636
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Regional effects of technological transition in China how relatedness and integration shape provincial development

&

References

  • Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. (1992). Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries – The analysis of patent data. Research Policy, 21(1), 79–93. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(92)90028-3
  • Arts, S., & Veugelers, R. (2015). Technology familiarity, recombinant novelty, and breakthrough invention. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(6), 1215–1246. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtu029
  • Asheim, B. T. (2012). The changing role of learning regions in the globalizing knowledge economy: A theoretical re-examination. Regional Studies, 46(8), 993–1004. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.607805
  • Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2006). Contextualising regional innovation systems in a globalising learning economy: On knowledge bases and institutional frameworks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 163–173. doi: 10.1007/s10961-005-5028-0
  • Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Asheim, B. T., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Regional innovation systems: Past – present – future. In R. G. Shearmur, C. Carrincazeaux, & D. Doloreux (Eds.), Handbook on the geographies of innovation (pp. 45–62). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., & Rigby, D. (2018). Smart specialization policy in the EU:Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900
  • Barbieri, E., Di Tommaso, M. R., & Bonnini, S. (2012). Industrial development policies and performances in Southern China: Beyond the specialised industrial cluster program. China Economic Review, 23(3), 613–625. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2010.12.005
  • Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
  • Bergman, E. M., & Maier, G. (2009). Network central: Regional positioning for innovative advantage. Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 615–644. doi: 10.1007/s00168-008-0251-x
  • Blažek, J. (2016). Towards a typology of repositioning strategies of GVC/GPN suppliers: The case of functional upgrading and downgrading. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(4), 849–869. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbv044
  • Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
  • Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
  • Boschma, R., Balland, P.-A., & Kogler, D. F. (2015). Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(1), 223–250. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtu012
  • Boschma, R., & Capone, G. (2015). Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework. Research Policy, 44(10), 1902–1914. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.013
  • Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85(3), 289–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x
  • Boschma, R., Minondo, A., & Navarro, M. (2012). Related variety and regional growth in Spain. Papers in Regional Science, 91(2), 241–256.
  • Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69–87. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5
  • Breznitz, D., & Murphree, M. (2011). Run of the red queen: Government, innovation, globalization, and economic growth in China. New Haven, CO: Yale University Press.
  • Castaldi, C., Frenken, K., & Los, B. (2015). Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: An analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies, 49(5), 767–781. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.940305
  • Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H. W.-c., Dicken, P., & Henderson, J. (2004). ‘Globalizing’ regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4), 468–484. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00142.x
  • Coe, N. M., & Yeung, H. W.-c. (2015). Global production networks: Theorizing economic development in an interconnected world (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Content, J., & Frenken, K. (2016). Related variety and economic development: A literature review. European Planning Studies, 24(12), 2097–2112. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517
  • Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction. Origins of the concept. In H.-J. Braczyk & M. Heidenreich (Eds.), Regional innovation systems: The role of governances in a globalized world (pp. 2–25). London: UCL Press.
  • Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, H.-J. (eds.). (1998). Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world. London: Routledge.
  • Fan, C. C. (1995). Of belts and ladders: State policy and uneven regional development in post-Mao China. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85(3), 421–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1995.tb01807.x
  • Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 30(7), 1019–1039. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00135-9
  • Foray, D. (2014). Regions and cities. Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Oxford: Routledge.
  • Frenken, K., & Boschma, R. (2007). A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 635–649. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbm018
  • Frenken, K., van Oort, F. G., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
  • Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2010). Transnational patents and international markets. Scientometrics, 82, 185–200. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0082-2
  • Fu, W., Revilla Diez, J., & Schiller, D. (2012). Interactive learning, informal networks and innovation: Evidence from electronics firm survey in the Pearl River Delta, China. Research Policy, 42, 635–646. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.006
  • Fuller, C., & Phelps, N. A. (2018). Revisiting the multinational enterprise in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(1), 139–161. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbx024
  • Global Times. (2019). China’s NBS taking over regional GDP data. Retrieved from http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1141700.shtml.
  • Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., & Trippl, M. (2018). Unrelated knowledge combinations: The unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 257–274. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsy012
  • Guo, Q., & He, C. (2017). Production space and regional industrial evolution in China. GeoJournal, 82(2), 379–396. doi: 10.1007/s10708-015-9689-4
  • Guo, Q., He, C., & Li, D. (2015). Entrepreneurship in China: The role of localisation and urbanisation economies. Urban Studies, 47(1), 121–144. doi: 10.1177/0042098015595598
  • He, C., Guo, Q., & Rigby, D. (2015). Industry relatedness, agglomeration externalities and firm survival in China. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 15.28, Retrieved from http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg1528.pdf.
  • He, C., Yan, Y., & Rigby, D. (2018). Regional industrial evolution in China. Papers in Regional Science, 97(2), 173–198. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12246
  • Hidalgo, C. A., Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Delgado, M., Feldman, M., Frenken, K., … Zhu, S. (2018). The principle of relatedness. In International conference on complex systems (pp. 451–457). Cham: Springer.
  • Howell, A. (2017). Marshallian sources of relatedness and their effects on firm survival and subsequent success in China. Economic Geography, 93(4), 346–366. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1308223
  • Howell, A., He, C., Yang, R., & Fan, C. (2016). Agglomeration, (un)-related variety and new firm survival in China: Do local subsidies matter? Papers in Regional Science, 97(3), 485–500. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12269
  • Isaksen, A. (2015). Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography, 15(3), 585–600. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbu026
  • Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. In M. D. Parrilli, R. D. Fitjar, & A. Rodríguez-Pose (Eds.), Routledge studies in innovation, organization and technology: Vol. 40. Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 66–84). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2017). Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography, 93(5), 436–457. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443
  • Kogler, D. F., Rigby, D. L., & Tucker, I. (2013). Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in US cities. European Planning Studies, 21(9), 1374–1391. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.755832
  • Kroll, H. (2009). The regional development of science and innovation in China: A brief review of current evidence on matches and mismatches. Working papers firms and region: R1/2009. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
  • Kroll, H. (2016). Exploring pathways of regional technological development in China through patent analysis. World Patent Information, 46, 74–86. doi: 10.1016/j.wpi.2016.06.003
  • Kroll, H., & Frietsch, R. (2014). Regional structures and trends in China’s innovation system: An indicator-based account of the last decade’s developments. In I. Liefner & Y. D. Wei (Eds.), Innovation and regional development in China (pp. 41–72). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kroll, H., & Schiller, D. (2010). Establishing an interface between public sector applied research and the Chinese enterprise sector: Preparing for 2020. Technovation, 30(2), 117–129. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.10.003
  • Liefner, I. (2014). Explaining regional development and innovation in China: How much can we learn from applying established Western theories. In I. Liefner & Y. D. Wei (Eds.), Innovation and regional development in China (pp. 21–40). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Liefner, I., & Wei, Y. D. (2014). Innovation and regional development in China. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
  • Liu, X., Gao, T., & Wang, X. (2018). Regional innovation index of China: 2017: How frontier regions innovate. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  • Liu, X. L., & White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: A framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research Policy, 30(7), 1091–1114. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00132-3
  • Los, B. (2000). The empirical performance of a new inter-industry technology spillover measure. In P. Saviotti & B. Nooteboom (Eds.), Technology and knowledge (pp. 118–151). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Markusen, A. R. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography, 72(3), 293–313. doi: 10.2307/144402
  • Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbl012
  • Miguelez, E., & Moreno, R. (2018). Relatedness, external linkages and regional innovation in Europe. Regional Studies, 52(5), 688–701. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1360478
  • Neffke, F., Henning, M. S., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time?: Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
  • Neuhäusler, P., Frietsch, R., & Kroll, H. (2019). Probabilistic concordance schemes for the re-assignment of patents to economic sectors and scientific publications to technology fields (= Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis Nr. 60). Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
  • ÓhUallacháin, B., & Lee, D.-s. (2011). Technological specialization and variety in urban invention. Regional Studies, 45(1), 67–88. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.486783
  • Peyman, H. (2018). China’s change: The greatest show on earth. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
  • Plekhanov, D. (2017). Quality of China’s official statistics: A brief review of academic perspectives Copenhagen. Journal of Asian Studies, 35(1), 76.
  • Segal, A. (2003). Digital dragon: High-technology enterprises in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Wang, C. C., & Guo, Y. Q. (2017). Local innovativeness and knowledge spillovers of indigenous firms on foreign firms. The Professional Geographer, 69(1), 117–125. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2016.1178150
  • Wang, C. C., Lin, G. C. S., & Li, G. (2010). Industrial clustering and technological innovation in China: New evidence from the ICT industry in Shenzhen. Environment and Planning A, 42(8), 1987–2010. doi: 10.1068/a4356
  • Wang, Y., Ning, L., & Prevezer, M. (2015). Technological diversification in China from 1986 to 2011: Evidence from patent data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99, 54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.019
  • Wang, J., & Prevezer, M. (2015). Related variety in Chinese cities: Local and foreign direct investment related variety and impacts on urban growth, Working Papers 59, Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research.
  • Wei, Y. D. (2014). FDI networks, R&D activities and the making of global cities in China. In I. Liefner & Y. D. Wei (Eds.), Innovation and regional development in China: Routledge studies in the modern world economy (pp. 97–120). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
  • White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838. doi: 10.2307/1912934
  • Zhang, J. (2013). Related variety, global connectivity and institutional embeddedness: Internet development in Beijing and Shanghai compared. Regional Studies, 47(7), 1065–1081. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.622744

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.