740
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Knowledge spillover from university research before the national innovation system reform in Japan: localisation, mechanisms, and intermediaries

References

  • Acs, Z., Anselin, L., and Varga, A. (2002), ‘Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge’, Research Policy, 31, 1069–1085. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6
  • Agrawal, A., and Henderson, R. (2002), ‘Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT’, Management Science, 48(1), 44–60.
  • Almeida, P., Dokko, G., and Rosenkopf, L. (2003), ‘Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: increasing opportunity and decreasing ability’, Research Policy, 32(2), 301–315. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00101-4
  • Almeida, P., and Kogut, B. (1995), ‘ The Geographic Localization of Ideas and the Mobility of Patent Holders’, Paper presented at the Conference on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Global Economy, organized by CIBER, University of Maryland, October 20, 1995.
  • Almeida, P., and Kogut, B. (1997), ‘The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation’, Small Business Economics, 9(1), 21–31. doi: 10.1023/A:1007995512597
  • Almeida, P., and Kogut, B. (1999), ‘Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks’, Management Science, 45(7), 905–917. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905
  • Anselin, L., Varga, A., and Acs, Z. (1997), ‘Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations’, Journal of Urban Economics, 42(3), 422–448. doi: 10.1006/juec.1997.2032
  • Arundel, A., van de Paal, G., and Soete, L. (1995), ‘ Innovation Strategies of Europe's Largest Industrial Firms: Results of the PACE Survey on Information Sources, Public Research, Protection of Innovations, and Government Programmes’, MERIT, Maastricht.
  • Arvanitis, S., Sydow, N., and Woerter, M. (2008), ‘Is there any impact of university-industry knowledge transfer on innovation and productivity? An empirical analysis based on Swiss firm data’, Review of Industrial Organization, 32(2), 77–94. doi: 10.1007/s11151-008-9164-1
  • Asheim, B., Coenen, L., and Vang, J. (2007), ‘Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, 655–670. doi: 10.1068/c0648
  • Audretsch, D., and Stephan, P. (1996), ‘Company-scientist locational links: the case of biotechnology’, American Economic Review, 86(3), 641–652.
  • Autant-Bernard, C. (2001), ‘Science and knowledge flows: evidence from the French case’, Research Policy, 30(7), 1069–1078. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00131-1
  • Balconi, M., Breschi, S., and Lissoni, F. (2004), ‘Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data’, Research Policy, 33(1), 127–145. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2
  • Baum, J., Calabrese, T., and Silverman, B. (2000), ‘Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology’, Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267–294. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8
  • Breschi, S., and Lissoni, F. (2001), ‘Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975–1005. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.975
  • Buesa, M., Heijs, J., Pellitero, M., and Baumert, T. (2006), ‘Regional systems of innovation and the knowledge production function: the Spanish case’, Technovation, 26, 463–472. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.007
  • Cassi, L., Corrocher, N., Malerba, F., and Vonortas, N. (2008), ‘Research networks as infrastructure for knowledge diffusion in European regions’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(7–8), 663–676. doi: 10.1080/10438590701785603
  • Cockburn, I., and Henderson, R. (1998), ‘Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157–182. doi: 10.1111/1467-6451.00067
  • Cohen, W., Nelson, R., and Walsh, J. (2000), ‘ Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)’, NBER Working Paper No. 7552.
  • Cohen, W., Nelson, R., and Walsh, J. (2002), ‘Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D’, Management Science, 48(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
  • Collins, S., and Wakoh, H. (2000), ‘Universities and technology transfer in Japan: recent reforms in historical perspective’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 213–222. doi: 10.1023/A:1007884925676
  • Deeds, D., and Hill, C. (1996), ‘Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: an empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms’, Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 41–55. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(95)00087-9
  • DiGregorio, D., and Shane, S. (2003), ‘Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?’, Research Policy, 32(2), 209–227. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5
  • Dornbusch, F., and Brenner, T. (2013), ‘ Universities as Local Knowledge Hubs under Different Technology Regimes: New Evidence from Academic Patenting’, Working Papers Firms and Region, No. R6/2013.
  • Dziczek, K., Luria, D., and Wiarda, E. (1997), ‘Assessing the impact of a manufacturing extension center’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 23(1), 29–35. doi: 10.1007/BF02511613
  • Felsenstein, D. (1994), ‘University-related science parks: ‘seedbeds’ or ‘enclaves’ of innovation?’, Technovation, 14, 93–110. doi: 10.1016/0166-4972(94)90099-X
  • Franklin, S., Wright, M., and Lockett, A. (2001), ‘Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1–2), 127–141. doi: 10.1023/A:1007896514609
  • Fritsch, M., and Lukas, R. (2001), ‘Who cooperates on R&D?’, Research Policy, 30(2), 297–312. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00115-8
  • Fritsch, M., and Franke, G. (2004), ‘Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation’, Research Policy, 33(2), 245–255. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00123-9
  • Fukugawa, N. (2005), ‘Characteristics of knowledge interactions between universities and small firms in Japan’, International Small Business Journal, 23(4), 379–401. doi: 10.1177/0266242605054052
  • Fukugawa, N. (2006a), ‘Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(2), 381–400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.07.005
  • Fukugawa, N. (2006b), ‘Determining factors in innovation of small firm networks: a case of cross industry groups in Japan’, Small Business Economics, 27(2–3), 181–193. doi: 10.1007/s11187-006-0010-2
  • Fukugawa, N. (2008), ‘Evaluating the strategy of local public technology centers in regional innovation systems: evidence from Japan’, Science and Public Policy, 35(3), 159–170. doi: 10.3152/030234208X299062
  • Fukugawa, N. (2009), ‘Determinants of licensing activities of local public technology centers in Japan’, Technovation, 29(12), 885–892. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.017
  • Fukugawa, N. (2011), ‘Impacts and channels of university spillovers before the national innovation system reform in Japan’, International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, 1(4), 383–393. doi: 10.1504/IJTIS.2011.044907
  • Fukugawa, N. (2013), ‘University spillovers into small technology-based firms: channel, mechanism, and geography’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4), 415–431. doi: 10.1007/s10961-012-9247-x
  • Gittelman, M. (2007), ‘Does geography matter for science-based firms? Epistemic communities and the geography of research and patenting in biotechnology’, Organization Science, 18(4), 724–741. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0249
  • Goldfarb, B., and Henrekson, M. (2003), ‘Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property’, Research Policy, 32(4), 639–658. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00034-3
  • Goto, A., and Motohashi, K. (2007), ‘Construction of a Japanese patent database and a first look at Japanese patenting activities’, Research Policy, 36(9), 1431–1442. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.06.005
  • Goto, A., and Nagata, A. (1997), ‘ Technological Opportunities and Appropriating the Returns from Innovation, in Japanese’, National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Tokyo.
  • Griliches, Z. (1979), ‘Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth’, Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92–116. doi: 10.2307/3003321
  • Heller, M., and Eisenberg, R. (1998), ‘Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research’, Science, 280(1), 698–701. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5364.698
  • Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M. (1998), ‘Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting 1965–1988’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 119–127. doi: 10.1162/003465398557221
  • Hicks, D. (1993), ‘University-industry research links in Japan’, Policy Sciences, 26, 361–395. doi: 10.1007/BF00999478
  • von Hippel, E., (1994), ‘Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation’, Management Science, 40(4), 429–439. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429
  • Howells, J. (2006), ‘Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation’, Research Policy, 35(5), 715–728. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
  • Intarakumnerd, P., and Chaoroenporn, P. (2013), ‘The roles of intermediaries and the development of their capabilities in sectoral innovation systems: a case study of Thailand’, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(2), 99–114. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2013.819249
  • Izushi, H. (2003), ‘Impact of the length of relationships upon the use of research institutes by SMEs’, Research Policy, 32, 771–788. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00085-9
  • Izushi, H. (2005), ‘Creation of relational assets through the library of equipment model: an industrial modernization approach of Japan's local technology centers’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 17, 183–204. doi: 10.1080/08985620500102832
  • Jaffe, A. (1989), ‘Real effects of academic research’, American Economic Review, 79(5), 957–970.
  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. (1993), ‘Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. doi: 10.2307/2118401
  • Jarmin, R., (1999), ‘Evaluating the impact of manufacturing extension on productivity growth’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(1), 99–119. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199924)18:1<99::AID-PAM6>3.0.CO;2-S
  • Jensen, R., and Thursby, M. (2001), ‘Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions’, American Economic Review, 91(1), 240–259. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.1.240
  • Kneller, R. (2007), Bridging Islands: Venture Companies and the Future of Japanese and American Industry, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R., and Winter, S. (1984), Survey Research on R&D Appropriability and Technological Opportunity, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Link, A., and Rees, J. (1990), ‘Firm size, university based research, and the returns to R&D’, Small Business Economics, 2(1), 25–31. doi: 10.1007/BF00389891
  • Lockett, A., Wright, M., and Franklin, S. (2003), ‘Technology transfer and universities’, Spin-Out Strategies Small Business Economics, 20, 185–200. doi: 10.1023/A:1022220216972
  • Luria, D., and Wiarda, E. (1996), ‘Performance benchmarking and measuring program impacts on customers: lessons from the Midwest manufacturing technology center’, Research Policy, 25, 233–246. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00837-3
  • Malerba, F. (2002), ‘Sectoral systems of innovation and production’, Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
  • Mansfield, E. (1991), ‘Academic research and industrial innovation’, Research Policy, 20(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90080-A
  • Mansfield, E. (1995), ‘Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics, and financing’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), 55–65. doi: 10.2307/2109992
  • Markman, G., Gianiodis, P., Phan, P., and Balkin, D. (2004), ‘Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: do incentive systems matter?’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 353–364. doi: 10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034127.01889.86
  • McKelvey, M., Hakan, A., and Massimo, R. (2003), ‘Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology pharmaceutical sector?’ Research Policy, 32(3), 483–501. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00020-3
  • Molina-Morales, F., and Martinez-Fernandez, M. (2010), ‘Social networks: effects of social capital on firm innovation’, Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2), 258–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00294.x
  • Motohashi, K. (2005), ‘University-industry collaborations in Japan: the role of new technology-based firms in transforming the national innovation system’, Research Policy, 34(5), 583–594. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.001
  • Motohashi, K., and Muramatsu, S. (2012), ‘Examining the university industry collaboration policy in Japan: patent analysis’, Technology in Society, 34, 149–162.
  • Nagaoka, S., and Walsh, J. (2009), ‘ Commercialization and Other Uses of Patents in Japan and the U.S.: Major Findings from the RIETI-Georgia Tech Inventor Survey’, RIETI Working Paper 09E011.
  • Narin, F., Hamilton, K., and Olivastro, D. (1997), ‘The increasing linkage between us technology and public science’, Research Policy, 26(3), 317–330. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00013-9
  • National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (2003), University-Industry Collaborations 1983–2001, Research Material 96, Tokyo: National Institute of Science and Technology Policy.
  • National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (2013), Science and Technology Indicators, Tokyo: National Institute of Science and Technology Policy.
  • Nelson, R., and Winter, S. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Nooteboom, B. (1999), ‘Innovation, learning and industrial organization’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 127–150. doi: 10.1093/cje/23.2.127
  • Odagiri, H. (1999), ‘University-industry collaboration in Japan: facts and interpretations’, in Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States, eds. L. Branscomb, F. Kodama, and R. Florida, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 252–265.
  • Odagiri, H., and Kato, Y. (1998), ‘University-industry research collaboration in the biotechnology industry: an empirical analysis’, Business Review, 45, 62–80.
  • Odagiri, H., Nakamura, Y., and Shibuya, M. (1997), ‘Research consortia as a vehicle for basic research: the case of fifth generation computer project in Japan’, Research Policy, 26(2), 191–207. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00008-5
  • OECD (1996), The Knowledge-Based Economy, Paris: OECD Publications.
  • Office of Technology Assessment (OTA), US Congress (1990), Making Things Better: Competing in Manufacturing, OTA-ITE-443, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  • Oldsman, E. (1996), ‘Does manufacturing extension matter? An evaluation of the industrial technology extension service in New York’, Research Policy, 25, 215–232. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(96)00836-0
  • Pavitt, K. (1984), ‘Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory’, Research Policy, 13(6), 343–373. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
  • Perkmann, M., and Walsh, K. (2008), ‘Engaging the scholar: three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry’, Research Policy, 37(10), 1884–1891. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.009
  • Ponds, R., Oort, F., and Frenken, K. (2010), ‘Innovation, spillovers and university-industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach’, Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2), 231–255. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbp036
  • Powell, W., Koput, K., and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996), ‘Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145. doi: 10.2307/2393988
  • Ronde, P., and Hussler, C. (2005), ‘Innovation in regions: what does really matter?’, Research Policy, 34(8), 1150–1172. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.011
  • Rothaermel, F., and Deeds, D. (2004), ‘Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development’, Strategic Management Journal, 25(3), 201–221. doi: 10.1002/smj.376
  • Sampat, B. (mimeo), ‘ The Effects of Bayh-Dole on Technology Transfer and the Academic Enterprise: A Survey of the Empirical Literature’, unpublished paper.
  • Santoro, M., and Chakrabarti, A. (2002), ‘Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions’, Research Policy, 31(7), 1163–1180. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1
  • Schartinger, D., Schibany, A., and Gassler, H. (2001), ‘Interactive relations between universities and firms: empirical evidence from Austria’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 255–268. doi: 10.1023/A:1011110207885
  • Science and Technology Agency (1985), White Paper on Science and Technology, Tokyo: Science and Technology Agency.
  • Shane, S. (2002), ‘Selling university technology: patterns from MIT’, Management Science, 48(1), 122–137. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.122.14281
  • Shapira, P. (1992), ‘Modernizing small manufacturers in Japan: the role of local public technology centers’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 17(1), 40–57. doi: 10.1007/BF02175820
  • Siegel, D., Waldman, D., and Link, A. (2003), ‘Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study’, Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
  • Stankiewicz, R. (1995), ‘The role of the science and technology infrastructure in the development and diffusion of industrial automation in Sweden’, in Technological Systems and Economic Performance: The Case of Factory Automation, ed. B. Carlsson, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 165–210.
  • Storey, D. (1994), Understanding the Small Business Sector, London: Routledge.
  • Thursby, J., and Kemp, S. (2002), ‘Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing’, Research Policy, 31, 109–124. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00160-8
  • Thursby, J., and Thursby, M. (2002), ‘Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing’, Management Science, 48(1), 90–104. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271
  • Varga, A. (1997), ‘ Regional Economic Effects of University Research: A Survey’, Working Paper.
  • Walsh, J., Arora, A., and Cohen, W. (2003), ‘Effects of research tool patents and licensing on biomedical innovation’, in Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, eds. W.M. Cohen and S. Merrill, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, pp. 285–340.
  • Westhead, P., and Batstone, S. (1999), ‘Perceived benefits of a managed science park location’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 11(2), 129–154. doi: 10.1080/089856299283236
  • Westhead, P., and Storey, D. (1994), An Assessment of Firms Located on and Off Science Parks in the United Kingdom, London: HMSO.
  • Woolgar, L. (2007), ‘New institutional policies for university-industry links in Japan’, Research Policy, 36, 1261–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.010
  • Yoshihara, M., and Tamai, K. (1999), ‘Lack of incentive and persistent constraints: factors hindering technology transfer at Japanese universities’, in Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States, eds. L. Branscomb, F. Kodama, and R. Florida, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 348–363.
  • Zucker, L., and Darby, M. (2001), ‘Capturing technological opportunities via Japan's star scientists: from Japanese firms’ biotech patents and products’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 37–58. doi: 10.1023/A:1007832127813
  • Zucker, L., Darby, M., and Armstrong, J. (1998a), ‘Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets?’ Economic Inquiry, 36, 65–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01696.x
  • Zucker, L., Darby, M., and Brewer, M. (1998b), ‘Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises’, American Economic Review, 88(1–2), 290–306.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.