The effect of proximity between universities and research institutes and firms on firm innovativeness

References

• Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., & McHale, J. (2006). Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 571–591. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbl016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. J. (2000). Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Science, 79, 435–443. doi: 10.1007/PL00011486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., & Geuna, A. (2001). Does proximity matter for knowledge transfer from public institutes and universities to firms (SPRU Electronic Working Paper No 73). Sussex: SPRU, University of Sussex. Retrieved from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/publications/imprint/sewps/sewp73/sewp73.html.
   Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., & Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(6), 559–580. doi: 10.1080/1043859092000234311
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2006). Mobility of inventors and the geography of knowledge spillover: New evidence on US data (KITeS Working Papers 184). Milan, Italy: KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Bocconi University.
   Google Scholar
• Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515–524. doi: 10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantner, ‌U, & Meder, A. (2007). Technological proximity and the choice of cooperation partner. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 2(1), 45–65. doi: 10.1007/s11403-007-0018-y
   Google Scholar
• Capaldo, A., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2014). Partner geographic and organizational proximity and the innovative performance of knowledge-creating alliances. European Management Review, 11, 63–84. doi: 10.1111/emre.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassi, L., & Plunket, A. (2014). Proximity, network formation and inventive performance: In search of the proximity paradox. The Annals of Regional Science, 53, 395–422. doi: 10.1007/s00168-014-0612-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K.-Y. A., Oerlemans, L. A., & Pretorius, M. W. (2010). Knowledge exchange behaviours of science park firms: The innovation hub case. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(2), 207–228. doi: 10.1080/09537320903498546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152. doi: 10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Este, P., & Iammarino, S. (2010). The spatial profile of university-business research partnerships. Papers in Regional Science, 89, 335–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdil, S., Erdil, O., & Keskin, H. (2005). The relationships between market orientation, firm innovativeness and innovation performance. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 1, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, C. D., & Dutrénit, G. (2014). Geographic proximity and university-industry interaction: The case of Mexico. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(2), 329–348. doi: 10.1007/s10961-014-9364-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, M. (2003). Technological proximity and co-movements of stock returns. Economics Letters, 79(1), 131–136. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00297-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, R., Araujo, V., Mascarini, S., Gomes Santos, E., & Costa, A. (2015). Looking at both sides: How specific characteristics of academic research groups and firms affect the geographical distance of university-industry linkages. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2, 518–534. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2015.1099464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. (2014). Substitution or overlap? The relations between geographical and non-spatial proximity dimensions in collaborative innovation projects. Regional Studies. doi: 10.1018/00343404.2013.873120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardeman, S., Frenken, K., Nomaler, O., & Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2015). Characterizing and comparing innovation systems by different ‘modes’ of knowledge production: A proximity approach. Science and Public Policy, 42(4), 530–548. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scu070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heringa, P. W., Horlings, E., van der Zouwe, M., van den Besselaar, P., & van Vierssen, W. (2014). How do dimensions of proximity relate to outcomes of collaboration? A survey of knowledge-intensive networks in the Dutch water sector. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23, 689–716. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2014.882139
   Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M., & Proserpio, L. (2004). Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative project. Research Policy, 33(8), 1153–1165. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, W., & Su, Y.-S. (2013). The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university-industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data. Research Policy, 42, 454–464. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hult, G. T., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 429–438. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P., & Kamondetdacha, R. (2015). Innovation system of the seafood industry in Thailand. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23, 271–287. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2015.1078925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P., & Tangchipiboon, T. (2002). National innovation system in less successful developing countries: The case study of Thailand. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1445–1457. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00074-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intarakumnerd, P., & Schiller, D. (2009). University-industry linkages in Thailand: Successes, failures, and lessons learned for other developing countries. Seoul Journal of Economics, 22(4), 551–589.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577–598. doi: 10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Keskin, H. (2006). Market orientation, learning orientation, and innovation capabilities in SMEs: An extended model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9, 396–417. doi: 10.1108/14601060610707849
   Google Scholar
• Kirat, T., & Lung, Y. (1999). Innovation and proximity: Territories as loci of collective learning processes. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6, 27–38. doi: 10.1177/096977649900600103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoben, J., Oerlemans, L., & Rutten, R. (2008). The effects of spatial mobility on the performance of firms. Economic Geography, 84(2), 157–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korotka, M. A. (2015). Proximity factors influencing academics’ decisions to cooperate with industrial organizations. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 415–423. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2015.1065758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, L. F. (2006). A learning organization perspective on knowledge-sharing behavior and firm innovation. Human Systems Management, 25(4), 227–236.
