University–industry collaboration and technological innovation: sequential mediation of knowledge transfer and barriers in automotive and biotechnology firms in Malaysia

References

• Adeoti, J., and Adeoti, A. (2005), ‘Biotechnology R&D partnership for industrial innovation in Nigeria’, Technovation, 25(4), 349–365. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00151-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G., Lampert, C.M., and Tandon, V. (2008), ‘Moving beyond Schumpeter: management research on the determinants of technological innovation’, The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 1–98. doi: 10.1080/19416520802211446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, A. (2003), ‘Engaging economic development through the commercialisation of research: the Malaysian experience’, in Paper presented at the General Conference of the Association of Commonwealth Universities, 31 Aug–4 Sep, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Alwin, D.F., and Hauser, R.M. (1975), ‘The decomposition of effects in path analysis’, American Sociological Review, 40 (February), 37–47. doi: 10.2307/2094445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankrah, S.N., Burgess, T.F., Grimshaw, P., and Shaw, N.E. (2013), ‘Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: what single-group studies of motives omit’, Technovation, 33(2–3), 50–65. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., and Woerter, M. (2008), ‘University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: what university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises’, Research Policy, 37(10), 1865–1883. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arza, V., and Vazquez, C. (2010), ‘Interactions between public research organisations and industry in Argentina’, Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 499–511. doi: 10.3152/030234210X512728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B.T., and Gertler, M. (2005), ‘The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems’, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, eds. J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, and R. Nelson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 240–291.
   Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., and Maskell, P. (2004), ‘Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation’, Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S.O., and Egger, P.H. (2013), ‘Endogenous product versus process innovation and a firm's propensity to export’, Empirical Economics, 44, 329–354. doi: 10.1007/s00181-009-0322-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., and Bodas Freitas, I.M. (2008), ‘Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: to what degree do sectors also matter?’, Research Policy, 37(10), 1837–1853. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbegal-mirabent, J., Lafuente, E., and Solé, F. (2013), ‘The pursuit of knowledge transfer activities: an efficiency analysis of Spanish universities’, Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2051–2059. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercovitz, J., and Feldmann, M. (2006), ‘Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 175–188. doi: 10.1007/s10961-005-5029-z
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., and Jacobsson, S. (2008), ‘ Functions in innovation systems: a framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers’, (RIDE/IMIT Working Paper No. 84426-008). Retrieved from Institute for Management of Innovation and Technology website: http://en.imit.se/pdf/reports/2007_153.pdf (accessed on February 18, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., and Rickne, A. (2008), ‘Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis’, Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerregaard, T. (2010), ‘Industry and academia in convergence: micro-institutional dimensions of R&D collaboration’, Technovation, 30(2), 100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, P.C. (2008), ‘Beyond the stars: the impact of affiliation with university biotechnology centers on the industrial involvement of university scientists’, Technovation, 28(5), 291–297. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, P.C., and Ponomariov, B.L. (2009), ‘University researchers working with private companies’, Technovation, 29(2), 142–153. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, J. (2000), ‘Competitive pressure: the effects on investments in product and process innovation’, The RAND Journal of Economics, 31(3), 549–569. doi: 10.2307/2601000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramwell, A., and Wolfe, D.a. (2008), ‘Universities and regional economic development: the entrepreneurial University of Waterloo’, Research Policy, 37(8), 1175–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and Malerba, F. (1997), ‘Sectoral innovation systems’, in Systems Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, ed. C. Edquist, London: Pinter Publishers, pp. 130–156.
   Google Scholar
• Brimble, P., and Doner, R.F. (2007), ‘University–industry linkages and economic development: the case of Thailand’, World Development, 35(6), 1021–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldera, A., and Debande, O. (2010), ‘Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: an empirical analysis’, Research Policy, 39(9), 1160–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B., and Jacobsson, S. (1997), ‘Diversity creation and technological systems: a technology policy perspective’, in Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, ed. C. Edquist, London: Pinter Publishers, pp. 266–294.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, I., and Roldán, J.L. (2013), ‘A mediation model between dimensions of social capital’, International Business Review, 22(6), 1034–1050. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli, R.T., and Bassellier, G. (2009), ‘Interpretation of formative measurement in information system research’, MIS Quarterly, 33(4), 689–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P., and Goddard, J. (2000), ‘The response of higher education institutions to regional needs’, European Journal of Education, 35(4), 475–496. doi: 10.1111/1467-3435.00041
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W.W. (1998), ‘The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling’, in Modern Methods for Business Research, ed. G.A. Marcoulides, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 295–336.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W.W. (2010), ‘How to write up and report PLS analyses’, in Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, eds. V. Esposito Vinzi, W.W. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 655–690.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1983), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., and Walsh, J.P. (2002), ‘Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R & D’, Management Science, 48(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (1996), ‘The new wave of regional innovation networks: analysis, characteristics and strategy’, Small Business Economics, 8(2), 159–171. doi: 10.1007/BF00394424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Uranga, M.G., and Etxebarria, G. (1997), ‘Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisational dimensions’, Research Policy, 26, 475–491. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cripps, D., Yencken, J., Coghlan, J., Anderson, D., and Marcus, S. (1999), University Research: Technology Transfer and Commercialisation Practices – Commissioned Report, No. 60, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Daghfous, A. (2004), ‘An empirical investigation of the roles of prior knowledge and learning activities in technology transfer’, Technovation, 24(12), 939–953. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00059-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P., and David, P.A. (1994), ‘Toward a new economics of science’, Research Policy, 23, 487–521. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fuentes, C., and Dutrénit, G. (2012), ‘Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit’, Research Policy, 41(9), 1666–1682. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Este, P., and Patel, P. (2007), ‘University–industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?’, Research Policy, 36(9), 1295–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., and Roth, K.P. (2008), ‘Advancing formative measurement models’, Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1203–1218. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. (1988), ‘Sources, procedures, and micro-economic effects of innovation’, Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 1120–1171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, J., and Goldstein, H. (2007), ‘Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities: a review of current approaches’, International Regional Science Review, 30(1), 20–46. doi: 10.1177/0160017606296731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutrenit, G., and Arza, V. (2010), ‘Channels and benefits of interactions between public research organisations and industry: comparing four Latin American countries’, Science and Public Policy, 37, 541–553. doi: 10.3152/030234210X512043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutrénit, G., De Fuentes, C., and Torres, A. (2010), ‘Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: evidence from Mexico’, Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 513–526. doi: 10.3152/030234210X512025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom, B.Y., and Lee, K. (2010), ‘Determinants of industry–academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: the case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization’, Research Policy, 39(5), 625–639. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (1983), ‘Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science’, Minerva, 2, 198–233.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. (1997), ‘Introduction: universities in the global knowledge economy’, in Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations, eds. H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, London and Washington, DC: Pinter, pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. (2000), ‘The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations’, Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eun, J.-H., Lee, K., and Wu, G. (2006), ‘Explaining the “university-run enterprises” in China: a theoretical framework for university–industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China’, Research Policy, 35(9), 1329–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, R.E., and Miller, N.B. (1992), A Primer for Soft Modeling. Akron, OH: The University of Akron Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foellmi, R., and Zweimuller, J. (2006), ‘Mass Consumption, Exclusion and Unemployment’, Discussion Paper Series – Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and Bookstein, F.L. (1982), ‘Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory’, Journal of Marketing and Research, XIX (November), 440–453. doi: 10.2307/3151718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freel, M.S., and Harrison, R.T. (2006), ‘Innovation and cooperation in the small firm sector: evidence from “Northern Britain”’, Regional Studies, 40(4), 289–305. doi: 10.1080/00343400600725095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance, London: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1996), ‘The greening of technology and models of innovation’, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 53, 27–39. doi: 10.1016/0040-1625(96)00060-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, I.M.F., Geuna, A., and Rossi, F. (2013), ‘Finding the right partners: institutional and personal modes of governance of university–industry interactions’, Research Policy, 42(1), 50–62. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromhold-Eisebith, M., and Werker, C. (2013), ‘Universities’ functions in knowledge transfer: a geographical perspective’, The Annals of Regional Science, 51(3), 621–643. doi: 10.1007/s00168-013-0559-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., and Boudreau, M.-C. (2000), ‘Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice’, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4 (August), 1–79.
   Google Scholar
• George, G., Zahra, S.a., and Wood, D.R. (2002), ‘The effects of business–university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies’, Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6), 577–609. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00069-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuna, A., and Rossi, F. (2011), ‘Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting’, Research Policy, 40(8), 1068–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenlein, M., and Kaplan, A.M. (2004), ‘A beginner's guide to partial least squares analysis’, Understanding Statistics, 3(4), 283–297. doi: 10.1207/s15328031us0304_4
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.E., Black, W.C., Babin, B. 1., Anderson, R.E., and Tatham, R.L. (2006), Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., and Anderson, R.E. (2009), Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., and Sarstedt, M. (2011), ‘PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet’, The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., and Sarstedt, M. (2013), A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlyn, D.W. (2013), ‘The concept of a university’, Philosophy, 71(276), 205–218. doi: 10.1017/S0031819100041449
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A.F. (2009). ‘Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium’. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. doi: 10.1080/03637750903310360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., and Georg, F. (2010), ‘Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: an illustration of available procedures’, in Handbook of Partial Least Squares, eds. V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 713–735.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., and Sinkovics, R.R. (2009), ‘The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing’, Advances in International Marketing, 20(2009), 277–319.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, L., Muñoz-Doyague, M.F., and Nieto, M. (2010), ‘Mobility of public researchers, scientific knowledge transfer, and the firm's innovation process’, Journal of Business Research, 63(5), 510–518. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2012), ‘Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities’, Research Policy, 41(2), 262–275. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyder, M., Theuvsen, L., and Hollmann-Hespos, T. (2012), ‘Investments in tracking and tracing systems in the food industry: a PLS analysis’, Food Policy, 37(1), 102–113. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, C.B., Mackenzie, S.B., and Podsakoff, P.M. (2004), ‘A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research’, Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (September 2003), 199–218. doi: 10.1086/376806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. (1992), ‘Institutional learning’, in National Systems of Innovation, ed. B.-A. Lundvall, London: Pinter, pp. 23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Jonker, M., Romijn, H., and Szirmai, A. (2004), ‘Technological effort, technological capabilities and economic performance. A case study of the paper manufacturing sector in West Java’, Technovation, 26(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, K.J., and Abraham, V. (2009), ‘ Industry-university interactions in India: case of select manufacturing industries’, in Promoting Effective Modes of University-Industry Interaction and Their Evolution for Economic Catch-up in Asia, eds. Lee et al., Seoul: East Asia Institute, Seoul National University, pp. 9–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lall, S. (2000), ‘ The Technological Structure and Performance of Developing Country Manufactured Exports, 1985–98’, Oxford Development Studies, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and Salter, A. (2004), ‘Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?’, Research Policy, 33(8), 1201–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Cho, H., Eom, B., and Wang, Y. (2009), ‘Industry-university linkages in Korea’, in Promoting Effective Modes of University-Industry Interaction and their Evolution for Economic Catch-up in Asia, eds. Lee et al., Seoul: East Asia Institute, Seoul National University, pp. 129–150.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.A. (1985), Product Innovation and User–Producer Interaction, Industrial Development Research Series (No. 31), Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.A. (ed.) (1992), National Systems of Innovation – Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.A., Johnson, B., Andersen, E.S., and Dalum, B. (2002), ‘National systems of production, innovation and competence building’, Research Policy, 31, 213–231. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., and Jarvis, C.B. (2005), ‘The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions’, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 710–730. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malairaja, C., and Zawdie, G. (2008), ‘Science parks and university–industry collaboration in Malaysia’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(6), 727–739. doi: 10.1080/09537320802426432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaysia. (2010), The Tenth Malaysia Plan 2011–2015, Putrajaya: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Malaysia. (2011), The National Higher Education Action Plan Phase 2 (2011–2015), Putrajaya: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. (2002), ‘Sectoral systems of innovation and production’, Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F., and Nelson, R. (2012), Economic Development as a Learning Process: Variation Across Sectors, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., and Malmberg, A. (1997), ‘Towards an explanation of regional specialization and industry agglomeration’, European Planning Studies, 5(1), 25–41. doi: 10.1080/09654319708720382
   Google Scholar
• MASTIC. (2012), ‘ Science and Technology Knowledge Productivity in Malaysia: Bibliometric Study 2012’.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Krahmer, F., and Schmoch, U. (1998), ‘Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields’, Research Policy, 27(8), 835–851. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00094-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothe, C., and Nguyen-Thi, T.U. (2012), ‘Non-technological and technological innovations: do services differ from manufacturing? An empirical analysis of Luxembourg firms’, International Journal of Technology Management, 57(4), 227–244. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2012.045544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowery, D.C., and Sampat, B.N. (2006), ‘Universities in national innovation systems’, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, eds. D.C. Mowery Fagerberg and R.R. Nelson, Oxford: Oxford Publishing, pp. 209–239.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R.R. (2008), ‘Economic development from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory’, Oxford Development Studies, 36(1), 9–22. doi: 10.1080/13600810701848037
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R., and Rosenberg, N. (1993), ‘Technical innovation and national systems’, in National Innovation Systems, ed. R. Nelson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto, M., and Quevedo, P. (2005), ‘Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort’, Technovation, 25(10), 1141–1157. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (2000), ‘Learning by interaction: absorptive capacity cognitive distance and governance’, Journal of Management and Governance, 4(2), 69–92. doi: 10.1023/A:1009941416749
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1981), The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities, Paris, France: Frascati Manual.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Oslo Manual (Vol. Third edit).
   Google Scholar
• Othman, R. Y. (2010), The biotechnology industry–future directions in Malaysia, National Biotechnology Division (BIOTEK) MOSTI Malaysia. http://www.cepp.utm.my/icbwi2010/pdf/presentation/ICBWI2010_D1P02_Prof_Dr_Rofina_Yasmin_Othman.pdf (accessed on February 18, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1984), ‘Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory’, Research Policy, 13, 343–373. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, L., and Teixeira, A.A.C. (2010), ‘Bridging university-firm relationships and open innovation literature: a critical synthesis’, Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, 15(3), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K.J., and Hayes, A.F. (2008), ‘Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models’, Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja Sabaradin, R.Z. (2013), Industry Brief: Malaysia's Automotive Industry (The National Carmaker), Global Advisory & Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rasiah, R. (1999), ‘Malaysia's national innovation system’, in Technology, Competitiveness and the State, eds. K.S. Jomo and G. Felker, London: Routledge, pp. 180–198.
   Google Scholar
• Rasiah, R. (2011), ‘The role of institutions and linkages in learning and innovation’, Institutions and Economies, 3(2), 165–172.
   Google Scholar
• Rasiah, R., and Govindaraju, C. (2009), ‘Industry-university linkages in the automotive, biotechnology and electronics sectors in Malaysia’, in Promoting Effective Modes of University-Industry Interaction and their Evolution for Economic Catch-up in Asia, eds. Lee et al., Seoul: East Asia Institute, pp. 71–97.
   Google Scholar
• Reinartz, W., Krafft, M., and Hoyer, W.D. (2004), ‘The customer relationship management process: its measurement and impact on performance’, Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (August), 293–305. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.41.3.293.35991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E.E., Schumacker, R.E., and Wothke, W. (1998), ‘A comparative review of interaction and nonlinear modeling’, in Interaction and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Modeling, eds. R.E. Schumacker and G.A. Marcoulides, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Saad, M., Zawdie, G., and Malairaja, C. (2008), ‘The triple helix strategy for universities in developing countries: the experiences in Malaysia and Algeria’, Science and Public Policy, 35(6), 431–443. doi: 10.3152/030234208X323316
   Google Scholar
• Sadullah, A.F. (2002), ‘Commercialisation of research results: issues and challenges. USM engineering and campus perspective’, USM Frontiers, 1(1), 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Santoro, M.D. (2000), ‘Success breeds success: the linkage between relationship intensity and tangible outcomes in industry-university collaborative ventures’, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(2), 255–273. doi: 10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00032-8
   Google Scholar
• Segarra-Blasco, A., and Arauzo-Carod, J.P. (2008), ‘Sources of innovation and industry–university interaction: evidence from Spanish firms’, Research Policy, 37(8), 1283–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikka, P. (1991), ‘Technological innovations by SMEs in India’, Technovation, 19, 317–321 doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00126-6
   Google Scholar
• Sosik, J.J., Kahai, S.S. and Piovoso, M.J. (2009), Silver Bullet or Voodoo Statistics? A Primer for Using Partial Least Squares Data Analytic Technique in Group and Organization Research, Group & Organization Management, 34(1), 5–36 doi: 10.1177/1059601108329198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira, A.a.C., and Mota, L. (2012), ‘A bibliometric portrait of the evolution, scientific roots and influence of the literature on university–industry links’, Scientometrics, 93(3), 719–743. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0823-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tether, B., and Tajar, A. (2008), ‘Beyond industry–university links: sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base’, Research Policy, 37(6), 1079–1095. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, A., Dutrénit, G., Sampedro, J.L., and Becerra, N. (2011), ‘What are the factors driving university–industry linkages in latecomer firms: evidence from Mexico’, Science and Public Policy, 38(1), 31–42. doi: 10.3152/030234211X12924093660390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold, H. (1973), ‘Nonlinear iterative partial least squares (NIPALS) modeling: some current developments’, in Multivariate Analysis, ed. P.R. Krishnaiah, New York: Academic Press, Volume 3, pp. 383–407.
   Google Scholar
• Wold, H. (1980), ‘Model construction and evaluation when theoretical knowledge is scarce: theory and application of partial least squares’, in Evaluation of Econometric Models, eds. J. Kmenta and James B. Ramsey, New York: Academic Press, pp. 47–74.
   Google Scholar
• Wold, H. (1985), ‘Partial least squares’, in Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, eds. S. Kotz and N.L. Johnson, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Volume 6, pp. 581–591.
   Google Scholar
• Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., and Sapienza, H.J. (2001), ‘Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms’, Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 587–613. doi: 10.1002/smj.183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar