studying Processes of Organizational Change, eds. George P. Huber and Andrew Van de VenH. pp. 155–185). Thousand Oaks, London, and New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.