   Google Scholar
• Lööf, H., & Broström, A. (2008). Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness? Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 73–90. doi: 10.1007/s10961-006-9001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429–451. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00048-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPherson, A. (2002). The contribution of academic-industry interaction to product innovation: The case of New York State's medical devices sector. Papers in Regional Science, 81, 121–129. doi: 10.1007/s101100100102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Molina-Morales, F. X., García-Villaverde, P. M., & Parra-Requena, G. (2014). Geographical and cognitive proximity effects on innovation performance in SMEs: A way through knowledge acquisition. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10, 231–251. doi: 10.1007/s11365-011-0214-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J., & Jonsson, O. (2007). Knowledge collaboration and proximity: The spatial organization of biotech innovation projects. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(2), 115–131. doi: 10.1177/0969776407075556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Numprasertchai, S., & Igel, B. (2005). Managing knowledge through collaboration: Multiple case studies of managing research in university laboratories in Thailand. Technovation, 25(10), 1173–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paci, R., Marrocu, E., & Usai, S. (2014). The complementary effects of proximity dimensions on knowledge spillovers. Spatial Economic Analysis, 9, 9–30. doi: 10.1080/17421772.2013.856518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panayides, P. (2006). Enhancing innovation capability through relationship management and implications for performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9, 466–483. doi: 10.1108/14601060610707876
   Google Scholar
• Prior, D. D. (2012). The effects of buyer-supplier relationships on buyer competitiveness. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27, 100–114. doi: 10.1108/08858621211196976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42, 51–67. doi: 10.1080/00343400701654186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ron, B., & Koen, F. (2010). The spatial evoluation of innovation networks: A proximity perspective. In B. Ron, & M. Ron (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 120–135). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rubera, G., & Kirca, A. H. (2012). Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing, 76, 130–147. doi: 10.1509/jm.10.0494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, D. (2006). The potential to upgrade the Thai innovation system by university-industry linkages. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 14(2), 67–91. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2006.9668619
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, D., & Brimble, P. (2009). Capacity building for university-industry linkages in developing countries: The case of the Thai higher education development project. Science, Technology & Society, 14(1), 59–92. doi: 10.1177/097172180801400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestre, B. D., & Dalcol, P. R. (2009). Geographical proximity and innovation: Evidences from the Campos Basin oil and gas industrial agglomeration – Brazil. Technovation, 29, 546–561. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, M., Berends, H., Van Der Bij, H., & Weggeman, M. (2007). The effect of IT and co-location on knowledge dissemination. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 52–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00232.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2016). How firms collaborate with public research organizations: The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects. Journal of Business Research, 69, 1250–1259. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2009). The structure and dynamics of knowledge networks: A proximity approach (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/36544.
   Google Scholar
• Thune, T. (2009). Proximity and interactive learning in university-firm relationships. Industry and Higher Education, 23(1), 7–16. doi: 10.5367/000000009787641332
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A. (2008). On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Regional Studies, 42, 869–889. doi: 10.1080/00343400801922814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, A. (2011). The role of proximity during long-distance collaborative projects. Temporary geographical proximity helps. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 7, 213–230. doi: 10.1504/IJFIP.2011.040075
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A., & Gilly, J.-P. (2000). On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics. Regional Sciences, 32(2), 169–180.
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Wang, D., & Zhao, Y. (2015). The effects of ties with service intermediaries on service and product innovations in Chinese manufacturing firms: The mediations of innovation search. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(3), 333–350. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2015.1120503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar